Skip to main content

AnthropicLLM matchup

Claude Sonnet 5.5vs.Claude Opus 5

Is the higher price worth it?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Claude Opus 5 perform about equally well, but Claude Opus 5 costs 2.5 times as much.

level
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
121.9

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Rank 5

117.3

Claude Opus 5

Rank 10

Sonnet 5.5 faster
SpeedTokens per second
103

Claude Sonnet 5.5

71

Claude Opus 5

Sonnet 5.5 cheaper
Price$ per 1M tokens
$4

Claude Sonnet 5.5

$10

Claude Opus 5

about as popular
Popularity0 to 100
79

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Rank 21 of 478

81

Claude Opus 5

Rank 18 of 478

Choose Claude Sonnet 5.5 for

MathematicsReasoningAgentsGeneralCoding

Choose Claude Opus 5 for

ProductivityMultimodalHealth (not certain)

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

Sonnet 5.5Opus 5

The median of all ranked models is below 100 in every area, so it sits in the centre of the net.

110120130140100CodingSonnet 5.5ReasoningSonnet 5.5MathematicsSonnet 5.5AgentsSonnet 5.5GeneralSonnet 5.5MultimodalOpus 5FinancelevelLegallevelHealthslightly Opus5
CodingSonnet 5.5 ahead
Sonnet 5.5125.2Rank 3
Opus 5118.3Rank 9
Median of ranked models87.5

95 % range: Sonnet 5.5 119.5 to 130.9, Opus 5 114.5 to 122.1.

AreaSonnet 5.5Opus 5

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the close-up the net starts at 100 points, just below the weaker model's lowest value; the reference group average is 100. Not in the net because a model has no own value there or the data are too thin: Knowledge.

Sonnet 5.5 is ahead in 5 of 10 areas, Opus 5 in 1.

Sonnet 5.5 ahead: 5level: 2too little data: 1Opus 5 slightly ahead: 1Opus 5 ahead: 1

Areas in the overall index
MathematicsSonnet 5.5 +18131.9 to 113.5
ReasoningSonnet 5.5 +11118.3 to 107.6
AgentsSonnet 5.5 +9120.8 to 112.0
GeneralSonnet 5.5 +9125.0 to 116.4
CodingSonnet 5.5 +7125.2 to 118.3
MultimodalOpus 5 +5110.7 to 115.5
Knowledgetoo little data122.8 to 121.9
Specialist fields
Healthleaning Opus 5not certain · 2 tests each
Legallevel114.5 to 116.3
Financelevel119.4 to 119.0

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 4 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
ProductivityOpus 5 +16116.4 to 132.5
Cybersecuritytoo little data112.7 to 112.7
Searchonly Opus 5 has a score
Educationonly Sonnet 5.5 has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 5 at the same effort

Both models measured at the same reasoning efforts. This shows whether a lead comes from the model or only from more compute.

maxSonnet 5.5 ahead
7.0 points gap across 11 shared test series
Overall index (max vs. max)Sonnet 5.5 slightly ahead
Sonnet 5.5 121.9 vs. Opus 5 117.3

The gap compares only the Artificial Analysis test series in which both models are measured at that effort. Tied below 3 points, ahead only beyond two standard errors.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeSonnet 5.5Coding 125.2 to 118.3
Maths and data analysisSonnet 5.5Mathematics 131.9 to 113.5, Reasoning 118.3 to 107.6
Facts and researchopenKnowledge 122.8 to 121.9 (too little data), Search without a score for Sonnet 5.5
Agents and workflowsSonnet 5.5Agents 120.8 to 112.0
Fast chat repliesSonnet 5.5103 to 71 tokens per second
Security analysisopenCybersecurity 112.7 to 112.7 (too little data)
Many requests on a small budgetSonnet 5.5$4 to $10 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsleaning Opus 5Finance 119.4 to 119.0, Legal 114.5 to 116.3, Health 121.9 to 130.0
Images, screenshots and PDFsOpus 5Multimodal 110.7 to 115.5

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 5 in our own test

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Claude Sonnet 5.5: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 28 s · $0.04

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
3,886 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0389
Response time
28.2 s
API model reported in response
anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5
Pinned endpoint
Anthropic | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5-20260928
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Claude Opus 5

Claude Opus 5: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 63 s · $0.14

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
anthropic/claude-opus-5
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
5,423 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.1357
Response time
63 s
API model reported in response
anthropic/claude-opus-5
Pinned endpoint
Anthropic | anthropic/claude-opus-5-20260723
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Earlier attempts (1)

  • Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Unavailable in this round

Claude Opus 5

Unavailable in this round

Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Claude Opus 5 in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v5)

20 of 95 models

Claude Fable 5.2max130.9
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh127.0
Claude Opus 5.5max125.7
Claude Fable 5.1max124.1
Claude Sonnet 5.5max121.9
Gemini 4 Argonhigh121.2
GPT-6 Astramax119.6
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.4
GPT-6.1 Solmax117.5
Claude Opus 5max117.3
Muse Wondermax113.7
Claude Fable 5max112.8
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.6
Muse Ember 1.0max110.5
GPT-5.6 Solmax109.3
GPT-6 Solmax108.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.7
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max107.1
GPT-6.1 Terramax106.5
Gemini 3.8 Flashhigh106.4

Popularity compared

How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.

Both are about as popular: Claude Sonnet 5.5 79, Claude Opus 5 81 out of 100.

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 13, 2026

Claude Sonnet 5.5Claude Opus 5

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricClaude Sonnet 5.5Claude Opus 5
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better121.9117.3
RankRank 5 of 95Rank 10 of 95
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$2$5
Outputwhat the model writes$10$25
Cost per task (own tests)average of 3 original-protocol tasks both models passed (SVG short test not included)$0.038$0.14
Speed
Tokens per second10371
Popularity
Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 10079Rank 21 of 47881Rank 18 of 478
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffJune 2026May 2026
ReleasedSep 28, 2026Jul 24, 2026
AvailabilityActiveActive
Open weightsnono

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

Successor of Opus 5Claude Opus 5.5

Overall index 125.7, rank 3$4 input and $20 output per 1M tokens

Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 5.5
As cheap as Sonnet 5.5Gemini 4 Carbon

Overall index 127.0, rank 2$2 input and $10 output per 1M tokens

Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
Best model in the overall indexClaude Fable 5.2

Overall index 130.9, rank 1$8 input and $40 output per 1M tokens

Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5.2

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: Claude Sonnet 5.5B: Claude Opus 5

BioMysteryBenchOverall · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 81.1%Claude Opus 5: 79.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 69.8%Claude Opus 5: 57.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 59.6%Claude Opus 5: 65.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 75.7%Claude Opus 5: 73.6%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 58.1%Claude Opus 5: 58.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
IOIOverall · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 83.1%Claude Opus 5: 84.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 48.1%Claude Opus 5: 55.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,715Claude Opus 5: 1,657LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,473Claude Opus 5: 1,489LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,263Claude Opus 5: 1,285LMArenaAs of 11/09/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
MedCodeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 52.9%Claude Opus 5: 63.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 91.1%Claude Opus 5: 91.0%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MysteryMechanismOverall · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 49.1%Claude Opus 5: 37.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 6.5%Claude Opus 5: 3.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ProofBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 100%Claude Opus 5: 99%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Public Benefits Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 67.2%Claude Opus 5: 76.9%Vals AIAs of 10/12/2026
SRE BenchOverall · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 30.2%Claude Opus 5: 12.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 16.7%Claude Opus 5: 23.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 64.1%Claude Opus 5: 53.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 61.8%Claude Opus 5: 51.8%Terminal-BenchAs of 10/06/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 47.1%Claude Opus 5: 27.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Science IndexOverall · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 59.1%Claude Opus 5: 47.9%Vals AIAs of 10/25/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 92.4%Claude Opus 5: 88.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
BioMysteryBenchHard · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 45.1%Claude Opus 5: 43.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 69.8%Claude Opus 5: 53.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1Patch · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 87.5%Claude Opus 5: 85.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 80.0%Claude Opus 5: 75.2%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 52.7%Claude Opus 5: 54.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
IOIIOI 2024 · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 85%Claude Opus 5: 100%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 69.7%Claude Opus 5: 65.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevHTML development · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,709Claude Opus 5: 1,650LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,474Claude Opus 5: 1,483LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,372Claude Opus 5: 1,364LMArenaAs of 11/09/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 49.5%Claude Opus 5: 41.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchCapability Score · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 51.6%Claude Opus 5: 31.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchFact-Pattern Analysis · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 39.5%Claude Opus 5: 48.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Hardware · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 53.3%Claude Opus 5: 33.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEarth Sciences · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 12.5%Claude Opus 5: 12.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Science IndexBioMysteryBench · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 81.1%Claude Opus 5: 79.3%Vals AIAs of 10/25/2026
BioMysteryBenchHuman-solvable · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 89.5%Claude Opus 5: 87.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCOBOL · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 70%Claude Opus 5: 70%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1PoC · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 31.7%Claude Opus 5: 45.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBDataroom · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 86.3%Claude Opus 5: 87.7%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)All-Pass · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 47.6%Claude Opus 5: 47.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
IOIIOI 2025 · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 88.3%Claude Opus 5: 87.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 91.3%Claude Opus 5: 92.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevImage to WebDev · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,744Claude Opus 5: 1,664LMArenaAs of 11/10/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,541Claude Opus 5: 1,547LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlCreative writing with images · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,243Claude Opus 5: 1,271LMArenaAs of 11/09/2026
ProgramBenchFully Resolved · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 6.5%Claude Opus 5: 3.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchFully Solved · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 30.2%Claude Opus 5: 12.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchNumbers & Calculations · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 60%Claude Opus 5: 60%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Media · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 75.0%Claude Opus 5: 58.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEngineering Sciences · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 44.4%Claude Opus 5: 11.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Science IndexMysteryMechanism · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 49.1%Claude Opus 5: 37.4%Vals AIAs of 10/25/2026
Code MigrationCode Quality · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 4.601 / 5Claude Opus 5: 4.75 / 5Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBDCF · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 70.1%Claude Opus 5: 70.0%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Comparables · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 47.1%Claude Opus 5: 47.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
IOIIOI 2026 · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 75.8%Claude Opus 5: 65.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · All-pass · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 39.5%Claude Opus 5: 62.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevReact development · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,750Claude Opus 5: 1,678LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCoding · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,517Claude Opus 5: 1,528LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlDiagram understanding · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,308Claude Opus 5: 1,326LMArenaAs of 11/09/2026
ProgramBenchRaw Pass Rate · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 76.3%Claude Opus 5: 82.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026

More comparisons

Compare Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Claude Opus 5 with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  2. 2Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  3. 3Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5.5
  4. 4Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3
  5. 5Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
  6. 6Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Grok 4.7
  7. 7Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  8. 8Claude Opus 5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  9. 9Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5.1
Show all 73 comparisons
  1. 10Claude Opus 5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  2. 11Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  3. 12Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  4. 13Claude Opus 5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  5. 14Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  6. 15Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Kimi K3
  7. 16Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  8. 17Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.6
  9. 18Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  10. 19Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  11. 20Claude Opus 5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  12. 21Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GLM-5.2
  13. 22Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  14. 23Claude Opus 5 vs. Kimi K3
  15. 24Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  16. 25Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  17. 26Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
  18. 27Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5
  19. 28Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  20. 29Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  21. 30Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.6
  22. 31Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  23. 32Claude Opus 5 vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  24. 33Claude Opus 5 vs. GLM-5.3
  25. 34Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  26. 35Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  27. 36Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  28. 37Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Muse Spark 1.3
  29. 38Claude Opus 5 vs. Grok 4.6
  30. 39Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.7
  31. 40Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 5
  32. 41Claude Opus 5 vs. Mistral Large 4
  33. 42Claude Opus 5 vs. Grok 4.7
  34. 43Claude Opus 5 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  35. 44Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  36. 45Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.8
  37. 46Claude Opus 5 vs. Muse Spark 1.3
  38. 47Claude Opus 5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5
  39. 48Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  40. 49Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Kimi K2.6
  41. 50Claude Opus 5 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  42. 51Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Grok 4.6
  43. 52Claude Opus 5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.5
  44. 53Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  45. 54Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.5
  46. 55Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
  47. 56Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 4.5
  48. 57Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 4
  49. 58Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Mistral Medium 3.5
  50. 59Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-5.4
  51. 60Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  52. 61Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-5.5
  53. 62Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.5
  54. 63Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  55. 64Claude Opus 5 vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
  56. 65Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra
  57. 66Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  58. 67Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Muse Wonder Full
  59. 68Claude Opus 5 vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  60. 69Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  61. 70Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
  62. 71Claude Opus 5 vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  63. 72Claude Opus 5 vs. Muse Wonder Full
  64. 73Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra