Skip to main content

AnthropicOpenAILLM matchup

Claude Haiku 5.5vs.GPT-6 Astra

Which one is better?

GPT-6 Astra performs better than Claude Haiku 5.5, but costs 100 times as much.

GPT-6 Astra ahead
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
103.4

Claude Haiku 5.5

Rank 20

121.3

GPT-6 Astra

Rank 6

Haiku 5.5 faster
SpeedTokens per second
236

Claude Haiku 5.5

43

GPT-6 Astra

Haiku 5.5 cheaper
Price$ per 1M tokens
$0.20

Claude Haiku 5.5

$20

GPT-6 Astra

about as popular
Popularity0 to 100
77

Claude Haiku 5.5

Rank 3 of 875

78

GPT-6 Astra

Rank 2 of 875

Above 100,000 tokens of context, Claude Haiku 5.5 costs more: $0.50 input and $2.50 output per 1M tokens. Above 272,000 tokens of context, GPT-6 Astra costs more: $20 input and $75 output per 1M tokens.

Choose Claude Haiku 5.5 for

No clear advantage

Choose GPT-6 Astra for

KnowledgeReasoningGeneralMathematicsCodingLegalAgentsHealth (not certain)Finance (not certain)

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

Haiku 5.5GPT-6 Astra

The median of all ranked models is below 100 in every area, so it sits in the centre of the net.

110120130100CodingGPT-6 AstraReasoningGPT-6 AstraMathematicsGPT-6 AstraKnowledgeGPT-6 AstraAgentsGPT-6 AstraGeneralGPT-6 AstraFinanceslightly GPT-6 AstraLegalGPT-6 AstraHealthslightly GPT-6 Astra
CodingGPT-6 Astra ahead
Haiku 5.5106.2Rank 18
GPT-6 Astra124.4Rank 3
Median of ranked models83.7

95 % range: Haiku 5.5 102.5 to 109.9, GPT-6 Astra 116.1 to 132.6.

AreaHaiku 5.5GPT-6 Astra

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the top field the net starts at 100 points, the reference group average; values below sit as a hollow point in the centre. Not in the net because a model has no own value there or the data are too thin: Multimodal.

GPT-6 Astra is ahead in 7 of 10 areas, Haiku 5.5 in none.

too little data: 1GPT-6 Astra slightly ahead: 2GPT-6 Astra ahead: 7

Areas in the overall index
KnowledgeGPT-6 Astra +4185.5 to 126.2
ReasoningGPT-6 Astra +21105.2 to 126.5
GeneralGPT-6 Astra +20106.4 to 126.4
MathematicsGPT-6 Astra +19107.1 to 126.2
CodingGPT-6 Astra +18106.2 to 124.4
AgentsGPT-6 Astra +7106.1 to 113.1
Multimodalonly GPT-6 Astra has a score
Specialist fields
LegalGPT-6 Astra +1694.4 to 110.4
Healthleaning GPT-6 Astranot certain · 2 tests each
Financeleaning GPT-6 Astranot certain · 5 tests each

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 4 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
Cybersecuritytoo little data108.6 to 112.4
Searchonly GPT-6 Astra has a score
Productivityonly Haiku 5.5 has a score
Educationonly Haiku 5.5 has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra at the same effort

Both models measured at the same reasoning efforts. This shows whether a lead comes from the model or only from more compute.

lowGPT-6 Astra ahead
Haiku 5.5 80.8 vs. GPT-6 Astra 110.7 · Gap 32.0 · Test series 10
mediumGPT-6 Astra ahead
Haiku 5.5 90.4 vs. GPT-6 Astra 116.6 · Gap 28.8 · Test series 10
highGPT-6 Astra ahead
Haiku 5.5 96.6 vs. GPT-6 Astra 119.6 · Gap 25.1 · Test series 10
xhighGPT-6 Astra ahead
Haiku 5.5 101.3 vs. GPT-6 Astra 120.3 · Gap 20.9 · Test series 10
maxGPT-6 Astra ahead
Haiku 5.5 103.4 vs. GPT-6 Astra 121.3 · Gap 16.1 · Test series 12
Overall index (max vs. max)GPT-6 Astra ahead
Haiku 5.5 103.4 vs. GPT-6 Astra 121.3

