Skip to main content

AnthropicxAILLM matchup

Claude Haiku 5.5vs.Grok 4.7

Which one is better?

Claude Haiku 5.5 and Grok 4.7 perform about equally well, but Grok 4.7 costs 20 times (input) and 12 times (output) as much.

level
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
103.4

Claude Haiku 5.5

Rank 20

103.3

Grok 4.7

Rank 21

Haiku 5.5 faster
SpeedTokens per second
236

Claude Haiku 5.5

71

Grok 4.7

Haiku 5.5 cheaper
Price$ per 1M tokens
$0.20

Claude Haiku 5.5

$3

Grok 4.7

Haiku 5.5 more popular
Popularity0 to 100
77

Claude Haiku 5.5

Rank 3 of 875

61

Grok 4.7

Rank 35 of 875

Above 100,000 tokens of context, Claude Haiku 5.5 costs more: $0.50 input and $2.50 output per 1M tokens. Above 200,000 tokens of context, Grok 4.7 costs more: $4 input and $12 output per 1M tokens.

Choose Claude Haiku 5.5 for

MathematicsGeneralCybersecurityEducationCoding

Choose Grok 4.7 for

KnowledgeLegal (not certain)

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

Haiku 5.5Grok 4.7

The median of all ranked models is below 100 in every area, so it sits in the centre of the net.

105110115100CodingHaiku 5.5ReasoninglevelMathematicsHaiku 5.5KnowledgeGrok 4.7AgentslevelGeneralHaiku 5.5FinancelevelLegalslightly Grok 4.7Healthlevel
CodingHaiku 5.5 ahead
Haiku 5.5106.2Rank 18
Grok 4.7103.1Rank 22
Median of ranked models83.7

95 % range: Haiku 5.5 102.5 to 109.9, Grok 4.7 100.2 to 106.1.

AreaHaiku 5.5Grok 4.7

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the top field the net starts at 100 points, the reference group average; values below sit as a hollow point in the centre. Not in the net because a model has no own value there or the data are too thin: Multimodal.

Haiku 5.5 is ahead in 3 of 10 areas, Grok 4.7 in 1.

Haiku 5.5 ahead: 3level: 4too little data: 1Grok 4.7 slightly ahead: 1Grok 4.7 ahead: 1

Areas in the overall index
KnowledgeGrok 4.7 +2085.5 to 105.5
MathematicsHaiku 5.5 +12107.1 to 94.8
GeneralHaiku 5.5 +5106.4 to 101.6
CodingHaiku 5.5 +3106.2 to 103.1
Reasoninglevel105.2 to 102.2
Agentslevel106.1 to 107.4
Multimodalonly Grok 4.7 has a score
Specialist fields
Legalleaning Grok 4.7not certain · 3 and 4 tests
Healthlevel108.9 to 106.1
Financelevel104.7 to 105.3

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 3 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
CybersecurityHaiku 5.5 +4108.6 to 104.2
EducationHaiku 5.5 +4109.6 to 105.9
Productivitytoo little data101.8 to 103.3

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Grok 4.7 at the same effort

Both models measured at the same reasoning efforts. This shows whether a lead comes from the model or only from more compute.

lowGrok 4.7 ahead
Haiku 5.5 80.8 vs. Grok 4.7 98.7 · Gap 19.0 · Test series 11
highGrok 4.7 slightly ahead
Haiku 5.5 96.6 vs. Grok 4.7 103.6 · Gap 7.8 · Test series 11
xhighGrok 4.7 slightly ahead
Haiku 5.5 101.3 vs. Grok 4.7 103.3 · Gap 3.2 · Test series 11
Overall index (max vs. xhigh)level
Haiku 5.5 103.4 vs. Grok 4.7 103.3

Gap and verdict compare only the Artificial Analysis test series in which both models are measured at that effort. Tied below 3 points, ahead only beyond two standard errors. The single values rest on all test series of each model, so their difference can deviate from the gap.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeHaiku 5.5Coding 106.2 to 103.1
Maths and data analysisHaiku 5.5Mathematics 107.1 to 94.8, Reasoning 105.2 to 102.2
Facts and researchGrok 4.7Knowledge 85.5 to 105.5
Agents and workflowslevelAgents 106.1 to 107.4
Fast chat repliesHaiku 5.5236 to 71 tokens per second
Security analysisHaiku 5.5Cybersecurity 108.6 to 104.2
Many requests on a small budgetHaiku 5.5$0.20 to $3 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsleaning Grok 4.7Finance 104.7 to 105.3, Legal 94.4 to 109.9, Health 108.9 to 106.1
Images, screenshots and PDFsopenMultimodal without a score for Haiku 5.5

