Skip to main content

AnthropicDeepSeekLLM matchup

Claude Sonnet 5.5vs.DeepSeek-V4-Pro

Which one is better?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 performs better than DeepSeek-V4-Pro, but costs 3 times (input) and 5.1 times (output) as much.

Sonnet 5.5 ahead
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
121.9

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Rank 5

87.1

DeepSeek-V4-Pro

Rank 48

Sonnet 5.5 faster
SpeedTokens per second
103

Claude Sonnet 5.5

44

DeepSeek-V4-Pro

DeepSeek-V4-Pro cheaper
Price$ per 1M tokens
$4

Claude Sonnet 5.5

$0.99

DeepSeek-V4-Pro

about as popular
Popularity0 to 100
79

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Rank 21 of 478

76

DeepSeek-V4-Pro

Rank 25 of 478

Choose Claude Sonnet 5.5 for

MathematicsHealthGeneralReasoningCodingKnowledgeFinanceLegalAgentsProductivity

No clear advantage for DeepSeek-V4-Pro.

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

Sonnet 5.5DeepSeek-V4-ProMedian of all ranked models

9011013015070CodingSonnet 5.5ReasoningSonnet 5.5MathematicsSonnet 5.5KnowledgeSonnet 5.5AgentsSonnet 5.5GeneralSonnet 5.5FinanceSonnet 5.5LegalSonnet 5.5HealthSonnet 5.5
CodingSonnet 5.5 ahead
Sonnet 5.5125.2Rank 3
DeepSeek-V4-Pro91.1Rank 53
Median of ranked models87.5

95 % range: Sonnet 5.5 119.5 to 130.9, DeepSeek-V4-Pro 85.5 to 96.6.

AreaSonnet 5.5DeepSeek-V4-Pro

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the close-up the net starts at 70 points, just below the weaker model's lowest value; the reference group average is 100. Not in the net because a model has no own value there or the data are too thin: Multimodal.

Sonnet 5.5 is ahead in 9 of 10 areas, DeepSeek-V4-Pro in none.

Sonnet 5.5 ahead: 9too little data: 1

Areas in the overall index
MathematicsSonnet 5.5 +47131.9 to 85.3
GeneralSonnet 5.5 +37125.0 to 87.6
ReasoningSonnet 5.5 +34118.3 to 84.1
CodingSonnet 5.5 +34125.2 to 91.1
KnowledgeSonnet 5.5 +34122.8 to 89.1
AgentsSonnet 5.5 +27120.8 to 93.9
Multimodalonly Sonnet 5.5 has a score
Specialist fields
HealthSonnet 5.5 +42121.9 to 79.4
FinanceSonnet 5.5 +32119.4 to 87.4
LegalSonnet 5.5 +31114.5 to 83.1

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 3 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
ProductivitySonnet 5.5 +26116.4 to 90.9
Cybersecurityonly Sonnet 5.5 has a score
Educationonly Sonnet 5.5 has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro at the same effort

Both models measured at the same reasoning efforts. This shows whether a lead comes from the model or only from more compute.

maxSonnet 5.5 ahead
30.0 points gap across 11 shared test series
Overall index (max vs. max)Sonnet 5.5 ahead
Sonnet 5.5 121.9 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro 87.1

The gap compares only the Artificial Analysis test series in which both models are measured at that effort. Tied below 3 points, ahead only beyond two standard errors.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeSonnet 5.5Coding 125.2 to 91.1
Maths and data analysisSonnet 5.5Mathematics 131.9 to 85.3, Reasoning 118.3 to 84.1
Facts and researchSonnet 5.5Knowledge 122.8 to 89.1
Agents and workflowsSonnet 5.5Agents 120.8 to 93.9
Fast chat repliesSonnet 5.5103 to 44 tokens per second
Security analysisopenCybersecurity without a score for DeepSeek-V4-Pro
Many requests on a small budgetDeepSeek-V4-Pro$4 to $0.99 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsSonnet 5.5Finance 119.4 to 87.4, Legal 114.5 to 83.1, Health 121.9 to 79.4
Images, screenshots and PDFsopenMultimodal without a score for DeepSeek-V4-Pro

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro in our own test

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Claude Sonnet 5.5: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 28 s · $0.04

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
3,886 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0389
Response time
28.2 s
API model reported in response
anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5
Pinned endpoint
Anthropic | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5-20260928
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro

The response reached the token limit. No complete recording is available.

Oct 5, 2026 · 68 s · $0.02

Not yet visually reviewed. A successful recording does not confirm correct physics or full compliance with the prompt.

Test details
Run date
Oct 5, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0813
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
8,192 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0163
Response time
67.6 s
API model reported in response
deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0813
Pinned endpoint
DeepSeek | deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-20260813
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Failed

Earlier attempts (3)

  • Oct 2, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
  • Oct 1, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
  • Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Unavailable in this round

DeepSeek-V4-Pro

DeepSeek-V4-Pro: SVG short test

Oct 14, 2026 · $0.0020

Test details
Test run
Oct 14, 2026
Provider
streamlake
API model
deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0813
Output
963 tokens
Reasoning
API reports 0 reasoning tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0020
Test round
43b8c5c46830

Claude Sonnet 5.5 and DeepSeek-V4-Pro in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v5)

20 of 95 models

Claude Fable 5.2max130.9
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh127.0
Claude Opus 5.5max125.7
Claude Fable 5.1max124.1
Claude Sonnet 5.5max121.9
Gemini 4 Argonhigh121.2
GPT-6 Astramax119.6
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.4
GPT-6.1 Solmax117.5
Claude Opus 5max117.3
Muse Wondermax113.7
Claude Fable 5max112.8
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.6
Muse Ember 1.0max110.5
GPT-5.6 Solmax109.3
GPT-6 Solmax108.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.7
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max107.1
GPT-6.1 Terramax106.5
DeepSeek-V4-Promax87.1

Popularity compared

How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.

Both are about as popular: Claude Sonnet 5.5 79, DeepSeek-V4-Pro 76 out of 100.

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 13, 2026

Claude Sonnet 5.5DeepSeek-V4-Pro

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricClaude Sonnet 5.5DeepSeek-V4-Pro
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better121.987.1
RankRank 5 of 95Rank 48 of 95
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$2$0.66
Outputwhat the model writes$10$1.98
Cost per task (own tests)average of 1 original-protocol task both models passed (SVG short test not included)$0.042$0.021
Speed
Tokens per second10344
Popularity
Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 10079Rank 21 of 47876Rank 25 of 478
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffJune 2026n/a
ReleasedSep 28, 2026Apr 24, 2026
AvailabilityActiveActive
Open weightsnoyes
  • DeepSeek-V4-Pro: At peak times (Mon, Tue, Wed, Thu, Fri, 01:00-04:00 UTC; Mon, Tue, Wed, Thu, Fri, 06:00-10:00 UTC) the price is $1.32 input and $3.96 output per 1M tokens. The table shows the off-peak price.

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

Cheaper than DeepSeek-V4-ProMuse Ember 1.0

Overall index 110.5, rank 14$0.10 input and $0.50 output per 1M tokens

View profile
Best model in the overall indexClaude Fable 5.2

Overall index 130.9, rank 1$8 input and $40 output per 1M tokens

Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5.2

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: Claude Sonnet 5.5B: DeepSeek-V4-Pro

Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 69.8%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 26.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 75.7%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 51.6%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 58.1%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 44.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 48.1%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 23.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,715DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 1,463LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,473DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 1,455LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
MedCodeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 52.9%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 40.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 91.1%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 75.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 6.5%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ProofBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 100%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 16%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
Public Benefits Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 67.2%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 62.9%Vals AIAs of 10/12/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 42.0%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 25.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 64.1%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 11.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 92.4%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 49.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 69.8%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 15.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 80.0%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 57.4%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 52.7%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 41.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 69.7%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 28.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevHTML development · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,709DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 1,470LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,474DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 1,448LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 49.5%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 16.7%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 12.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Hardware · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 53.3%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCOBOL · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 70.0%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 58.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBDataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 86.3%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 62.6%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)All-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 47.6%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 31.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 91.3%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 83.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevReact development · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,750DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 1,452LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,541DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 1,500LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
ProgramBenchFully Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 6.5%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 65.2%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 54.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Media · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 75%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCode Quality · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 4.601 / 5DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 3.401 / 5Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBDCF · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 70.1%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 44.4%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Comparables · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 47.1%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 39.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 39.5%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 23.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevWeb development · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,715DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 1,463LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCoding · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,517DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 1,488LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
ProgramBenchRaw Pass Rate · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 76.3%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 47.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 49.9%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 36.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0ML · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 81.8%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 3.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBLBO · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 70.0%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 43.9%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Disclosure Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 71.4%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 52.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 77.8%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 86.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCreative writing · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,464DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 1,440LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 77.2%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 65.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Operations · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 51.9%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 7.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBM&A · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 83.0%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 48.2%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Earnings Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 76.5%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 59.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchCivil Litigation · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 48.1%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 33.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlEnglish · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,484DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 1,467LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
Tax Agent BenchFact-Pattern Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 39.5%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 21.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Science · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 54.8%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 7.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBMisc · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 69.1%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 57.6%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Financial Modeling · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 25.5%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 10.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchCivil Litigation · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 81.7%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 86.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlEntertainment, sports and media · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,455DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 1,432LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
Tax Agent BenchFact-Pattern Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 73.9%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 55.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Security · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 93.3%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 26.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBOperating · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 71.6%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 47.2%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)General Qualitative Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 67.1%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 60.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchConstitutional / Civil Rights · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 42.1%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 13.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlExcluding ties · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,482DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 1,457LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
Tax Agent BenchForms & Filings · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 40.0%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 13.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026

More comparisons

Compare Claude Sonnet 5.5 and DeepSeek-V4-Pro with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  2. 2Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  3. 3Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  4. 4Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5.5
  5. 5Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3
  6. 6Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
  7. 7Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 5
  8. 8Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Grok 4.7
  9. 9Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
Show all 70 comparisons
  1. 10GPT-6 Luna vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  2. 11Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5.1
  3. 12Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  4. 13Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  5. 14Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  6. 15Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Kimi K3
  7. 16Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  8. 17Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  9. 18Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.6
  10. 19DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  11. 20Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  12. 21Claude Opus 5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  13. 22Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GLM-5.2
  14. 23Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  15. 24DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  16. 25Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  17. 26Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
  18. 27DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  19. 28Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  20. 29Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5
  21. 30Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  22. 31Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  23. 32Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.6
  24. 33Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  25. 34DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. GLM-5.3
  26. 35DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. Kimi K3
  27. 36Grok 4.7 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  28. 37Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  29. 38GPT-5.6 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  30. 39DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  31. 40Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Muse Spark 1.3
  32. 41Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.7
  33. 42DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  34. 43Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  35. 44Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.8
  36. 45DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. Mistral Large 4
  37. 46DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. MiMo-V2.5-Pro
  38. 47GPT-6 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  39. 48Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Kimi K2.6
  40. 49Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Grok 4.6
  41. 50DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. MiMo-V2.5
  42. 51Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  43. 52Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.5
  44. 53Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
  45. 54Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 4.5
  46. 55Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 4
  47. 56Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Mistral Medium 3.5
  48. 57Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-5.4
  49. 58Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  50. 59Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-5.5
  51. 60Claude Opus 4.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  52. 61Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.5
  53. 62Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  54. 63Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra
  55. 64Gemini 4 Argon vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  56. 65Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Muse Wonder Full
  57. 66DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  58. 67Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  59. 68GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  60. 69Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
  61. 70GPT-6.1 Terra vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro