AnthropicAlibabaLLM matchup
Claude Haiku 5.5vs.Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
Which one is better?
Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen 3.8 Max 0902 perform about equally well, but Qwen 3.8 Max 0902 costs 16.5 times (input) and 9.9 times (output) as much.
103.4
Claude Haiku 5.5
Rank 20
100.3
Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
Rank 28
236
Claude Haiku 5.5
46
Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
$0.20
Claude Haiku 5.5
$2.48
Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
77
Claude Haiku 5.5
Rank 3 of 875
68
Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
Rank 17 of 875
Above 100,000 tokens of context, Claude Haiku 5.5 costs more: $0.50 input and $2.50 output per 1M tokens.
Choose Claude Haiku 5.5 for
CybersecurityEducationHealthMathematicsGeneralFinanceCodingAgents (not certain)Reasoning (not certain)
Choose Qwen 3.8 Max 0902 for
Legal (not certain)Knowledge (not certain)
Where is the difference?
Strengths at a glance
Haiku 5.5Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
The median of all ranked models is below 100 in every area, so it sits in the centre of the net.
CodingHaiku 5.5 ahead
Haiku 5.5106.2Rank 18
Qwen 3.8 Max 0902100.7Rank 25
Median of ranked models83.7
95 % range: Haiku 5.5 102.5 to 109.9, Qwen 3.8 Max 0902 95.6 to 105.8.
AreaHaiku 5.5Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the top field the net starts at 100 points, the reference group average; values below sit as a hollow point in the centre. Not in the net because a model has no own value there or the data are too thin: Multimodal.
Haiku 5.5 is ahead in 5 of 10 areas, Qwen 3.8 Max 0902 in none.
Haiku 5.5 ahead: 5Haiku 5.5 slightly ahead: 2too little data: 1Qwen 3.8 Max 0902 slightly ahead: 2
Areas in the overall index
MathematicsHaiku 5.5 +9107.1 to 97.9
GeneralHaiku 5.5 +6106.4 to 100.1
CodingHaiku 5.5 +6106.2 to 100.7
Knowledgeleaning Qwen 3.8 Max 0902not certain · 2 tests each
Agentsleaning Haiku 5.5not certain · 4 and 7 tests
Reasoningleaning Haiku 5.5not certain · 4 and 3 tests
Multimodalonly Qwen 3.8 Max 0902 has a score
Specialist fields
HealthHaiku 5.5 +14108.9 to 94.9
FinanceHaiku 5.5 +6104.7 to 98.6
Legalleaning Qwen 3.8 Max 0902not certain · 3 tests each
Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.
Show 3 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
CybersecurityHaiku 5.5 +22108.6 to 86.8
EducationHaiku 5.5 +17109.6 to 92.6
Productivitytoo little data101.8 to 103.0
Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902 at the same effort
Both models measured at the same reasoning efforts. This shows whether a lead comes from the model or only from more compute.
xhightied
Haiku 5.5 101.3 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902 100.3 · Gap 0.7 · Test series 11
Overall index (max vs. xhigh)Haiku 5.5 slightly ahead
Haiku 5.5 103.4 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902 100.3
| Effort | Haiku 5.5 | Qwen 3.8 Max 0902 | Gap | Verdict | Test series |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| xhigh | 101.3 | 100.3 | 0.7 | tied | 11 |
| Overall index (max vs. xhigh) | 103.4 | 100.3 | 3.1 | Haiku 5.5 slightly ahead |
Gap and verdict compare only the Artificial Analysis test series in which both models are measured at that effort. Tied below 3 points, ahead only beyond two standard errors. The single values rest on all test series of each model, so their difference can deviate from the gap.
Which model for which task?
Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.
TaskBetter choicebased on
Writing and debugging codeHaiku 5.5Coding 106.2 to 100.7
Maths and data analysisHaiku 5.5Mathematics 107.1 to 97.9, Reasoning 105.2 to 101.8
Facts and researchleaning Qwen 3.8 Max 0902Knowledge 85.5 to 97.7
Agents and workflowsleaning Haiku 5.5Agents 106.1 to 98.1
Fast chat repliesHaiku 5.5236 to 46 tokens per second
Security analysisHaiku 5.5Cybersecurity 108.6 to 86.8
Many requests on a small budgetHaiku 5.5$0.20 to $2.48 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsdepends on the partFinance 104.7 to 98.6, Legal 94.4 to 109.0, Health 108.9 to 94.9
Images, screenshots and PDFsopenMultimodal without a score for Haiku 5.5
See for yourself: same task, one attempt
The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.
Claude Haiku 5.5
Not tested yet
Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
The response reached the token limit. No complete recording is available.
Oct 5, 2026 · 190 s · $0.05
Not yet visually reviewed. A successful recording does not confirm correct physics or full compliance with the prompt.
Test details
- Run date
- Oct 5, 2026
- API provider
- openrouter
- Requested API model
- qwen/qwen3.8-max-0902
- Reasoning setting
- high
- Token limit including reasoning
- 8,192 tokens
- Output tokens
- 8,192 tokens
- Cost of the attempt
- $0.0493
- Response time
- 189.9 s
- API model reported in response
- qwen/qwen3.8-max-0902
- Pinned endpoint
- Alibaba | qwen/qwen3.8-max-20260902
- Temperature
- Provider default
- Test protocol
- community-visual-tests-v1
- Technical checks
- Failed
Earlier attempts (3)
- Oct 2, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
- Oct 1, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
- Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
SVG short test
SVG short test
One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.
Prompt
Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.
Claude Haiku 5.5
Unavailable in this round
Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
Unavailable in this round
Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen 3.8 Max 0902 in the overall index
Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.
Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v4)
20 of 91 models
5 models in this view are measured at a lower reasoning effort than max in the overall index. Dashed column: lower reasoning effort than the top.
Claude Opus 5.5max126.1
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh125.7
Claude Fable 5.1max123.8
Claude Sonnet 5.5max122.8
Gemini 4 Argonhigh122.3
GPT-6 Astramax121.3
GPT-6.1 Solmax119.2
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.3
Claude Opus 5max117.2
Muse Wondermax113.4
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.9
Claude Fable 5max112.5
GPT-6 Solmax110.6
GPT-5.6 Solmax108.7
Muse Spark 1.3max107.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max106.6
Gemini 3.8 Flashhigh106.5
Claude Haiku 5.5max103.4
Qwen 3.8 Max 0902xhigh100.3
Claude Opus 5.5, Anthropic: 126.1 · Rank 1 · reasoning effort max
Gemini 4 Carbon, Google DeepMind: 125.7 · Rank 2 · reasoning effort high
Claude Fable 5.1, Anthropic: 123.8 · Rank 3 · reasoning effort max
Claude Sonnet 5.5, Anthropic: 122.8 · Rank 4 · reasoning effort max
Gemini 4 Argon, Google DeepMind: 122.3 · Rank 5 · reasoning effort high
GPT-6 Astra, OpenAI: 121.3 · Rank 6 · reasoning effort max
GPT-6.1 Sol, OpenAI: 119.2 · Rank 7 · reasoning effort max
Muse Wonder Full, Meta: 118.3 · Rank 8 · reasoning effort max
Claude Opus 5, Anthropic: 117.2 · Rank 9 · reasoning effort max
Muse Wonder, Meta: 113.4 · Rank 10 · reasoning effort max
Kimi K3.1 Pro, Moonshot AI: 112.9 · Rank 11 · reasoning effort max
Claude Fable 5, Anthropic: 112.5 · Rank 12 · reasoning effort max
GPT-6 Sol, OpenAI: 110.6 · Rank 13 · reasoning effort max
GPT-5.6 Sol, OpenAI: 108.7 · Rank 14 · reasoning effort max
Muse Spark 1.3, Meta: 107.4 · Rank 15 · reasoning effort max
Gemini 3.7 Flash, Google: 107.1 · Rank 16 · reasoning effort high
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, DeepSeek: 106.6 · Rank 17 · reasoning effort max
Gemini 3.8 Flash, Google: 106.5 · Rank 18 · reasoning effort high
Claude Haiku 5.5, Anthropic: 103.4 · Rank 20 · reasoning effort max
Qwen 3.8 Max 0902, Alibaba: 100.3 · Rank 28 · reasoning effort xhigh
Claude Opus 5.5
Gemini 4 Carbon
Claude Fable 5.1
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Gemini 4 Argon
GPT-6 Astra
GPT-6.1 Sol
Muse Wonder Full
Claude Opus 5
Muse Wonder
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Claude Fable 5
GPT-6 Sol
GPT-5.6 Sol
Muse Spark 1.3
Gemini 3.7 Flash
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Claude Haiku 5.5
Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
Popularity compared
How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.
Claude Haiku 5.5 is more popular than Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 77 to 68 out of 100.
Over time
Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 5, 2026
Claude Haiku 5.5Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
All data side by side
The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen 3.8 Max 0902 |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | ||
| Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better | 103.4 | 100.3 |
| Rank | Rank 20 of 91 | Rank 28 of 91 |
| Price per 1M tokens | ||
| Inputwhat you send | $0.10above 100,000 tokens: $0.50 | $1.65 |
| Outputwhat the model writes | $0.50above 100,000 tokens: $2.50 | $4.951 |
| Speed | ||
| Tokens per second | 236 | 46 |
| Popularity | ||
| Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 100 | 77Rank 3 of 875 | 68Rank 17 of 875 |
| Technical | ||
| Context windowhow much text the model reads at once | 1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages | 1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages |
| Knowledge cutoff | June 2026 | n/a |
| Released | Oct 7, 2026 | Sep 2, 2026 |
| Availability | Active | API-only |
| Open weights | no | no |
Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis
Is there a better choice?
Best model in the overall indexClaude Opus 5.5
Overall index 126.1, rank 1. $4 input and $20 output per 1M tokens.
Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 5.5Shared benchmarks
Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.
A: Claude Haiku 5.5B: Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 44.6%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 24%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 75.5%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 28.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 59%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 60.1%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMB v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 65.5%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 66%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 54.1%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 50.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ImmigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 61.8%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 70.1%Vals AIAs of 10/28/2026
IOIOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 47.3%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 68.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 43.8%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 47.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 1,589Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 1,676LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
MedCodeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 51.5%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 40.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 89.5%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 84.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MysteryMechanismOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 35.1%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 23.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 2.5%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ProofBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 89%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 58%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Public Benefits Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 63.2%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 67.1%Vals AIAs of 10/12/2026
SAGEOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 89.8%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 81.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SWE-bench MultimodalOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 44%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 42.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 31.9%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 32.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 36.4%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 34.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 10%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 12.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vibe Code Bench 1-100Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 20.4%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 12.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 90.4%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 64.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 36.1%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 11.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1Patch · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 89.3%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 57.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 77.9%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 54.3%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMB v1.1Comps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 77.7%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 65.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 49.6%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 48.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ImmigrationAll-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 16%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 25.2%Vals AIAs of 10/28/2026
IOIIOI 2024 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 67.7%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 78.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 50%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 59.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevHTML development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 1,568Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 1,657LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 29.5%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 10.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SAGEComputer Science · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 91.6%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 86.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SWE-bench Multimodalbpmn-js · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 64.2%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 62.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 6.7%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 20%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Hardware · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 20%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEarth Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 0%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 12.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCOBOL · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 70%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 60%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1PoC · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 61.7%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBDataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 85.5%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 83.5%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMB v1.1Dataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 85.8%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 84.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent (v2)All-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 42.9%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 38.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ImmigrationContent Checks · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 57.6%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 67.9%Vals AIAs of 10/28/2026
IOIIOI 2025 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 31.3%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 68.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 88.7%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 90.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevReact development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 1,608Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 1,692LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
ProgramBenchFully Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 2.5%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SAGELinear Algebra · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 86.8%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 69.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SWE-bench MultimodalCarbon · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 24.1%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 24.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 54.1%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 62.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Media · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 25%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 50%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEngineering Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 0%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCode Quality · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 4.825 / 5Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 4.255 / 5Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBDCF · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 55.1%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 49.1%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMB v1.1DCF · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 63.1%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 54.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Comparables · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 45.3%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 44.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ImmigrationIntake Checks · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 47.7%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 48.3%Vals AIAs of 10/28/2026
IOIIOI 2026 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 42.8%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 60.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 44.2%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 46.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevWeb development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 1,589Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 1,676LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
ProgramBenchRaw Pass Rate · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 78.7%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 40%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SAGEPartial Differential Equations · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 89.9%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 88.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SWE-bench MultimodalESLint · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 63.6%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 72.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 36.7%Qwen 3.8 Max 0902: 49.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
More comparisons
Compare Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen 3.8 Max 0902 with the models people compare them with most often.
Compare another matchup
Predecessor and successor
The most popular comparisons
- 1Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
- 2Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
- 3Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
- 4Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 5Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 6Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
- 7Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
- 8Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
- 9Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3
Show all 57 comparisons
- 10Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
- 11Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
- 12Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.5
- 13Qwen 3.8 Max 0902 vs. Mistral Large 4
- 14GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
- 15Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5
- 16DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
- 17Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 5
- 18Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra
- 19Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
- 20Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.8
- 21DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
- 22GPT-6 Luna vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
- 23Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Argon
- 24GPT-6 Astra vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
- 25Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Grok 4.7
- 26Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
- 27Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Muse Spark 1.3
- 28Gemini 3.7 Flash vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
- 29Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.6
- 30GPT-6 Sol vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
- 31Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
- 32Muse Spark 1.3 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
- 33Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 4
- 34Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
- 35Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
- 36Claude Opus 4.8 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
- 37Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
- 38DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
- 39Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
- 40Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
- 41Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
- 42Claude Fable 5.1 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
- 43Grok 4.7 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
- 44Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.6
- 45Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
- 46Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Kimi K2.6
- 47Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
- 48Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
- 49GLM-5.3-Flash vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
- 50GPT-5.6 Luna vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
- 51Claude Opus 4.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
- 52Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.7
- 53Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 3
- 54Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-5.5
- 55Claude Haiku 4.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
- 56Muse Wonder Full vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
- 57Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra