XiaomiLanguage modelActive

MiMo V2.6 Flash

MiMo V2.6 Flash is in the upper middle: Rank 31 of 92 in the overall index. Through the API it is cheap.

IntelligenceRank 31 of 92

98.3Overall indexhigher is better

SpeedRank 94 of 100

35Tokens per secondhigher is better

PriceRank 6 of 95

Input $0.14 · Output $0.28

$0.18per 1M tokenslower is better

Contextn/a

n/atokens at once

PopularityRank 395 of 876

34out of 100same as last month

Summary

It is cheap: $0.18 per 1M tokens (input and output blended); a typical model costs $1.55. At 35 tokens per second it writes slower than a typical model (87).

MiMo V2.6 Flash is Xiaomi’s smaller V2.6 class for frequent, cost-sensitive agent calls. The open Flash RL release uses a sparse MoE base of about 309B parameters with 15B active. The line remains multimodal and built for long contexts and reasoning.

As with MiMo V2.6 Pro, Xiaomi lists the API as mimo-v2.6-flash and the local checkpoint as MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL. Flash is the smaller product and checkpoint class for frequent calls within the V2.6 line.

MiMo V2.6 Flash benchmarks

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v4)

20 of 92 models

4 models in this view are measured at a lower reasoning effort than max in the overall index. Dashed column: lower reasoning effort than the top.

Claude Opus 5.5max126.1

Gemini 4 Carbonhigh125.8

Claude Fable 5.1max123.8

Claude Sonnet 5.5max122.8

Gemini 4 Argonhigh122.3

GPT-6 Astramax121.3

GPT-6.1 Solmax119.2

Muse Wonder Fullmax118.3

Claude Opus 5max117.2

Muse Wondermax113.4

Kimi K3.1 Promax112.9

Claude Fable 5max112.5

GPT-6 Solmax110.5

GPT-5.6 Solmax108.7

Muse Spark 1.3max107.4

Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.1

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max106.6

Gemini 3.8 Flashhigh106.5

GPT-6.1 Terramax105.3

MiMo V2.6 Flash98.3

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Gemini 3.8 Flash

GPT-6.1 Terra

MiMo V2.6 Flash

Speed

20 of 100 models

Mercury 2.5576tokens/s

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite336tokens/s

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite299tokens/s

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning245tokens/s

Claude Haiku 5.5236tokens/s

o3-mini230tokens/s

Ling 3.0 Flash199tokens/s

DeepSeek-V3 0324195tokens/s

GPT-5.4 mini191tokens/s

Gemini 3 Flash Preview191tokens/s

Gemini 3.5 Flash184tokens/s

Gemini 3.6 Flash182tokens/s

Command A Plus177tokens/s

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash176tokens/s

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017172tokens/s

Qwen 3.7 Max165tokens/s

GPT-5.4 nano153tokens/s

GPT OSS 20B152tokens/s

GPT OSS 120B151tokens/s

MiMo V2.6 Flash35tokens/s

Mercury 2.5

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

Gemini 3 Flash Preview

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

MiMo V2.6 Flash

Output tokens per second, measured by Artificial Analysis

Intelligence vs. price

most attractive area: stronger and cheaper than half of the models shownbest intelligence for the price

MiMo V2.6 Flash by task area

Points, 100 = reference group average · higher is better

FinanceRank 21 of 104104.8

LegalRank 23 of 72103.8

AgentsRank 21 of 98103.6

GeneralRank 26 of 6599.9

Mathematicstoo little data98.6

CodingRank 32 of 10998.0

HealthRank 29 of 7295.2

ReasoningRank 40 of 7294.5

Multimodaltoo little data93.4

Knowledgetoo little data91.2

Light bar: too few results for a rank yet.

Show all 580 published benchmark results

Measurements without matching peer values

These measurements have no matching peer values under the same test conditions. Their original values and sources remain available here.

AutomationBench-AA: Overall (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)

Source value: 64.05168250285656
Score: 64.05168250285656
Metric: Objectives completed without guardrail violations
Unit: %
Benchmark version: AA private 657-task split of AutomationBench v1.0.6
Category: agentic
Task: overall
Task label: Overall
Direction: Higher is better
Source type: independent-evaluator
Evaluator: Artificial Analysis
Status: superseded
Retrieved at: 2026-11-02
Methodology: Exact AA configuration: MiMo-V2.6-Flash (release mimo-v2-6-flash, row mimo-v2-6-flash, UUID 127de816-57d3-4037-8484-480a613cd413, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=not specified). AA source value for average reasoning tokens before the answer: 2000. Its methodology averages 60 varied prompts and assumes 2,000 when no average is available. This is not a token cap.. Source model ID: artificial-analysis/127de816-57d3-4037-8484-480a613cd413/mimo-v2-6-flash/mimo-v2-6-flash. Source model name: MiMo V2.6 Flash. Provider reported by source: Xiaomi. Model snapshot: MiMo-V2.6-Flash. Evaluator: Artificial Analysis. Dataset type: artificial-analysis-evaluation. Reasoning: reasoning enabled. Score display: 64.1%. Source ID: artificial-analysis. Evidence capture ID: aa-model-page-2026-11-02-67d46be20a5b. Source payload hash: 67d46be20a5b412db6cfb60ad190441fcaa5513500b8fd47d033168d0e97b6b2. Parser version: artificial-analysis-rsc-models-v3. Imported at: 2026-11-02. Source cohort: artificial-analysis-automationbench-aa:AA private 657-task split of AutomationBench v1.0.6:v5.0:reasoning:effort=unspecified:suffix=unspecified
Comparison methodology: Exact AA configuration: MiMo-V2.6-Flash (release mimo-v2-6-flash, row mimo-v2-6-flash, UUID 127de816-57d3-4037-8484-480a613cd413, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=not specified). AA source value for average reasoning tokens before the answer: 2000. Its methodology averages 60 varied prompts and assumes 2,000 when no average is available. This is not a token cap.. Reasoning: reasoning enabled
Context: This result is retained as historical evidence and is not interchangeable with current results.

Source Artificial Analysis

AutomationBench-AA: Overall (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)

Source value: 64.05168250285656
Score: 64.05168250285656
Metric: Objectives completed without guardrail violations
Unit: %
Benchmark version: AA private 657-task split of AutomationBench v1.0.6
Category: agentic
Task: overall
Task label: Overall
Direction: Higher is better
Source type: independent-evaluator
Evaluator: Artificial Analysis
Status: active
Retrieved at: 2026-11-06
Methodology: Exact AA configuration: MiMo-V2.6-Flash (release mimo-v2-6-flash, row mimo-v2-6-flash, UUID 127de816-57d3-4037-8484-480a613cd413, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=not specified). This source capture does not provide an average reasoning-token count.. Source model ID: artificial-analysis/127de816-57d3-4037-8484-480a613cd413/mimo-v2-6-flash/mimo-v2-6-flash. Source model name: MiMo V2.6 Flash. Provider reported by source: Xiaomi. Model snapshot: MiMo-V2.6-Flash. Evaluator: Artificial Analysis. Dataset type: artificial-analysis-evaluation. Reasoning: reasoning enabled. Score display: 64.1%. Source ID: artificial-analysis. Evidence capture ID: aa-model-page-2026-11-06-ec1194e008b3. Source payload hash: ec1194e008b3638ef60dbf5249daf9e6047364e22905e745a4af64c5f3f080fe. Parser version: artificial-analysis-rsc-models-v4. Imported at: 2026-11-06. Source cohort: artificial-analysis-automationbench-aa:AA private 657-task split of AutomationBench v1.0.6:v5.0.1:reasoning:effort=unspecified:suffix=unspecified
Comparison methodology: Exact AA configuration: MiMo-V2.6-Flash (release mimo-v2-6-flash, row mimo-v2-6-flash, UUID 127de816-57d3-4037-8484-480a613cd413, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=not specified). This source capture does not provide an average reasoning-token count.. Reasoning: reasoning enabled

Source Artificial Analysis

CritPt v2 (Hard Subset): Overall (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)

Source value: 29.5
Score: 29.5
Metric: pass@1 accuracy
Unit: %
Benchmark version: v2 hard subset
Category: reasoning
Task: overall
Task label: Overall
Direction: Higher is better
Source type: independent-evaluator
Evaluator: Artificial Analysis
Status: superseded
Retrieved at: 2026-11-02
Methodology: Exact AA configuration: MiMo-V2.6-Flash (release mimo-v2-6-flash, row mimo-v2-6-flash, UUID 127de816-57d3-4037-8484-480a613cd413, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=not specified). AA source value for average reasoning tokens before the answer: 2000. Its methodology averages 60 varied prompts and assumes 2,000 when no average is available. This is not a token cap.. Source model ID: artificial-analysis/127de816-57d3-4037-8484-480a613cd413/mimo-v2-6-flash/mimo-v2-6-flash. Source model name: MiMo V2.6 Flash. Provider reported by source: Xiaomi. Model snapshot: MiMo-V2.6-Flash. Evaluator: Artificial Analysis. Dataset type: artificial-analysis-evaluation. Reasoning: reasoning enabled. Score display: 29.5%. Source ID: artificial-analysis. Evidence capture ID: aa-model-page-2026-11-02-67d46be20a5b. Source payload hash: 67d46be20a5b412db6cfb60ad190441fcaa5513500b8fd47d033168d0e97b6b2. Parser version: artificial-analysis-rsc-models-v3. Imported at: 2026-11-02. Source cohort: artificial-analysis-critpt-v2-hard-subset:v2 hard subset:v5.0:reasoning:effort=unspecified:suffix=unspecified
Comparison methodology: Exact AA configuration: MiMo-V2.6-Flash (release mimo-v2-6-flash, row mimo-v2-6-flash, UUID 127de816-57d3-4037-8484-480a613cd413, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=not specified). AA source value for average reasoning tokens before the answer: 2000. Its methodology averages 60 varied prompts and assumes 2,000 when no average is available. This is not a token cap.. Reasoning: reasoning enabled
Context: This is the 40-question hard subset of CritPt v2, not the full 70-question CritPt v2 run.. This result is retained as historical evidence and is not interchangeable with current results.

Source Artificial Analysis

CritPt v2 (Hard Subset): Overall (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)

Source value: 29.5
Score: 29.5
Metric: pass@1 accuracy
Unit: %
Benchmark version: v2 hard subset, November 2026 grading
Category: reasoning
Task: overall
Task label: Overall
Direction: Higher is better
Source type: independent-evaluator
Evaluator: Artificial Analysis
Status: active
Retrieved at: 2026-11-06
Methodology: Exact AA configuration: MiMo-V2.6-Flash (release mimo-v2-6-flash, row mimo-v2-6-flash, UUID 127de816-57d3-4037-8484-480a613cd413, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=not specified). This source capture does not provide an average reasoning-token count.. Source model ID: artificial-analysis/127de816-57d3-4037-8484-480a613cd413/mimo-v2-6-flash/mimo-v2-6-flash. Source model name: MiMo V2.6 Flash. Provider reported by source: Xiaomi. Model snapshot: MiMo-V2.6-Flash. Evaluator: Artificial Analysis. Dataset type: artificial-analysis-evaluation. Reasoning: reasoning enabled. Score display: 29.5%. Source ID: artificial-analysis. Evidence capture ID: aa-model-page-2026-11-06-ec1194e008b3. Source payload hash: ec1194e008b3638ef60dbf5249daf9e6047364e22905e745a4af64c5f3f080fe. Parser version: artificial-analysis-rsc-models-v4. Imported at: 2026-11-06. Source cohort: artificial-analysis-critpt-v2-hard-subset:v2 hard subset, November 2026 grading:v5.0.1:reasoning:effort=unspecified:suffix=unspecified
Comparison methodology: Exact AA configuration: MiMo-V2.6-Flash (release mimo-v2-6-flash, row mimo-v2-6-flash, UUID 127de816-57d3-4037-8484-480a613cd413, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=not specified). This source capture does not provide an average reasoning-token count.. Reasoning: reasoning enabled
Context: This is the 40-question hard subset of CritPt v2, not the full 70-question CritPt v2 run.

Source Artificial Analysis

CritPt v2: Overall (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)

Source value: 12
Score: 12
Metric: pass@1 accuracy
Unit: %
Benchmark version: v2
Category: reasoning
Task: overall
Task label: Overall
Direction: Higher is better
Source type: independent-evaluator
Evaluator: Artificial Analysis
Status: disputed
Retrieved at: 2026-11-02
Methodology: Exact AA configuration: MiMo-V2.6-Flash (release mimo-v2-6-flash, row mimo-v2-6-flash, UUID 127de816-57d3-4037-8484-480a613cd413, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=not specified). AA source value for average reasoning tokens before the answer: 2000. Its methodology averages 60 varied prompts and assumes 2,000 when no average is available. This is not a token cap. The full CritPt v2 run covers 70 questions with five repeats. The official grading server reports pass@1.. Source model ID: artificial-analysis/127de816-57d3-4037-8484-480a613cd413/mimo-v2-6-flash/mimo-v2-6-flash. Source model name: MiMo V2.6 Flash. Provider reported by source: Xiaomi. Model snapshot: MiMo-V2.6-Flash. Evaluator: Artificial Analysis. Dataset type: artificial-analysis-evaluation. Tool policy: Python functions, symbolic expressions, and numerical answers; official grading server. Attempts: 70 questions, five repeats per question, pass@1. Reasoning: reasoning enabled. Score display: 12.0%. Source ID: artificial-analysis. Evidence capture ID: aa-model-page-2026-11-02-67d46be20a5b. Source payload hash: 67d46be20a5b412db6cfb60ad190441fcaa5513500b8fd47d033168d0e97b6b2. Parser version: artificial-analysis-rsc-models-v3. Imported at: 2026-11-02. Source cohort: artificial-analysis-critpt-v2:v2:standalone:reasoning:effort=unspecified:suffix=unspecified
Comparison methodology: Exact AA configuration: MiMo-V2.6-Flash (release mimo-v2-6-flash, row mimo-v2-6-flash, UUID 127de816-57d3-4037-8484-480a613cd413, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=not specified). AA source value for average reasoning tokens before the answer: 2000. Its methodology averages 60 varied prompts and assumes 2,000 when no average is available. This is not a token cap. The full CritPt v2 run covers 70 questions with five repeats. The official grading server reports pass@1.. Tool policy: Python functions, symbolic expressions, and numerical answers; official grading server. Attempts: 70 questions, five repeats per question, pass@1. Reasoning: reasoning enabled
Context: This AA source field contains the original CritPt score. The earlier CritPt v2 attribution was incorrect; the value and former label remain as disputed historical evidence.. The source dataset marks this result as disputed. It remains visible as documented evidence, but is not reliable comparative proof.

Source Artificial Analysis

FrontierCode: Overall (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)

Source value: 21.6152272727273
Score: 21.6152272727273
Metric: Mean score over three attempts per task
Unit: %
Benchmark version: 2.0
Category: coding
Task: overall
Task label: Overall
Direction: Higher is better
Source type: independent-evaluator
Evaluator: Artificial Analysis
Status: superseded
Retrieved at: 2026-11-02
Methodology: Exact AA configuration: MiMo-V2.6-Flash (release mimo-v2-6-flash, row mimo-v2-6-flash, UUID 127de816-57d3-4037-8484-480a613cd413, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=not specified). AA source value for average reasoning tokens before the answer: 2000. Its methodology averages 60 varied prompts and assumes 2,000 when no average is available. This is not a token cap.. Source model ID: artificial-analysis/127de816-57d3-4037-8484-480a613cd413/mimo-v2-6-flash/mimo-v2-6-flash. Source model name: MiMo V2.6 Flash. Provider reported by source: Xiaomi. Model snapshot: MiMo-V2.6-Flash. Evaluator: Artificial Analysis. Dataset type: artificial-analysis-evaluation. Reasoning: reasoning enabled. Score display: 21.6%. Source ID: artificial-analysis. Evidence capture ID: aa-model-page-2026-11-02-67d46be20a5b. Source payload hash: 67d46be20a5b412db6cfb60ad190441fcaa5513500b8fd47d033168d0e97b6b2. Parser version: artificial-analysis-rsc-models-v3. Imported at: 2026-11-02. Source cohort: artificial-analysis-frontiercode-2-0:2.0:v5.0:reasoning:effort=unspecified:suffix=unspecified
Comparison methodology: Exact AA configuration: MiMo-V2.6-Flash (release mimo-v2-6-flash, row mimo-v2-6-flash, UUID 127de816-57d3-4037-8484-480a613cd413, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=not specified). AA source value for average reasoning tokens before the answer: 2000. Its methodology averages 60 varied prompts and assumes 2,000 when no average is available. This is not a token cap.. Reasoning: reasoning enabled
Context: This result is retained as historical evidence and is not interchangeable with current results.

Source Artificial Analysis

FrontierCode: Overall (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)

Source value: 21.6152272727273
Score: 21.6152272727273
Metric: Mean score over three attempts per task
Unit: %
Benchmark version: 2.0
Category: coding
Task: overall
Task label: Overall
Direction: Higher is better
Source type: independent-evaluator
Evaluator: Artificial Analysis
Status: active
Retrieved at: 2026-11-06
Methodology: Exact AA configuration: MiMo-V2.6-Flash (release mimo-v2-6-flash, row mimo-v2-6-flash, UUID 127de816-57d3-4037-8484-480a613cd413, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=not specified). This source capture does not provide an average reasoning-token count.. Source model ID: artificial-analysis/127de816-57d3-4037-8484-480a613cd413/mimo-v2-6-flash/mimo-v2-6-flash. Source model name: MiMo V2.6 Flash. Provider reported by source: Xiaomi. Model snapshot: MiMo-V2.6-Flash. Evaluator: Artificial Analysis. Dataset type: artificial-analysis-evaluation. Reasoning: reasoning enabled. Score display: 21.6%. Source ID: artificial-analysis. Evidence capture ID: aa-model-page-2026-11-06-ec1194e008b3. Source payload hash: ec1194e008b3638ef60dbf5249daf9e6047364e22905e745a4af64c5f3f080fe. Parser version: artificial-analysis-rsc-models-v4. Imported at: 2026-11-06. Source cohort: artificial-analysis-frontiercode-2-0:2.0:v5.0.1:reasoning:effort=unspecified:suffix=unspecified
Comparison methodology: Exact AA configuration: MiMo-V2.6-Flash (release mimo-v2-6-flash, row mimo-v2-6-flash, UUID 127de816-57d3-4037-8484-480a613cd413, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=not specified). This source capture does not provide an average reasoning-token count.. Reasoning: reasoning enabled

Source Artificial Analysis

FrontierCode 1.1 Main: Overall (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)

Source value: 42.0675333333333
Score: 42.0675333333333
Metric: Mean score over three attempts per task
Unit: %
Benchmark version: 1.1 Main
Category: coding
Task: overall
Task label: Overall
Direction: Higher is better
Source type: independent-evaluator
Evaluator: Artificial Analysis
Status: superseded
Retrieved at: 2026-11-02
Methodology: Exact AA configuration: MiMo-V2.6-Flash (release mimo-v2-6-flash, row mimo-v2-6-flash, UUID 127de816-57d3-4037-8484-480a613cd413, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=not specified). AA source value for average reasoning tokens before the answer: 2000. Its methodology averages 60 varied prompts and assumes 2,000 when no average is available. This is not a token cap. The primary 100-task FrontierCode 1.1 set is run three times per task, with equal task weights. Failing any blocking check or being flagged by the trajectory scanner scores zero; runs passing every blocking check score 70 to 100 percent.. Source model ID: artificial-analysis/127de816-57d3-4037-8484-480a613cd413/mimo-v2-6-flash/mimo-v2-6-flash. Source model name: MiMo V2.6 Flash. Provider reported by source: Xiaomi. Model snapshot: MiMo-V2.6-Flash. Evaluator: Artificial Analysis. Dataset type: artificial-analysis-evaluation. Harness: Artificial Analysis Stirrup. Agent: Stirrup coding agent. Tool policy: 250-turn cap; repository worktree graded as left by the agent. Attempts: Mean score, 3 attempts per task. Reasoning: reasoning enabled. Score display: 42.1%. Source ID: artificial-analysis. Evidence capture ID: aa-model-page-2026-11-02-67d46be20a5b. Source payload hash: 67d46be20a5b412db6cfb60ad190441fcaa5513500b8fd47d033168d0e97b6b2. Parser version: artificial-analysis-rsc-models-v3. Imported at: 2026-11-02. Source cohort: artificial-analysis-frontiercode:1.1 Main:standalone:reasoning:effort=unspecified:suffix=unspecified
Comparison methodology: Exact AA configuration: MiMo-V2.6-Flash (release mimo-v2-6-flash, row mimo-v2-6-flash, UUID 127de816-57d3-4037-8484-480a613cd413, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=not specified). AA source value for average reasoning tokens before the answer: 2000. Its methodology averages 60 varied prompts and assumes 2,000 when no average is available. This is not a token cap. The primary 100-task FrontierCode 1.1 set is run three times per task, with equal task weights. Failing any blocking check or being flagged by the trajectory scanner scores zero; runs passing every blocking check score 70 to 100 percent.. Harness: Artificial Analysis Stirrup. Agent: Stirrup coding agent. Tool policy: 250-turn cap; repository worktree graded as left by the agent. Attempts: Mean score, 3 attempts per task. Reasoning: reasoning enabled
Context: FrontierCode 1.1 Main is a private 100-task subset of 150 tasks. These are AA mean rubric scores, not a binary pass rate.. This result is retained as historical evidence and is not interchangeable with current results.

Source Artificial Analysis

FrontierCode 1.1 Main: Overall (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)

Source value: 42.0675333333333
Score: 42.0675333333333
Metric: Mean score over three attempts per task
Unit: %
Benchmark version: 1.1 Main
Category: coding
Task: overall
Task label: Overall
Direction: Higher is better
Source type: independent-evaluator
Evaluator: Artificial Analysis
Status: active
Retrieved at: 2026-11-06
Methodology: Exact AA configuration: MiMo-V2.6-Flash (release mimo-v2-6-flash, row mimo-v2-6-flash, UUID 127de816-57d3-4037-8484-480a613cd413, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=not specified). This source capture does not provide an average reasoning-token count. The primary 100-task FrontierCode 1.1 set is run three times per task, with equal task weights. Failing any blocking check or being flagged by the trajectory scanner scores zero; runs passing every blocking check score 70 to 100 percent.. Source model ID: artificial-analysis/127de816-57d3-4037-8484-480a613cd413/mimo-v2-6-flash/mimo-v2-6-flash. Source model name: MiMo V2.6 Flash. Provider reported by source: Xiaomi. Model snapshot: MiMo-V2.6-Flash. Evaluator: Artificial Analysis. Dataset type: artificial-analysis-evaluation. Harness: Artificial Analysis Stirrup. Agent: Stirrup coding agent. Tool policy: 250-turn cap; repository worktree graded as left by the agent. Attempts: Mean score, 3 attempts per task. Reasoning: reasoning enabled. Score display: 42.1%. Source ID: artificial-analysis. Evidence capture ID: aa-model-page-2026-11-06-ec1194e008b3. Source payload hash: ec1194e008b3638ef60dbf5249daf9e6047364e22905e745a4af64c5f3f080fe. Parser version: artificial-analysis-rsc-models-v4. Imported at: 2026-11-06. Source cohort: artificial-analysis-frontiercode:1.1 Main:standalone:reasoning:effort=unspecified:suffix=unspecified
Comparison methodology: Exact AA configuration: MiMo-V2.6-Flash (release mimo-v2-6-flash, row mimo-v2-6-flash, UUID 127de816-57d3-4037-8484-480a613cd413, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=not specified). This source capture does not provide an average reasoning-token count. The primary 100-task FrontierCode 1.1 set is run three times per task, with equal task weights. Failing any blocking check or being flagged by the trajectory scanner scores zero; runs passing every blocking check score 70 to 100 percent.. Harness: Artificial Analysis Stirrup. Agent: Stirrup coding agent. Tool policy: 250-turn cap; repository worktree graded as left by the agent. Attempts: Mean score, 3 attempts per task. Reasoning: reasoning enabled
Context: FrontierCode 1.1 Main is a private 100-task subset of 150 tasks. These are AA mean rubric scores, not a binary pass rate.

Source Artificial Analysis

GDP.pdf: Overall (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)

Source value: 9
Score: 9
Metric: All-pass rate
Unit: %
Benchmark version: unspecified
Category: reasoning
Task: overall
Task label: Overall
Direction: Higher is better
Source type: independent-evaluator
Evaluator: Artificial Analysis
Status: superseded
Retrieved at: 2026-11-02
Methodology: Exact AA configuration: MiMo-V2.6-Flash (release mimo-v2-6-flash, row mimo-v2-6-flash, UUID 127de816-57d3-4037-8484-480a613cd413, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=not specified). AA source value for average reasoning tokens before the answer: 2000. Its methodology averages 60 varied prompts and assumes 2,000 when no average is available. This is not a token cap.. Source model ID: artificial-analysis/127de816-57d3-4037-8484-480a613cd413/mimo-v2-6-flash/mimo-v2-6-flash. Source model name: MiMo V2.6 Flash. Provider reported by source: Xiaomi. Model snapshot: MiMo-V2.6-Flash. Evaluator: Artificial Analysis. Dataset type: artificial-analysis-evaluation. Reasoning: reasoning enabled. Score display: 9.0%. Source ID: artificial-analysis. Evidence capture ID: aa-model-page-2026-11-02-67d46be20a5b. Source payload hash: 67d46be20a5b412db6cfb60ad190441fcaa5513500b8fd47d033168d0e97b6b2. Parser version: artificial-analysis-rsc-models-v3. Imported at: 2026-11-02. Source cohort: artificial-analysis-gdp-pdf:unspecified:v5.0:reasoning:effort=unspecified:suffix=unspecified
Comparison methodology: Exact AA configuration: MiMo-V2.6-Flash (release mimo-v2-6-flash, row mimo-v2-6-flash, UUID 127de816-57d3-4037-8484-480a613cd413, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=not specified). AA source value for average reasoning tokens before the answer: 2000. Its methodology averages 60 varied prompts and assumes 2,000 when no average is available. This is not a token cap.. Reasoning: reasoning enabled
Context: This result is retained as historical evidence and is not interchangeable with current results.

Source Artificial Analysis

GDP.pdf: Overall (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)

Source value: 9
Score: 9
Metric: All-pass rate
Unit: %
Benchmark version: unspecified
Category: reasoning
Task: overall
Task label: Overall
Direction: Higher is better
Source type: independent-evaluator
Evaluator: Artificial Analysis
Status: active
Retrieved at: 2026-11-06
Methodology: Exact AA configuration: MiMo-V2.6-Flash (release mimo-v2-6-flash, row mimo-v2-6-flash, UUID 127de816-57d3-4037-8484-480a613cd413, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=not specified). This source capture does not provide an average reasoning-token count.. Source model ID: artificial-analysis/127de816-57d3-4037-8484-480a613cd413/mimo-v2-6-flash/mimo-v2-6-flash. Source model name: MiMo V2.6 Flash. Provider reported by source: Xiaomi. Model snapshot: MiMo-V2.6-Flash. Evaluator: Artificial Analysis. Dataset type: artificial-analysis-evaluation. Reasoning: reasoning enabled. Score display: 9.0%. Source ID: artificial-analysis. Evidence capture ID: aa-model-page-2026-11-06-ec1194e008b3. Source payload hash: ec1194e008b3638ef60dbf5249daf9e6047364e22905e745a4af64c5f3f080fe. Parser version: artificial-analysis-rsc-models-v4. Imported at: 2026-11-06. Source cohort: artificial-analysis-gdp-pdf:unspecified:v5.0.1:reasoning:effort=unspecified:suffix=unspecified
Comparison methodology: Exact AA configuration: MiMo-V2.6-Flash (release mimo-v2-6-flash, row mimo-v2-6-flash, UUID 127de816-57d3-4037-8484-480a613cd413, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=not specified). This source capture does not provide an average reasoning-token count.. Reasoning: reasoning enabled

Source Artificial Analysis

HLE-Diamond: Overall (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)

Source value: 13.700000000000001
Score: 13.700000000000001
Metric: pass@1 accuracy
Unit: %
Benchmark version: Diamond
Category: general
Task: overall
Task label: Overall
Direction: Higher is better
Source type: independent-evaluator
Evaluator: Artificial Analysis
Status: superseded
Retrieved at: 2026-11-02
Methodology: Exact AA configuration: MiMo-V2.6-Flash (release mimo-v2-6-flash, row mimo-v2-6-flash, UUID 127de816-57d3-4037-8484-480a613cd413, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=not specified). AA source value for average reasoning tokens before the answer: 2000. Its methodology averages 60 varied prompts and assumes 2,000 when no average is available. This is not a token cap.. Source model ID: artificial-analysis/127de816-57d3-4037-8484-480a613cd413/mimo-v2-6-flash/mimo-v2-6-flash. Source model name: MiMo V2.6 Flash. Provider reported by source: Xiaomi. Model snapshot: MiMo-V2.6-Flash. Evaluator: Artificial Analysis. Dataset type: artificial-analysis-evaluation. Reasoning: reasoning enabled. Score display: 13.7%. Source ID: artificial-analysis. Evidence capture ID: aa-model-page-2026-11-02-67d46be20a5b. Source payload hash: 67d46be20a5b412db6cfb60ad190441fcaa5513500b8fd47d033168d0e97b6b2. Parser version: artificial-analysis-rsc-models-v3. Imported at: 2026-11-02. Source cohort: artificial-analysis-hle-diamond:Diamond:v5.0:reasoning:effort=unspecified:suffix=unspecified
Comparison methodology: Exact AA configuration: MiMo-V2.6-Flash (release mimo-v2-6-flash, row mimo-v2-6-flash, UUID 127de816-57d3-4037-8484-480a613cd413, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=not specified). AA source value for average reasoning tokens before the answer: 2000. Its methodology averages 60 varied prompts and assumes 2,000 when no average is available. This is not a token cap.. Reasoning: reasoning enabled
Context: This result is retained as historical evidence and is not interchangeable with current results.

Source Artificial Analysis

Page 1 of 49

See for yourself: one prompt, one attempt

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

MiMo V2.6 Flash

Earlier tests

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Oct 2, 2026 · 76 s · $0.0021

Test details

Run date: Oct 2, 2026
API provider: openrouter
Requested API model: xiaomi/mimo-v2.6-flash
Reasoning setting: high
Token limit including reasoning: 8,192 tokens
Output tokens: 7,377 tokens
Cost of the attempt: $0.0021
Response time: 76.4 s
API model reported in response: xiaomi/mimo-v2.6-flash
Pinned endpoint: Xiaomi | xiaomi/mimo-v2.6-flash-20260921
Temperature: Provider default
Test protocol: community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks: Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Earlier attempts (1)

Oct 1, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high

Task origin: Simon Willison

Popularity compared

How often the model is searched for, used and mentioned, compared with every model of its category.

Popularity index

The 100 most popular models of this category, 0 to 100, higher is more popular

20 of 101 models

GPT-573

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 101769

Kimi K368

DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT63

MiMo V2.6 Flash34

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT

MiMo V2.6 Flash

As of November 2026 · Source: gradually.ai popularity index

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 6, 2026

MiMo V2.6 FlashReka Flash 3 34Nex-N2-mini 34Qwen 3 Next 80B A3B Instruct 34Mixtral 8x22B 33

Method changes in the timeline, a jump at these points is no market event:

1November 1, 2026: Value only with search or usage data, 30-day attention

What is gaining popularity right now, across models, vendors, harnesses and AI subscriptions, is collected in All AI trends.

Similar models

More models of the same kind as MiMo V2.6 Flash, chosen by model line, developer, size, price and release date.

All specifications

Architecture

Model class: Omnimodal reasoning model; Source: Model class
Open checkpoint: MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL, MIT license; Source: Open checkpoint

Input and output

Modalities: Text, image, video, and audio; Source: Modalities

Watermarking and provenance

AI watermarking refers to invisible signals embedded in the output. Visible marks and provenance metadata are listed separately. Unknown means there is insufficient evidence for that particular field.

AI watermarking: Unknown; no source
Watermarking technique: Not known; no source

Licence and access

Access: API and local execution; Source: Access

API

API model ID: mimo-v2.6-flash; Source: API model ID

Further details

API and checkpoint: The API ID and open RL checkpoint use different names. The provider does not document them as identical serving configurations.; Source: API and checkpoint
Checkpoint architecture: Sparse MoE, 309B parameters, 15B active; Source: Checkpoint architecture
Checkpoint context: 1M tokens; Source: Checkpoint context

Prices

API pricesSubscriptions

1 offer, prices in US dollars per 1M tokens, blended from 3 parts input and 1 part output.

Provider	Input	Output	Cache read	Blended
Xiaomidirect	$0.14	$0.28	$0.0028	$0.18

Direct price according to the developer, checked Oct 25, 2026. Open the LLM price index

More price tiers and rules

Cache price: US$0.0028 / 1M tokens, overseas real-time API, cache hitSource
Input price: US$0.14 / 1M tokens, overseas real-time API, cache missSource
Output price: US$0.28 / 1M tokens, overseas real-time APISource
Batch input price: US$0.07 / 1M tokens, overseas batch APISource
Batch output price: US$0.14 / 1M tokens, overseas batch APISource

No Xiaomi subscription includes this model. Through other providers from $1 a month (Command Code Go, with limited credits). 10 plans in Germany.

Plan	Monthly list price	Note
Command Code Go	$1	with limited credit
Poe Basic	$4.99	with limited credit
Command Code GOAT	$10	with limited credit
Command Code Pro	$20	with limited credit
Poe Plus	$19.99	with limited credit
Poe Pro	$49.99	with limited credit
Command Code Max 10×	$100	with limited credit
Poe Advanced	$99.99	with limited credit
Command Code Max 20×	$200	with limited credit
Poe Max	$249.99	with limited credit

All plans in the AI subscription comparison

Frequently asked questions about MiMo V2.6 Flash

How good is MiMo V2.6 Flash in benchmarks?

Decent: Rank 31 of 92 in the overall index.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v4) from 35 benchmark results · data through Nov 6, 2026

IntelligenceOverall index in points, 100 = reference group average · higher is better

Qwen 3.8 Max 0902100.3

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash99.7

Claude Opus 4.899.0

MiMo V2.6 FlashRank 3198.3

Step 5 Preview97.3

Gemini 3.5 Flash96.9

Gemini 3.6 Flash96.7

What is the Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v4)?

A point value that combines many independent benchmarks into one number. 100 points is the average of a fixed reference group, higher is better. MiMo V2.6 Flash scores 98.3 points, which is rank 31 of 92.

Own analysis by gradually.ai, method benchmark-meta-score-v4 · for MiMo V2.6 Flash from 35 test series

Which data: Only current, reviewed results from independent evaluators such as Artificial Analysis, Vals AI, LMArena, LiveBench and Epoch AI. Vendor claims and historical or disputed values do not count.
One value per test: For each source and test series the latest retrieval with one fixed setup counts. When a source tests several reasoning levels, the highest documented one applies. A series needs at least 5 models.
Making tests comparable: Percentages are converted so that gaps near 0 and near 100 % count fairly, then every series is put on the same scale. A hard test therefore does not weigh more than an easy one.
Shared strength: A statistical model estimates, from all series at once, one shared capability per model and, per area, how far a model deviates from it. Missing tests are never counted as zero.
Weighting: Core areas (Coding, Reasoning, Mathematics, Knowledge, Agents, General and Multimodal) count 75 % together, the domain areas Finance, Legal and Health 25 %.
The point scale: The value is measured against a fixed reference group of 29 models, much like an IQ score: 100 points is its average and 15 points one standard deviation of the group. The scale is open at both ends and is not a percentage. A model 15 points ahead does better in roughly three of four benchmark comparisons. New models do not shift older values.
Place by score: The place follows the order of the scores among all models with a place, such as "rank 14 of 95". A second calculation checks whether a lead is reliable by recomputing the score 200 times with randomly redrawn test families. If a model is not almost always ahead there, the two models count as level.
Minimum evidence: A value needs at least 8 test series from 2 sources and 3 areas, a place only with enough precision. Missing core areas are flagged as "estimated".
What it is not: Not a test run by gradually.ai and no verdict on every single task. For a specific task the area values and the individual benchmarks matter more.

How much does MiMo V2.6 Flash cost?

Through the API $0.14 per 1M input tokens and $0.28 output. That is cheap.

PriceDollars per 1M tokens, input and output blended · lower is better

MiMo V2.6 FlashRank 6 of 95$0.18

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash$0.26

Step 5 Preview$1.43

Gemini 3.6 Flash$1.50

GLM-5.3$2.15

Qwen 3.8 Max 0902$2.48

Claude Opus 4.8$10

How fast is MiMo V2.6 Flash?

35 tokens per second. That is slower than a typical model at 87.

Measured by Artificial Analysis on Nov 6, 2026. AA 3.0.0, including time to first token, averaged across available workloads and five days.

SpeedTokens per second · higher is better

Gemini 3.5 Flash184

Gemini 3.6 Flash182

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash176

Step 5 Preview132

Claude Opus 4.882

Qwen 3.8 Max 090246

MiMo V2.6 FlashRank 94 of 10035

Can I run MiMo V2.6 Flash locally?

Yes, the weights are open.

Stated by Xiaomi

Open weights: yes
License: n/a
Parameters: n/a
active per token: n/a

Where can I use MiMo V2.6 Flash?

Not in a Xiaomi subscription. Including other providers that makes 10 plans in Germany, plus the API.

Subscription comparison, prices in Germany incl. VAT

At Xiaomi

No Xiaomi subscription includes this model.

Through other providers

10 plans from 2 providers, from $1 a month (Command Code Go), with limited credits.

Through the API

$0.14 input, $0.28 output per 1M tokens.

Sources and data date

Show all 74 sources

Benchmark sources at a glance

Which independent evaluators tested this model. This is coverage, not a quality ranking.

Evaluator	Test series	Composite indices	Recorded active measurements
Artificial Analysis	12	0	14
Vals AI	24	5	262
LMArena	0	0	75
Scale AI Evals	0	0	1
Roboflow Vision Evals	0	0	11

Without vendor claims and historical or disputed results; those stay labelled in the single values. 87 measurements are not yet assigned to a test series.

Type	Evidence and data date
Speed	Xiaomi, Reasoning enabled; effort unspecified. AA 3.0.0, including time to first token, averaged across available workloads and five days. Retrieved November 6, 2026. Source: Artificial Analysis · Speed (Artificial Analysis)Speed measurement methodology
Price	Base API prices without caching or batch discounts. Higher context tiers and other rates are listed under Costs. Source: Pricing · Xiaomi MiMo API pricing (retrieved October 25, 2026)
Research status	Research date October 15, 2026. 19 source URLs checked. This documents the inspected sources, not an exhaustive inventory of every publication.
Not published	evaluation-units-and-run-settings Note The exact Flash-RL column is published, but units, task dates, prompt/agent harnesses, inference effort, and quantization are not specified in the benchmark table.
Not published	serving-checkpoint-and-generation-settings Note These snapshots identify the exact leaderboard model_name but do not publish an immutable serving checkpoint, reasoning or effort setting, prompts, or decoding parameters.
Not published	unique-prompt-count Note vote_count is explicitly the number of battles for the model. The number of unique prompts is not supplied and is not inferred from vote_count.
Unresolved	factuality-toggle-state Note The captured text subset does not expose the factuality-toggle state or weight. No factuality mode is inferred; the source subset remains the exact scope.
Not published	served-checkpoint-and-generation-settings Note The captured Arena rows do not identify an immutable served checkpoint, prompt set, temperature, or decoding configuration beyond their exact source model_name and cohort.
Unresolved	rating-bound-coverage Note The source publishes rating_lower and rating_upper, copied exactly. The captured README does not state their confidence coverage or calculation; no confidence percentage or half-width is inferred.
Unresolved	vision-evals-denominator-and-uncertainty Note The exact-model page gives no evaluation sample count and does not define the ± statistic shown for multi-run task means.
Unresolved	DeepSWE v1.1 score discrepancy Note The release article reports 65.7 after 30 RL steps; the current official model card reports 67.9. Neither source supplies enough run/checkpoint metadata to reconcile them.
Not published	GameBench 2 Intensive group Note The source reports: Not supported by this model.
Additional source	Xiaomi MiMo model release (retrieved September 22, 2026) · Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 model release · Editorial description reviewed October 2, 2026
Additional source	Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 announcement (retrieved September 22, 2026; October 15, 2026; October 17, 2026; October 28, 2026) · Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 announcement · Editorial description reviewed October 2, 2026
Additional source	MiMo V2.6 Flash RL model card (retrieved September 22, 2026; October 15, 2026; October 28, 2026) · MiMo V2.6 Flash RL model card · Editorial description reviewed October 2, 2026
Additional source	Artificial Analysis (retrieved October 29, 2026; November 2, 2026; November 6, 2026)1 2
Additional source	Artificial Analysis (retrieved November 2, 2026; November 6, 2026)1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Additional source	Artificial Analysis (retrieved November 2, 2026)1 2
Additional source	Artificial Analysis (retrieved November 6, 2026)1 2 3
Additional source	Vals AI (retrieved November 6, 2026)1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Additional source	Vals AI (retrieved October 16, 2026; November 6, 2026)1 2 3 4
Additional source	Vals AI (retrieved October 16, 2026; October 31, 2026; November 6, 2026)
Additional source	Vals AI (retrieved October 16, 2026; October 30, 2026; October 31, 2026)
Additional source	Vals AI (retrieved October 28, 2026; November 6, 2026)
Additional source	Towards AI ToneBench (retrieved October 17, 2026; October 28, 2026; October 30, 2026)
Additional source	Arena leaderboard dataset, raw Text subset (retrieved October 17, 2026)
Additional source	Arena leaderboard dataset, raw Vision subset (retrieved October 17, 2026)
Additional source	LMArena leaderboard dataset, Text Style Control (retrieved October 17, 2026)
Additional source	LMArena leaderboard dataset, Vision Style Control (retrieved October 17, 2026)
Additional source	LMArena leaderboard dataset, Code Arena WebDev (retrieved October 17, 2026)
Additional source	DataLLM Lab (retrieved October 17, 2026; October 23, 2026)
Additional source	While AI (retrieved October 17, 2026)
Additional source	Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6 technical report (retrieved October 17, 2026)
Additional source	Roboflow Vision Evals (retrieved October 19, 2026)
Additional source	DuelLab GameBench 2 model results (retrieved October 28, 2026; November 2, 2026; November 5, 2026)
Additional source	Parallel Search Capability Leaderboard (retrieved October 28, 2026; November 5, 2026)
Additional source	Roboflow Vision Evals (retrieved October 28, 2026)
Additional source	MathBench.ai (retrieved October 28, 2026)
Additional source	Scale AI HSS (retrieved October 28, 2026)
Additional source	Parallel Search Capability Leaderboard (retrieved November 5, 2026)
Additional source	Model metadata (retrieved October 28, 2026)
Additional source	OpenRouter: Popularity index (derived), CC BY 4.0
Additional source	Vercel AI Gateway: Popularity index (derived), CC BY 4.0
Additional source	Ollama: cumulative downloads for the popularity index
Additional source	Replicate: cumulative runs for the popularity index
Additional source	Google Trending Now: limited feed selection for Germany and the US
Additional source	Creative Commons Attribution 4.0