See for yourself: same task, one attempt

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

Claude Haiku 5.5

Not tested yet

Grok 4.7

Grok 4.7: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 13 s · $0.0072

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
x-ai/grok-4.7
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
1,069 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0072
Response time
13.4 s
API model reported in response
x-ai/grok-4.7
Pinned endpoint
xAI | x-ai/grok-4.7-20260916
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Earlier attempts (1)

  • Oct 1, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Unavailable in this round

Grok 4.7

Unavailable in this round

Claude Haiku 5.5 and Grok 4.7 in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v4)

20 of 91 models

5 models in this view are measured at a lower reasoning effort than max in the overall index. Dashed column: lower reasoning effort than the top.

Claude Opus 5.5max126.1
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh125.7
Claude Fable 5.1max123.8
Claude Sonnet 5.5max122.8
Gemini 4 Argonhigh122.3
GPT-6 Astramax121.3
GPT-6.1 Solmax119.2
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.3
Claude Opus 5max117.2
Muse Wondermax113.4
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.9
Claude Fable 5max112.5
GPT-6 Solmax110.6
GPT-5.6 Solmax108.7
Muse Spark 1.3max107.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max106.6
Gemini 3.8 Flashhigh106.5
Claude Haiku 5.5max103.4
Grok 4.7xhigh103.3

Popularity compared

How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.

Claude Haiku 5.5 is more popular than Grok 4.7: 77 to 61 out of 100.

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 5, 2026

Claude Haiku 5.5Grok 4.7

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricClaude Haiku 5.5Grok 4.7
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better103.4103.3
RankRank 20 of 91Rank 21 of 91
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$0.10above 100,000 tokens: $0.50$2above 200,000 tokens: $4
Outputwhat the model writes$0.50above 100,000 tokens: $2.50$6above 200,000 tokens: $12
Speed
Tokens per second23671
Popularity
Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 10077Rank 3 of 87561Rank 35 of 875
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages500,000 tokens≈ 750 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffJune 2026May 2026
ReleasedOct 7, 2026Sep 21, 2026
AvailabilityActiveActive
Open weightsnono

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

Best model in the overall indexClaude Opus 5.5

Overall index 126.1, rank 1. $4 input and $20 output per 1M tokens.

Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 5.5

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: Claude Haiku 5.5B: Grok 4.7

AA-BriefcaseOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 1,441.38 eloGrok 4.7: 1,629.15 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AA-OmniscienceOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 5.3 pointsGrok 4.7: 30 pointsArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AA-Omniscience AccuracyOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 31.8%Grok 4.7: 41.8%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateOverall · lower is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 38.9%Grok 4.7: 20.2%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AutomationBench-AAOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 33.7%Grok 4.7: 63.5%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
BioMysteryBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 70.4%Grok 4.7: 69.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 44.6%Grok 4.7: 44.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Code Migration v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 52.4%Grok 4.7: 53.2%Vals AIAs of 10/30/2026
CritPt v2 (Hard Subset)Overall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 45.0%Grok 4.7: 37.0%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
CyberBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 75.5%Grok 4.7: 69.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 59%Grok 4.7: 67%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMB v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 65.5%Grok 4.7: 71.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 54.1%Grok 4.7: 52.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Finance Agent v2.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 65.4%Grok 4.7: 60.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
FrontierCodeOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 23.2%Grok 4.7: 27.8%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
FrontierCode 1.1 MainOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 43.6%Grok 4.7: 34.2%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
GDP.pdfOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 17.2%Grok 4.7: 23.2%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
GDPval-AAOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 1,424.29 eloGrok 4.7: 1,715.8 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
HLAB-Vals-1.1Overall · Task fully resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 4.2%Grok 4.7: 18.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
HLE-DiamondOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 23.7%Grok 4.7: 23.6%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
ImmigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 61.8%Grok 4.7: 68%Vals AIAs of 10/28/2026
IOIOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 47.3%Grok 4.7: 57.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 43.8%Grok 4.7: 47.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 1,589Grok 4.7: 1,637LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 1,425Grok 4.7: 1,441LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
MedCodeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 51.5%Grok 4.7: 49.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 89.5%Grok 4.7: 89.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MysteryMechanismOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 35.1%Grok 4.7: 25.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 2.5%Grok 4.7: 0.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ProofBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 89%Grok 4.7: 26%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Public Benefits Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 63.2%Grok 4.7: 65.6%Vals AIAs of 10/12/2026
SAGEOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 89.8%Grok 4.7: 88.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 5.7%Grok 4.7: 3.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SWE-bench MultimodalOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 44%Grok 4.7: 42.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 31.9%Grok 4.7: 34.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-BenchOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 21.7%Grok 4.7: 24.7%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 36.4%Grok 4.7: 28.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 10%Grok 4.7: 10%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 10.0%Grok 4.7: 9.5%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
Vals Finance IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 57.4%Grok 4.7: 58.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 58.7%Grok 4.7: 58.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Legal IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 70.3%Grok 4.7: 72.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Router IndexFull Index · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 58.7%Grok 4.7: 58.6%Vals AIAs of 11/03/2026
Vals Science IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 38.5%Grok 4.7: 34.8%Vals AIAs of 10/25/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 90.4%Grok 4.7: 86.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
AA-BriefcaseOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 1,523.33 eloGrok 4.7: 1,637.4 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AA-OmniscienceOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 7.833 pointsGrok 4.7: 31.233 pointsArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AA-Omniscience AccuracyOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 33.8%Grok 4.7: 42.7%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateOverall · lower is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 39.2%Grok 4.7: 20.0%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AutomationBench-AAOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 36.0%Grok 4.7: 65.6%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
BioMysteryBenchHard · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 29.4%Grok 4.7: 29.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 36.1%Grok 4.7: 36.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Code Migration v1.1CLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 42.1%Grok 4.7: 40.6%Vals AIAs of 10/30/2026
CritPt v2 (Hard Subset)Overall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 47.5%Grok 4.7: 33.5%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
CyberBench v1.1Patch · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 89.3%Grok 4.7: 83.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 77.9%Grok 4.7: 65%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMB v1.1Comps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 77.7%Grok 4.7: 72.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 49.6%Grok 4.7: 46.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Finance Agent v2.1Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 67.7%Grok 4.7: 58.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
FrontierCodeOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 29.9%Grok 4.7: 28.7%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
FrontierCode 1.1 MainOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 45.5%Grok 4.7: 33.8%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
GDP.pdfOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 18.2%Grok 4.7: 20.0%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
GDPval-AAOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 1,521.54 eloGrok 4.7: 1,718.42 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
HLAB-Vals-1.1Antitrust Competition · Criteria passed · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 86.2%Grok 4.7: 93.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026

More comparisons

Compare Claude Haiku 5.5 and Grok 4.7 with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  2. 2Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
  3. 3Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  4. 4Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  5. 5Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  6. 6Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
  7. 7Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. Grok 4.7
  8. 8Grok 4.7 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  9. 9Grok 4.7 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Show all 59 comparisons
  1. 10Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3
  2. 11Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
  3. 12Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  4. 13Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.5
  5. 14Grok 4.7 vs. Kimi K3
  6. 15Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Grok 4.7
  7. 16Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5
  8. 17GPT-6 Luna vs. Grok 4.7
  9. 18Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 5
  10. 19Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  11. 20Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  12. 21Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.8
  13. 22Gemini 4 Argon vs. Grok 4.7
  14. 23Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  15. 24Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  16. 25Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  17. 26Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Grok 4.7
  18. 27Grok 4.7 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  19. 28Grok 4.7 vs. Grok 4.5
  20. 29Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Muse Spark 1.3
  21. 30Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.6
  22. 31Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
  23. 32Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 4
  24. 33Claude Fable 5.1 vs. Grok 4.7
  25. 34Claude Opus 4.8 vs. Grok 4.7
  26. 35Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  27. 36GPT-5.6 Terra vs. Grok 4.7
  28. 37Grok 4.7 vs. GLM-5.3
  29. 38Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. Grok 4.7
  30. 39Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  31. 40Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  32. 41Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  33. 42Grok 4.7 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  34. 43Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  35. 44GPT-6 Sol vs. Grok 4.7
  36. 45Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  37. 46Claude Opus 5 vs. Grok 4.7
  38. 47Grok 4.7 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  39. 48Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.6
  40. 49GPT-5.6 Luna vs. Grok 4.7
  41. 50Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Kimi K2.6
  42. 51Grok 4.7 vs. GLM-5.2
  43. 52Muse Wonder Full vs. Grok 4.7
  44. 53Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. Grok 4.7
  45. 54Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.7
  46. 55Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 3
  47. 56Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-5.5
  48. 57GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Grok 4.7
  49. 58Claude Opus 4.7 vs. Grok 4.7
  50. 59Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra