- Home
- LLM comparison
- Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Muse Spark 1.3
AnthropicMetaLLM matchup
Claude Haiku 5.5vs.Muse Spark 1.3
Which one is better?
Claude Haiku 5.5 and Muse Spark 1.3 perform about equally well, but Muse Spark 1.3 costs 12.5 times (input) and 8.5 times (output) as much.
Claude Haiku 5.5
Rank 20
Muse Spark 1.3
Rank 15
Claude Haiku 5.5
Muse Spark 1.3
Claude Haiku 5.5
Muse Spark 1.3
Claude Haiku 5.5
Rank 3 of 875
Muse Spark 1.3
Rank 110 of 875
Above 100,000 tokens of context, Claude Haiku 5.5 costs more: $0.50 input and $2.50 output per 1M tokens.
Choose Claude Haiku 5.5 for
Choose Muse Spark 1.3 for
On this page
Where is the difference?
Strengths at a glance
Haiku 5.5Muse Spark 1.3
The median of all ranked models is below 100 in every area, so it sits in the centre of the net.
95 % range: Haiku 5.5 102.5 to 109.9, Muse Spark 1.3 102.9 to 109.2.
The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the top field the net starts at 100 points, the reference group average; values below sit as a hollow point in the centre. Not in the net because a model has no own value there or the data are too thin: Multimodal, Health.
Muse Spark 1.3 is ahead in 2 of 10 areas, Haiku 5.5 in 1.
Haiku 5.5 ahead: 1level: 3too little data: 2Muse Spark 1.3 slightly ahead: 2Muse Spark 1.3 ahead: 2
Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.
Show 3 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Muse Spark 1.3 at the same effort
Both models measured at the same reasoning efforts. This shows whether a lead comes from the model or only from more compute.
| Effort | Haiku 5.5 | Muse Spark 1.3 | Gap | Verdict | Test series |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| max | 103.4 | 107.4 | 0.9 | tied | 12 |
| Overall index (max vs. max) | 103.4 | 107.4 | 4.0 | Muse Spark 1.3 slightly ahead |
Gap and verdict compare only the Artificial Analysis test series in which both models are measured at that effort. Tied below 3 points, ahead only beyond two standard errors. The single values rest on all test series of each model, so their difference can deviate from the gap.
Which model for which task?
Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.
See for yourself: same task, one attempt
The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.
Claude Haiku 5.5
Not tested yet
Muse Spark 1.3

Oct 2, 2026 · 88 s · $0.03
Test details
- Run date
- Oct 2, 2026
- API provider
- openrouter
- Requested API model
- meta/muse-spark-1.3
- Reasoning setting
- high
- Token limit including reasoning
- 8,192 tokens
- Output tokens
- 7,269 tokens
- Cost of the attempt
- $0.0309
- Response time
- 87.9 s
- API model reported in response
- meta/muse-spark-1.3
- Pinned endpoint
- Meta | meta/muse-spark-1.3-20260902
- Temperature
- Provider default
- Test protocol
- community-visual-tests-v1
- Technical checks
- Passed, not a quality rating
Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.
Earlier attempts (2)
- Oct 1, 2026Output withheld for safetyReasoning setting: high
- Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
SVG short test
SVG short test
One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.
Prompt
Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.
Claude Haiku 5.5
Unavailable in this round
Muse Spark 1.3
Unavailable in this round
Claude Haiku 5.5 and Muse Spark 1.3 in the overall index
Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.
Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v4)
20 of 91 models
4 models in this view are measured at a lower reasoning effort than max in the overall index. Dashed column: lower reasoning effort than the top.
Popularity compared
How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.
Claude Haiku 5.5 is more popular than Muse Spark 1.3: 77 to 50 out of 100.
Over time
Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 5, 2026
Claude Haiku 5.5Muse Spark 1.3
All data side by side
The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | ||
| Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better | 103.4 | 107.4 |
| Rank | Rank 20 of 91 | Rank 15 of 91 |
| Price per 1M tokens | ||
| Inputwhat you send | $0.10above 100,000 tokens: $0.50 | $1.25 |
| Outputwhat the model writes | $0.50above 100,000 tokens: $2.50 | $4.25 |
| Speed | ||
| Tokens per second | 236 | 120 |
| Popularity | ||
| Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 100 | 77Rank 3 of 875 | 50Rank 110 of 875 |
| Technical | ||
| Context windowhow much text the model reads at once | 1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages | 1.05 M tokens≈ 1,570 A4 pages |
| Knowledge cutoff | June 2026 | n/a |
| Released | Oct 7, 2026 | Sep 2, 2026 |
| Availability | Active | Active |
| Open weights | no | no |
Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis
Is there a better choice?
Overall index 126.1, rank 1. $4 input and $20 output per 1M tokens.
Muse Spark 1.3 vs. Claude Opus 5.5Shared benchmarks
Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.
A: Claude Haiku 5.5B: Muse Spark 1.3
Show 54 more benchmarks
More comparisons
Compare Claude Haiku 5.5 and Muse Spark 1.3 with the models people compare them with most often.
Compare another matchup
Predecessor and successor
The most popular comparisons
- 1Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
- 2Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
- 3Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
- 4Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 5Muse Spark 1.3 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 6Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 7Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
- 8Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3
- 9Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Show all 49 comparisons
- 10Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
- 11Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.5
- 12Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Muse Spark 1.3
- 13Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5
- 14Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 5
- 15Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra
- 16Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
- 17Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.8
- 18Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Argon
- 19Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Grok 4.7
- 20Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Muse Spark 1.3
- 21Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
- 22Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
- 23Muse Wonder vs. Muse Spark 1.3
- 24Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.6
- 25Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
- 26Muse Spark 1.3 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
- 27Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 4
- 28Muse Spark 1.3 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 29Claude Opus 5 vs. Muse Spark 1.3
- 30GPT-6 Luna vs. Muse Spark 1.3
- 31Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
- 32Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. Muse Spark 1.3
- 33GPT-5.6 Sol vs. Muse Spark 1.3
- 34Muse Wonder Full vs. Muse Spark 1.3
- 35Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
- 36Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
- 37Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
- 38Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
- 39Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
- 40GPT-6 Sol vs. Muse Spark 1.3
- 41Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.6
- 42Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Kimi K2.6
- 43Muse Spark 1.3 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
- 44Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.7
- 45Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 3
- 46Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-5.5
- 47Claude Opus 4.6 vs. Muse Spark 1.3
- 48GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Muse Spark 1.3
- 49Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra