Skip to main content

AnthropicLLM matchup

Claude Opus 5.5vs.Claude Haiku 5.5

Is the higher price worth it?

Claude Opus 5.5 performs better than Claude Haiku 5.5, but costs 40 times as much.

Opus 5.5 ahead
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
126.1

Claude Opus 5.5

Rank 1

103.4

Claude Haiku 5.5

Rank 20

Haiku 5.5 faster
SpeedTokens per second
106

Claude Opus 5.5

236

Claude Haiku 5.5

Haiku 5.5 cheaper
Price$ per 1M tokens
$8

Claude Opus 5.5

$0.20

Claude Haiku 5.5

Haiku 5.5 more popular
Popularity0 to 100
70

Claude Opus 5.5

Rank 13 of 875

77

Claude Haiku 5.5

Rank 3 of 875

Above 100,000 tokens of context, Claude Haiku 5.5 costs more: $0.50 input and $2.50 output per 1M tokens.

Choose Claude Opus 5.5 for

KnowledgeLegalMathematicsCodingProductivityGeneralEducationReasoningFinanceHealthAgents

Choose Claude Haiku 5.5 for

No clear advantage

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

Opus 5.5Haiku 5.5

The median of all ranked models is below 100 in every area, so it sits in the centre of the net.

110120130140100CodingOpus 5.5ReasoningOpus 5.5MathematicsOpus 5.5KnowledgeOpus 5.5AgentsOpus 5.5GeneralOpus 5.5FinanceOpus 5.5LegalOpus 5.5HealthOpus 5.5
CodingOpus 5.5 ahead
Opus 5.5130.0Rank 1
Haiku 5.5106.2Rank 18
Median of ranked models83.7

95 % range: Opus 5.5 121.2 to 138.8, Haiku 5.5 102.5 to 109.9.

AreaOpus 5.5Haiku 5.5

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the top field the net starts at 100 points, the reference group average; values below sit as a hollow point in the centre. Not in the net because a model has no own value there or the data are too thin: Multimodal.

Opus 5.5 is ahead in 9 of 10 areas, Haiku 5.5 in none.

Opus 5.5 ahead: 9too little data: 1

Areas in the overall index
KnowledgeOpus 5.5 +46131.4 to 85.5
MathematicsOpus 5.5 +25131.8 to 107.1
CodingOpus 5.5 +24130.0 to 106.2
GeneralOpus 5.5 +19125.1 to 106.4
ReasoningOpus 5.5 +17122.5 to 105.2
AgentsOpus 5.5 +11117.2 to 106.1
Multimodalonly Opus 5.5 has a score
Specialist fields
LegalOpus 5.5 +27121.5 to 94.4
FinanceOpus 5.5 +17121.4 to 104.7
HealthOpus 5.5 +13122.1 to 108.9

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 4 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
ProductivityOpus 5.5 +23125.0 to 101.8
EducationOpus 5.5 +17127.0 to 109.6
Cybersecuritytoo little data120.6 to 108.6
Searchonly Opus 5.5 has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5 at the same effort

Both models measured at the same reasoning efforts. This shows whether a lead comes from the model or only from more compute.

lowOpus 5.5 ahead
Opus 5.5 106.5 vs. Haiku 5.5 80.8 · Gap 23.8 · Test series 11
mediumOpus 5.5 ahead
Opus 5.5 117.5 vs. Haiku 5.5 90.4 · Gap 25.8 · Test series 11
highOpus 5.5 ahead
Opus 5.5 120.4 vs. Haiku 5.5 96.6 · Gap 22.8 · Test series 11
xhighOpus 5.5 ahead
Opus 5.5 124.2 vs. Haiku 5.5 101.3 · Gap 21.9 · Test series 11
maxOpus 5.5 ahead
Opus 5.5 126.1 vs. Haiku 5.5 103.4 · Gap 19.9 · Test series 12
Overall index (max vs. max)Opus 5.5 ahead
Opus 5.5 126.1 vs. Haiku 5.5 103.4

Gap and verdict compare only the Artificial Analysis test series in which both models are measured at that effort. Tied below 3 points, ahead only beyond two standard errors. The single values rest on all test series of each model, so their difference can deviate from the gap.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeOpus 5.5Coding 130.0 to 106.2
Maths and data analysisOpus 5.5Mathematics 131.8 to 107.1, Reasoning 122.5 to 105.2
Facts and researchOpus 5.5Knowledge 131.4 to 85.5, Search without a score for Haiku 5.5
Agents and workflowsOpus 5.5Agents 117.2 to 106.1
Fast chat repliesHaiku 5.5106 to 236 tokens per second
Security analysisopenCybersecurity 120.6 to 108.6 (too little data)
Many requests on a small budgetHaiku 5.5$8 to $0.20 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsOpus 5.5Finance 121.4 to 104.7, Legal 121.5 to 94.4, Health 122.1 to 108.9
Images, screenshots and PDFsopenMultimodal without a score for Haiku 5.5

See for yourself: same task, one attempt

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

Claude Opus 5.5

Claude Opus 5.5: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 33 s · $0.07

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
3,536 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0708
Response time
33.2 s
API model reported in response
anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Pinned endpoint
Anthropic | anthropic/claude-opus-5.5-20260921
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Not tested yet

SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

Claude Opus 5.5

Unavailable in this round

Claude Haiku 5.5

Unavailable in this round

Claude Opus 5.5 and Claude Haiku 5.5 in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v4)

20 of 91 models

4 models in this view are measured at a lower reasoning effort than max in the overall index. Dashed column: lower reasoning effort than the top.

Claude Opus 5.5max126.1
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh125.7
Claude Fable 5.1max123.8
Claude Sonnet 5.5max122.8
Gemini 4 Argonhigh122.3
GPT-6 Astramax121.3
GPT-6.1 Solmax119.2
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.3
Claude Opus 5max117.2
Muse Wondermax113.4
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.9
Claude Fable 5max112.5
GPT-6 Solmax110.6
GPT-5.6 Solmax108.7
Muse Spark 1.3max107.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max106.6
Gemini 3.8 Flashhigh106.5
GPT-6.1 Terramax105.2
Claude Haiku 5.5max103.4

Popularity compared

How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.

Claude Haiku 5.5 is more popular than Claude Opus 5.5: 77 to 70 out of 100.

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 5, 2026

Claude Opus 5.5Claude Haiku 5.5

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricClaude Opus 5.5Claude Haiku 5.5
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better126.1103.4
RankRank 1 of 91Rank 20 of 91
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$4$0.10above 100,000 tokens: $0.50
Outputwhat the model writes$20$0.50above 100,000 tokens: $2.50
Speed
Tokens per second106236
Popularity
Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 10070Rank 13 of 87577Rank 3 of 875
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffJune 2026June 2026
ReleasedSep 22, 2026Oct 7, 2026
AvailabilityActiveActive
Open weightsnono

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: Claude Opus 5.5B: Claude Haiku 5.5

BioMysteryBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 79.3%Claude Haiku 5.5: 70.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ClaimBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 100%Claude Haiku 5.5: 100%Vals AIAs of 10/23/2026
Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 66.6%Claude Haiku 5.5: 44.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Code Migration v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 81%Claude Haiku 5.5: 52.4%Vals AIAs of 10/30/2026
CyberBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 55.4%Claude Haiku 5.5: 75.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 75.9%Claude Haiku 5.5: 59%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMB v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 75.8%Claude Haiku 5.5: 65.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 58.6%Claude Haiku 5.5: 54.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Finance Agent v2.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 67.8%Claude Haiku 5.5: 65.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
HLAB-Vals-1.1Overall · Task fully resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 9.2%Claude Haiku 5.5: 4.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
ImmigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 72.1%Claude Haiku 5.5: 61.8%Vals AIAs of 10/28/2026
IOIOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 95.1%Claude Haiku 5.5: 47.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 50.5%Claude Haiku 5.5: 43.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,810Claude Haiku 5.5: 1,589LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,509Claude Haiku 5.5: 1,425LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
MedCodeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 49.8%Claude Haiku 5.5: 51.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 91.4%Claude Haiku 5.5: 89.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MysteryMechanismOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 49.6%Claude Haiku 5.5: 35.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 18.5%Claude Haiku 5.5: 2.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ProofBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 100%Claude Haiku 5.5: 89%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Public Benefits Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 70.6%Claude Haiku 5.5: 63.2%Vals AIAs of 10/12/2026
SAGEOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 91.3%Claude Haiku 5.5: 89.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 33.6%Claude Haiku 5.5: 5.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SWE-bench MultimodalOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 70.2%Claude Haiku 5.5: 44%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 45.6%Claude Haiku 5.5: 31.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65.2%Claude Haiku 5.5: 36.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 47.1%Claude Haiku 5.5: 10%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Finance IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65.6%Claude Haiku 5.5: 57.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 70.2%Claude Haiku 5.5: 58.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Legal IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 72.3%Claude Haiku 5.5: 70.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Router IndexFull Index · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 64.2%Claude Haiku 5.5: 58.7%Vals AIAs of 11/03/2026
Vals Science IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 58.7%Claude Haiku 5.5: 38.5%Vals AIAs of 10/25/2026
Vibe Code Bench 1-100Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 30.4%Claude Haiku 5.5: 20.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 90.3%Claude Haiku 5.5: 90.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
BioMysteryBenchHard · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 47.1%Claude Haiku 5.5: 29.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ClaimBenchDirect support · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 100%Claude Haiku 5.5: 100%Vals AIAs of 10/23/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65.5%Claude Haiku 5.5: 36.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Code Migration v1.1CLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 78.4%Claude Haiku 5.5: 42.1%Vals AIAs of 10/30/2026
CyberBench v1.1Patch · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 85.7%Claude Haiku 5.5: 89.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 76.4%Claude Haiku 5.5: 77.9%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMB v1.1Comps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 75.7%Claude Haiku 5.5: 77.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 54.5%Claude Haiku 5.5: 49.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Finance Agent v2.1Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 67.1%Claude Haiku 5.5: 67.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
HLAB-Vals-1.1Antitrust Competition · Criteria passed · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 88.4%Claude Haiku 5.5: 86.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ImmigrationAll-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 24.4%Claude Haiku 5.5: 16%Vals AIAs of 10/28/2026
IOIIOI 2024 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 100%Claude Haiku 5.5: 67.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65.2%Claude Haiku 5.5: 50%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevHTML development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,753Claude Haiku 5.5: 1,568LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,495Claude Haiku 5.5: 1,435LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65%Claude Haiku 5.5: 29.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SAGEComputer Science · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 92.8%Claude Haiku 5.5: 91.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchCapability Score · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 53.6%Claude Haiku 5.5: 18.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SWE-bench Multimodalbpmn-js · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 83%Claude Haiku 5.5: 64.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 30%Claude Haiku 5.5: 6.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Hardware · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 60%Claude Haiku 5.5: 20%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEarth Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 37.5%Claude Haiku 5.5: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Finance IndexEMB v1.1 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 75.8%Claude Haiku 5.5: 65.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals IndexCode Migration v1.1 · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 80.5%Claude Haiku 5.5: 50.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Legal IndexBusiness & Commercial · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 69.2%Claude Haiku 5.5: 67.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Router IndexCode Migration · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 47.5%Claude Haiku 5.5: 50.2%Vals AIAs of 11/03/2026
Vals Science IndexBioMysteryBench · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 79.3%Claude Haiku 5.5: 70.4%Vals AIAs of 10/25/2026
BioMysteryBenchHuman-solvable · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 86.8%Claude Haiku 5.5: 79.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ClaimBenchMissing evidence · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 100%Claude Haiku 5.5: 100%Vals AIAs of 10/23/2026
Code MigrationCOBOL · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 70%Claude Haiku 5.5: 70%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026

More comparisons

Compare Claude Opus 5.5 and Claude Haiku 5.5 with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  2. 2Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  3. 3Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  4. 4Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5.5
  5. 5Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  6. 6Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  7. 7Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5
  8. 8Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  9. 9Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
Show all 80 comparisons
  1. 10Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  2. 11Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5.1
  3. 12Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  4. 13Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Kimi K3
  5. 14Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  6. 15Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  7. 16Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  8. 17Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  9. 18Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3
  10. 19Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  11. 20Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Muse Wonder Full
  12. 21Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  13. 22Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3
  14. 23Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.6
  15. 24Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
  16. 25Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  17. 26Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Grok 4.6
  18. 27Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.5
  19. 28Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.5
  20. 29Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.2
  21. 30Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 4
  22. 31Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.8
  23. 32Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.5
  24. 33Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Muse Spark 1.3
  25. 34Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5
  26. 35Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.6
  27. 36Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 5
  28. 37Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  29. 38Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  30. 39Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.8
  31. 40Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  32. 41Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  33. 42Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 3
  34. 43Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Grok 4.7
  35. 44Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  36. 45Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  37. 46Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  38. 47Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Grok 4.7
  39. 48Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Muse Spark 1.3
  40. 49Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.6
  41. 50Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
  42. 51Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  43. 52Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 4
  44. 53Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  45. 54Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  46. 55Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  47. 56Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  48. 57Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  49. 58Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Mistral Medium 3.5
  50. 59Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  51. 60Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5
  52. 61Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  53. 62Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  54. 63Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  55. 64Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  56. 65Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  57. 66Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  58. 67Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.6
  59. 68Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Kimi K2.6
  60. 69Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  61. 70Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Kimi K2.6
  62. 71Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.4
  63. 72Claude Opus 5.5 vs. MiMo-V2.5
  64. 73Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
  65. 74Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.5
  66. 75Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.7
  67. 76Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra
  68. 77Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 3
  69. 78Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-5.5
  70. 79Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 4.5
  71. 80Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra