- Home
- LLM comparison
- Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.6
AnthropicLLM matchup
Claude Haiku 5.5vs.Claude Opus 4.6
Is the higher price worth it?
Claude Haiku 5.5 performs better than Claude Opus 4.6 and is cheaper: Claude Opus 4.6 costs 50 times as much.
Claude Haiku 5.5
Rank 20
Claude Opus 4.6
Rank 52
Claude Haiku 5.5
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Haiku 5.5
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Haiku 5.5
Rank 3 of 875
Claude Opus 4.6
Rank 337 of 875
Above 100,000 tokens of context, Claude Haiku 5.5 costs more: $0.50 input and $2.50 output per 1M tokens.
Choose Claude Haiku 5.5 for
Choose Claude Opus 4.6 for
No clear advantage
On this page
Where is the difference?
Strengths at a glance
Haiku 5.5Opus 4.6
The median of all ranked models is below 100 in every area, so it sits in the centre of the net.
95 % range: Haiku 5.5 102.5 to 109.9, Opus 4.6 77.6 to 90.4.
The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the top field the net starts at 100 points, the reference group average; values below sit as a hollow point in the centre. Not in the net because a model has no own value there or the data are too thin: Mathematics, Knowledge, Multimodal, Legal.
Haiku 5.5 is ahead in 6 of 10 areas, Opus 4.6 in none.
Haiku 5.5 ahead: 6too little data: 4
Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.
Show 3 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.
Which model for which task?
Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.
See for yourself: same task, one attempt
SVG short test
One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.
Prompt
Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.
Claude Haiku 5.5
Unavailable in this round
Claude Opus 4.6

Oct 14, 2026 · $0.0196
Test details
- Test run
- Oct 14, 2026
- Provider
- anthropic
- API model
- anthropic/claude-opus-4.6
- Output
- 766 tokens
- Reasoning
- API reports 0 reasoning tokens
- Cost of the attempt
- $0.0196
- Test round
- 43b8c5c46830
Earlier tests
Claude Haiku 5.5
Not tested yet
Claude Opus 4.6

Oct 1, 2026 · 85 s · $0.16
Test details
- Run date
- Oct 1, 2026
- API provider
- openrouter
- Requested API model
- anthropic/claude-opus-4.6
- Reasoning setting
- high
- Token limit including reasoning
- 8,192 tokens
- Output tokens
- 6,460 tokens
- Cost of the attempt
- $0.1616
- Response time
- 85.1 s
- API model reported in response
- anthropic/claude-opus-4.6
- Pinned endpoint
- Anthropic | anthropic/claude-4.6-opus-20260205
- Temperature
- Provider default
- Test protocol
- community-visual-tests-v1
- Technical checks
- Passed, not a quality rating
Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.
Claude Haiku 5.5 and Claude Opus 4.6 in the overall index
Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.
Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v4)
20 of 91 models
4 models in this view are measured at a lower reasoning effort than max in the overall index. Dashed column: lower reasoning effort than the top.
Popularity compared
How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.
Claude Haiku 5.5 is more popular than Claude Opus 4.6: 77 to 37 out of 100.
Over time
Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 5, 2026
Claude Haiku 5.5Claude Opus 4.6
All data side by side
The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Claude Opus 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | ||
| Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better | 103.4 | 81.9 |
| Rank | Rank 20 of 91 | Rank 52 of 91 |
| Price per 1M tokens | ||
| Inputwhat you send | $0.10above 100,000 tokens: $0.50 | $5 |
| Outputwhat the model writes | $0.50above 100,000 tokens: $2.50 | $25 |
| Speed | ||
| Tokens per second | 236 | 52 |
| Popularity | ||
| Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 100 | 77Rank 3 of 875 | 37Rank 337 of 875 |
| Technical | ||
| Context windowhow much text the model reads at once | 1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages | 1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages |
| Knowledge cutoff | June 2026 | May 2025 |
| Released | Oct 7, 2026 | February 2026 |
| Availability | Active | Active |
| Open weights | no | no |
Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis
Is there a better choice?
Overall index 93.5, rank 39. $5 input and $25 output per 1M tokens.
Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.7Overall index 98.3, rank 31. $0.14 input and $0.28 output per 1M tokens.
View profileOverall index 126.1, rank 1. $4 input and $20 output per 1M tokens.
Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 5.5Shared benchmarks
Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.
A: Claude Haiku 5.5B: Claude Opus 4.6
Show 51 more benchmarks
More comparisons
Compare Claude Haiku 5.5 and Claude Opus 4.6 with the models people compare them with most often.
Compare another matchup
Predecessor and successor
The most popular comparisons
- 1Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
- 2Claude Opus 4.6 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
- 3Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
- 4Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
- 5Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 6Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 7Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
- 8Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3
- 9Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Show all 54 comparisons
- 10Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
- 11Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.5
- 12Claude Opus 4.6 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 13Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5
- 14Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.6
- 15Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 5
- 16Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra
- 17Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
- 18Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.8
- 19Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.6
- 20Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Argon
- 21Claude Opus 4.6 vs. GPT-6 Luna
- 22Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Grok 4.7
- 23Claude Opus 4.6 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
- 24Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
- 25Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
- 26Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Muse Spark 1.3
- 27Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.6
- 28Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
- 29Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 4
- 30Claude Opus 4.6 vs. GPT-6 Astra
- 31Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
- 32Claude Opus 4.6 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
- 33Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
- 34Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
- 35Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
- 36Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
- 37Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
- 38Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Kimi K2.6
- 39Claude Opus 4.6 vs. GPT-6 Sol
- 40Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.7
- 41Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 3
- 42Claude Opus 4.6 vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
- 43Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-5.5
- 44Claude Opus 4.6 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.6
- 45Claude Opus 4.6 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 46Claude Opus 4.6 vs. GLM-5.3
- 47Claude Fable 5.1 vs. Claude Opus 4.6
- 48Claude Opus 4.6 vs. Muse Spark 1.3
- 49Claude Opus 4.6 vs. Mistral Large 4
- 50Claude Opus 4.6 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
- 51Claude Opus 4.8 vs. Claude Opus 4.6
- 52Claude Opus 4.6 vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
- 53Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra
- 54Claude Opus 4.6 vs. Muse Wonder Full