Skip to main content

AnthropicOpenAILLM matchup

Claude Haiku 5.5vs.GPT-6.1 Sol

Which one is better?

GPT-6.1 Sol performs better than Claude Haiku 5.5, but costs 20 times as much.

GPT-6.1 Sol ahead
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
103.4

Claude Haiku 5.5

Rank 20

119.2

GPT-6.1 Sol

Rank 7

Haiku 5.5 faster
SpeedTokens per second
236

Claude Haiku 5.5

51

GPT-6.1 Sol

Haiku 5.5 cheaper
Price$ per 1M tokens
$0.20

Claude Haiku 5.5

$4

GPT-6.1 Sol

Haiku 5.5 more popular
Popularity0 to 100
77

Claude Haiku 5.5

Rank 3 of 875

27

GPT-6.1 Sol

Rank 510 of 875

Above 100,000 tokens of context, Claude Haiku 5.5 costs more: $0.50 input and $2.50 output per 1M tokens. Above 272,000 tokens of context, GPT-6.1 Sol costs more: $4 input and $15 output per 1M tokens.

Choose Claude Haiku 5.5 for

No clear advantage

Choose GPT-6.1 Sol for

KnowledgeGeneralReasoningMathematicsCodingLegalEducationAgentsHealth (not certain)

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

Haiku 5.5GPT-6.1 Sol

The median of all ranked models is below 100 in every area, so it sits in the centre of the net.

110120130100CodingGPT-6.1 SolReasoningGPT-6.1 SolMathematicsGPT-6.1 SolKnowledgeGPT-6.1 SolAgentsGPT-6.1 SolGeneralGPT-6.1 SolFinancelevelLegalGPT-6.1 SolHealthslightly GPT-6.1 Sol
CodingGPT-6.1 Sol ahead
Haiku 5.5106.2Rank 18
GPT-6.1 Sol120.6Rank 7
Median of ranked models83.7

95 % range: Haiku 5.5 102.5 to 109.9, GPT-6.1 Sol 114.5 to 126.6.

AreaHaiku 5.5GPT-6.1 Sol

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the top field the net starts at 100 points, the reference group average; values below sit as a hollow point in the centre. Not in the net because a model has no own value there or the data are too thin: Multimodal.

GPT-6.1 Sol is ahead in 7 of 10 areas, Haiku 5.5 in none.

level: 1too little data: 1GPT-6.1 Sol slightly ahead: 1GPT-6.1 Sol ahead: 7

Areas in the overall index
KnowledgeGPT-6.1 Sol +3885.5 to 123.7
GeneralGPT-6.1 Sol +18106.4 to 123.9
ReasoningGPT-6.1 Sol +17105.2 to 122.6
MathematicsGPT-6.1 Sol +17107.1 to 124.4
CodingGPT-6.1 Sol +14106.2 to 120.6
AgentsGPT-6.1 Sol +7106.1 to 113.1
Multimodalonly GPT-6.1 Sol has a score
Specialist fields
LegalGPT-6.1 Sol +1494.4 to 108.7
Healthleaning GPT-6.1 Solnot certain · 2 tests each
Financelevel104.7 to 107.4

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 4 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
EducationGPT-6.1 Sol +11109.6 to 120.6
Productivitytoo little data101.8 to 107.3
Cybersecuritytoo little data108.6 to 108.9
Searchonly GPT-6.1 Sol has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol at the same effort

Both models measured at the same reasoning efforts. This shows whether a lead comes from the model or only from more compute.

lowGPT-6.1 Sol ahead
Haiku 5.5 80.8 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol 103.7 · Gap 23.2 · Test series 11
mediumGPT-6.1 Sol ahead
Haiku 5.5 90.4 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol 112.5 · Gap 23.0 · Test series 11
highGPT-6.1 Sol ahead
Haiku 5.5 96.6 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol 115.9 · Gap 20.1 · Test series 11
xhighGPT-6.1 Sol ahead
Haiku 5.5 101.3 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol 117.4 · Gap 17.1 · Test series 11
maxGPT-6.1 Sol ahead
Haiku 5.5 103.4 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol 119.2 · Gap 14.8 · Test series 12
Overall index (max vs. max)GPT-6.1 Sol ahead
Haiku 5.5 103.4 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol 119.2

Gap and verdict compare only the Artificial Analysis test series in which both models are measured at that effort. Tied below 3 points, ahead only beyond two standard errors. The single values rest on all test series of each model, so their difference can deviate from the gap.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeGPT-6.1 SolCoding 106.2 to 120.6
Maths and data analysisGPT-6.1 SolMathematics 107.1 to 124.4, Reasoning 105.2 to 122.6
Facts and researchGPT-6.1 SolKnowledge 85.5 to 123.7, Search without a score for Haiku 5.5
Agents and workflowsGPT-6.1 SolAgents 106.1 to 113.1
Fast chat repliesHaiku 5.5236 to 51 tokens per second
Security analysisopenCybersecurity 108.6 to 108.9 (too little data)
Many requests on a small budgetHaiku 5.5$0.20 to $4 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsGPT-6.1 SolFinance 104.7 to 107.4, Legal 94.4 to 108.7, Health 108.9 to 113.2
Images, screenshots and PDFsopenMultimodal without a score for Haiku 5.5

See for yourself: same task, one attempt

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

Claude Haiku 5.5

Not tested yet

GPT-6.1 Sol

GPT-6.1 Sol: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 84 s · $0.04

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
openai/gpt-6.1-sol
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
3,583 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0359
Response time
83.6 s
API model reported in response
openai/gpt-6.1-sol
Pinned endpoint
OpenAI | openai/gpt-6.1-sol-20260929
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Unavailable in this round

GPT-6.1 Sol

Unavailable in this round

Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT-6.1 Sol in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v4)

20 of 91 models

4 models in this view are measured at a lower reasoning effort than max in the overall index. Dashed column: lower reasoning effort than the top.

Claude Opus 5.5max126.1
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh125.7
Claude Fable 5.1max123.8
Claude Sonnet 5.5max122.8
Gemini 4 Argonhigh122.3
GPT-6 Astramax121.3
GPT-6.1 Solmax119.2
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.3
Claude Opus 5max117.2
Muse Wondermax113.4
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.9
Claude Fable 5max112.5
GPT-6 Solmax110.6
GPT-5.6 Solmax108.7
Muse Spark 1.3max107.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max106.6
Gemini 3.8 Flashhigh106.5
GPT-6.1 Terramax105.2
Claude Haiku 5.5max103.4

Popularity compared

How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.

Claude Haiku 5.5 is more popular than GPT-6.1 Sol: 77 to 27 out of 100.

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 5, 2026

Claude Haiku 5.5GPT-6.1 Sol

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricClaude Haiku 5.5GPT-6.1 Sol
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better103.4119.2
RankRank 20 of 91Rank 7 of 91
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$0.10above 100,000 tokens: $0.50$2above 272,000 tokens: $4
Outputwhat the model writes$0.50above 100,000 tokens: $2.50$10above 272,000 tokens: $15
Speed
Tokens per second23651
Popularity
Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 10077Rank 3 of 87527Rank 510 of 875
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages1.05 M tokens≈ 1,580 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffJune 2026Apr 30, 2026
ReleasedOct 7, 2026Sep 29, 2026
AvailabilityActiveActive
Open weightsnono

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

Best model in the overall indexClaude Opus 5.5

Overall index 126.1, rank 1. $4 input and $20 output per 1M tokens.

GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Claude Opus 5.5

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: Claude Haiku 5.5B: GPT-6.1 Sol

AA-AnalystAgentOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 53.8%GPT-6.1 Sol: 50.0%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AA-BriefcaseOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 1,441.38 eloGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,468.52 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AA-OmniscienceOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 5.3 pointsGPT-6.1 Sol: 41 pointsArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AA-Omniscience AccuracyOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 31.8%GPT-6.1 Sol: 60.4%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateOverall · lower is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 38.9%GPT-6.1 Sol: 49.0%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AutomationBench-AAOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 33.7%GPT-6.1 Sol: 64.5%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
BioMysteryBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 70.4%GPT-6.1 Sol: 79.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ClaimBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 100%GPT-6.1 Sol: 100%Vals AIAs of 10/23/2026
Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 44.6%GPT-6.1 Sol: 65.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Code Migration v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 52.4%GPT-6.1 Sol: 77.3%Vals AIAs of 10/30/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
CritPt v2 (Hard Subset)Overall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 45.0%GPT-6.1 Sol: 68.5%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
CyberBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 75.5%GPT-6.1 Sol: 39.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 59%GPT-6.1 Sol: 70.8%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMB v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 65.5%GPT-6.1 Sol: 71.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 54.1%GPT-6.1 Sol: 52%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Finance Agent v2.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 65.4%GPT-6.1 Sol: 61.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
FrontierCodeOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 23.2%GPT-6.1 Sol: 36.7%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
FrontierCode 1.1 MainOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 43.6%GPT-6.1 Sol: 46.6%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
GDP.pdfOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 17.2%GPT-6.1 Sol: 32.0%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
GDPval-AAOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 1,424.29 eloGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,520.45 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
HLAB-Vals-1.1Overall · Task fully resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 4.2%GPT-6.1 Sol: 6.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
HLE-DiamondOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 23.7%GPT-6.1 Sol: 51.9%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
ImmigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 61.8%GPT-6.1 Sol: 67.8%Vals AIAs of 10/28/2026
IOIOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 47.3%GPT-6.1 Sol: 96.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 43.8%GPT-6.1 Sol: 38.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 1,589GPT-6.1 Sol: 1,751LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 1,425GPT-6.1 Sol: 1,481LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
MedCodeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 51.5%GPT-6.1 Sol: 48.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 89.5%GPT-6.1 Sol: 86.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MysteryMechanismOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 35.1%GPT-6.1 Sol: 46.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 2.5%GPT-6.1 Sol: 3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ProofBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 89%GPT-6.1 Sol: 99%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Public Benefits Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 63.2%GPT-6.1 Sol: 59.3%Vals AIAs of 10/12/2026
SAGEOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 89.8%GPT-6.1 Sol: 90.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 5.7%GPT-6.1 Sol: 50.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SWE-bench MultimodalOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 44%GPT-6.1 Sol: 43.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 31.9%GPT-6.1 Sol: 21.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-BenchOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 21.7%GPT-6.1 Sol: 51.5%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 36.4%GPT-6.1 Sol: 55.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 10%GPT-6.1 Sol: 52.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 10.0%GPT-6.1 Sol: 46.2%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
Vals Finance IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 57.4%GPT-6.1 Sol: 55.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 58.7%GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Legal IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 70.3%GPT-6.1 Sol: 68.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Router IndexFull Index · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 58.7%GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.9%Vals AIAs of 11/03/2026
Vals Science IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 38.5%GPT-6.1 Sol: 59.6%Vals AIAs of 10/25/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 90.4%GPT-6.1 Sol: 88.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
AA-BriefcaseOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 1,523.33 eloGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,503.18 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AA-OmniscienceOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 7.833 pointsGPT-6.1 Sol: 42.367 pointsArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AA-Omniscience AccuracyOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 33.8%GPT-6.1 Sol: 61.1%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateOverall · lower is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 39.2%GPT-6.1 Sol: 48.0%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AutomationBench-AAOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 36.0%GPT-6.1 Sol: 66.6%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
BioMysteryBenchHard · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 29.4%GPT-6.1 Sol: 39.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ClaimBenchDirect support · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 100%GPT-6.1 Sol: 100%Vals AIAs of 10/23/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 36.1%GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Code Migration v1.1CLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 42.1%GPT-6.1 Sol: 74.8%Vals AIAs of 10/30/2026
CritPt v2 (Hard Subset)Overall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 47.5%GPT-6.1 Sol: 69.5%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
CyberBench v1.1Patch · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 89.3%GPT-6.1 Sol: 78.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 77.9%GPT-6.1 Sol: 61.8%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMB v1.1Comps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 77.7%GPT-6.1 Sol: 61.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 49.6%GPT-6.1 Sol: 44.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Finance Agent v2.1Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 67.7%GPT-6.1 Sol: 54.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
FrontierCodeOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 29.9%GPT-6.1 Sol: 38.5%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
FrontierCode 1.1 MainOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 45.5%GPT-6.1 Sol: 46.3%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026

More comparisons

Compare Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT-6.1 Sol with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  2. 2GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-6 Astra
  3. 3GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  4. 4Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
  5. 5Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  6. 6Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  7. 7Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  8. 8Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  9. 9Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
Show all 75 comparisons
  1. 10GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  2. 11Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3
  3. 12Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
  4. 13Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  5. 14Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  6. 15GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  7. 16Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.5
  8. 17GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  9. 18GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  10. 19GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  11. 20GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  12. 21Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5
  13. 22GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-6 Luna
  14. 23GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  15. 24Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 5
  16. 25Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  17. 26Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  18. 27Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.8
  19. 28GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Kimi K3
  20. 29Claude Opus 4.8 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  21. 30Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  22. 31Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Grok 4.7
  23. 32GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-6.1 Terra
  24. 33Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  25. 34Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  26. 35GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  27. 36Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Muse Spark 1.3
  28. 37Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.6
  29. 38Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
  30. 39Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 4
  31. 40GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  32. 41Claude Opus 4.6 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  33. 42Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  34. 43Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  35. 44GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.4 mini
  36. 45Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  37. 46Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  38. 47Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  39. 48Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  40. 49GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  41. 50Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.6
  42. 51Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Kimi K2.6
  43. 52Claude Sonnet 5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  44. 53GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GLM-5.3
  45. 54Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  46. 55GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.4
  47. 56Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  48. 57Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.7
  49. 58Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 3
  50. 59Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-5.5
  51. 60Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  52. 61GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Grok 4.7
  53. 62GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  54. 63GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.5
  55. 64GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  56. 65Claude Opus 4.7 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  57. 66Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  58. 67GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Kimi K2.6
  59. 68GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Muse Spark 1.3
  60. 69GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GLM-5.2
  61. 70GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  62. 71Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra
  63. 72GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Muse Wonder Full
  64. 73GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Muse Wonder
  65. 74Claude Haiku 4.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  66. 75GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro