Skip to main content

OpenAIGoogleLLM matchup

GPT-6.1 Solvs.Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Which one is better?

GPT-6.1 Sol performs better than Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite, but costs 6.7 times (input) and 4 times (output) as much.

GPT-6.1 Sol ahead
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
117.5

GPT-6.1 Sol

Rank 9

72.4

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Rank 67

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite faster
SpeedTokens per second
54

GPT-6.1 Sol

140

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite cheaper
Price$ per 1M tokens
$4

GPT-6.1 Sol

$0.85

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Popularity0 to 100
n/a

GPT-6.1 Sol

71

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Rank 38 of 485

Above 272,000 tokens of context, GPT-6.1 Sol costs more: $4 input and $15 output per 1M tokens.

Choose GPT-6.1 Sol for

GeneralCodingReasoningEducationKnowledgeAgentsHealthProductivityLegalMultimodalFinance

No clear advantage for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite.

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

GPT-6.1 SolGemini 3.5 Flash-LiteMedian of all ranked models

759511513555CodingGPT-6.1 SolReasoningGPT-6.1 SolKnowledgeGPT-6.1 SolAgentsGPT-6.1 SolGeneralGPT-6.1 SolMultimodalGPT-6.1 SolFinanceGPT-6.1 SolLegalGPT-6.1 SolHealthGPT-6.1 Sol
CodingGPT-6.1 Sol ahead
GPT-6.1 Sol120.6Rank 8
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite68.6Rank 81
Median of ranked models87.5

95 % range: GPT-6.1 Sol 113.7 to 127.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 62.1 to 75.1.

AreaGPT-6.1 SolGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the close-up the net starts at 55 points, just below the weaker model's lowest value; the reference group average is 100. Not in the net because a model has no own value there or the data are too thin: Mathematics.

GPT-6.1 Sol is ahead in 9 of 10 areas, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite in none.

GPT-6.1 Sol ahead: 9too little data: 1

Areas in the overall index
GeneralGPT-6.1 Sol +55119.0 to 64.0
CodingGPT-6.1 Sol +52120.6 to 68.6
ReasoningGPT-6.1 Sol +51122.7 to 71.6
KnowledgeGPT-6.1 Sol +46123.7 to 77.9
AgentsGPT-6.1 Sol +42112.0 to 69.9
MultimodalGPT-6.1 Sol +34118.0 to 83.6
Mathematicsonly GPT-6.1 Sol has a score
Specialist fields
HealthGPT-6.1 Sol +37110.2 to 72.8
LegalGPT-6.1 Sol +34107.0 to 72.5
FinanceGPT-6.1 Sol +31105.8 to 74.7

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 4 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
EducationGPT-6.1 Sol +50119.9 to 69.6
ProductivityGPT-6.1 Sol +36100.7 to 64.7
Cybersecuritytoo little data93.0 to 70.7
Searchonly GPT-6.1 Sol has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite at the same effort

Both models measured at the same reasoning efforts. This shows whether a lead comes from the model or only from more compute.

highGPT-6.1 Sol ahead
49.0 points gap across 11 shared test series
Overall index (max vs. high)GPT-6.1 Sol ahead
GPT-6.1 Sol 117.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 72.4

The gap compares only the Artificial Analysis test series in which both models are measured at that effort. Tied below 3 points, ahead only beyond two standard errors.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeGPT-6.1 SolCoding 120.6 to 68.6
Maths and data analysisGPT-6.1 SolMathematics without a score for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite, Reasoning 122.7 to 71.6
Facts and researchGPT-6.1 SolKnowledge 123.7 to 77.9, Search without a score for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Agents and workflowsGPT-6.1 SolAgents 112.0 to 69.9
Fast chat repliesGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite54 to 140 tokens per second
Security analysisopenCybersecurity 93.0 to 70.7 (too little data)
Many requests on a small budgetGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite$4 to $0.85 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsGPT-6.1 SolFinance 105.8 to 74.7, Legal 107.0 to 72.5, Health 110.2 to 72.8
Images, screenshots and PDFsGPT-6.1 SolMultimodal 118.0 to 83.6

GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite in our own test

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

GPT-6.1 Sol

GPT-6.1 Sol: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 84 s · $0.04

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
openai/gpt-6.1-sol
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
3,583 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0359
Response time
83.6 s
API model reported in response
openai/gpt-6.1-sol
Pinned endpoint
OpenAI | openai/gpt-6.1-sol-20260929
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 2, 2026 · 14 s · $0.01

Test details
Run date
Oct 2, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
google/gemini-3.5-flash-lite
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
5,414 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0135
Response time
14.3 s
API model reported in response
google/gemini-3.5-flash-lite
Pinned endpoint
Google AI Studio | google/gemini-3.5-flash-lite-20260721
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Earlier attempts (2)

  • Oct 1, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
  • Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

GPT-6.1 Sol

Unavailable in this round

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Unavailable in this round

GPT-6.1 Sol and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v5)

20 of 95 models

Claude Fable 5.2max130.9
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh127.0
Claude Opus 5.5max125.7
Claude Fable 5.1max124.1
Claude Sonnet 5.5max121.9
Gemini 4 Argonhigh121.2
GPT-6 Astramax119.6
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.4
GPT-6.1 Solmax117.5
Claude Opus 5max117.3
Muse Wondermax113.7
Claude Fable 5max112.8
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.6
Muse Ember 1.0max110.5
GPT-5.6 Solmax109.3
GPT-6 Solmax108.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.7
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max107.1
GPT-6.1 Terramax106.5
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Litehigh72.4

Popularity compared

How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.

GPT-6.1 Sol has no popularity score yet.

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 14, 2026

GPT-6.1 SolGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricGPT-6.1 SolGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better117.572.4
RankRank 9 of 95Rank 67 of 95
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$2above 272,000 tokens: $4$0.30
Outputwhat the model writes$10above 272,000 tokens: $15$2.50
Cost per task (own tests)average of 3 original-protocol tasks both models passed (SVG short test not included)$0.044$0.022
Speed
Tokens per second54140
Popularity
Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 100n/a71Rank 38 of 485
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1.05 M tokens≈ 1,580 A4 pages1.05 M tokens≈ 1,570 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffApr 30, 2026n/a
ReleasedSep 29, 2026Jul 21, 2026
AvailabilityActiveActive
Open weightsnono

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

Cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteMuse Ember 1.0

Overall index 110.5, rank 14$0.10 input and $0.50 output per 1M tokens

View profile
Best model in the overall indexClaude Fable 5.2

Overall index 130.9, rank 1$8 input and $40 output per 1M tokens

GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Claude Fable 5.2

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: GPT-6.1 SolB: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 65.1%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 6.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 39.3%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 59.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 70.8%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 43.2%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 52.0%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 47.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Financial Coaching BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 68.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 57.5%Vals AIAs of 11/13/2026
ImmigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 67.8%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 55.7%Vals AIAs of 10/28/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 38.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 13.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,743Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 1,432LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,481Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 1,455LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,293Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 1,266LMArenaAs of 11/09/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
MedCodeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 48.8%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 43.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 86.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 70.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 3%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Public Benefits Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 59.3%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 51.8%Vals AIAs of 10/12/2026
SAGEOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 90.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 79.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 21.8%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 7.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 88.9%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 37.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 63.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 5.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1Patch · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 78.6%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 73.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 61.8%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 46.4%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 44.7%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 41.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Financial Coaching BenchElicitation · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 59.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 51.3%Vals AIAs of 11/13/2026
ImmigrationAll-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 22.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 14.1%Vals AIAs of 10/28/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 53.0%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 19.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevImage to WebDev · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,696Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 1,449LMArenaAs of 11/10/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,480Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 1,453LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,348Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 1,306LMArenaAs of 11/09/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 46%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SAGEComputer Science · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 92.4%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 82.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 6.7%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 3.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCOBOL · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 70%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1PoC · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 0%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 45%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBDataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 84.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 57.7%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)All-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 39.9%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 35.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Financial Coaching BenchLength-Controlled · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 69.9%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 58.1%Vals AIAs of 11/13/2026
ImmigrationContent Checks · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 65.1%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 51.7%Vals AIAs of 10/28/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 85.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 72.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevReact development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,747Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 1,407LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,531Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 1,485LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlCreative writing with images · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,303Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 1,252LMArenaAs of 11/09/2026
ProgramBenchFully Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 3%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SAGELinear Algebra · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 87.2%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 70.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 64.8%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 34.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCode Quality · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 4.496 / 5Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 2.652 / 5Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBDCF · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 65.3%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 33.6%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Comparables · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 42.6%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 45.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ImmigrationIntake Checks · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 39.6%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 31.5%Vals AIAs of 10/28/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 39.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 7.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevWeb development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,743Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 1,432LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCoding · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,540Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 1,502LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlDiagram understanding · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,327Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 1,287LMArenaAs of 11/09/2026
ProgramBenchRaw Pass Rate · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 85.3%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 33.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SAGEPartial Differential Equations · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 90.7%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 85.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 33.3%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 3.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBLBO · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 64.4%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 40.1%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Disclosure Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 58.4%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 56.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 84.2%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 73.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCreative writing · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,449Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 1,436LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlEnglish · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,287Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 1,266LMArenaAs of 11/09/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 63.4%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 24.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBM&A · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 83.9%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 43.2%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Earnings Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 71.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 64.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchCivil Litigation · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 29.6%Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 11.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlEnglish · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,491Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 1,461LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026

More comparisons

Compare GPT-6.1 Sol and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
  2. 2GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  3. 3GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
  4. 4Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
  5. 5GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-6.1 Terra
  6. 6Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
  7. 7GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-6 Astra
  8. 8Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  9. 9Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Show all 55 comparisons
  1. 10GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  2. 11Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs. GLM-5.3
  3. 12GPT-5.6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
  4. 13Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  5. 14GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  6. 15Gemini 3.7 Flash vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
  7. 16Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  8. 17Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  9. 18GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  10. 19GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-6 Luna
  11. 20Claude Haiku 4.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
  12. 21GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
  13. 22GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  14. 23Claude Opus 4.8 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  15. 24GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  16. 25GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  17. 26GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  18. 27GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.4 mini
  19. 28GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.4
  20. 29GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  21. 30GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  22. 31Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  23. 32Claude Opus 4.6 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  24. 33GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  25. 34Claude Sonnet 5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  26. 35Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  27. 36GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.5
  28. 37Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  29. 38Gemini 4 Argon vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
  30. 39GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Grok 4.7
  31. 40Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  32. 41GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  33. 42Claude Opus 4.7 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  34. 43GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GLM-5.3
  35. 44Claude Fable 5.2 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  36. 45GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
  37. 46GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  38. 47Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  39. 48GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  40. 49GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  41. 50GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Kimi K3
  42. 51Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  43. 52GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  44. 53GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Muse Wonder
  45. 54Claude Haiku 4.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  46. 55Claude Opus 4.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol