Skip to main content

AnthropicOpenAILLM matchup

Claude Sonnet 5.5vs.GPT-5.6 Terra

Which one is better?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 performs better than GPT-5.6 Terra and is cheaper: GPT-5.6 Terra costs 1.2 times as much for output and about the same for input.

Sonnet 5.5 ahead
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
121.9

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Rank 5

100.9

GPT-5.6 Terra

Rank 31

Sonnet 5.5 faster
SpeedTokens per second
103

Claude Sonnet 5.5

72

GPT-5.6 Terra

about the same price
Price$ per 1M tokens
$4

Claude Sonnet 5.5

$4.50

GPT-5.6 Terra

Popularity0 to 100
79

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Rank 21 of 478

n/a

GPT-5.6 Terra

Above 272,000 tokens of context, GPT-5.6 Terra costs more: $4 input and $18 output per 1M tokens.

Choose Claude Sonnet 5.5 for

KnowledgeMathematicsHealthCodingGeneralAgentsProductivityFinanceReasoningEducationLegalMultimodal

No clear advantage for GPT-5.6 Terra.

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

Sonnet 5.5GPT-5.6 TerraMedian of all ranked models

10012014080CodingSonnet 5.5ReasoningSonnet 5.5MathematicsSonnet 5.5KnowledgeSonnet 5.5AgentsSonnet 5.5GeneralSonnet 5.5MultimodalSonnet 5.5FinanceSonnet 5.5LegalSonnet 5.5HealthSonnet 5.5
CodingSonnet 5.5 ahead
Sonnet 5.5125.2Rank 3
GPT-5.6 Terra104.5Rank 23
Median of ranked models87.5

95 % range: Sonnet 5.5 119.5 to 130.9, GPT-5.6 Terra 98.7 to 110.4.

AreaSonnet 5.5GPT-5.6 Terra

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the close-up the net starts at 80 points, just below the weaker model's lowest value; the reference group average is 100.

Sonnet 5.5 is ahead in 10 of 10 areas, GPT-5.6 Terra in none.

Sonnet 5.5 ahead: 10

Areas in the overall index
KnowledgeSonnet 5.5 +35122.8 to 88.1
MathematicsSonnet 5.5 +30131.9 to 101.8
CodingSonnet 5.5 +21125.2 to 104.5
GeneralSonnet 5.5 +20125.0 to 104.8
AgentsSonnet 5.5 +19120.8 to 101.7
ReasoningSonnet 5.5 +13118.3 to 105.7
MultimodalSonnet 5.5 +11110.7 to 99.3
Specialist fields
HealthSonnet 5.5 +27121.9 to 94.8
FinanceSonnet 5.5 +17119.4 to 102.4
LegalSonnet 5.5 +12114.5 to 102.7

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 3 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
ProductivitySonnet 5.5 +19116.4 to 97.9
EducationSonnet 5.5 +12113.8 to 101.7
Cybersecuritytoo little data112.7 to 107.3

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Terra at the same effort

Both models measured at the same reasoning efforts. This shows whether a lead comes from the model or only from more compute.

maxSonnet 5.5 ahead
22.0 points gap across 10 shared test series
Overall index (max vs. max)Sonnet 5.5 ahead
Sonnet 5.5 121.9 vs. GPT-5.6 Terra 100.9

The gap compares only the Artificial Analysis test series in which both models are measured at that effort. Tied below 3 points, ahead only beyond two standard errors.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeSonnet 5.5Coding 125.2 to 104.5
Maths and data analysisSonnet 5.5Mathematics 131.9 to 101.8, Reasoning 118.3 to 105.7
Facts and researchSonnet 5.5Knowledge 122.8 to 88.1
Agents and workflowsSonnet 5.5Agents 120.8 to 101.7
Fast chat repliesSonnet 5.5103 to 72 tokens per second
Security analysisopenCybersecurity 112.7 to 107.3 (too little data)
Many requests on a small budgetabout the same$4 to $4.50 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsSonnet 5.5Finance 119.4 to 102.4, Legal 114.5 to 102.7, Health 121.9 to 94.8
Images, screenshots and PDFsSonnet 5.5Multimodal 110.7 to 99.3

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Terra in our own test

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Claude Sonnet 5.5: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 28 s · $0.04

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
3,886 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0389
Response time
28.2 s
API model reported in response
anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5
Pinned endpoint
Anthropic | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5-20260928
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

GPT-5.6 Terra

GPT-5.6 Terra: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Sep 7, 2026 · 65 s · $0.04

Test details
Run date
Sep 7, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
openai/gpt-5.6-terra
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
3,373 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0405
Response time
64.6 s
API model reported in response
openai/gpt-5.6-terra
Pinned endpoint
OpenAI | openai/gpt-5.6-terra-20260709
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Unavailable in this round

GPT-5.6 Terra

Unavailable in this round

Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GPT-5.6 Terra in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v5)

20 of 95 models

Claude Fable 5.2max130.9
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh127.0
Claude Opus 5.5max125.7
Claude Fable 5.1max124.1
Claude Sonnet 5.5max121.9
Gemini 4 Argonhigh121.2
GPT-6 Astramax119.6
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.4
GPT-6.1 Solmax117.5
Claude Opus 5max117.3
Muse Wondermax113.7
Claude Fable 5max112.8
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.6
Muse Ember 1.0max110.5
GPT-5.6 Solmax109.3
GPT-6 Solmax108.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.7
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max107.1
GPT-6.1 Terramax106.5
GPT-5.6 Terramax100.9

Popularity compared

How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.

GPT-5.6 Terra has no popularity score yet.

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 13, 2026

Claude Sonnet 5.5GPT-5.6 Terra

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricClaude Sonnet 5.5GPT-5.6 Terra
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better121.9100.9
RankRank 5 of 95Rank 31 of 95
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$2$2above 272,000 tokens: $4
Outputwhat the model writes$10$12above 272,000 tokens: $18
Cost per task (own tests)average of 3 original-protocol tasks both models passed (SVG short test not included)$0.038$0.047
Speed
Tokens per second10372
Popularity
Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 10079Rank 21 of 478n/a
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages1.05 M tokens≈ 1,580 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffJune 2026Feb 16, 2026
ReleasedSep 28, 2026Jul 9, 2026
AvailabilityActiveActive
Open weightsnono

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

Successor of GPT-5.6 TerraGPT-6.1 Terra

Overall index 106.5, rank 19$1 input and $5 output per 1M tokens

Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra
As cheap as Sonnet 5.5Gemini 4 Carbon

Overall index 127.0, rank 2$2 input and $10 output per 1M tokens

Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
Best model in the overall indexClaude Fable 5.2

Overall index 130.9, rank 1$8 input and $40 output per 1M tokens

Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5.2

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: Claude Sonnet 5.5B: GPT-5.6 Terra

Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 69.8%GPT-5.6 Terra: 47.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 59.6%GPT-5.6 Terra: 72.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 75.7%GPT-5.6 Terra: 66.2%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 58.1%GPT-5.6 Terra: 54.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Financial Coaching BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 74.9%GPT-5.6 Terra: 71.0%Vals AIAs of 11/13/2026
IOIOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 83.1%GPT-5.6 Terra: 87.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 48.1%GPT-5.6 Terra: 41.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,473GPT-5.6 Terra: 1,468LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,263GPT-5.6 Terra: 1,266LMArenaAs of 11/09/2026
MedCodeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 52.9%GPT-5.6 Terra: 43.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 91.1%GPT-5.6 Terra: 82.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 6.5%GPT-5.6 Terra: 0.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ProofBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 100%GPT-5.6 Terra: 74%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Public Benefits Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 67.2%GPT-5.6 Terra: 62.4%Vals AIAs of 10/12/2026
SAGEOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 88%GPT-5.6 Terra: 87%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 30.2%GPT-5.6 Terra: 9.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 42%GPT-5.6 Terra: 30%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 64.1%GPT-5.6 Terra: 22.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 47.1%GPT-5.6 Terra: 10.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 92.4%GPT-5.6 Terra: 74.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 69.8%GPT-5.6 Terra: 40.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1Patch · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 87.5%GPT-5.6 Terra: 87.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 80.0%GPT-5.6 Terra: 62.2%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 52.7%GPT-5.6 Terra: 49.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Financial Coaching BenchElicitation · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 63.1%GPT-5.6 Terra: 61.1%Vals AIAs of 11/13/2026
IOIIOI 2024 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 85%GPT-5.6 Terra: 85%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 69.7%GPT-5.6 Terra: 57.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,474GPT-5.6 Terra: 1,466LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,372GPT-5.6 Terra: 1,303LMArenaAs of 11/09/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 49.5%GPT-5.6 Terra: 15.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SAGEComputer Science · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 91.4%GPT-5.6 Terra: 89.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchCapability Score · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 51.6%GPT-5.6 Terra: 26.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 16.7%GPT-5.6 Terra: 16.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Hardware · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 53.3%GPT-5.6 Terra: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEarth Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 12.5%GPT-5.6 Terra: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCOBOL · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 70%GPT-5.6 Terra: 70%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1PoC · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 31.7%GPT-5.6 Terra: 56.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBDataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 86.3%GPT-5.6 Terra: 82.2%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)All-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 47.6%GPT-5.6 Terra: 42.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Financial Coaching BenchLength-Controlled · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 75.2%GPT-5.6 Terra: 70.9%Vals AIAs of 11/13/2026
IOIIOI 2025 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 88.3%GPT-5.6 Terra: 77.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 91.3%GPT-5.6 Terra: 88.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,541GPT-5.6 Terra: 1,516LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlCreative writing with images · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,243GPT-5.6 Terra: 1,250LMArenaAs of 11/09/2026
ProgramBenchFully Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 6.5%GPT-5.6 Terra: 0.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SAGELinear Algebra · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 80.3%GPT-5.6 Terra: 79.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchFully Solved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 30.2%GPT-5.6 Terra: 9.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 65.2%GPT-5.6 Terra: 64.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Media · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 75.0%GPT-5.6 Terra: 16.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEngineering Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 44.4%GPT-5.6 Terra: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCode Quality · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 4.601 / 5GPT-5.6 Terra: 3.948 / 5Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBDCF · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 70.1%GPT-5.6 Terra: 53.4%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Comparables · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 47.1%GPT-5.6 Terra: 47.0%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
IOIIOI 2026 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 75.8%GPT-5.6 Terra: 100.0%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 39.5%GPT-5.6 Terra: 37.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCoding · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,517GPT-5.6 Terra: 1,517LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlDiagram understanding · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,308GPT-5.6 Terra: 1,296LMArenaAs of 11/09/2026
ProgramBenchRaw Pass Rate · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 76.3%GPT-5.6 Terra: 72.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SAGEPartial Differential Equations · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 91.1%GPT-5.6 Terra: 93.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 49.9%GPT-5.6 Terra: 33.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0ML · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 81.8%GPT-5.6 Terra: 15.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceLife Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 42.1%GPT-5.6 Terra: 15.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBLBO · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 70.0%GPT-5.6 Terra: 50.4%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Disclosure Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 71.4%GPT-5.6 Terra: 66.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026

More comparisons

Compare Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GPT-5.6 Terra with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1GPT-6 Luna vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  2. 2Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  3. 3Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  4. 4Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5.5
  5. 5Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3
  6. 6Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
  7. 7Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 5
  8. 8Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Grok 4.7
  9. 9Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
Show all 61 comparisons
  1. 10Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5.1
  2. 11GPT-5.6 Terra vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  3. 12Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  4. 13Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  5. 14Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  6. 15Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Kimi K3
  7. 16Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  8. 17GPT-6 Astra vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  9. 18Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.6
  10. 19GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  11. 20Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  12. 21Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  13. 22Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GLM-5.2
  14. 23Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  15. 24Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  16. 25Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
  17. 26Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5
  18. 27Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  19. 28Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  20. 29Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.6
  21. 30Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  22. 31Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  23. 32Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  24. 33Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Muse Spark 1.3
  25. 34GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  26. 35Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.7
  27. 36GPT-5.6 Terra vs. Grok 4.7
  28. 37Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  29. 38Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.8
  30. 39Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Kimi K2.6
  31. 40Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Grok 4.6
  32. 41Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  33. 42GPT-5.6 Terra vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  34. 43Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.5
  35. 44Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
  36. 45Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 4.5
  37. 46Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 4
  38. 47Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Mistral Medium 3.5
  39. 48GPT-5.6 Terra vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
  40. 49GPT-5.6 Terra vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  41. 50Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  42. 51Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-5.4
  43. 52Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  44. 53GPT-5.6 Terra vs. GPT-5.4
  45. 54Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-5.5
  46. 55Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.5
  47. 56Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  48. 57Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra
  49. 58Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Muse Wonder Full
  50. 59Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  51. 60Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
  52. 61GPT-5.6 Terra vs. Gemini 4 Argon