Skip to main content

AnthropicZ.aiLLM matchup

Claude Sonnet 5.5vs.GLM-5.3-Flash

Which one is better?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 performs better than GLM-5.3-Flash, but costs 13.3 times (input) and 20 times (output) as much.

Sonnet 5.5 ahead
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
121.9

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Rank 5

94.3

GLM-5.3-Flash

Rank 43

about as fast
SpeedTokens per second
103

Claude Sonnet 5.5

101

GLM-5.3-Flash

GLM-5.3-Flash cheaper
Price$ per 1M tokens
$4

Claude Sonnet 5.5

$0.24

GLM-5.3-Flash

GLM-5.3-Flash more popular
Popularity0 to 100
79

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Rank 21 of 478

85

GLM-5.3-Flash

Rank 7 of 478

Choose Claude Sonnet 5.5 for

MathematicsKnowledgeGeneralReasoningCodingAgentsHealthFinanceMultimodalLegal

No clear advantage for GLM-5.3-Flash.

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

Sonnet 5.5GLM-5.3-FlashMedian of all ranked models

10012014080CodingSonnet 5.5ReasoningSonnet 5.5MathematicsSonnet 5.5KnowledgeSonnet 5.5AgentsSonnet 5.5GeneralSonnet 5.5MultimodalSonnet 5.5FinanceSonnet 5.5LegalSonnet 5.5HealthSonnet 5.5
CodingSonnet 5.5 ahead
Sonnet 5.5125.2Rank 3
GLM-5.3-Flash97.0Rank 44
Median of ranked models87.5

95 % range: Sonnet 5.5 119.5 to 130.9, GLM-5.3-Flash 91.3 to 102.6.

AreaSonnet 5.5GLM-5.3-Flash

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the close-up the net starts at 80 points, just below the weaker model's lowest value; the reference group average is 100.

Sonnet 5.5 is ahead in 10 of 10 areas, GLM-5.3-Flash in none.

Sonnet 5.5 ahead: 10

Areas in the overall index
MathematicsSonnet 5.5 +41131.9 to 91.0
KnowledgeSonnet 5.5 +36122.8 to 87.1
GeneralSonnet 5.5 +34125.0 to 91.4
ReasoningSonnet 5.5 +32118.3 to 86.8
CodingSonnet 5.5 +28125.2 to 97.0
AgentsSonnet 5.5 +28120.8 to 93.0
MultimodalSonnet 5.5 +14110.7 to 97.1
Specialist fields
HealthSonnet 5.5 +20121.9 to 102.0
FinanceSonnet 5.5 +19119.4 to 100.4
LegalSonnet 5.5 +14114.5 to 101.0

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 3 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
Cybersecuritytoo little data112.7 to 97.0
Educationtoo little data113.8 to 104.9
Productivityonly Sonnet 5.5 has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash at the same effort

Both models measured at the same reasoning efforts. This shows whether a lead comes from the model or only from more compute.

maxSonnet 5.5 ahead
25.5 points gap across 12 shared test series
Overall index (max vs. max)Sonnet 5.5 ahead
Sonnet 5.5 121.9 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash 94.3

The gap compares only the Artificial Analysis test series in which both models are measured at that effort. Tied below 3 points, ahead only beyond two standard errors.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeSonnet 5.5Coding 125.2 to 97.0
Maths and data analysisSonnet 5.5Mathematics 131.9 to 91.0, Reasoning 118.3 to 86.8
Facts and researchSonnet 5.5Knowledge 122.8 to 87.1
Agents and workflowsSonnet 5.5Agents 120.8 to 93.0
Fast chat repliesabout the same103 to 101 tokens per second
Security analysisopenCybersecurity 112.7 to 97.0 (too little data)
Many requests on a small budgetGLM-5.3-Flash$4 to $0.24 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsSonnet 5.5Finance 119.4 to 100.4, Legal 114.5 to 101.0, Health 121.9 to 102.0
Images, screenshots and PDFsSonnet 5.5Multimodal 110.7 to 97.1

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash in our own test

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Claude Sonnet 5.5: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 28 s · $0.04

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
3,886 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0389
Response time
28.2 s
API model reported in response
anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5
Pinned endpoint
Anthropic | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5-20260928
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

GLM-5.3-Flash

GLM-5.3-Flash: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 50 s · $0.0013

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
z-ai/glm-5.3-flash
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
2,563 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0013
Response time
49.7 s
API model reported in response
z-ai/glm-5.3-flash
Pinned endpoint
Z.AI | z-ai/glm-5.3-flash-20260826
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Earlier attempts (1)

  • Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Unavailable in this round

GLM-5.3-Flash

Unavailable in this round

Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GLM-5.3-Flash in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v5)

20 of 95 models

Claude Fable 5.2max130.9
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh127.0
Claude Opus 5.5max125.7
Claude Fable 5.1max124.1
Claude Sonnet 5.5max121.9
Gemini 4 Argonhigh121.2
GPT-6 Astramax119.6
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.4
GPT-6.1 Solmax117.5
Claude Opus 5max117.3
Muse Wondermax113.7
Claude Fable 5max112.8
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.6
Muse Ember 1.0max110.5
GPT-5.6 Solmax109.3
GPT-6 Solmax108.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.7
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max107.1
GPT-6.1 Terramax106.5
GLM-5.3-Flashmax94.3

Popularity compared

How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.

GLM-5.3-Flash is more popular than Claude Sonnet 5.5: 85 to 79 out of 100.

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 13, 2026

Claude Sonnet 5.5GLM-5.3-Flash

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricClaude Sonnet 5.5GLM-5.3-Flash
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better121.994.3
RankRank 5 of 95Rank 43 of 95
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$2$0.15
Outputwhat the model writes$10$0.50
Cost per task (own tests)average of 3 original-protocol tasks both models passed (SVG short test not included)$0.038$0.005
Speed
Tokens per second103101
Popularity
Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 10079Rank 21 of 47885Rank 7 of 478
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffJune 2026n/a
ReleasedSep 28, 2026Aug 26, 2026
AvailabilityActiveOpen Source
Open weightsnoyes

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

Cheaper than GLM-5.3-FlashMuse Ember 1.0

Overall index 110.5, rank 14$0.10 input and $0.50 output per 1M tokens

View profile
Best model in the overall indexClaude Fable 5.2

Overall index 130.9, rank 1$8 input and $40 output per 1M tokens

Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5.2

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: Claude Sonnet 5.5B: GLM-5.3-Flash

Access to Justice BenchmarkOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 74.9%GLM-5.3-Flash: 71.1%Vals AIAs of 11/10/2026
Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 69.8%GLM-5.3-Flash: 20.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Code Migration v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 86.9%GLM-5.3-Flash: 51.6%Vals AIAs of 10/30/2026
CyberBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 59.6%GLM-5.3-Flash: 67.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 75.7%GLM-5.3-Flash: 55.9%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMB v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 75.9%GLM-5.3-Flash: 66.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 58.1%GLM-5.3-Flash: 57.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Finance Agent v2.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 67.3%GLM-5.3-Flash: 60.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
HLAB-Vals-1.1Overall · Task fully resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 10.4%GLM-5.3-Flash: 10.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
IOIOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 83.1%GLM-5.3-Flash: 52.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 48.1%GLM-5.3-Flash: 45.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,772GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,609LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,473GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,475LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,263GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,272LMArenaAs of 11/09/2026
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 91.1%GLM-5.3-Flash: 88.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 6.5%GLM-5.3-Flash: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ProofBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 100%GLM-5.3-Flash: 21%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
SAGEOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 88.0%GLM-5.3-Flash: 89.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 30.2%GLM-5.3-Flash: 0.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 42.0%GLM-5.3-Flash: 31.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 64.1%GLM-5.3-Flash: 37.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 47.1%GLM-5.3-Flash: 2.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Finance IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 64.5%GLM-5.3-Flash: 55.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 70.9%GLM-5.3-Flash: 50.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Legal IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 68.0%GLM-5.3-Flash: 71.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Router IndexFull Index · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 69.0%GLM-5.3-Flash: 50.9%Vals AIAs of 11/03/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 92.4%GLM-5.3-Flash: 30.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 69.8%GLM-5.3-Flash: 7.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Code Migration v1.1CLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 82.8%GLM-5.3-Flash: 38.7%Vals AIAs of 10/30/2026
CyberBench v1.1Patch · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 87.5%GLM-5.3-Flash: 85.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 80.0%GLM-5.3-Flash: 44.6%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMB v1.1Comps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 79.4%GLM-5.3-Flash: 67.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 52.7%GLM-5.3-Flash: 53.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Finance Agent v2.1Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 66.2%GLM-5.3-Flash: 57.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
HLAB-Vals-1.1Antitrust Competition · Criteria passed · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 90.2%GLM-5.3-Flash: 92.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
IOIIOI 2024 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 85.0%GLM-5.3-Flash: 53.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 69.7%GLM-5.3-Flash: 57.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevHTML development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,753GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,576LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,474GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,471LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,372GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,334LMArenaAs of 11/09/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 49.5%GLM-5.3-Flash: 7.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SAGEComputer Science · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 91.4%GLM-5.3-Flash: 91.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchCapability Score · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 51.6%GLM-5.3-Flash: 6.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 16.7%GLM-5.3-Flash: 10.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Hardware · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 53.3%GLM-5.3-Flash: 20.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEarth Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 12.5%GLM-5.3-Flash: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Finance IndexEMB v1.1 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 75.9%GLM-5.3-Flash: 66.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals IndexCode Migration v1.1 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 87.4%GLM-5.3-Flash: 50.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Legal IndexBusiness & Commercial · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 62.7%GLM-5.3-Flash: 67.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Router IndexCode Migration · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 87.4%GLM-5.3-Flash: 50.6%Vals AIAs of 11/03/2026
Code MigrationCOBOL · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 70%GLM-5.3-Flash: 60%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Code Migration v1.1COBOL · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 99.0%GLM-5.3-Flash: 90.5%Vals AIAs of 10/30/2026
CyberBench v1.1PoC · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 31.7%GLM-5.3-Flash: 50.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBDataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 86.3%GLM-5.3-Flash: 65.7%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMB v1.1Dataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 87.7%GLM-5.3-Flash: 80.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent (v2)All-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 47.6%GLM-5.3-Flash: 46.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Finance Agent v2.1All-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 54.4%GLM-5.3-Flash: 47.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
HLAB-Vals-1.1Antitrust Competition · Task fully resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 10%GLM-5.3-Flash: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
IOIIOI 2025 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 88.3%GLM-5.3-Flash: 56.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 91.3%GLM-5.3-Flash: 90.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevImage to WebDev · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,744GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,582LMArenaAs of 11/10/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,541GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,529LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlCreative writing with images · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,243GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,246LMArenaAs of 11/09/2026
ProgramBenchFully Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 6.5%GLM-5.3-Flash: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026

More comparisons

Compare Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GLM-5.3-Flash with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  2. 2Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  3. 3Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5.5
  4. 4DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  5. 5Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  6. 6GPT-6 Luna vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  7. 7Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3
  8. 8Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
  9. 9Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 5
Show all 81 comparisons
  1. 10Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  2. 11Grok 4.7 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  3. 12Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Grok 4.7
  4. 13Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  5. 14Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  6. 15GLM-5.3-Flash vs. GLM-5.3
  7. 16DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  8. 17DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  9. 18Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5.1
  10. 19Claude Opus 5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  11. 20Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  12. 21Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  13. 22Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  14. 23Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Kimi K3
  15. 24Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  16. 25Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.6
  17. 26Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  18. 27Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  19. 28GPT-5.6 Sol vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  20. 29Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  21. 30GPT-6 Sol vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  22. 31GPT-6 Astra vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  23. 32Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GLM-5.2
  24. 33GLM-5.3-Flash vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  25. 34Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  26. 35GPT-5.4 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  27. 36Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  28. 37Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
  29. 38Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5
  30. 39Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  31. 40GLM-5.3-Flash vs. Mistral Large 4
  32. 41Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  33. 42Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.6
  34. 43Kimi K3 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  35. 44Claude Opus 4.6 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  36. 45Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  37. 46Claude Opus 4.8 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  38. 47Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Muse Spark 1.3
  39. 48Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.7
  40. 49DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  41. 50GLM-5.3-Flash vs. GLM-5.2
  42. 51GPT-5.6 Luna vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  43. 52Claude Haiku 4.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  44. 53Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  45. 54Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.8
  46. 55Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Kimi K2.6
  47. 56Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  48. 57GLM-5.3-Flash vs. MiMo-V2.5-Pro
  49. 58Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Grok 4.6
  50. 59Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  51. 60Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.5
  52. 61Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
  53. 62Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 4.5
  54. 63Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 4
  55. 64Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Mistral Medium 3.5
  56. 65Gemini 3.6 Flash vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  57. 66GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  58. 67Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-5.4
  59. 68Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  60. 69Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-5.5
  61. 70GPT-5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  62. 71Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.5
  63. 72Grok 4.3 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  64. 73Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  65. 74Kimi K3.1 Pro vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  66. 75Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra
  67. 76Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Muse Wonder Full
  68. 77GPT-6.1 Terra vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  69. 78Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  70. 79Gemini 4 Argon vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  71. 80Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
  72. 81Muse Wonder Full vs. GLM-5.3-Flash