Skip to main content

OpenAIZ.aiLLM matchup

GPT-6 Solvs.GLM-5.3-Flash

Which one is better?

GPT-6 Sol performs better than GLM-5.3-Flash, but costs 13.3 times (input) and 20 times (output) as much.

GPT-6 Sol ahead
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
110.5

GPT-6 Sol

Rank 13

94.2

GLM-5.3-Flash

Rank 37

GPT-6 Sol faster
SpeedTokens per second
111

GPT-6 Sol

56

GLM-5.3-Flash

GLM-5.3-Flash cheaper
Price$ per 1M tokens
$4

GPT-6 Sol

$0.24

GLM-5.3-Flash

GPT-6 Sol more popular
Popularity0 to 100
73

GPT-6 Sol

Rank 3 of 785

44

GLM-5.3-Flash

Rank 202 of 785

Above 272,000 tokens of context, GPT-6 Sol costs more: $4 input and $15 output per 1M tokens.

Choose GPT-6 Sol for

ReasoningMathematicsGeneralKnowledgeCybersecurityCodingAgentsMultimodal

Choose GLM-5.3-Flash for

No clear advantage

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

GPT-6 SolGLM-5.3-FlashMedian of all ranked models

10012080CodingGPT-6 SolReasoningGPT-6 SolMathematicsGPT-6 SolKnowledgeGPT-6 SolAgentsGPT-6 SolGeneralGPT-6 SolMultimodalGPT-6 SolFinancelevel
CodingGPT-6 Sol ahead
GPT-6 Sol114.9Rank 11
GLM-5.3-Flash96.8Rank 38
Median of ranked models84.1

95 % range: GPT-6 Sol 112.2 to 117.6, GLM-5.3-Flash 91.3 to 102.2.

AreaGPT-6 SolGLM-5.3-Flash

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the close-up the net starts at 80 points, just below the weaker model's lowest value; the reference group average is 100. Not in the net because a model has no own value there or the data are too thin: Legal, Health.

GPT-6 Sol is ahead in 7 of 10 areas, GLM-5.3-Flash in none.

GPT-6 Sol ahead: 7level: 1too little data: 2

Areas in the overall index
ReasoningGPT-6 Sol +26114.1 to 87.7
MathematicsGPT-6 Sol +26117.5 to 91.3
GeneralGPT-6 Sol +22113.0 to 91.1
KnowledgeGPT-6 Sol +21109.8 to 88.8
CodingGPT-6 Sol +18114.9 to 96.8
AgentsGPT-6 Sol +13107.2 to 93.7
MultimodalGPT-6 Sol +11106.9 to 96.2
Specialist fields
Financelevel101.3 to 100.1
Healthtoo little data104.8 to 99.3
Legaltoo little data104.8 to 99.4

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 4 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
CybersecurityGPT-6 Sol +20116.4 to 96.0
Searchonly GPT-6 Sol has a score
Productivityonly GPT-6 Sol has a score
Educationonly GLM-5.3-Flash has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

GPT-6 Sol vs. GLM-5.3-Flash at the same effort

Both models measured at the same reasoning efforts. This shows whether a lead comes from the model or only from more compute.

maxGPT-6 Sol ahead
GPT-6 Sol 110.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash 94.2 · Gap 15.1 · Test series 11
Overall index (max vs. max)GPT-6 Sol ahead
GPT-6 Sol 110.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash 94.2

Gap and verdict compare only the Artificial Analysis test series in which both models are measured at that effort. Tied below 3 points, ahead only beyond two standard errors. The single values rest on all test series of each model, so their difference can deviate from the gap.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeGPT-6 SolCoding 114.9 to 96.8
Maths and data analysisGPT-6 SolMathematics 117.5 to 91.3, Reasoning 114.1 to 87.7
Facts and researchGPT-6 SolKnowledge 109.8 to 88.8, Search without a score for GLM-5.3-Flash
Agents and workflowsGPT-6 SolAgents 107.2 to 93.7
Fast chat repliesGPT-6 Sol111 to 56 tokens per second
Security analysisGPT-6 SolCybersecurity 116.4 to 96.0
Many requests on a small budgetGLM-5.3-Flash$4 to $0.24 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textslevelFinance 101.3 to 100.1, Legal 104.8 to 99.4 (too little data), Health 104.8 to 99.3 (too little data)
Images, screenshots and PDFsGPT-6 SolMultimodal 106.9 to 96.2

See for yourself: same task, one attempt

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

GPT-6 Sol

GPT-6 Sol: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 80 s · $0.04

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
openai/gpt-6-sol
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
4,389 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0439
Response time
80.5 s
API model reported in response
openai/gpt-6-sol
Pinned endpoint
OpenAI | openai/gpt-6-sol-20260922
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

GLM-5.3-Flash

GLM-5.3-Flash: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 50 s · $0.0013

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
z-ai/glm-5.3-flash
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
2,563 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0013
Response time
49.7 s
API model reported in response
z-ai/glm-5.3-flash
Pinned endpoint
Z.AI | z-ai/glm-5.3-flash-20260826
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Earlier attempts (1)

  • Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

GPT-6 Sol

Unavailable in this round

GLM-5.3-Flash

Unavailable in this round

GPT-6 Sol and GLM-5.3-Flash in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v4)

20 of 92 models

4 models in this view are measured at a lower reasoning effort than max in the overall index. Dashed column: lower reasoning effort than the top.

Claude Opus 5.5max126.1
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh125.8
Claude Fable 5.1max123.8
Claude Sonnet 5.5max122.8
Gemini 4 Argonhigh122.3
GPT-6 Astramax121.3
GPT-6.1 Solmax119.2
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.3
Claude Opus 5max117.2
Muse Wondermax113.4
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.9
Claude Fable 5max112.5
GPT-6 Solmax110.5
GPT-5.6 Solmax108.7
Muse Spark 1.3max107.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max106.6
Gemini 3.8 Flashhigh106.5
GPT-6.1 Terramax105.3
GLM-5.3-Flashmax94.2

Popularity compared

How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.

GPT-6 Sol is more popular than GLM-5.3-Flash: 73 to 44 out of 100.

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 7, 2026

GPT-6 SolGLM-5.3-Flash

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricGPT-6 SolGLM-5.3-Flash
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better110.594.2
RankRank 13 of 92Rank 37 of 92
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$2above 272,000 tokens: $4$0.15
Outputwhat the model writes$10above 272,000 tokens: $15$0.50
Cost per task (own tests)average of 3 original-protocol tasks both models passed (SVG short test not included)$0.044$0.005
Speed
Tokens per second11156
Popularity
Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 10073Rank 3 of 78544Rank 202 of 785
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1.05 M tokens≈ 1,580 A4 pages1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffApr 20, 2026n/a
ReleasedSep 22, 2026Aug 26, 2026
AvailabilityActiveOpen Source
Open weightsnoyes

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

Successor of GPT-6 SolGPT-6.1 Sol

Overall index 119.2, rank 7$2 input and $10 output per 1M tokens

GLM-5.3-Flash vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
Cheaper than GLM-5.3-FlashClaude Haiku 5.5

Overall index 103.4, rank 20$0.10 input and $0.50 output per 1M tokens

GPT-6 Sol vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
Best model in the overall indexClaude Opus 5.5

Overall index 126.1, rank 1$4 input and $20 output per 1M tokens

GPT-6 Sol vs. Claude Opus 5.5

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: GPT-6 SolB: GLM-5.3-Flash

Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 57.2%GLM-5.3-Flash: 20.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 78.0%GLM-5.3-Flash: 67.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 71.5%GLM-5.3-Flash: 55.9%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 49.1%GLM-5.3-Flash: 57.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
IOIOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 82.6%GLM-5.3-Flash: 52.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 28.8%GLM-5.3-Flash: 45.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,678GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,607LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,458GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,477LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,266GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,271LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 82.0%GLM-5.3-Flash: 88.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 2%GLM-5.3-Flash: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ProofBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 83%GLM-5.3-Flash: 21%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
SRE BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 30.5%GLM-5.3-Flash: 0.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 15.0%GLM-5.3-Flash: 31.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 44.4%GLM-5.3-Flash: 37.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 30.0%GLM-5.3-Flash: 2.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 87.8%GLM-5.3-Flash: 30.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 52.9%GLM-5.3-Flash: 7.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1Patch · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 89.3%GLM-5.3-Flash: 85.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 73.3%GLM-5.3-Flash: 44.6%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 43.2%GLM-5.3-Flash: 53.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
IOIIOI 2024 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 100.0%GLM-5.3-Flash: 53.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 39.4%GLM-5.3-Flash: 57.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevHTML development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,680GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,577LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,448GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,470LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlCreative writing with images · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,252GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,242LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 32.5%GLM-5.3-Flash: 7.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchCapability Score · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 57.3%GLM-5.3-Flash: 6.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 6.7%GLM-5.3-Flash: 10.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Hardware · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 6.7%GLM-5.3-Flash: 20.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEarth Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 25%GLM-5.3-Flash: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCOBOL · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 70%GLM-5.3-Flash: 60%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1PoC · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 66.7%GLM-5.3-Flash: 50.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBDataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 83.9%GLM-5.3-Flash: 65.7%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)All-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 36.0%GLM-5.3-Flash: 46.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
IOIIOI 2025 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 79.3%GLM-5.3-Flash: 56.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 80.5%GLM-5.3-Flash: 90.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevImage to WebDev · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,660GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,578LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,485GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,530LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlDiagram understanding · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,303GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,306LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchFully Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 2%GLM-5.3-Flash: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchFully Solved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 30.5%GLM-5.3-Flash: 0.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 50.7%GLM-5.3-Flash: 52.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Media · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 41.7%GLM-5.3-Flash: 25.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEngineering Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 22.2%GLM-5.3-Flash: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCode Quality · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 4.375 / 5GLM-5.3-Flash: 4.355 / 5Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBDCF · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 63.1%GLM-5.3-Flash: 59.9%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Comparables · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 40.8%GLM-5.3-Flash: 45.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
IOIIOI 2026 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 68.5%GLM-5.3-Flash: 47.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 27.9%GLM-5.3-Flash: 44.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevReact development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,680GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,624LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCoding · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,519GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,526LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlEnglish · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,255GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,270LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchRaw Pass Rate · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 81.9%GLM-5.3-Flash: 48.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 23.2%GLM-5.3-Flash: 43.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0ML · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 45.5%GLM-5.3-Flash: 51.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceLife Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 42.1%GLM-5.3-Flash: 5.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBLBO · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 59.4%GLM-5.3-Flash: 48.0%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Disclosure Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 55.6%GLM-5.3-Flash: 71.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 80.4%GLM-5.3-Flash: 91.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevWeb development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,678GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,607LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCreative writing · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,435GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,434LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlHomework · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,306GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,306LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 56.1%GLM-5.3-Flash: 61.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026

More comparisons

Compare GPT-6 Sol and GLM-5.3-Flash with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  2. 2GPT-6 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  3. 3Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  4. 4GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  5. 5GPT-6 Luna vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  6. 6GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  7. 7Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  8. 8DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  9. 9Grok 4.7 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
Show all 66 comparisons
  1. 10GPT-6 Astra vs. GPT-6 Sol
  2. 11GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  3. 12DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  4. 13GPT-5.4 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  5. 14Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  6. 15Claude Opus 5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  7. 16DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  8. 17Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  9. 18GLM-5.3-Flash vs. Mistral Large 4
  10. 19GLM-5.3-Flash vs. GLM-5.3
  11. 20GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  12. 21Claude Opus 4.8 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  13. 22GPT-6 Astra vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  14. 23Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  15. 24GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.4
  16. 25GPT-5.6 Sol vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  17. 26GPT-6 Sol vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  18. 27GPT-6 Sol vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  19. 28GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-6 Luna
  20. 29Claude Opus 4.6 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  21. 30GPT-6 Sol vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  22. 31Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  23. 32Claude Opus 4.8 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  24. 33Kimi K3 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  25. 34GPT-6 Sol vs. Grok 4.7
  26. 35Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  27. 36Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  28. 37Claude Haiku 4.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  29. 38GPT-6 Sol vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  30. 39Claude Sonnet 5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  31. 40GPT-6 Sol vs. Kimi K3
  32. 41Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  33. 42GPT-6 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  34. 43GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  35. 44Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  36. 45Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  37. 46GLM-5.3-Flash vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  38. 47Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  39. 48DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  40. 49GPT-6 Sol vs. Mistral Large 4
  41. 50GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  42. 51GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  43. 52GLM-5.3-Flash vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  44. 53Claude Opus 4.6 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  45. 54GLM-5.3-Flash vs. MiMo-V2.5-Pro
  46. 55GLM-5.3-Flash vs. GLM-5.2
  47. 56GPT-6 Sol vs. Muse Wonder
  48. 57GPT-5.6 Luna vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  49. 58Claude Haiku 4.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  50. 59GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.5
  51. 60GPT-6.1 Terra vs. GPT-6 Sol
  52. 61GPT-5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  53. 62Grok 4.3 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  54. 63Kimi K3.1 Pro vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  55. 64GPT-6.1 Terra vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  56. 65GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
  57. 66Gemini 4 Argon vs. GLM-5.3-Flash