Skip to main content

OpenAILLM matchup

GPT-6.1 Solvs.GPT-5.6 Luna

Is the higher price worth it?

GPT-6.1 Sol performs better than GPT-5.6 Luna, but costs 10 times (input) and 8.3 times (output) as much.

GPT-6.1 Sol ahead
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
117.5

GPT-6.1 Sol

Rank 9

93.8

GPT-5.6 Luna

Rank 44

GPT-5.6 Luna faster
SpeedTokens per second
54

GPT-6.1 Sol

86

GPT-5.6 Luna

GPT-5.6 Luna cheaper
Price$ per 1M tokens
$4

GPT-6.1 Sol

$0.45

GPT-5.6 Luna

Popularity0 to 100
n/a

GPT-6.1 Sol

83

GPT-5.6 Luna

Rank 13 of 485

Above 272,000 tokens of context, GPT-6.1 Sol costs more: $4 input and $15 output per 1M tokens. Above 272,000 tokens of context, GPT-5.6 Luna costs more: $0.40 input and $1.80 output per 1M tokens.

Choose GPT-6.1 Sol for

KnowledgeMathematicsGeneralMultimodalCodingReasoningHealthAgentsLegalFinance

No clear advantage for GPT-5.6 Luna.

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

GPT-6.1 SolGPT-5.6 LunaMedian of all ranked models

9511513575CodingGPT-6.1 SolReasoningGPT-6.1 SolMathematicsGPT-6.1 SolKnowledgeGPT-6.1 SolAgentsGPT-6.1 SolGeneralGPT-6.1 SolMultimodalGPT-6.1 SolFinanceGPT-6.1 SolLegalGPT-6.1 SolHealthGPT-6.1 Sol
CodingGPT-6.1 Sol ahead
GPT-6.1 Sol120.6Rank 8
GPT-5.6 Luna96.4Rank 45
Median of ranked models87.5

95 % range: GPT-6.1 Sol 113.7 to 127.5, GPT-5.6 Luna 86.6 to 106.2.

AreaGPT-6.1 SolGPT-5.6 Luna

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the close-up the net starts at 75 points, just below the weaker model's lowest value; the reference group average is 100.

GPT-6.1 Sol is ahead in 10 of 10 areas, GPT-5.6 Luna in none.

GPT-6.1 Sol ahead: 10

Areas in the overall index
KnowledgeGPT-6.1 Sol +43123.7 to 80.3
MathematicsGPT-6.1 Sol +29124.1 to 95.1
GeneralGPT-6.1 Sol +29119.0 to 90.1
MultimodalGPT-6.1 Sol +27118.0 to 91.2
CodingGPT-6.1 Sol +24120.6 to 96.4
ReasoningGPT-6.1 Sol +23122.7 to 99.9
AgentsGPT-6.1 Sol +13112.0 to 98.6
Specialist fields
HealthGPT-6.1 Sol +19110.2 to 91.5
LegalGPT-6.1 Sol +11107.0 to 96.2
FinanceGPT-6.1 Sol +7105.8 to 99.2

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 4 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
Cybersecuritytoo little data93.0 to 102.2
Productivitytoo little data100.7 to 91.7
Searchonly GPT-6.1 Sol has a score
Educationonly GPT-6.1 Sol has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Luna at the same effort

Both models measured at the same reasoning efforts. This shows whether a lead comes from the model or only from more compute.

maxGPT-6.1 Sol ahead
31.6 points gap across 11 shared test series
Overall index (max vs. max)GPT-6.1 Sol ahead
GPT-6.1 Sol 117.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna 93.8

The gap compares only the Artificial Analysis test series in which both models are measured at that effort. Tied below 3 points, ahead only beyond two standard errors.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeGPT-6.1 SolCoding 120.6 to 96.4
Maths and data analysisGPT-6.1 SolMathematics 124.1 to 95.1, Reasoning 122.7 to 99.9
Facts and researchGPT-6.1 SolKnowledge 123.7 to 80.3, Search without a score for GPT-5.6 Luna
Agents and workflowsGPT-6.1 SolAgents 112.0 to 98.6
Fast chat repliesGPT-5.6 Luna54 to 86 tokens per second
Security analysisopenCybersecurity 93.0 to 102.2 (too little data)
Many requests on a small budgetGPT-5.6 Luna$4 to $0.45 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsGPT-6.1 SolFinance 105.8 to 99.2, Legal 107.0 to 96.2, Health 110.2 to 91.5
Images, screenshots and PDFsGPT-6.1 SolMultimodal 118.0 to 91.2

GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Luna in our own test

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

GPT-6.1 Sol

GPT-6.1 Sol: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 84 s · $0.04

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
openai/gpt-6.1-sol
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
3,583 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0359
Response time
83.6 s
API model reported in response
openai/gpt-6.1-sol
Pinned endpoint
OpenAI | openai/gpt-6.1-sol-20260929
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

GPT-5.6 Luna

GPT-5.6 Luna: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Sep 7, 2026 · 50 s · $0.0038

Test details
Run date
Sep 7, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
openai/gpt-5.6-luna
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
3,164 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0038
Response time
49.9 s
API model reported in response
openai/gpt-5.6-luna
Pinned endpoint
OpenAI | openai/gpt-5.6-luna-20260709
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

GPT-6.1 Sol

Unavailable in this round

GPT-5.6 Luna

Unavailable in this round

GPT-6.1 Sol and GPT-5.6 Luna in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v5)

20 of 95 models

Claude Fable 5.2max130.9
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh127.0
Claude Opus 5.5max125.7
Claude Fable 5.1max124.1
Claude Sonnet 5.5max121.9
Gemini 4 Argonhigh121.2
GPT-6 Astramax119.6
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.4
GPT-6.1 Solmax117.5
Claude Opus 5max117.3
Muse Wondermax113.7
Claude Fable 5max112.8
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.6
Muse Ember 1.0max110.5
GPT-5.6 Solmax109.3
GPT-6 Solmax108.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.7
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max107.1
GPT-6.1 Terramax106.5
GPT-5.6 Lunamax93.8

Popularity compared

How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.

GPT-6.1 Sol has no popularity score yet.

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 14, 2026

GPT-6.1 SolGPT-5.6 Luna

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricGPT-6.1 SolGPT-5.6 Luna
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better117.593.8
RankRank 9 of 95Rank 44 of 95
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$2above 272,000 tokens: $4$0.20above 272,000 tokens: $0.40
Outputwhat the model writes$10above 272,000 tokens: $15$1.20above 272,000 tokens: $1.80
Cost per task (own tests)average of 3 original-protocol tasks both models passed (SVG short test not included)$0.044$0.008
Speed
Tokens per second5486
Popularity
Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 100n/a83Rank 13 of 485
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1.05 M tokens≈ 1,580 A4 pages1.05 M tokens≈ 1,580 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffApr 30, 2026Feb 16, 2026
ReleasedSep 29, 2026Jul 9, 2026
AvailabilityActiveActive
Open weightsnono

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

Successor of GPT-5.6 LunaGPT-6 Luna

Overall index 95.6, rank 40$0.10 input and $0.50 output per 1M tokens

GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-6 Luna
Cheaper than GPT-5.6 LunaMuse Ember 1.0

Overall index 110.5, rank 14$0.10 input and $0.50 output per 1M tokens

View profile
Best model in the overall indexClaude Fable 5.2

Overall index 130.9, rank 1$8 input and $40 output per 1M tokens

GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Claude Fable 5.2

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: GPT-6.1 SolB: GPT-5.6 Luna

AA-BriefcaseOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,554.7 eloGPT-5.6 Luna: 1,338.9 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/10/2026
AA-OmniscienceOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 42.0 pointsGPT-5.6 Luna: -17.1 pointsArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
AA-Omniscience AccuracyOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 61.8%GPT-5.6 Luna: 39.1%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateOverall · lower is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 51.9%GPT-5.6 Luna: 92.3%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
Access to Justice BenchmarkOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 65.8%GPT-5.6 Luna: 65.6%Vals AIAs of 11/10/2026
AutomationBench-AAOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 64.9%GPT-5.6 Luna: 50.2%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
BioMysteryBenchOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 79.6%GPT-5.6 Luna: 61.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 65.1%GPT-5.6 Luna: 44.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CritPt v2 (Hard Subset)Overall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 69.5%GPT-5.6 Luna: 30.5%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
CyberBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 39.3%GPT-5.6 Luna: 73.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
EMBOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 70.8%GPT-5.6 Luna: 67.1%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 52%GPT-5.6 Luna: 55%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Financial Coaching BenchOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 68.5%GPT-5.6 Luna: 69.3%Vals AIAs of 11/13/2026
FrontierCodeOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 40.6%GPT-5.6 Luna: 17.6%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
GDP.pdfOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 31.0%GPT-5.6 Luna: 24.0%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
GDPval-AAOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,607.7 eloGPT-5.6 Luna: 1,468.2 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/10/2026
HLE-DiamondOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 58.8%GPT-5.6 Luna: 20.9%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
IOIOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 96.9%GPT-5.6 Luna: 61.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 38.5%GPT-5.6 Luna: 36.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,481GPT-5.6 Luna: 1,453LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,293GPT-5.6 Luna: 1,255LMArenaAs of 11/09/2026
MedCodeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 48.8%GPT-5.6 Luna: 42.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 86.5%GPT-5.6 Luna: 84.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MMMU-ProOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 86.0%GPT-5.6 Luna: 78.6%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
MysteryMechanismOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 46.4%GPT-5.6 Luna: 14.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 3%GPT-5.6 Luna: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ProofBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 99%GPT-5.6 Luna: 60%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Public Benefits Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 59.3%GPT-5.6 Luna: 61.2%Vals AIAs of 10/12/2026
SRE BenchOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 50.8%GPT-5.6 Luna: 1.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 21.8%GPT-5.6 Luna: 24.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-BenchOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 56.1%GPT-5.6 Luna: 11.6%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 55.1%GPT-5.6 Luna: 11.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 52.9%GPT-5.6 Luna: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 58.1%GPT-5.6 Luna: 3.3%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
Vals Science IndexOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 59.6%GPT-5.6 Luna: 25.3%Vals AIAs of 10/25/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 88.9%GPT-5.6 Luna: 77.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
BioMysteryBenchHard · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 39.2%GPT-5.6 Luna: 27.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 63.5%GPT-5.6 Luna: 36.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1Patch · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 78.6%GPT-5.6 Luna: 83.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 61.8%GPT-5.6 Luna: 54.6%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 44.7%GPT-5.6 Luna: 52.0%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Financial Coaching BenchElicitation · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 59.5%GPT-5.6 Luna: 54.4%Vals AIAs of 11/13/2026
IOIIOI 2024 · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 100%GPT-5.6 Luna: 85%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 53.0%GPT-5.6 Luna: 48.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,480GPT-5.6 Luna: 1,462LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,348GPT-5.6 Luna: 1,285LMArenaAs of 11/09/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 46%GPT-5.6 Luna: 9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchCapability Score · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 56.3%GPT-5.6 Luna: 6.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 6.7%GPT-5.6 Luna: 10.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Hardware · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 40%GPT-5.6 Luna: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEarth Sciences · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 62.5%GPT-5.6 Luna: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Science IndexBioMysteryBench · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 79.6%GPT-5.6 Luna: 61.5%Vals AIAs of 10/25/2026
BioMysteryBenchHuman-solvable · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 89.0%GPT-5.6 Luna: 69.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCOBOL · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 70%GPT-5.6 Luna: 70%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1PoC · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 0.0%GPT-5.6 Luna: 63.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBDataroom · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 84.5%GPT-5.6 Luna: 83.0%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)All-Pass · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 39.9%GPT-5.6 Luna: 43.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Financial Coaching BenchLength-Controlled · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 69.9%GPT-5.6 Luna: 69.5%Vals AIAs of 11/13/2026
IOIIOI 2025 · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 100.0%GPT-5.6 Luna: 49.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 85.5%GPT-5.6 Luna: 87.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,531GPT-5.6 Luna: 1,478LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlCreative writing with images · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,303GPT-5.6 Luna: 1,257LMArenaAs of 11/09/2026
ProgramBenchFully Resolved · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 3%GPT-5.6 Luna: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchFully Solved · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 50.8%GPT-5.6 Luna: 1.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026

More comparisons

Compare GPT-6.1 Sol and GPT-5.6 Luna with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  2. 2Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  3. 3GPT-5.6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  4. 4Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  5. 5GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-6.1 Terra
  6. 6GPT-5.6 Luna vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  7. 7GPT-5.6 Luna vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  8. 8GPT-5.6 Luna vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  9. 9GPT-5.6 Luna vs. GPT-5.4 mini
Show all 75 comparisons
  1. 10GPT-6 Astra vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  2. 11GPT-5.6 Luna vs. Grok 4.7
  3. 12GPT-5.6 Luna vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  4. 13GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-6 Astra
  5. 14Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  6. 15Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  7. 16GPT-5.6 Luna vs. Kimi K3
  8. 17GPT-5.6 Luna vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  9. 18Claude Sonnet 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  10. 19GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  11. 20GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  12. 21GPT-5.6 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  13. 22GPT-5.6 Luna vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  14. 23GPT-5.6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
  15. 24GPT-5.6 Luna vs. Kimi K2.6
  16. 25Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  17. 26GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  18. 27GPT-5.6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  19. 28GPT-5.6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
  20. 29GPT-5.6 Luna vs. MiMo-V2.5-Pro
  21. 30Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  22. 31Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  23. 32GPT-5.6 Luna vs. GPT-5.4
  24. 33GPT-5.6 Luna vs. Mistral Large 4
  25. 34Claude Opus 4.6 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  26. 35GPT-5.6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  27. 36GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  28. 37GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-6 Luna
  29. 38GPT-5.6 Luna vs. GPT-5.5
  30. 39Claude Haiku 4.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  31. 40GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
  32. 41Claude Opus 4.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  33. 42GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  34. 43Claude Opus 4.8 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  35. 44GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  36. 45GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  37. 46GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  38. 47GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.4 mini
  39. 48GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.4
  40. 49GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  41. 50GPT-6.1 Terra vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  42. 51GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  43. 52Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  44. 53Claude Opus 4.6 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  45. 54Claude Sonnet 5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  46. 55GPT-5.6 Luna vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  47. 56Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  48. 57GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.5
  49. 58Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  50. 59GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Grok 4.7
  51. 60Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  52. 61GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  53. 62Claude Opus 4.7 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  54. 63GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GLM-5.3
  55. 64Claude Fable 5.2 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  56. 65GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
  57. 66GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  58. 67Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  59. 68GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  60. 69GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  61. 70GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Kimi K3
  62. 71Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  63. 72GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  64. 73GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Muse Wonder
  65. 74Claude Haiku 4.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  66. 75Claude Opus 4.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol