Skip to main content

xAIZ.aiLLM matchup

Grok 4.7vs.GLM-5.3-Flash

Which one is better?

Grok 4.7 performs better than GLM-5.3-Flash, but costs 13.3 times (input) and 12 times (output) as much.

Grok 4.7 ahead
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
103.4

Grok 4.7

Rank 21

94.2

GLM-5.3-Flash

Rank 37

Grok 4.7 faster
SpeedTokens per second
71

Grok 4.7

56

GLM-5.3-Flash

GLM-5.3-Flash cheaper
Price$ per 1M tokens
$3

Grok 4.7

$0.24

GLM-5.3-Flash

Grok 4.7 more popular
Popularity0 to 100
61

Grok 4.7

Rank 37 of 876

44

GLM-5.3-Flash

Rank 200 of 876

Above 200,000 tokens of context, Grok 4.7 costs more: $4 input and $12 output per 1M tokens.

Choose Grok 4.7 for

KnowledgeReasoningAgentsGeneralLegalCybersecurityHealthCodingFinanceEducationMathematics (not certain)

Choose GLM-5.3-Flash for

No clear advantage

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

Grok 4.7GLM-5.3-FlashMedian of all ranked models

9010011012080CodingGrok 4.7ReasoningGrok 4.7Mathematicsslightly Grok4.7KnowledgeGrok 4.7AgentsGrok 4.7GeneralGrok 4.7MultimodallevelFinanceGrok 4.7LegalGrok 4.7HealthGrok 4.7
CodingGrok 4.7 ahead
Grok 4.7103.2Rank 22
GLM-5.3-Flash96.8Rank 38
Median of ranked models84.1

95 % range: Grok 4.7 100.2 to 106.1, GLM-5.3-Flash 91.3 to 102.2.

AreaGrok 4.7GLM-5.3-Flash

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the close-up the net starts at 80 points, just below the weaker model's lowest value; the reference group average is 100.

Grok 4.7 is ahead in 8 of 10 areas, GLM-5.3-Flash in none.

Grok 4.7 ahead: 8Grok 4.7 slightly ahead: 1level: 1

Areas in the overall index
KnowledgeGrok 4.7 +17105.5 to 88.8
ReasoningGrok 4.7 +15102.2 to 87.7
AgentsGrok 4.7 +14107.4 to 93.7
GeneralGrok 4.7 +11101.6 to 91.1
CodingGrok 4.7 +6103.2 to 96.8
Mathematicsleaning Grok 4.7not certain · 4 tests each
Multimodallevel96.0 to 96.2
Specialist fields
LegalGrok 4.7 +10109.9 to 99.4
HealthGrok 4.7 +7106.2 to 99.3
FinanceGrok 4.7 +5105.3 to 100.1

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 3 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
CybersecurityGrok 4.7 +8104.2 to 96.0
EducationGrok 4.7 +4106.0 to 101.8
Productivityonly Grok 4.7 has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeGrok 4.7Coding 103.2 to 96.8
Maths and data analysisGrok 4.7Mathematics 94.8 to 91.3, Reasoning 102.2 to 87.7
Facts and researchGrok 4.7Knowledge 105.5 to 88.8
Agents and workflowsGrok 4.7Agents 107.4 to 93.7
Fast chat repliesGrok 4.771 to 56 tokens per second
Security analysisGrok 4.7Cybersecurity 104.2 to 96.0
Many requests on a small budgetGLM-5.3-Flash$3 to $0.24 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsGrok 4.7Finance 105.3 to 100.1, Legal 109.9 to 99.4, Health 106.2 to 99.3
Images, screenshots and PDFslevelMultimodal 96.0 to 96.2

See for yourself: same task, one attempt

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

Grok 4.7

Grok 4.7: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 13 s · $0.0072

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
x-ai/grok-4.7
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
1,069 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0072
Response time
13.4 s
API model reported in response
x-ai/grok-4.7
Pinned endpoint
xAI | x-ai/grok-4.7-20260916
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Earlier attempts (1)

  • Oct 1, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high

GLM-5.3-Flash

GLM-5.3-Flash: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 50 s · $0.0013

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
z-ai/glm-5.3-flash
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
2,563 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0013
Response time
49.7 s
API model reported in response
z-ai/glm-5.3-flash
Pinned endpoint
Z.AI | z-ai/glm-5.3-flash-20260826
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Earlier attempts (1)

  • Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

Grok 4.7

Unavailable in this round

GLM-5.3-Flash

Unavailable in this round

Grok 4.7 and GLM-5.3-Flash in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v4)

20 of 92 models

5 models in this view are measured at a lower reasoning effort than max in the overall index. Dashed column: lower reasoning effort than the top.

Claude Opus 5.5max126.1
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh125.8
Claude Fable 5.1max123.8
Claude Sonnet 5.5max122.8
Gemini 4 Argonhigh122.3
GPT-6 Astramax121.3
GPT-6.1 Solmax119.2
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.3
Claude Opus 5max117.2
Muse Wondermax113.4
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.9
Claude Fable 5max112.5
GPT-6 Solmax110.5
GPT-5.6 Solmax108.7
Muse Spark 1.3max107.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max106.6
Gemini 3.8 Flashhigh106.5
Grok 4.7xhigh103.4
GLM-5.3-Flashmax94.2

Popularity compared

How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.

Grok 4.7 is more popular than GLM-5.3-Flash: 61 to 44 out of 100.

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 6, 2026

Grok 4.7GLM-5.3-Flash

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricGrok 4.7GLM-5.3-Flash
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better103.494.2
RankRank 21 of 92Rank 37 of 92
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$2above 200,000 tokens: $4$0.15
Outputwhat the model writes$6above 200,000 tokens: $12$0.50
Cost per task (own tests)average of 1 original-protocol task both models passed (SVG short test not included)$0.007$0.001
Speed
Tokens per second7156
Popularity
Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 10061Rank 37 of 87644Rank 200 of 876
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once500,000 tokens≈ 750 A4 pages1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffMay 2026n/a
ReleasedSep 21, 2026Aug 26, 2026
AvailabilityActiveOpen Source
Open weightsnoyes

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

Cheaper than GLM-5.3-FlashClaude Haiku 5.5

Overall index 103.4, rank 20$0.10 input and $0.50 output per 1M tokens

Grok 4.7 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
Best model in the overall indexClaude Opus 5.5

Overall index 126.1, rank 1$4 input and $20 output per 1M tokens

Grok 4.7 vs. Claude Opus 5.5

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: Grok 4.7B: GLM-5.3-Flash

Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 44.8%GLM-5.3-Flash: 20.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Code Migration v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 53.2%GLM-5.3-Flash: 51.6%Vals AIAs of 10/30/2026
CyberBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 69.5%GLM-5.3-Flash: 67.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 67.0%GLM-5.3-Flash: 55.9%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMB v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 71.5%GLM-5.3-Flash: 66.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 52.3%GLM-5.3-Flash: 57.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Finance Agent v2.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 60.6%GLM-5.3-Flash: 60.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
HLAB-Vals-1.1Overall · Task fully resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 18.3%GLM-5.3-Flash: 10.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
IOIOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 57.7%GLM-5.3-Flash: 52.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 47.1%GLM-5.3-Flash: 45.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
LegalBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 84.4%GLM-5.3-Flash: 83.9%Vals AIAs of 10/13/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 1,637GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,607LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 1,441GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,477LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 1,250GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,271LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 89.4%GLM-5.3-Flash: 88.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 0.5%GLM-5.3-Flash: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ProofBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 26%GLM-5.3-Flash: 21%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
SAGEOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 88.7%GLM-5.3-Flash: 89.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 3.8%GLM-5.3-Flash: 0.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 34.2%GLM-5.3-Flash: 31.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 28.8%GLM-5.3-Flash: 37.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 10.0%GLM-5.3-Flash: 2.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Finance IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 58.5%GLM-5.3-Flash: 55.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 58.6%GLM-5.3-Flash: 50.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Legal IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 72.6%GLM-5.3-Flash: 71.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Router IndexFull Index · higher is betterGrok 4.7: 58.6%GLM-5.3-Flash: 50.9%Vals AIAs of 11/03/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 86.2%GLM-5.3-Flash: 30.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 36.4%GLM-5.3-Flash: 7.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Code Migration v1.1CLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 40.6%GLM-5.3-Flash: 38.7%Vals AIAs of 10/30/2026
CyberBench v1.1Patch · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 83.9%GLM-5.3-Flash: 85.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 65.0%GLM-5.3-Flash: 44.6%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMB v1.1Comps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 72.4%GLM-5.3-Flash: 67.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 46.3%GLM-5.3-Flash: 53.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Finance Agent v2.1Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 58.5%GLM-5.3-Flash: 57.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
HLAB-Vals-1.1Antitrust Competition · Criteria passed · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 93.5%GLM-5.3-Flash: 92.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
IOIIOI 2024 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 61.7%GLM-5.3-Flash: 53.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 54.5%GLM-5.3-Flash: 57.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LegalBenchConclusion Tasks · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 88.6%GLM-5.3-Flash: 89.6%Vals AIAs of 10/13/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevHTML development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 1,629GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,577LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 1,437GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,470LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 1,267GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,338LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 21.5%GLM-5.3-Flash: 7.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SAGEComputer Science · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 92.5%GLM-5.3-Flash: 91.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchCapability Score · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 17.6%GLM-5.3-Flash: 6.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 13.3%GLM-5.3-Flash: 10.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Hardware · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 26.7%GLM-5.3-Flash: 20.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEarth Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 25%GLM-5.3-Flash: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Finance IndexEMB v1.1 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 71.5%GLM-5.3-Flash: 66.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals IndexCode Migration v1.1 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 51.8%GLM-5.3-Flash: 50.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Legal IndexBusiness & Commercial · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 68.7%GLM-5.3-Flash: 67.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Router IndexCode Migration · higher is betterGrok 4.7: 51.8%GLM-5.3-Flash: 50.6%Vals AIAs of 11/03/2026
Code MigrationCOBOL · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 70%GLM-5.3-Flash: 60%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Code Migration v1.1COBOL · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 91.2%GLM-5.3-Flash: 90.5%Vals AIAs of 10/30/2026
CyberBench v1.1PoC · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 55%GLM-5.3-Flash: 50%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBDataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 83.6%GLM-5.3-Flash: 65.7%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMB v1.1Dataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 84.6%GLM-5.3-Flash: 80.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent (v2)All-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 42.1%GLM-5.3-Flash: 46.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Finance Agent v2.1All-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 49.2%GLM-5.3-Flash: 47.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
HLAB-Vals-1.1Antitrust Competition · Task fully resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 20%GLM-5.3-Flash: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
IOIIOI 2025 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 56.2%GLM-5.3-Flash: 56.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 87.2%GLM-5.3-Flash: 90.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LegalBenchInterpretation Tasks · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 81.3%GLM-5.3-Flash: 79.5%Vals AIAs of 10/13/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevImage to WebDev · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 1,586GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,578LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 1,495GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,530LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026

More comparisons

Compare Grok 4.7 and GLM-5.3-Flash with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  2. 2GPT-6 Luna vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  3. 3Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  4. 4DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  5. 5Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. Grok 4.7
  6. 6Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Grok 4.7
  7. 7Grok 4.7 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  8. 8Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Grok 4.7
  9. 9GPT-5.4 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
Show all 65 comparisons
  1. 10Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  2. 11GPT-6 Sol vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  3. 12Claude Opus 5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  4. 13Grok 4.7 vs. Kimi K3
  5. 14DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  6. 15GLM-5.3-Flash vs. Mistral Large 4
  7. 16GLM-5.3-Flash vs. GLM-5.3
  8. 17DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  9. 18GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  10. 19Gemini 4 Argon vs. Grok 4.7
  11. 20GPT-5.6 Sol vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  12. 21GPT-6 Astra vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  13. 22Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  14. 23Grok 4.7 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  15. 24GPT-6 Luna vs. Grok 4.7
  16. 25Claude Opus 4.6 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  17. 26Claude Opus 4.8 vs. Grok 4.7
  18. 27Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Grok 4.7
  19. 28Kimi K3 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  20. 29Claude Opus 4.8 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  21. 30Grok 4.7 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  22. 31Claude Fable 5.1 vs. Grok 4.7
  23. 32Grok 4.7 vs. Grok 4.5
  24. 33GPT-5.6 Terra vs. Grok 4.7
  25. 34Claude Haiku 4.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  26. 35GPT-6 Sol vs. Grok 4.7
  27. 36Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. Grok 4.7
  28. 37Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  29. 38Grok 4.7 vs. GLM-5.3
  30. 39Gemini 4 Argon vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  31. 40GPT-5.6 Luna vs. Grok 4.7
  32. 41Grok 4.7 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  33. 42GLM-5.3-Flash vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  34. 43Grok 4.7 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  35. 44Claude Opus 5 vs. Grok 4.7
  36. 45DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  37. 46GPT-5.6 Sol vs. Grok 4.7
  38. 47Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  39. 48Grok 4.7 vs. GLM-5.2
  40. 49Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. Grok 4.7
  41. 50GLM-5.3-Flash vs. MiMo-V2.5-Pro
  42. 51Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs. Grok 4.7
  43. 52GLM-5.3-Flash vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  44. 53GLM-5.3-Flash vs. GLM-5.2
  45. 54GPT-5.6 Luna vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  46. 55Claude Opus 4.7 vs. Grok 4.7
  47. 56GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Grok 4.7
  48. 57Muse Wonder Full vs. Grok 4.7
  49. 58Claude Haiku 4.5 vs. Grok 4.7
  50. 59GPT-5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  51. 60GPT-6.1 Terra vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  52. 61Grok 4.3 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  53. 62GPT-6.1 Terra vs. Grok 4.7
  54. 63Kimi K3.1 Pro vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  55. 64Grok 4.7 vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  56. 65Gemini 4 Carbon vs. Grok 4.7