Skip to main content

OpenAIDeepSeekLLM matchup

GPT-6.1 Solvs.DeepSeek-V4-Pro

Which one is better?

GPT-6.1 Sol performs better than DeepSeek-V4-Pro, but costs 3 times (input) and 5.1 times (output) as much.

GPT-6.1 Sol ahead
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
117.5

GPT-6.1 Sol

Rank 9

87.1

DeepSeek-V4-Pro

Rank 48

GPT-6.1 Sol faster
SpeedTokens per second
54

GPT-6.1 Sol

42

DeepSeek-V4-Pro

DeepSeek-V4-Pro cheaper
Price$ per 1M tokens
$4

GPT-6.1 Sol

$0.99

DeepSeek-V4-Pro

Popularity0 to 100
n/a

GPT-6.1 Sol

75

DeepSeek-V4-Pro

Rank 26 of 485

Above 272,000 tokens of context, GPT-6.1 Sol costs more: $4 input and $15 output per 1M tokens.

Choose GPT-6.1 Sol for

MathematicsReasoningKnowledgeGeneralHealthCodingLegalFinanceAgents

No clear advantage for DeepSeek-V4-Pro.

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

GPT-6.1 SolDeepSeek-V4-ProMedian of all ranked models

9011013070CodingGPT-6.1 SolReasoningGPT-6.1 SolMathematicsGPT-6.1 SolKnowledgeGPT-6.1 SolAgentsGPT-6.1 SolGeneralGPT-6.1 SolFinanceGPT-6.1 SolLegalGPT-6.1 SolHealthGPT-6.1 Sol
CodingGPT-6.1 Sol ahead
GPT-6.1 Sol120.6Rank 8
DeepSeek-V4-Pro91.1Rank 53
Median of ranked models87.5

95 % range: GPT-6.1 Sol 113.7 to 127.5, DeepSeek-V4-Pro 85.5 to 96.6.

AreaGPT-6.1 SolDeepSeek-V4-Pro

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the close-up the net starts at 70 points, just below the weaker model's lowest value; the reference group average is 100. Not in the net because a model has no own value there or the data are too thin: Multimodal.

GPT-6.1 Sol is ahead in 9 of 10 areas, DeepSeek-V4-Pro in none.

GPT-6.1 Sol ahead: 9too little data: 1

Areas in the overall index
MathematicsGPT-6.1 Sol +39124.1 to 85.3
ReasoningGPT-6.1 Sol +39122.7 to 84.1
KnowledgeGPT-6.1 Sol +35123.7 to 89.1
GeneralGPT-6.1 Sol +31119.0 to 87.6
CodingGPT-6.1 Sol +30120.6 to 91.1
AgentsGPT-6.1 Sol +18112.0 to 93.9
Multimodalonly GPT-6.1 Sol has a score
Specialist fields
HealthGPT-6.1 Sol +31110.2 to 79.4
LegalGPT-6.1 Sol +24107.0 to 83.1
FinanceGPT-6.1 Sol +18105.8 to 87.4

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 4 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
Productivitytoo little data100.7 to 90.9
Cybersecurityonly GPT-6.1 Sol has a score
Searchonly GPT-6.1 Sol has a score
Educationonly GPT-6.1 Sol has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro at the same effort

Both models measured at the same reasoning efforts. This shows whether a lead comes from the model or only from more compute.

maxGPT-6.1 Sol ahead
30.3 points gap across 11 shared test series
Overall index (max vs. max)GPT-6.1 Sol ahead
GPT-6.1 Sol 117.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro 87.1

The gap compares only the Artificial Analysis test series in which both models are measured at that effort. Tied below 3 points, ahead only beyond two standard errors.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeGPT-6.1 SolCoding 120.6 to 91.1
Maths and data analysisGPT-6.1 SolMathematics 124.1 to 85.3, Reasoning 122.7 to 84.1
Facts and researchGPT-6.1 SolKnowledge 123.7 to 89.1, Search without a score for DeepSeek-V4-Pro
Agents and workflowsGPT-6.1 SolAgents 112.0 to 93.9
Fast chat repliesGPT-6.1 Sol54 to 42 tokens per second
Security analysisopenCybersecurity without a score for DeepSeek-V4-Pro
Many requests on a small budgetDeepSeek-V4-Pro$4 to $0.99 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsGPT-6.1 SolFinance 105.8 to 87.4, Legal 107.0 to 83.1, Health 110.2 to 79.4
Images, screenshots and PDFsopenMultimodal without a score for DeepSeek-V4-Pro

GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro in our own test

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

GPT-6.1 Sol

GPT-6.1 Sol: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 84 s · $0.04

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
openai/gpt-6.1-sol
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
3,583 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0359
Response time
83.6 s
API model reported in response
openai/gpt-6.1-sol
Pinned endpoint
OpenAI | openai/gpt-6.1-sol-20260929
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro

The response reached the token limit. No complete recording is available.

Oct 5, 2026 · 68 s · $0.02

Not yet visually reviewed. A successful recording does not confirm correct physics or full compliance with the prompt.

Test details
Run date
Oct 5, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0813
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
8,192 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0163
Response time
67.6 s
API model reported in response
deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0813
Pinned endpoint
DeepSeek | deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-20260813
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Failed

Earlier attempts (3)

  • Oct 2, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
  • Oct 1, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
  • Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

GPT-6.1 Sol

Unavailable in this round

DeepSeek-V4-Pro

DeepSeek-V4-Pro: SVG short test

Oct 14, 2026 · $0.0020

Test details
Test run
Oct 14, 2026
Provider
streamlake
API model
deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0813
Output
963 tokens
Reasoning
API reports 0 reasoning tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0020
Test round
43b8c5c46830

GPT-6.1 Sol and DeepSeek-V4-Pro in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v5)

20 of 95 models

Claude Fable 5.2max130.9
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh127.0
Claude Opus 5.5max125.7
Claude Fable 5.1max124.1
Claude Sonnet 5.5max121.9
Gemini 4 Argonhigh121.2
GPT-6 Astramax119.6
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.4
GPT-6.1 Solmax117.5
Claude Opus 5max117.3
Muse Wondermax113.7
Claude Fable 5max112.8
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.6
Muse Ember 1.0max110.5
GPT-5.6 Solmax109.3
GPT-6 Solmax108.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.7
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max107.1
GPT-6.1 Terramax106.5
DeepSeek-V4-Promax87.1

Popularity compared

How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.

GPT-6.1 Sol has no popularity score yet.

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 14, 2026

GPT-6.1 SolDeepSeek-V4-Pro

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricGPT-6.1 SolDeepSeek-V4-Pro
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better117.587.1
RankRank 9 of 95Rank 48 of 95
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$2above 272,000 tokens: $4$0.66
Outputwhat the model writes$10above 272,000 tokens: $15$1.98
Cost per task (own tests)average of 1 original-protocol task both models passed (SVG short test not included)$0.038$0.021
Speed
Tokens per second5442
Popularity
Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 100n/a75Rank 26 of 485
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1.05 M tokens≈ 1,580 A4 pages1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffApr 30, 2026n/a
ReleasedSep 29, 2026Apr 24, 2026
AvailabilityActiveActive
Open weightsnoyes
  • DeepSeek-V4-Pro: At peak times (Mon, Tue, Wed, Thu, Fri, 01:00-04:00 UTC; Mon, Tue, Wed, Thu, Fri, 06:00-10:00 UTC) the price is $1.32 input and $3.96 output per 1M tokens. The table shows the off-peak price.

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

Cheaper than DeepSeek-V4-ProMuse Ember 1.0

Overall index 110.5, rank 14$0.10 input and $0.50 output per 1M tokens

View profile
Best model in the overall indexClaude Fable 5.2

Overall index 130.9, rank 1$8 input and $40 output per 1M tokens

GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Claude Fable 5.2

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: GPT-6.1 SolB: DeepSeek-V4-Pro

