Compare published benchmark results from matching versions and cohorts, API pricing, and technical specifications. Any documented test setup differences remain visible.
shared result series
178
distinct benchmarks
19
latest retrieval
2026-10-15
Change model selection
Specifications
General specifications
Release date, availability, context window, architecture, and published parameter counts at a glance. Undisclosed details remain marked as unavailable.
The table compares official standard API rates per 1M tokens, including published cache pricing. Batch, fast, priority, regional surcharges, tool calls, and cloud platform pricing are excluded.
Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie
Pricing by provider
Direct developer pricing and provider endpoint tariffs routed through OpenRouter are listed separately. Prices are in USD per 1M tokens. Context-dependent direct tiers plus regional, Flex, Priority, and other OpenRouter tariffs remain individually identifiable.
No provider tariff for GPT-6.1 Sol is available in the stored OpenRouter snapshot. The official direct price is still shown.
No provider tariff for Muse Wonder is available in the stored OpenRouter snapshot. The official direct price is still shown.
Only published results with the same benchmark version, task, metric, and comparison cohort are paired. Different reasoning levels, agents, harnesses, or output limits appear directly in the table.
Capability profile from matched benchmarks
Each axis averages directly matched benchmark families. A value of 100 means the stronger value within this pair, not a universal quality score.
GPT-6.1 Sol
Muse Wonder
Coding: 99.4 / 97.1 (2 benchmark families)
Reasoning: 99.2 / 99.8 (1 benchmark family)
Knowledge: 99.3 / 100 (1 benchmark family)
Finance: 98.9 / 100 (1 benchmark family)
General: 98.1 / 100 (1 benchmark family)
22 matched rows from 2 benchmark families were considered. The radar shows 5 of 5 comparable categories.
GPT-6.1 SolMuse Wonder
BioMysteryBenchOverall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
GPT-6.1 SolHigher measured value79.63 %
Muse Wonder67.037 %
Code MigrationOverall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
GPT-6.1 SolHigher measured value65.122 %
Muse Wonder62.552 %
CyberBench v1.1Overall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
GPT-6.1 Sol39.286 %
Muse WonderHigher measured value80.357 %
EMBOverall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
GPT-6.1 SolHigher measured value70.773 %
Muse Wonder67.084 %
Finance Agent (v2)Overall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
GPT-6.1 Sol52.033 %
Muse WonderHigher measured value56.637 %
Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkOverall · Task fully resolved. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
GPT-6.1 Sol5.417 %
Muse WonderHigher measured value17.083 %
IOIOverall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
GPT-6.1 SolHigher measured value96.889 %
Muse Wonder66.944 %
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
GPT-6.1 Sol38.462 %
Muse WonderHigher measured value50.481 %
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-6.1 SolWinner1,760.088
Muse Wonder1,650.947
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall. Higher is better. No documented setup difference
GPT-6.1 Sol1,483.959
Muse WonderWinner1,512.671
MysteryMechanismOverall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
GPT-6.1 SolHigher measured value46.396 %
Muse Wonder27.477 %
ProofBenchOverall. Higher is better. Test setup not documented as identical
GPT-6.1 SolHigher measured value99 %
Muse Wonder84 %
Key to the marks:better valuebetter, but not conclusivetie
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: webdevMetric: WebDev Arena Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: Snapshot: gpt-6.1-sol-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev Muse Wonder: Snapshot: muse-wonder-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDevGPT-6.1 Sol: Arena rating from 2,592 published pairwise votes.Muse Wonder: Arena rating from 1,228 published pairwise votes.
Winner1,760.088
95% confidence interval: ±13.918The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
1,650.947
95% confidence interval: ±18.263The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: Snapshot: gpt-6.1-sol-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Text, style control Muse Wonder: Snapshot: muse-wonder-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Text, style controlGPT-6.1 Sol: Arena rating from 5,762 published pairwise votes.Muse Wonder: Arena rating from 1,944 published pairwise votes.
1,483.959
95% confidence interval: ±8.383The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
Winner1,512.671
95% confidence interval: ±13.236The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: webdevMetric: WebDev Arena Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: Snapshot: gpt-6.1-sol-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev Muse Wonder: Snapshot: muse-wonder-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDevGPT-6.1 Sol: Arena rating from 2,592 published pairwise votes.Muse Wonder: Arena rating from 1,228 published pairwise votes.
Winner1,760.088
95% confidence interval: ±13.918The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
1,650.947
95% confidence interval: ±18.263The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and financeTest details
No documented difference in the test setupNo clear leadVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: Snapshot: gpt-6.1-sol-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Text, style control Muse Wonder: Snapshot: muse-wonder-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Text, style controlGPT-6.1 Sol: Arena rating from 911 published pairwise votes.Muse Wonder: Arena rating from 338 published pairwise votes.
1,483.743
95% confidence interval: ±19.566The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
No clear lead1,500.247
95% confidence interval: ±30.856The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
No documented difference in the test setupNo clear leadVersion: webdevMetric: WebDev Arena Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: Snapshot: gpt-6.1-sol-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev Muse Wonder: Snapshot: muse-wonder-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDevGPT-6.1 Sol: Arena rating from 443 published pairwise votes.Muse Wonder: Arena rating from 158 published pairwise votes.
No clear lead1,795.266
95% confidence interval: ±34.707The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
1,721.908
95% confidence interval: ±51.47The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
No documented difference in the test setupNo clear leadVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: Snapshot: gpt-6.1-sol-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Text, style control Muse Wonder: Snapshot: muse-wonder-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Text, style controlGPT-6.1 Sol: Arena rating from 1,164 published pairwise votes.Muse Wonder: Arena rating from 487 published pairwise votes.
1,538.321
95% confidence interval: ±17.762The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
No clear lead1,557.956
95% confidence interval: ±26.189The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
No documented difference in the test setupVersion: webdevMetric: WebDev Arena Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: Snapshot: gpt-6.1-sol-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDev Muse Wonder: Snapshot: muse-wonder-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Code Arena WebDevGPT-6.1 Sol: Arena rating from 1,648 published pairwise votes.Muse Wonder: Arena rating from 787 published pairwise votes.
Winner1,760.774
95% confidence interval: ±17.324The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
1,637.813
95% confidence interval: ±23.199The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
No documented difference in the test setupNo clear leadVersion: style-control-v1Metric: style-controlled Bradley-Terry ratingScoring: Higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: Snapshot: gpt-6.1-sol-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Text, style control Muse Wonder: Snapshot: muse-wonder-max, Reasoning: max, Harness: Arena Text, style controlGPT-6.1 Sol: Arena rating from 1,290 published pairwise votes.Muse Wonder: Arena rating from 427 published pairwise votes.
1,460.414
95% confidence interval: ±17.645The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
No clear lead1,485.682
95% confidence interval: ±29.474The Arena score measures human preference rather than a fixed capability test. The confidence interval, Arena category, and model configuration are part of the result.
Your workload, budget, and required context length matter most. A coding benchmark says little about visual understanding or agent performance.
The standard price table uses direct developer rates. The provider comparison labels OpenRouter endpoints, regions, and special tariffs separately.
Every result links to its measurement source and retrieval date. Labels distinguish vendor reports, official benchmark leaderboards, and independent evaluations. Disputed or archived results are excluded.
More matchups
Related LLM comparisons
Compare GPT-6.1 Sol and Muse Wonder with other leading models using the same data and benchmark logic.
