Skip to main content

AnthropicOpenAILLM matchup

Claude Sonnet 5.5vs.GPT-6 Luna

Which one is better?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 performs better than GPT-6 Luna, but costs 20 times as much.

Sonnet 5.5 ahead
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
121.9

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Rank 5

95.6

GPT-6 Luna

Rank 40

Sonnet 5.5 faster
SpeedTokens per second
103

Claude Sonnet 5.5

77

GPT-6 Luna

GPT-6 Luna cheaper
Price$ per 1M tokens
$4

Claude Sonnet 5.5

$0.20

GPT-6 Luna

GPT-6 Luna more popular
Popularity0 to 100
79

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Rank 21 of 478

85

GPT-6 Luna

Rank 9 of 478

Above 272,000 tokens of context, GPT-6 Luna costs more: $0.20 input and $0.75 output per 1M tokens.

Choose Claude Sonnet 5.5 for

KnowledgeGeneralProductivityHealthCodingMathematicsEducationLegalMultimodalFinanceReasoningAgents

No clear advantage for GPT-6 Luna.

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

Sonnet 5.5GPT-6 LunaMedian of all ranked models

10012014080CodingSonnet 5.5ReasoningSonnet 5.5MathematicsSonnet 5.5KnowledgeSonnet 5.5AgentsSonnet 5.5GeneralSonnet 5.5MultimodalSonnet 5.5FinanceSonnet 5.5LegalSonnet 5.5HealthSonnet 5.5
CodingSonnet 5.5 ahead
Sonnet 5.5125.2Rank 3
GPT-6 Luna97.8Rank 40
Median of ranked models87.5

95 % range: Sonnet 5.5 119.5 to 130.9, GPT-6 Luna 94.8 to 100.7.

AreaSonnet 5.5GPT-6 Luna

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the close-up the net starts at 80 points, just below the weaker model's lowest value; the reference group average is 100.

Sonnet 5.5 is ahead in 10 of 10 areas, GPT-6 Luna in none.

Sonnet 5.5 ahead: 10

Areas in the overall index
KnowledgeSonnet 5.5 +35122.8 to 87.8
GeneralSonnet 5.5 +32125.0 to 93.4
CodingSonnet 5.5 +27125.2 to 97.8
MathematicsSonnet 5.5 +26131.9 to 105.8
MultimodalSonnet 5.5 +23110.7 to 88.2
ReasoningSonnet 5.5 +21118.3 to 97.8
AgentsSonnet 5.5 +21120.8 to 100.2
Specialist fields
HealthSonnet 5.5 +28121.9 to 94.2
LegalSonnet 5.5 +24114.5 to 90.5
FinanceSonnet 5.5 +21119.4 to 98.1

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 4 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
ProductivitySonnet 5.5 +29116.4 to 87.2
EducationSonnet 5.5 +24113.8 to 89.8
Cybersecuritytoo little data112.7 to 106.8
Searchonly GPT-6 Luna has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna at the same effort

Both models measured at the same reasoning efforts. This shows whether a lead comes from the model or only from more compute.

lowSonnet 5.5 ahead
29.7 points gap across 11 shared test series
mediumSonnet 5.5 ahead
17.2 points gap across 11 shared test series
highSonnet 5.5 ahead
23.0 points gap across 11 shared test series
xhighSonnet 5.5 ahead
26.1 points gap across 11 shared test series
maxSonnet 5.5 ahead
23.7 points gap across 12 shared test series
Overall index (max vs. max)Sonnet 5.5 ahead
Sonnet 5.5 121.9 vs. GPT-6 Luna 95.6

The gap compares only the Artificial Analysis test series in which both models are measured at that effort. Tied below 3 points, ahead only beyond two standard errors.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeSonnet 5.5Coding 125.2 to 97.8
Maths and data analysisSonnet 5.5Mathematics 131.9 to 105.8, Reasoning 118.3 to 97.8
Facts and researchSonnet 5.5Knowledge 122.8 to 87.8, Search without a score for Sonnet 5.5
Agents and workflowsSonnet 5.5Agents 120.8 to 100.2
Fast chat repliesSonnet 5.5103 to 77 tokens per second
Security analysisopenCybersecurity 112.7 to 106.8 (too little data)
Many requests on a small budgetGPT-6 Luna$4 to $0.20 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsSonnet 5.5Finance 119.4 to 98.1, Legal 114.5 to 90.5, Health 121.9 to 94.2
Images, screenshots and PDFsSonnet 5.5Multimodal 110.7 to 88.2

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna in our own test

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Claude Sonnet 5.5: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 28 s · $0.04

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
3,886 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0389
Response time
28.2 s
API model reported in response
anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5
Pinned endpoint
Anthropic | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5-20260928
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

GPT-6 Luna

GPT-6 Luna: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 47 s · $0.0022

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
openai/gpt-6-luna
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
4,493 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0022
Response time
46.7 s
API model reported in response
openai/gpt-6-luna
Pinned endpoint
OpenAI | openai/gpt-6-luna-20260922
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Unavailable in this round

GPT-6 Luna

Unavailable in this round

Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GPT-6 Luna in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v5)

20 of 95 models

Claude Fable 5.2max130.9
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh127.0
Claude Opus 5.5max125.7
Claude Fable 5.1max124.1
Claude Sonnet 5.5max121.9
Gemini 4 Argonhigh121.2
GPT-6 Astramax119.6
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.4
GPT-6.1 Solmax117.5
Claude Opus 5max117.3
Muse Wondermax113.7
Claude Fable 5max112.8
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.6
Muse Ember 1.0max110.5
GPT-5.6 Solmax109.3
GPT-6 Solmax108.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.7
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max107.1
GPT-6.1 Terramax106.5
GPT-6 Lunamax95.6

Popularity compared

How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.

GPT-6 Luna is more popular than Claude Sonnet 5.5: 85 to 79 out of 100.

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 13, 2026

Claude Sonnet 5.5GPT-6 Luna

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricClaude Sonnet 5.5GPT-6 Luna
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better121.995.6
RankRank 5 of 95Rank 40 of 95
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$2$0.10above 272,000 tokens: $0.20
Outputwhat the model writes$10$0.50above 272,000 tokens: $0.75
Cost per task (own tests)average of 3 original-protocol tasks both models passed (SVG short test not included)$0.038$0.003
Speed
Tokens per second10377
Popularity
Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 10079Rank 21 of 47885Rank 9 of 478
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages1.05 M tokens≈ 1,580 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffJune 2026May 18, 2026
ReleasedSep 28, 2026Sep 22, 2026
AvailabilityActiveActive
Open weightsnono

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

As cheap as GPT-6 LunaMuse Ember 1.0

Overall index 110.5, rank 14$0.10 input and $0.50 output per 1M tokens

View profile
Best model in the overall indexClaude Fable 5.2

Overall index 130.9, rank 1$8 input and $40 output per 1M tokens

Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5.2

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: Claude Sonnet 5.5B: GPT-6 Luna

BioMysteryBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 81.1%GPT-6 Luna: 61.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ClaimBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 100.0%GPT-6 Luna: 99.2%Vals AIAs of 10/23/2026
Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 69.8%GPT-6 Luna: 42.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Code Migration v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 86.9%GPT-6 Luna: 46.7%Vals AIAs of 10/30/2026
CyberBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 59.6%GPT-6 Luna: 76.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 75.7%GPT-6 Luna: 68.5%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMB v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 75.9%GPT-6 Luna: 70.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 58.1%GPT-6 Luna: 49.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Finance Agent v2.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 67.3%GPT-6 Luna: 56.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Financial Coaching BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 74.9%GPT-6 Luna: 65.2%Vals AIAs of 11/13/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
HLAB-Vals-1.1Overall · Task fully resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 10.4%GPT-6 Luna: 4.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ImmigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 69.0%GPT-6 Luna: 62.5%Vals AIAs of 10/28/2026
IOIOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 83.1%GPT-6 Luna: 55.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 48.1%GPT-6 Luna: 30.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,772GPT-6 Luna: 1,577LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,473GPT-6 Luna: 1,441LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,263GPT-6 Luna: 1,235LMArenaAs of 11/09/2026
MedCodeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 52.9%GPT-6 Luna: 44.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 91.1%GPT-6 Luna: 83.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MysteryMechanismOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 49.1%GPT-6 Luna: 19.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 6.5%GPT-6 Luna: 0.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ProofBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 100%GPT-6 Luna: 64%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Public Benefits Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 67.2%GPT-6 Luna: 57.6%Vals AIAs of 10/12/2026
SAGEOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 88.0%GPT-6 Luna: 83.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 30.2%GPT-6 Luna: 2.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SWE-bench MultimodalOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 58.3%GPT-6 Luna: 37.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 42.0%GPT-6 Luna: 19.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 64.1%GPT-6 Luna: 13.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 47.1%GPT-6 Luna: 4.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Finance IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 64.5%GPT-6 Luna: 53.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 70.9%GPT-6 Luna: 52.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Legal IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 68.0%GPT-6 Luna: 62.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Router IndexFull Index · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 69.0%GPT-6 Luna: 52.3%Vals AIAs of 11/03/2026
Vals Science IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 59.1%GPT-6 Luna: 28.4%Vals AIAs of 10/25/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 92.4%GPT-6 Luna: 81.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
BioMysteryBenchHard · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 45.1%GPT-6 Luna: 17.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ClaimBenchDirect support · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 100%GPT-6 Luna: 100%Vals AIAs of 10/23/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 69.8%GPT-6 Luna: 37.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Code Migration v1.1CLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 82.8%GPT-6 Luna: 44.3%Vals AIAs of 10/30/2026
CyberBench v1.1Patch · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 87.5%GPT-6 Luna: 87.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 80.0%GPT-6 Luna: 70.5%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMB v1.1Comps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 79.4%GPT-6 Luna: 69.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 52.7%GPT-6 Luna: 49.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Finance Agent v2.1Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 66.2%GPT-6 Luna: 56.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Financial Coaching BenchElicitation · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 63.1%GPT-6 Luna: 53.3%Vals AIAs of 11/13/2026
HLAB-Vals-1.1Antitrust Competition · Criteria passed · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 90.2%GPT-6 Luna: 84.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ImmigrationAll-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 22.1%GPT-6 Luna: 16.4%Vals AIAs of 10/28/2026
IOIIOI 2024 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 85.0%GPT-6 Luna: 69.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 69.7%GPT-6 Luna: 37.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevHTML development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,753GPT-6 Luna: 1,595LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,474GPT-6 Luna: 1,439LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,372GPT-6 Luna: 1,304LMArenaAs of 11/09/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 49.5%GPT-6 Luna: 8.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SAGEComputer Science · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 91.4%GPT-6 Luna: 86.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchCapability Score · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 51.6%GPT-6 Luna: 11.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SWE-bench Multimodalbpmn-js · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 73.6%GPT-6 Luna: 56.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 16.7%GPT-6 Luna: 6.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Hardware · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 53.3%GPT-6 Luna: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEarth Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 12.5%GPT-6 Luna: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Finance IndexEMB v1.1 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 75.9%GPT-6 Luna: 70.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals IndexCode Migration v1.1 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 87.4%GPT-6 Luna: 45.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Legal IndexBusiness & Commercial · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 62.7%GPT-6 Luna: 55.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Router IndexCode Migration · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 87.4%GPT-6 Luna: 45.5%Vals AIAs of 11/03/2026
Vals Science IndexBioMysteryBench · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 81.1%GPT-6 Luna: 61.5%Vals AIAs of 10/25/2026

More comparisons

Compare Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GPT-6 Luna with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1GPT-6 Luna vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  2. 2Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  3. 3Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  4. 4GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  5. 5Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5.5
  6. 6GPT-6 Luna vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  7. 7Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  8. 8GPT-6 Luna vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  9. 9GPT-6 Luna vs. GPT-5.4 mini
Show all 91 comparisons
  1. 10GPT-6 Luna vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  2. 11Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3
  3. 12Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
  4. 13Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 5
  5. 14GPT-6 Astra vs. GPT-6 Luna
  6. 15Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Grok 4.7
  7. 16Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  8. 17Claude Sonnet 5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  9. 18GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
  10. 19GPT-6 Luna vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  11. 20Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5.1
  12. 21Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  13. 22Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  14. 23Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Kimi K3
  15. 24Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  16. 25Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.6
  17. 26GPT-6 Luna vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  18. 27Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  19. 28GPT-6 Luna vs. Grok 4.7
  20. 29Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  21. 30GPT-6 Luna vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  22. 31Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  23. 32Claude Haiku 4.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  24. 33Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GLM-5.2
  25. 34GPT-6 Luna vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  26. 35GPT-6 Luna vs. GPT-5.4
  27. 36GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  28. 37Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  29. 38Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  30. 39GPT-6 Luna vs. GLM-5.2
  31. 40Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
  32. 41Claude Opus 4.8 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  33. 42Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5
  34. 43Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  35. 44Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  36. 45Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.6
  37. 46Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  38. 47Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  39. 48Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  40. 49GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-6 Luna
  41. 50Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  42. 51GPT-6 Luna vs. Muse Spark 1.3
  43. 52GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  44. 53Claude Opus 4.6 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  45. 54GPT-6 Luna vs. GLM-5.3
  46. 55GPT-6 Luna vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  47. 56Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Muse Spark 1.3
  48. 57Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.7
  49. 58Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  50. 59Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.8
  51. 60GPT-6 Luna vs. MiMo-V2.5
  52. 61GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
  53. 62Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Kimi K2.6
  54. 63GPT-6 Luna vs. GPT-5.5
  55. 64Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Grok 4.6
  56. 65GPT-6 Luna vs. Grok 4.6
  57. 66Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  58. 67Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  59. 68Claude Opus 4.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  60. 69Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.5
  61. 70Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
  62. 71Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  63. 72Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 4.5
  64. 73GPT-6 Luna vs. Mistral Medium 3.5
  65. 74GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  66. 75Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 4
  67. 76Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Mistral Medium 3.5
  68. 77Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-5.4
  69. 78Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  70. 79GPT-6 Luna vs. Mistral Large 4
  71. 80GPT-6 Luna vs. Grok 4.5
  72. 81GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-6 Luna
  73. 82GPT-6.1 Terra vs. GPT-6 Luna
  74. 83Claude Opus 4.7 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  75. 84Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-5.5
  76. 85Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.5
  77. 86Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  78. 87GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  79. 88Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra
  80. 89Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Muse Wonder Full
  81. 90Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  82. 91Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Carbon