AA-BriefcaseOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,554.7 eloDeepSeek-V4-Pro: 1,253.2 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/10/2026
AA-OmniscienceOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 42.033 pointsDeepSeek-V4-Pro: -6.367 pointsArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
AA-Omniscience AccuracyOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 61.8%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 45.2%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateOverall · lower is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 51.9%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 94.1%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
AutomationBench-AAOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 64.9%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 56.7%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 65.1%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 26.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CritPt v2 (Hard Subset)Overall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 69.5%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 23.5%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 70.8%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 51.6%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 52.0%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 44.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
FrontierCodeOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 40.6%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 17.1%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
FrontierCode 1.1 MainOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 49.1%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 38.8%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
GDP.pdfOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 31.0%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 11.4%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
GDPval-AAOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,607.7 eloDeepSeek-V4-Pro: 1,457.4 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/10/2026
HLE-DiamondOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 58.8%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 19.5%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 38.5%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 23.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,743DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 1,463LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,481DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 1,455LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
MedCodeOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 48.8%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 40.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 86.5%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 75.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 3%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ProofBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 99%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 16%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Public Benefits Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 59.3%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 62.9%Vals AIAs of 10/12/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 21.8%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 25.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-BenchOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 56.1%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 14.1%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 55.1%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 11.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 58.1%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 5.7%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 88.9%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 49.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 63.5%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 15.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 61.8%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 57.4%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 44.7%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 41.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 53.0%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 28.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevHTML development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,794DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 1,470LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,480DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 1,448LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 46%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 6.7%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 12.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Hardware · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 40%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCOBOL · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 70.0%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 58.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBDataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 84.5%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 62.6%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)All-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 39.9%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 31.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 85.5%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 83.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevReact development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,747DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 1,452LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,531DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 1,500LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
ProgramBenchFully Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 3%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 64.8%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 54.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Media · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 50%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCode Quality · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 4.496 / 5DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 3.401 / 5Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBDCF · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 65.3%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 44.4%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Comparables · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 42.6%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 39.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 39.5%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 23.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevWeb development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,743DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 1,463LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCoding · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,540DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 1,488LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
ProgramBenchRaw Pass Rate · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 85.3%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 47.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 33.3%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 36.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0ML · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 54.5%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 3.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBLBO · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 64.4%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 43.9%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Disclosure Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 58.4%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 52.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 84.2%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 86.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCreative writing · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,449DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 1,440LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 63.4%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 65.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Operations · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 40.7%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 7.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBM&A · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 83.9%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 48.2%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Earnings Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 71.5%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 59.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchCivil Litigation · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 29.6%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 33.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlEnglish · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,491DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 1,467LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026

More comparisons

Compare GPT-6.1 Sol and DeepSeek-V4-Pro with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  2. 2GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  3. 3DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  4. 4GPT-6 Luna vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  5. 5Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  6. 6Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  7. 7GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-6.1 Terra
  8. 8Claude Opus 5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  9. 9DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
Show all 67 comparisons
  1. 10Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  2. 11Grok 4.7 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  3. 12DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  4. 13DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. Kimi K3
  5. 14GPT-5.6 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  6. 15DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. MiMo-V2.5-Pro
  7. 16DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. GLM-5.3
  8. 17DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  9. 18GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-6 Astra
  10. 19DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  11. 20GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  12. 21DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. Mistral Large 4
  13. 22DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. MiMo-V2.5
  14. 23GPT-5.6 Luna vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  15. 24GPT-6 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  16. 25GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  17. 26Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  18. 27Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  19. 28GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  20. 29GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-6 Luna
  21. 30Claude Opus 4.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  22. 31GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
  23. 32GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  24. 33Claude Opus 4.8 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  25. 34GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  26. 35GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  27. 36GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  28. 37GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.4 mini
  29. 38GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.4
  30. 39GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  31. 40GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  32. 41Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  33. 42Claude Opus 4.6 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  34. 43GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  35. 44Gemini 4 Argon vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  36. 45Claude Sonnet 5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  37. 46Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  38. 47GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.5
  39. 48Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  40. 49DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  41. 50GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Grok 4.7
  42. 51Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  43. 52GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  44. 53Claude Opus 4.7 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  45. 54GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GLM-5.3
  46. 55Claude Fable 5.2 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  47. 56GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
  48. 57GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  49. 58Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  50. 59GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  51. 60GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  52. 61GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Kimi K3
  53. 62Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  54. 63GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Muse Wonder
  55. 64Claude Haiku 4.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  56. 65GPT-6.1 Terra vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  57. 66Gemini 4 Carbon vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  58. 67Claude Opus 4.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol