Skip to main content

OpenAIMoonshot AILLM matchup

GPT-6.1 Solvs.Kimi K3

Which one is better?

GPT-6.1 Sol performs better than Kimi K3 and is cheaper: Kimi K3 costs 1.5 times as much.

GPT-6.1 Sol ahead
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
117.5

GPT-6.1 Sol

Rank 9

101.5

Kimi K3

Rank 26

Kimi K3 faster
SpeedTokens per second
54

GPT-6.1 Sol

79

Kimi K3

GPT-6.1 Sol cheaper
Price$ per 1M tokens
$4

GPT-6.1 Sol

$6

Kimi K3

Popularity0 to 100
n/a

GPT-6.1 Sol

85

Kimi K3

Rank 5 of 485

Above 272,000 tokens of context, GPT-6.1 Sol costs more: $4 input and $15 output per 1M tokens.

Choose GPT-6.1 Sol for

KnowledgeReasoningCodingMathematicsEducationMultimodalAgentsGeneral (not certain)Health (not certain)

Choose Kimi K3 for

CybersecurityProductivity

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

GPT-6.1 SolKimi K3Median of all ranked models

10011012013090CodingGPT-6.1 SolReasoningGPT-6.1 SolMathematicsGPT-6.1 SolKnowledgeGPT-6.1 SolAgentsGPT-6.1 SolGeneralslightlyGPT-6.1 SolMultimodalGPT-6.1 SolFinancelevelLegallevelHealthslightlyGPT-6.1 Sol
CodingGPT-6.1 Sol ahead
GPT-6.1 Sol120.6Rank 8
Kimi K397.3Rank 43
Median of ranked models87.5

95 % range: GPT-6.1 Sol 113.7 to 127.5, Kimi K3 90.3 to 104.2.

AreaGPT-6.1 SolKimi K3

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the close-up the net starts at 90 points, just below the weaker model's lowest value; the reference group average is 100.

GPT-6.1 Sol is ahead in 6 of 10 areas, Kimi K3 in none.

GPT-6.1 Sol ahead: 6GPT-6.1 Sol slightly ahead: 2level: 2

Areas in the overall index
KnowledgeGPT-6.1 Sol +28123.7 to 95.3
ReasoningGPT-6.1 Sol +26122.7 to 97.0
CodingGPT-6.1 Sol +23120.6 to 97.3
MathematicsGPT-6.1 Sol +23124.1 to 101.5
MultimodalGPT-6.1 Sol +16118.0 to 101.6
AgentsGPT-6.1 Sol +15112.0 to 97.4
Generalleaning GPT-6.1 Solnot certain · 7 and 5 tests
Specialist fields
Healthleaning GPT-6.1 Solnot certain · 2 tests each
Legallevel107.0 to 109.8
Financelevel105.8 to 105.3

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 4 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
EducationGPT-6.1 Sol +20119.9 to 100.3
CybersecurityKimi K3 +1693.0 to 109.3
ProductivityKimi K3 +7100.7 to 107.2
Searchonly GPT-6.1 Sol has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Kimi K3 at the same effort

Both models measured at the same reasoning efforts. This shows whether a lead comes from the model or only from more compute.

lowGPT-6.1 Sol ahead
23.9 points gap across 12 shared test series
maxGPT-6.1 Sol ahead
11.3 points gap across 4 shared test series
Overall index (max vs. max)GPT-6.1 Sol ahead
GPT-6.1 Sol 117.5 vs. Kimi K3 101.5

The gap compares only the Artificial Analysis test series in which both models are measured at that effort. Tied below 3 points, ahead only beyond two standard errors.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeGPT-6.1 SolCoding 120.6 to 97.3
Maths and data analysisGPT-6.1 SolMathematics 124.1 to 101.5, Reasoning 122.7 to 97.0
Facts and researchGPT-6.1 SolKnowledge 123.7 to 95.3, Search without a score for Kimi K3
Agents and workflowsGPT-6.1 SolAgents 112.0 to 97.4
Fast chat repliesKimi K354 to 79 tokens per second
Security analysisKimi K3Cybersecurity 93.0 to 109.3
Many requests on a small budgetGPT-6.1 Sol$4 to $6 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsleaning GPT-6.1 SolFinance 105.8 to 105.3, Legal 107.0 to 109.8, Health 110.2 to 105.0
Images, screenshots and PDFsGPT-6.1 SolMultimodal 118.0 to 101.6

GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Kimi K3 in our own test

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

GPT-6.1 Sol

GPT-6.1 Sol: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 84 s · $0.04

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
openai/gpt-6.1-sol
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
3,583 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0359
Response time
83.6 s
API model reported in response
openai/gpt-6.1-sol
Pinned endpoint
OpenAI | openai/gpt-6.1-sol-20260929
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Kimi K3

Kimi K3: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 173 s · $0.08

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
moonshotai/kimi-k3
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
5,145 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0775
Response time
173.4 s
API model reported in response
moonshotai/kimi-k3
Pinned endpoint
Moonshot AI | moonshotai/kimi-k3-20260715
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Earlier attempts (1)

  • Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

GPT-6.1 Sol

Unavailable in this round

Kimi K3

Kimi K3: SVG short test

Oct 14, 2026 · $0.0049

Test details
Test run
Oct 14, 2026
Provider
chutes/mxfp4
API model
moonshotai/kimi-k3
Output
495 tokens
Reasoning
API reports 0 reasoning tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0049
Test round
43b8c5c46830

GPT-6.1 Sol and Kimi K3 in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v5)

20 of 95 models

Claude Fable 5.2max130.9
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh127.0
Claude Opus 5.5max125.7
Claude Fable 5.1max124.1
Claude Sonnet 5.5max121.9
Gemini 4 Argonhigh121.2
GPT-6 Astramax119.6
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.4
GPT-6.1 Solmax117.5
Claude Opus 5max117.3
Muse Wondermax113.7
Claude Fable 5max112.8
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.6
Muse Ember 1.0max110.5
GPT-5.6 Solmax109.3
GPT-6 Solmax108.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.7
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max107.1
GPT-6.1 Terramax106.5
Kimi K3max101.5

Popularity compared

How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.

GPT-6.1 Sol has no popularity score yet.

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 14, 2026

GPT-6.1 SolKimi K3

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricGPT-6.1 SolKimi K3
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better117.5101.5
RankRank 9 of 95Rank 26 of 95
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$2above 272,000 tokens: $4$3
Outputwhat the model writes$10above 272,000 tokens: $15$15
Cost per task (own tests)average of 3 original-protocol tasks both models passed (SVG short test not included)$0.044$0.055
Speed
Tokens per second5479
Popularity
Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 100n/a85Rank 5 of 485
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1.05 M tokens≈ 1,580 A4 pages1.05 M tokens≈ 1,570 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffApr 30, 2026n/a
ReleasedSep 29, 2026Jul 16, 2026
AvailabilityActiveActive
Open weightsnoyes

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

Successor of Kimi K3Kimi K3.1 Pro

Overall index 112.6, rank 13$2 input and $10 output per 1M tokens

GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
As cheap as GPT-6.1 SolGemini 4 Carbon

Overall index 127.0, rank 2$2 input and $10 output per 1M tokens

GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
Best model in the overall indexClaude Fable 5.2

Overall index 130.9, rank 1$8 input and $40 output per 1M tokens

GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Claude Fable 5.2

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: GPT-6.1 SolB: Kimi K3

AA-AnalystAgentOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 50.0%Kimi K3: 38.8%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
AA-BriefcaseOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,114.1 eloKimi K3: 985.1 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
AA-OmniscienceOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 38.0 pointsKimi K3: -1.7 pointsArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
AA-Omniscience AccuracyOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 58.6%Kimi K3: 42.4%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateOverall · lower is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 49.9%Kimi K3: 76.6%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
Access to Justice BenchmarkOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 65.8%Kimi K3: 68.2%Vals AIAs of 11/10/2026
AutomationBench-AAOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 52.6%Kimi K3: 49.3%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
BioMysteryBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 79.6%Kimi K3: 72.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 65.1%Kimi K3: 16.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Code Migration v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 77.3%Kimi K3: 28.6%Vals AIAs of 10/30/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
CritPt v2 (Hard Subset)Overall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 62.5%Kimi K3: 5.5%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
CyberBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 39.3%Kimi K3: 75.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 70.8%Kimi K3: 66.7%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMB v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 71.1%Kimi K3: 71.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 52.0%Kimi K3: 53.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Finance Agent v2.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 61.8%Kimi K3: 60.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Financial Coaching BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 68.5%Kimi K3: 74.5%Vals AIAs of 11/13/2026
FrontierCodeOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 20.2%Kimi K3: 10.9%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
FrontierCode 1.1 MainOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 49.1%Kimi K3: 43.6%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
GDP.pdfOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 27.0%Kimi K3: 18.6%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
GDPval-AAOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,607.7 eloKimi K3: 1,542.8 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/10/2026
HLAB-Vals-1.1Overall · Task fully resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 6.3%Kimi K3: 12.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
HLE-DiamondOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 38.2%Kimi K3: 14.0%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
ImmigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 67.8%Kimi K3: 68.3%Vals AIAs of 10/28/2026
IOIOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 96.9%Kimi K3: 48.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 38.5%Kimi K3: 46.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,743Kimi K3: 1,658LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,481Kimi K3: 1,487LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
MedCodeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 48.8%Kimi K3: 49.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 86.5%Kimi K3: 88.0%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MMMU-ProOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 86.0%Kimi K3: 80.5%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 3%Kimi K3: 2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ProofBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 99%Kimi K3: 87%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Public Benefits Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 59.3%Kimi K3: 68.2%Vals AIAs of 10/12/2026
SAGEOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 90.5%Kimi K3: 86.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SWE-bench MultimodalOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 43.5%Kimi K3: 44.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 21.8%Kimi K3: 33.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-BenchOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 30.8%Kimi K3: 12.6%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 55.1%Kimi K3: 17.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 52.9%Kimi K3: 1.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 11.0%Kimi K3: 1.0%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
Vals Finance IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 55.8%Kimi K3: 58.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 63.9%Kimi K3: 53.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Legal IndexBusiness & Commercial · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 65.6%Kimi K3: 66.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Router IndexFull Index · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 63.9%Kimi K3: 53.0%Vals AIAs of 11/03/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 88.9%Kimi K3: 85.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
BioMysteryBenchHard · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 39.2%Kimi K3: 41.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 63.5%Kimi K3: 1.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Code Migration v1.1CLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 74.8%Kimi K3: 11.4%Vals AIAs of 10/30/2026
CyberBench v1.1Patch · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 78.6%Kimi K3: 82.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 61.8%Kimi K3: 70.8%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMB v1.1Comps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 61.2%Kimi K3: 76.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 44.7%Kimi K3: 45.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Finance Agent v2.1Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 54.7%Kimi K3: 61.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Financial Coaching BenchElicitation · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 59.5%Kimi K3: 49.6%Vals AIAs of 11/13/2026
HLAB-Vals-1.1Antitrust Competition · Criteria passed · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 90.8%Kimi K3: 93.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ImmigrationAll-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 22.5%Kimi K3: 21.4%Vals AIAs of 10/28/2026
IOIIOI 2024 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 100.0%Kimi K3: 59.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 53.0%Kimi K3: 63.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevHTML development · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,794Kimi K3: 1,640LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,480Kimi K3: 1,488LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 46.0%Kimi K3: 17.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SAGEComputer Science · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 92.4%Kimi K3: 91.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SWE-bench Multimodalbpmn-js · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 60.4%Kimi K3: 56.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026

More comparisons

Compare GPT-6.1 Sol and Kimi K3 with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1Claude Fable 5.2 vs. Kimi K3
  2. 2Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Kimi K3
  3. 3GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  4. 4Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Kimi K3
  5. 5GPT-6 Astra vs. Kimi K3
  6. 6Claude Opus 5 vs. Kimi K3
  7. 7GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-6.1 Terra
  8. 8Grok 4.7 vs. Kimi K3
  9. 9DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs. Kimi K3
Show all 65 comparisons
  1. 10DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. Kimi K3
  2. 11DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. Kimi K3
  3. 12Kimi K3 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  4. 13DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. Kimi K3
  5. 14Kimi K3 vs. GLM-5.3
  6. 15GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-6 Astra
  7. 16GPT-5.6 Luna vs. Kimi K3
  8. 17Claude Sonnet 5 vs. Kimi K3
  9. 18Kimi K3 vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  10. 19GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  11. 20GPT-6 Sol vs. Kimi K3
  12. 21Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs. Kimi K3
  13. 22GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  14. 23Muse Spark 1.3 vs. Kimi K3
  15. 24Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  16. 25Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  17. 26Claude Opus 4.8 vs. Kimi K3
  18. 27Kimi K3 vs. Mistral Large 4
  19. 28GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  20. 29GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-6 Luna
  21. 30Grok 4.5 vs. Kimi K3
  22. 31GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
  23. 32GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  24. 33Claude Opus 4.8 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  25. 34GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  26. 35GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  27. 36GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  28. 37GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.4 mini
  29. 38GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.4
  30. 39GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  31. 40GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  32. 41Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  33. 42Gemini 4 Argon vs. Kimi K3
  34. 43Claude Opus 4.6 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  35. 44GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  36. 45Claude Sonnet 5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  37. 46Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  38. 47Muse Wonder vs. Kimi K3
  39. 48GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.5
  40. 49Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  41. 50GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Grok 4.7
  42. 51Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  43. 52GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  44. 53Claude Opus 4.7 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  45. 54GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GLM-5.3
  46. 55Claude Fable 5.2 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  47. 56GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
  48. 57GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  49. 58Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  50. 59GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  51. 60GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  52. 61Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  53. 62GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  54. 63GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Muse Wonder
  55. 64Claude Haiku 4.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  56. 65Claude Opus 4.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol