Skip to main content

CohereLanguage model

Command A Plus

Command A Plus has a provisional overall index of 32.9 but no place yet because there are not yet enough results for a fixed place.

Intelligencenot ranked yet

32.9Overall indexhigher is better

SpeedRank 13 of 100

177Tokens per secondhigher is better

Priceno API price

n/aper 1M tokenslower is better

ContextRank 98 of 102

128Ktokens at once≈ 190 A4 pages

PopularityRank 463 of 785

33out of 100same as last month

based on search, usage and attention

Summary

At 177 tokens per second it writes faster than a typical model (87). Estimated without own results in: Mathematics.

Command A Plus extends the Command A family into a sparse mixture-of-experts model with image input. Cohere describes it as its first MoE model and names agentic tasks, reasoning, translation, and support for 48 languages. The model has 218 billion total parameters and 25 billion active parameters.

Cohere's current documentation lists 128,000 context tokens and up to 64,000 output tokens. For open-source deployment, it names Apache 2.0 and a target configuration of W4A4 on one B200 or two H100s. That hardware statement applies to the documented W4A4 configuration.

Command A Plus benchmarks

Speed

20 of 100 models

Mercury 2.5576tokens/s · Configuration Reasoning enabled; effort unspecified · AA 3.0.0, including time to first token, averaged across available workloads and five days · Retrieved 2026-11-06
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite336tokens/s · Configuration High effort · AA 3.0.0, including time to first token, averaged across available workloads and five days · Retrieved 2026-11-06
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite299tokens/s · Configuration High effort · AA 3.0.0, including time to first token, averaged across available workloads and five days · Retrieved 2026-11-06
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning245tokens/s · Configuration Reasoning enabled; effort unspecified · AA 3.0.0, including time to first token, averaged across available workloads and five days · Retrieved 2026-11-06
Claude Haiku 5.5236tokens/s · Configuration Max effort · AA 3.0.0, including time to first token, averaged across available workloads and five days · Retrieved 2026-11-06
o3-mini230tokens/s · Configuration High effort · AA 3.0.0, including time to first token, averaged across available workloads and five days · Retrieved 2026-11-06
Ling 3.0 Flash199tokens/s · Configuration Reasoning enabled; effort unspecified · AA 3.0.0, including time to first token, averaged across available workloads and five days · Retrieved 2026-11-06
DeepSeek-V3 0324195tokens/s · Configuration Non-reasoning · AA 3.0.0, including time to first token, averaged across available workloads and five days · Retrieved 2026-11-06
GPT-5.4 mini191tokens/s · Configuration Xhigh effort · AA 3.0.0, including time to first token, averaged across available workloads and five days · Retrieved 2026-11-06
Gemini 3 Flash Preview191tokens/s · Configuration Non-reasoning · AA 3.0.0, including time to first token, averaged across available workloads and five days · Retrieved 2026-11-06
Gemini 3.5 Flash184tokens/s · Configuration High effort · AA 3.0.0, including time to first token, averaged across available workloads and five days · Retrieved 2026-11-06
Gemini 3.6 Flash182tokens/s · Configuration High effort · AA 3.0.0, including time to first token, averaged across available workloads and five days · Retrieved 2026-11-06
Command A Plus177tokens/s · Configuration Reasoning enabled; effort unspecified · AA 3.0.0, including time to first token, averaged across available workloads and five days · Retrieved 2026-11-06
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash176tokens/s · Configuration Max effort · AA 3.0.0, including time to first token, averaged across available workloads and five days · Retrieved 2026-11-06
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017172tokens/s · Configuration Max effort · AA 3.0.0, including time to first token, averaged across available workloads and five days · Retrieved 2026-11-06
Qwen 3.7 Max165tokens/s · Configuration Reasoning enabled; effort unspecified · AA 3.0.0, including time to first token, averaged across available workloads and five days · Retrieved 2026-11-06
GPT-5.4 nano153tokens/s · Configuration Xhigh effort · AA 3.0.0, including time to first token, averaged across available workloads and five days · Retrieved 2026-11-06
GPT OSS 20B152tokens/s · Configuration High effort · AA 3.0.0, including time to first token, averaged across available workloads and five days · Retrieved 2026-11-06
GPT OSS 120B151tokens/s · Configuration High effort · AA 3.0.0, including time to first token, averaged across available workloads and five days · Retrieved 2026-11-06
Claude Sonnet 5.5151tokens/s · Configuration Max effort · AA 3.0.0, including time to first token, averaged across available workloads and five days · Retrieved 2026-11-06

Output tokens per second, measured by Artificial Analysis

Command A Plus by task area

Points, 100 = reference group average · higher is better

GeneralRank 59 of 6549.6
Knowledgetoo little data43.9
Multimodaltoo little data38.9
AgentsRank 92 of 9838.1
CodingRank 106 of 10935.7
ReasoningRank 68 of 7235.0
HealthRank 71 of 7225.6
Legaltoo little data25.6
Financetoo little data17.2

Light bar: too few results for a rank yet. No tests yet: Mathematics.

Show all 132 published benchmark results

Page 1 of 11

Measurements without matching peer values

These measurements have no matching peer values under the same test conditions. Their original values and sources remain available here.

AutomationBench-AA: Overall (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
1.8104537047977383
Score
1.8104537047977383
Metric
Objectives completed without guardrail violations
Unit
%
Benchmark version
AA private 657-task split of AutomationBench v1.0.6
Category
agentic
Task
overall
Task label
Overall
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
Artificial Analysis
Status
superseded
Retrieved at
2026-11-02
Methodology
Exact AA configuration: Command A+ (release command-a-plus, row command-a-plus, UUID 2e9ff877-fd2c-4ce7-b631-7ca1bdb6d13e, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=not specified). AA source value for average reasoning tokens before the answer: 2000. Its methodology averages 60 varied prompts and assumes 2,000 when no average is available. This is not a token cap.. Source model ID: artificial-analysis/2e9ff877-fd2c-4ce7-b631-7ca1bdb6d13e/command-a-plus/command-a-plus. Source model name: Command A Plus. Provider reported by source: Cohere. Model snapshot: Command A+. Evaluator: Artificial Analysis. Dataset type: artificial-analysis-evaluation. Reasoning: reasoning enabled. Score display: 1.8%. Source ID: artificial-analysis. Evidence capture ID: aa-model-page-2026-11-02-67d46be20a5b. Source payload hash: 67d46be20a5b412db6cfb60ad190441fcaa5513500b8fd47d033168d0e97b6b2. Parser version: artificial-analysis-rsc-models-v3. Imported at: 2026-11-02. Source cohort: artificial-analysis-automationbench-aa:AA private 657-task split of AutomationBench v1.0.6:v5.0:reasoning:effort=unspecified:suffix=unspecified
Comparison methodology
Exact AA configuration: Command A+ (release command-a-plus, row command-a-plus, UUID 2e9ff877-fd2c-4ce7-b631-7ca1bdb6d13e, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=not specified). AA source value for average reasoning tokens before the answer: 2000. Its methodology averages 60 varied prompts and assumes 2,000 when no average is available. This is not a token cap.. Reasoning: reasoning enabled
Context
This result is retained as historical evidence and is not interchangeable with current results.
Source Artificial Analysis
AutomationBench-AA: Overall (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
1.8104537047977383
Score
1.8104537047977383
Metric
Objectives completed without guardrail violations
Unit
%
Benchmark version
AA private 657-task split of AutomationBench v1.0.6
Category
agentic
Task
overall
Task label
Overall
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
Artificial Analysis
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-11-07
Methodology
Exact AA configuration: Command A+ (release command-a-plus, row command-a-plus, UUID 2e9ff877-fd2c-4ce7-b631-7ca1bdb6d13e, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=not specified). This source capture does not provide an average reasoning-token count.. Source model ID: artificial-analysis/2e9ff877-fd2c-4ce7-b631-7ca1bdb6d13e/command-a-plus/command-a-plus. Source model name: Command A Plus. Provider reported by source: Cohere. Model snapshot: Command A+. Evaluator: Artificial Analysis. Dataset type: artificial-analysis-evaluation. Reasoning: reasoning enabled. Score display: 1.8%. Source ID: artificial-analysis. Evidence capture ID: aa-model-page-2026-11-07-b96e3ffc8c5b. Source payload hash: b96e3ffc8c5b052aa56f96d05e89d02b8cc234a75085820fca0ca2a39e498274. Parser version: artificial-analysis-rsc-models-v4. Imported at: 2026-11-07. Source cohort: artificial-analysis-automationbench-aa:AA private 657-task split of AutomationBench v1.0.6:v5.0.1:reasoning:effort=unspecified:suffix=unspecified
Comparison methodology
Exact AA configuration: Command A+ (release command-a-plus, row command-a-plus, UUID 2e9ff877-fd2c-4ce7-b631-7ca1bdb6d13e, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=not specified). This source capture does not provide an average reasoning-token count.. Reasoning: reasoning enabled
Source Artificial Analysis
CritPt v2 (Hard Subset): Overall (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
2.5
Score
2.5
Metric
pass@1 accuracy
Unit
%
Benchmark version
v2 hard subset
Category
reasoning
Task
overall
Task label
Overall
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
Artificial Analysis
Status
superseded
Retrieved at
2026-11-02
Methodology
Exact AA configuration: Command A+ (release command-a-plus, row command-a-plus, UUID 2e9ff877-fd2c-4ce7-b631-7ca1bdb6d13e, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=not specified). AA source value for average reasoning tokens before the answer: 2000. Its methodology averages 60 varied prompts and assumes 2,000 when no average is available. This is not a token cap.. Source model ID: artificial-analysis/2e9ff877-fd2c-4ce7-b631-7ca1bdb6d13e/command-a-plus/command-a-plus. Source model name: Command A Plus. Provider reported by source: Cohere. Model snapshot: Command A+. Evaluator: Artificial Analysis. Dataset type: artificial-analysis-evaluation. Reasoning: reasoning enabled. Score display: 2.5%. Source ID: artificial-analysis. Evidence capture ID: aa-model-page-2026-11-02-67d46be20a5b. Source payload hash: 67d46be20a5b412db6cfb60ad190441fcaa5513500b8fd47d033168d0e97b6b2. Parser version: artificial-analysis-rsc-models-v3. Imported at: 2026-11-02. Source cohort: artificial-analysis-critpt-v2-hard-subset:v2 hard subset:v5.0:reasoning:effort=unspecified:suffix=unspecified
Comparison methodology
Exact AA configuration: Command A+ (release command-a-plus, row command-a-plus, UUID 2e9ff877-fd2c-4ce7-b631-7ca1bdb6d13e, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=not specified). AA source value for average reasoning tokens before the answer: 2000. Its methodology averages 60 varied prompts and assumes 2,000 when no average is available. This is not a token cap.. Reasoning: reasoning enabled
Context
This is the 40-question hard subset of CritPt v2, not the full 70-question CritPt v2 run.. This result is retained as historical evidence and is not interchangeable with current results.
Source Artificial Analysis
CritPt v2 (Hard Subset): Overall (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
2.5
Score
2.5
Metric
pass@1 accuracy
Unit
%
Benchmark version
v2 hard subset, November 2026 grading
Category
reasoning
Task
overall
Task label
Overall
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
Artificial Analysis
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-11-07
Methodology
Exact AA configuration: Command A+ (release command-a-plus, row command-a-plus, UUID 2e9ff877-fd2c-4ce7-b631-7ca1bdb6d13e, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=not specified). This source capture does not provide an average reasoning-token count.. Source model ID: artificial-analysis/2e9ff877-fd2c-4ce7-b631-7ca1bdb6d13e/command-a-plus/command-a-plus. Source model name: Command A Plus. Provider reported by source: Cohere. Model snapshot: Command A+. Evaluator: Artificial Analysis. Dataset type: artificial-analysis-evaluation. Reasoning: reasoning enabled. Score display: 2.5%. Source ID: artificial-analysis. Evidence capture ID: aa-model-page-2026-11-07-b96e3ffc8c5b. Source payload hash: b96e3ffc8c5b052aa56f96d05e89d02b8cc234a75085820fca0ca2a39e498274. Parser version: artificial-analysis-rsc-models-v4. Imported at: 2026-11-07. Source cohort: artificial-analysis-critpt-v2-hard-subset:v2 hard subset, November 2026 grading:v5.0.1:reasoning:effort=unspecified:suffix=unspecified
Comparison methodology
Exact AA configuration: Command A+ (release command-a-plus, row command-a-plus, UUID 2e9ff877-fd2c-4ce7-b631-7ca1bdb6d13e, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=not specified). This source capture does not provide an average reasoning-token count.. Reasoning: reasoning enabled
Context
This is the 40-question hard subset of CritPt v2, not the full 70-question CritPt v2 run.
Source Artificial Analysis
CritPt v2: Overall (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
0.28571428571428603
Score
0.28571428571428603
Metric
pass@1 accuracy
Unit
%
Benchmark version
v2
Category
reasoning
Task
overall
Task label
Overall
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
Artificial Analysis
Status
disputed
Retrieved at
2026-11-02
Methodology
Exact AA configuration: Command A+ (release command-a-plus, row command-a-plus, UUID 2e9ff877-fd2c-4ce7-b631-7ca1bdb6d13e, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=not specified). AA source value for average reasoning tokens before the answer: 2000. Its methodology averages 60 varied prompts and assumes 2,000 when no average is available. This is not a token cap. The full CritPt v2 run covers 70 questions with five repeats. The official grading server reports pass@1.. Source model ID: artificial-analysis/2e9ff877-fd2c-4ce7-b631-7ca1bdb6d13e/command-a-plus/command-a-plus. Source model name: Command A Plus. Provider reported by source: Cohere. Model snapshot: Command A+. Evaluator: Artificial Analysis. Dataset type: artificial-analysis-evaluation. Tool policy: Python functions, symbolic expressions, and numerical answers; official grading server. Attempts: 70 questions, five repeats per question, pass@1. Reasoning: reasoning enabled. Score display: 0.3%. Source ID: artificial-analysis. Evidence capture ID: aa-model-page-2026-11-02-67d46be20a5b. Source payload hash: 67d46be20a5b412db6cfb60ad190441fcaa5513500b8fd47d033168d0e97b6b2. Parser version: artificial-analysis-rsc-models-v3. Imported at: 2026-11-02. Source cohort: artificial-analysis-critpt-v2:v2:standalone:reasoning:effort=unspecified:suffix=unspecified
Comparison methodology
Exact AA configuration: Command A+ (release command-a-plus, row command-a-plus, UUID 2e9ff877-fd2c-4ce7-b631-7ca1bdb6d13e, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=not specified). AA source value for average reasoning tokens before the answer: 2000. Its methodology averages 60 varied prompts and assumes 2,000 when no average is available. This is not a token cap. The full CritPt v2 run covers 70 questions with five repeats. The official grading server reports pass@1.. Tool policy: Python functions, symbolic expressions, and numerical answers; official grading server. Attempts: 70 questions, five repeats per question, pass@1. Reasoning: reasoning enabled
Context
This AA source field contains the original CritPt score. The earlier CritPt v2 attribution was incorrect; the value and former label remain as disputed historical evidence.. The source dataset marks this result as disputed. It remains visible as documented evidence, but is not reliable comparative proof.
Source Artificial Analysis
FrontierCode: Overall (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
0
Score
0
Metric
Mean score over three attempts per task
Unit
%
Benchmark version
2.0
Category
coding
Task
overall
Task label
Overall
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
Artificial Analysis
Status
superseded
Retrieved at
2026-11-02
Methodology
Exact AA configuration: Command A+ (release command-a-plus, row command-a-plus, UUID 2e9ff877-fd2c-4ce7-b631-7ca1bdb6d13e, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=not specified). AA source value for average reasoning tokens before the answer: 2000. Its methodology averages 60 varied prompts and assumes 2,000 when no average is available. This is not a token cap.. Source model ID: artificial-analysis/2e9ff877-fd2c-4ce7-b631-7ca1bdb6d13e/command-a-plus/command-a-plus. Source model name: Command A Plus. Provider reported by source: Cohere. Model snapshot: Command A+. Evaluator: Artificial Analysis. Dataset type: artificial-analysis-evaluation. Reasoning: reasoning enabled. Score display: 0.0%. Source ID: artificial-analysis. Evidence capture ID: aa-model-page-2026-11-02-67d46be20a5b. Source payload hash: 67d46be20a5b412db6cfb60ad190441fcaa5513500b8fd47d033168d0e97b6b2. Parser version: artificial-analysis-rsc-models-v3. Imported at: 2026-11-02. Source cohort: artificial-analysis-frontiercode-2-0:2.0:v5.0:reasoning:effort=unspecified:suffix=unspecified
Comparison methodology
Exact AA configuration: Command A+ (release command-a-plus, row command-a-plus, UUID 2e9ff877-fd2c-4ce7-b631-7ca1bdb6d13e, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=not specified). AA source value for average reasoning tokens before the answer: 2000. Its methodology averages 60 varied prompts and assumes 2,000 when no average is available. This is not a token cap.. Reasoning: reasoning enabled
Context
This result is retained as historical evidence and is not interchangeable with current results.
Source Artificial Analysis
FrontierCode: Overall (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
0
Score
0
Metric
Mean score over three attempts per task
Unit
%
Benchmark version
2.0
Category
coding
Task
overall
Task label
Overall
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
Artificial Analysis
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-11-07
Methodology
Exact AA configuration: Command A+ (release command-a-plus, row command-a-plus, UUID 2e9ff877-fd2c-4ce7-b631-7ca1bdb6d13e, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=not specified). This source capture does not provide an average reasoning-token count.. Source model ID: artificial-analysis/2e9ff877-fd2c-4ce7-b631-7ca1bdb6d13e/command-a-plus/command-a-plus. Source model name: Command A Plus. Provider reported by source: Cohere. Model snapshot: Command A+. Evaluator: Artificial Analysis. Dataset type: artificial-analysis-evaluation. Reasoning: reasoning enabled. Score display: 0.0%. Source ID: artificial-analysis. Evidence capture ID: aa-model-page-2026-11-07-b96e3ffc8c5b. Source payload hash: b96e3ffc8c5b052aa56f96d05e89d02b8cc234a75085820fca0ca2a39e498274. Parser version: artificial-analysis-rsc-models-v4. Imported at: 2026-11-07. Source cohort: artificial-analysis-frontiercode-2-0:2.0:v5.0.1:reasoning:effort=unspecified:suffix=unspecified
Comparison methodology
Exact AA configuration: Command A+ (release command-a-plus, row command-a-plus, UUID 2e9ff877-fd2c-4ce7-b631-7ca1bdb6d13e, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=not specified). This source capture does not provide an average reasoning-token count.. Reasoning: reasoning enabled
Source Artificial Analysis
FrontierCode 1.1 Main: Overall (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
1.21166666666667
Score
1.21166666666667
Metric
Mean score over three attempts per task
Unit
%
Benchmark version
1.1 Main
Category
coding
Task
overall
Task label
Overall
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
Artificial Analysis
Status
superseded
Retrieved at
2026-11-02
Methodology
Exact AA configuration: Command A+ (release command-a-plus, row command-a-plus, UUID 2e9ff877-fd2c-4ce7-b631-7ca1bdb6d13e, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=not specified). AA source value for average reasoning tokens before the answer: 2000. Its methodology averages 60 varied prompts and assumes 2,000 when no average is available. This is not a token cap. The primary 100-task FrontierCode 1.1 set is run three times per task, with equal task weights. Failing any blocking check or being flagged by the trajectory scanner scores zero; runs passing every blocking check score 70 to 100 percent.. Source model ID: artificial-analysis/2e9ff877-fd2c-4ce7-b631-7ca1bdb6d13e/command-a-plus/command-a-plus. Source model name: Command A Plus. Provider reported by source: Cohere. Model snapshot: Command A+. Evaluator: Artificial Analysis. Dataset type: artificial-analysis-evaluation. Harness: Artificial Analysis Stirrup. Agent: Stirrup coding agent. Tool policy: 250-turn cap; repository worktree graded as left by the agent. Attempts: Mean score, 3 attempts per task. Reasoning: reasoning enabled. Score display: 1.2%. Source ID: artificial-analysis. Evidence capture ID: aa-model-page-2026-11-02-67d46be20a5b. Source payload hash: 67d46be20a5b412db6cfb60ad190441fcaa5513500b8fd47d033168d0e97b6b2. Parser version: artificial-analysis-rsc-models-v3. Imported at: 2026-11-02. Source cohort: artificial-analysis-frontiercode:1.1 Main:standalone:reasoning:effort=unspecified:suffix=unspecified
Comparison methodology
Exact AA configuration: Command A+ (release command-a-plus, row command-a-plus, UUID 2e9ff877-fd2c-4ce7-b631-7ca1bdb6d13e, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=not specified). AA source value for average reasoning tokens before the answer: 2000. Its methodology averages 60 varied prompts and assumes 2,000 when no average is available. This is not a token cap. The primary 100-task FrontierCode 1.1 set is run three times per task, with equal task weights. Failing any blocking check or being flagged by the trajectory scanner scores zero; runs passing every blocking check score 70 to 100 percent.. Harness: Artificial Analysis Stirrup. Agent: Stirrup coding agent. Tool policy: 250-turn cap; repository worktree graded as left by the agent. Attempts: Mean score, 3 attempts per task. Reasoning: reasoning enabled
Context
FrontierCode 1.1 Main is a private 100-task subset of 150 tasks. These are AA mean rubric scores, not a binary pass rate.. This result is retained as historical evidence and is not interchangeable with current results.
Source Artificial Analysis
FrontierCode 1.1 Main: Overall (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
1.21166666666667
Score
1.21166666666667
Metric
Mean score over three attempts per task
Unit
%
Benchmark version
1.1 Main
Category
coding
Task
overall
Task label
Overall
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
Artificial Analysis
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-11-07
Methodology
Exact AA configuration: Command A+ (release command-a-plus, row command-a-plus, UUID 2e9ff877-fd2c-4ce7-b631-7ca1bdb6d13e, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=not specified). This source capture does not provide an average reasoning-token count. The primary 100-task FrontierCode 1.1 set is run three times per task, with equal task weights. Failing any blocking check or being flagged by the trajectory scanner scores zero; runs passing every blocking check score 70 to 100 percent.. Source model ID: artificial-analysis/2e9ff877-fd2c-4ce7-b631-7ca1bdb6d13e/command-a-plus/command-a-plus. Source model name: Command A Plus. Provider reported by source: Cohere. Model snapshot: Command A+. Evaluator: Artificial Analysis. Dataset type: artificial-analysis-evaluation. Harness: Artificial Analysis Stirrup. Agent: Stirrup coding agent. Tool policy: 250-turn cap; repository worktree graded as left by the agent. Attempts: Mean score, 3 attempts per task. Reasoning: reasoning enabled. Score display: 1.2%. Source ID: artificial-analysis. Evidence capture ID: aa-model-page-2026-11-07-b96e3ffc8c5b. Source payload hash: b96e3ffc8c5b052aa56f96d05e89d02b8cc234a75085820fca0ca2a39e498274. Parser version: artificial-analysis-rsc-models-v4. Imported at: 2026-11-07. Source cohort: artificial-analysis-frontiercode:1.1 Main:standalone:reasoning:effort=unspecified:suffix=unspecified
Comparison methodology
Exact AA configuration: Command A+ (release command-a-plus, row command-a-plus, UUID 2e9ff877-fd2c-4ce7-b631-7ca1bdb6d13e, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=not specified). This source capture does not provide an average reasoning-token count. The primary 100-task FrontierCode 1.1 set is run three times per task, with equal task weights. Failing any blocking check or being flagged by the trajectory scanner scores zero; runs passing every blocking check score 70 to 100 percent.. Harness: Artificial Analysis Stirrup. Agent: Stirrup coding agent. Tool policy: 250-turn cap; repository worktree graded as left by the agent. Attempts: Mean score, 3 attempts per task. Reasoning: reasoning enabled
Context
FrontierCode 1.1 Main is a private 100-task subset of 150 tasks. These are AA mean rubric scores, not a binary pass rate.
Source Artificial Analysis
GDP.pdf: Overall (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
1
Score
1
Metric
All-pass rate
Unit
%
Benchmark version
unspecified
Category
reasoning
Task
overall
Task label
Overall
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
Artificial Analysis
Status
superseded
Retrieved at
2026-11-02
Methodology
Exact AA configuration: Command A+ (release command-a-plus, row command-a-plus, UUID 2e9ff877-fd2c-4ce7-b631-7ca1bdb6d13e, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=not specified). AA source value for average reasoning tokens before the answer: 2000. Its methodology averages 60 varied prompts and assumes 2,000 when no average is available. This is not a token cap.. Source model ID: artificial-analysis/2e9ff877-fd2c-4ce7-b631-7ca1bdb6d13e/command-a-plus/command-a-plus. Source model name: Command A Plus. Provider reported by source: Cohere. Model snapshot: Command A+. Evaluator: Artificial Analysis. Dataset type: artificial-analysis-evaluation. Reasoning: reasoning enabled. Score display: 1.0%. Source ID: artificial-analysis. Evidence capture ID: aa-model-page-2026-11-02-67d46be20a5b. Source payload hash: 67d46be20a5b412db6cfb60ad190441fcaa5513500b8fd47d033168d0e97b6b2. Parser version: artificial-analysis-rsc-models-v3. Imported at: 2026-11-02. Source cohort: artificial-analysis-gdp-pdf:unspecified:v5.0:reasoning:effort=unspecified:suffix=unspecified
Comparison methodology
Exact AA configuration: Command A+ (release command-a-plus, row command-a-plus, UUID 2e9ff877-fd2c-4ce7-b631-7ca1bdb6d13e, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=not specified). AA source value for average reasoning tokens before the answer: 2000. Its methodology averages 60 varied prompts and assumes 2,000 when no average is available. This is not a token cap.. Reasoning: reasoning enabled
Context
This result is retained as historical evidence and is not interchangeable with current results.
Source Artificial Analysis
GDP.pdf: Overall (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
1
Score
1
Metric
All-pass rate
Unit
%
Benchmark version
unspecified
Category
reasoning
Task
overall
Task label
Overall
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
Artificial Analysis
Status
active
Retrieved at
2026-11-07
Methodology
Exact AA configuration: Command A+ (release command-a-plus, row command-a-plus, UUID 2e9ff877-fd2c-4ce7-b631-7ca1bdb6d13e, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=not specified). This source capture does not provide an average reasoning-token count.. Source model ID: artificial-analysis/2e9ff877-fd2c-4ce7-b631-7ca1bdb6d13e/command-a-plus/command-a-plus. Source model name: Command A Plus. Provider reported by source: Cohere. Model snapshot: Command A+. Evaluator: Artificial Analysis. Dataset type: artificial-analysis-evaluation. Reasoning: reasoning enabled. Score display: 1.0%. Source ID: artificial-analysis. Evidence capture ID: aa-model-page-2026-11-07-b96e3ffc8c5b. Source payload hash: b96e3ffc8c5b052aa56f96d05e89d02b8cc234a75085820fca0ca2a39e498274. Parser version: artificial-analysis-rsc-models-v4. Imported at: 2026-11-07. Source cohort: artificial-analysis-gdp-pdf:unspecified:v5.0.1:reasoning:effort=unspecified:suffix=unspecified
Comparison methodology
Exact AA configuration: Command A+ (release command-a-plus, row command-a-plus, UUID 2e9ff877-fd2c-4ce7-b631-7ca1bdb6d13e, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=not specified). This source capture does not provide an average reasoning-token count.. Reasoning: reasoning enabled
Source Artificial Analysis
HLE-Diamond: Overall (Show measurement, test conditions, and source)
Source value
5.1
Score
5.1
Metric
pass@1 accuracy
Unit
%
Benchmark version
Diamond
Category
general
Task
overall
Task label
Overall
Direction
Higher is better
Source type
independent-evaluator
Evaluator
Artificial Analysis
Status
superseded
Retrieved at
2026-11-02
Methodology
Exact AA configuration: Command A+ (release command-a-plus, row command-a-plus, UUID 2e9ff877-fd2c-4ce7-b631-7ca1bdb6d13e, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=not specified). AA source value for average reasoning tokens before the answer: 2000. Its methodology averages 60 varied prompts and assumes 2,000 when no average is available. This is not a token cap.. Source model ID: artificial-analysis/2e9ff877-fd2c-4ce7-b631-7ca1bdb6d13e/command-a-plus/command-a-plus. Source model name: Command A Plus. Provider reported by source: Cohere. Model snapshot: Command A+. Evaluator: Artificial Analysis. Dataset type: artificial-analysis-evaluation. Reasoning: reasoning enabled. Score display: 5.1%. Source ID: artificial-analysis. Evidence capture ID: aa-model-page-2026-11-02-67d46be20a5b. Source payload hash: 67d46be20a5b412db6cfb60ad190441fcaa5513500b8fd47d033168d0e97b6b2. Parser version: artificial-analysis-rsc-models-v3. Imported at: 2026-11-02. Source cohort: artificial-analysis-hle-diamond:Diamond:v5.0:reasoning:effort=unspecified:suffix=unspecified
Comparison methodology
Exact AA configuration: Command A+ (release command-a-plus, row command-a-plus, UUID 2e9ff877-fd2c-4ce7-b631-7ca1bdb6d13e, reasoning=true, effort=not specified, suffix=not specified). AA source value for average reasoning tokens before the answer: 2000. Its methodology averages 60 varied prompts and assumes 2,000 when no average is available. This is not a token cap.. Reasoning: reasoning enabled
Context
This result is retained as historical evidence and is not interchangeable with current results.
Source Artificial Analysis

Page 1 of 11

See for yourself: one prompt, one attempt

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Command A Plus

Command A Plus: SVG short test

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

Oct 14, 2026 · $0.0015

Test details
Test run
Oct 14, 2026
Provider
cohere
API model
cohere/command-a-plus
Output
999 tokens
Reasoning
API reports 0 reasoning tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0015
Test round
43b8c5c46830
Earlier tests
Command A Plus: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Oct 1, 2026 · 21 s · $0.0072

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
cohere/command-a-plus
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
4,817 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0072
Response time
21 s
API model reported in response
cohere/command-a-plus
Pinned endpoint
Cohere | cohere/command-a-plus-05-2026
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Task origin: Simon Willison

Popularity compared

How often the model is searched for, used and mentioned, compared with every model of its category.

Popularity index

The 100 most popular models of this category, 0 to 100, higher is more popular

20 of 101 models

As of November 2026 · Source: gradually.ai popularity index

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 7, 2026

Command A PlusAmazon Nova Pro 33Aya Expanse 32B 33AREX-2 33Nex-N2-mini 33

Method changes in the timeline, a jump at these points is no market event:

  1. 1November 1, 2026: Value only with search or usage data, 30-day attention

What is gaining popularity right now, across models, vendors, harnesses and AI subscriptions, is collected in All AI trends.

All specifications

Architecture

Parameters
218 billion
Source: Parameters
Active parameters
25 billion
Source: Active parameters
Knowledge cutoff
April 2025
Source: Knowledge cutoff

Input and output

Context window
128,000 tokens
Source: Context window
Maximum output
64,000 tokens
Source: Maximum output
Inputs
Text, Image
Source: Inputs
Outputs
Text
Source: Outputs
Reasoning
Yes
Source: Reasoning
Tool calling
Yes
Source: Tool calling

Watermarking and provenance

AI watermarking refers to invisible signals embedded in the output. Visible marks and provenance metadata are listed separately. Unknown means there is insufficient evidence for that particular field.

AI watermarking
Unknown
no source
Watermarking technique
Not known
no source

Licence and access

Weights
Open weights
Source: Weights
License
CC BY-NC-4.0
Source: License

Prices

Not included in any subscription in Germany.

All plans in the AI subscription comparison

Frequently asked questions about Command A Plus

How good is Command A Plus in benchmarks?

Not ranked in the overall index yet; the provisional value is 32.9 points. The value is provisional because there are not yet enough results for a fixed place.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v4) from 17 benchmark results · data through Nov 7, 2026

What is the Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v4)?

A point value that combines many independent benchmarks into one number. 100 points is the average of a fixed reference group, higher is better. Command A Plus has a provisional 32.9 points, not yet ranked.

Own analysis by gradually.ai, method benchmark-meta-score-v4 · for Command A Plus from 17 test series

Which data
Only current, reviewed results from independent evaluators such as Artificial Analysis, Vals AI, LMArena, LiveBench and Epoch AI. Vendor claims and historical or disputed values do not count.
One value per test
For each source and test series the latest retrieval with one fixed setup counts. When a source tests several reasoning levels, the highest documented one applies. A series needs at least 5 models.
Making tests comparable
Percentages are converted so that gaps near 0 and near 100 % count fairly, then every series is put on the same scale. A hard test therefore does not weigh more than an easy one.
Shared strength
A statistical model estimates, from all series at once, one shared capability per model and, per area, how far a model deviates from it. Missing tests are never counted as zero.
Weighting
Core areas (Coding, Reasoning, Mathematics, Knowledge, Agents, General and Multimodal) count 75 % together, the domain areas Finance, Legal and Health 25 %.
The point scale
The value is measured against a fixed reference group of 29 models, much like an IQ score: 100 points is its average and 15 points one standard deviation of the group. The scale is open at both ends and is not a percentage. A model 15 points ahead does better in roughly three of four benchmark comparisons. New models do not shift older values.
Place by score
The place follows the order of the scores among all models with a place, such as "rank 14 of 95". A second calculation checks whether a lead is reliable by recomputing the score 200 times with randomly redrawn test families. If a model is not almost always ahead there, the two models count as level.
Minimum evidence
A value needs at least 8 test series from 2 sources and 3 areas, a place only with enough precision. Missing core areas are flagged as "estimated".
What it is not
Not a test run by gradually.ai and no verdict on every single task. For a specific task the area values and the individual benchmarks matter more.

What is the knowledge cutoff of Command A Plus?

April 2025, according to Cohere. That is 13 months before release.

Stated by Cohere

How large is the context window of Command A Plus?

128,000 tokens. That is how much text Command A Plus reads at once, about 190 A4 pages.

Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Context windowTokens the model reads at once · higher is better
GLM-5.1200K
DeepSeek-V3 0324164K
GLM-4.5131K
GPT OSS 120B131K
Command A PlusRank 98 of 102128K
DeepSeek-V3.2128K
DeepSeek-R1128K

How fast is Command A Plus?

177 tokens per second. That is faster than a typical model at 87.

Measured by Artificial Analysis on Nov 6, 2026. AA 3.0.0, including time to first token, averaged across available workloads and five days.

SpeedTokens per second · higher is better
Gemini 3 Flash Preview191
Gemini 3.5 Flash184
Gemini 3.6 Flash182
Command A PlusRank 13 of 100177
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash176
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017172
Qwen 3.7 Max165

Can I run Command A Plus locally?

Yes, the weights are open. With 218B parameters it needs a lot of memory, more a server than a laptop.

Stated by Cohere

Open weights
yes
License
CC BY-NC-4.0
Parameters
218B
active per token
25B

Sources and data date

Show all 42 sources

Benchmark sources at a glance

Which independent evaluators tested this model. This is coverage, not a quality ranking.

EvaluatorTest seriesComposite indicesRecorded active measurements
Artificial Analysis20034
Vals AI4019

Without vendor claims and historical or disputed results; those stay labelled in the single values.

TypeEvidence and data date
Speed

Cohere, Reasoning enabled; effort unspecified. AA 3.0.0, including time to first token, averaged across available workloads and five days. Retrieved November 6, 2026.

Input

Documented modalities. Retrieved October 27, 2026.

Output

Documented modalities. Retrieved October 27, 2026.

Research statusResearch date October 15, 2026. 11 source URLs checked. This documents the inspected sources, not an exhaustive inventory of every publication.
Not published

evaluation-details

Note

The post gives methodology notes but not full task snapshots, exact run counts or complete model-serving parameters for these rows.

Not published

AA per-profile sample counts

Original wording

Evaluator methodology task totals and repeats are published, but the exact Command A+ completed/scored denominator for each model-page field is not. No sampleCount has been populated.

Not published

AA model-page benchmark prompts and effort

Original wording

The profile is marked reasoning-enabled with reasoningTokens=2000, but the source does not bind those fields to each individual evaluation's executed prompt or effort.

Unresolved

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index discrepancy

Original wording

Cohere's official launch page reports an unversioned index score of 37, while the current exact AA profile reports v4.3.2 value 13.1335002685349. Versions/execution are not comparable from the available record; current AA row is marked disputed.

Unresolved

CritPt status

Original wording

The exact profile exposes a numeric CritPt field, but AA's CritPt evaluator page says Under review with an expert audit underway; excluded rather than treated as a confirmed measurement.

Additional sourceArtificial Analysis (retrieved October 29, 2026; November 2, 2026; November 7, 2026)12
Additional sourceArtificial Analysis (retrieved November 2, 2026; November 7, 2026)12345678
Additional sourceArtificial Analysis (retrieved October 17, 2026; November 2, 2026)
Additional sourceArtificial Analysis (retrieved November 7, 2026)123
Additional sourceArtificial Analysis (retrieved November 2, 2026)
Additional sourceArtificial Analysis (retrieved October 17, 2026; November 2, 2026; November 7, 2026)
Additional sourceVals AI (retrieved November 7, 2026)1234
Additional sourceVals AI (retrieved October 16, 2026; October 30, 2026; October 31, 2026)
Additional sourceCohere Command A+ release evaluation notes (retrieved October 15, 2026; October 17, 2026)
Additional sourceArtificial Analysis, Command A+ model profile (retrieved October 17, 2026)
Additional sourceToneBench, Cohere Command A+ (05-2026) profile (retrieved October 17, 2026; October 20, 2026; October 28, 2026; October 30, 2026)
Additional sourceRed Hat AI, Command A+ 05-2026 FP8 Hugging Face model card, Evaluation > Accuracy table (BF16 comparator column) (retrieved October 18, 2026)
Additional sourceModel metadata (retrieved October 15, 2026; October 17, 2026)
Additional sourceModel metadata (retrieved October 17, 2026)123
Additional sourceModel metadata (retrieved October 18, 2026)
Additional sourceCohere current model overview · Editorial description reviewed October 2, 2026
Additional sourceCohere Command A Plus documentation · Editorial description reviewed October 2, 2026
Additional sourceCohere Command A Plus model card · Editorial description reviewed October 2, 2026
Additional sourceOpenRouter: Popularity index (derived), CC BY 4.0
Additional sourceVercel AI Gateway: Popularity index (derived), CC BY 4.0
Additional sourceOllama: cumulative downloads for the popularity index
Additional sourceReplicate: cumulative runs for the popularity index
Additional sourceGoogle Trending Now: limited feed selection for Germany and the US
Additional sourceCreative Commons Attribution 4.0