Gap and verdict compare only the Artificial Analysis test series in which both models are measured at that effort. Tied below 3 points, ahead only beyond two standard errors. The single values rest on all test series of each model, so their difference can deviate from the gap.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeGPT-6 AstraCoding 106.2 to 124.4
Maths and data analysisGPT-6 AstraMathematics 107.1 to 126.2, Reasoning 105.2 to 126.5
Facts and researchGPT-6 AstraKnowledge 85.5 to 126.2, Search without a score for Haiku 5.5
Agents and workflowsGPT-6 AstraAgents 106.1 to 113.1
Fast chat repliesHaiku 5.5236 to 43 tokens per second
Security analysisopenCybersecurity 108.6 to 112.4 (too little data)
Many requests on a small budgetHaiku 5.5$0.20 to $20 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsGPT-6 AstraFinance 104.7 to 108.1, Legal 94.4 to 110.4, Health 108.9 to 115.9
Images, screenshots and PDFsopenMultimodal without a score for Haiku 5.5

See for yourself: same task, one attempt

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

Claude Haiku 5.5

Not tested yet

GPT-6 Astra

GPT-6 Astra: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Sep 7, 2026 · 142 s · $0.20

Test details
Run date
Sep 7, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
openai/gpt-6-astra
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
3,966 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.1985
Response time
141.7 s
API model reported in response
openai/gpt-6-astra
Pinned endpoint
OpenAI | openai/gpt-6-astra-20260903
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

Claude Haiku 5.5

Unavailable in this round

GPT-6 Astra

Unavailable in this round

Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v4)

20 of 91 models

4 models in this view are measured at a lower reasoning effort than max in the overall index. Dashed column: lower reasoning effort than the top.

Claude Opus 5.5max126.1
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh125.7
Claude Fable 5.1max123.8
Claude Sonnet 5.5max122.8
Gemini 4 Argonhigh122.3
GPT-6 Astramax121.3
GPT-6.1 Solmax119.2
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.3
Claude Opus 5max117.2
Muse Wondermax113.4
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.9
Claude Fable 5max112.5
GPT-6 Solmax110.6
GPT-5.6 Solmax108.7
Muse Spark 1.3max107.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max106.6
Gemini 3.8 Flashhigh106.5
GPT-6.1 Terramax105.2
Claude Haiku 5.5max103.4

Popularity compared

How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.

GPT-6 Astra is more popular than Claude Haiku 5.5: 78 to 77 out of 100.

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 5, 2026

Claude Haiku 5.5GPT-6 Astra

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricClaude Haiku 5.5GPT-6 Astra
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better103.4121.3
RankRank 20 of 91Rank 6 of 91
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$0.10above 100,000 tokens: $0.50$10above 272,000 tokens: $20
Outputwhat the model writes$0.50above 100,000 tokens: $2.50$50above 272,000 tokens: $75
Speed
Tokens per second23643
Popularity
Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 10077Rank 3 of 87578Rank 2 of 875
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages1.05 M tokens≈ 1,580 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffJune 2026Apr 30, 2026
ReleasedOct 7, 2026Sep 3, 2026
AvailabilityActiveLimited access
Open weightsnono

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

Best model in the overall indexClaude Opus 5.5

Overall index 126.1, rank 1. $4 input and $20 output per 1M tokens.

GPT-6 Astra vs. Claude Opus 5.5

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: Claude Haiku 5.5B: GPT-6 Astra

AA-AnalystAgentOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 53.8%GPT-6 Astra: 51.2%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AA-BriefcaseOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 1,441.38 eloGPT-6 Astra: 1,504.54 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AA-OmniscienceOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 5.3 pointsGPT-6 Astra: 44.567 pointsArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AA-Omniscience AccuracyOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 31.8%GPT-6 Astra: 61.1%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateOverall · lower is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 38.9%GPT-6 Astra: 42.5%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AutomationBench-AAOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 33.7%GPT-6 Astra: 66.6%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
BioMysteryBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 70.4%GPT-6 Astra: 79.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 44.6%GPT-6 Astra: 67.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Code Migration v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 52.4%GPT-6 Astra: 80.6%Vals AIAs of 10/30/2026
CritPt v2 (Hard Subset)Overall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 45.0%GPT-6 Astra: 71.5%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
CyberBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 75.5%GPT-6 Astra: 41.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 59%GPT-6 Astra: 71.7%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMB v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 65.5%GPT-6 Astra: 72.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 54.1%GPT-6 Astra: 53.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Finance Agent v2.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 65.4%GPT-6 Astra: 60.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
FrontierCodeOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 23.2%GPT-6 Astra: 40.1%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
FrontierCode 1.1 MainOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 41.8%GPT-6 Astra: 47.0%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
GDP.pdfOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 17.2%GPT-6 Astra: 31.0%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
GDPval-AAOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 1,424.29 eloGPT-6 Astra: 1,536.04 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
HLAB-Vals-1.1Overall · Task fully resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 4.2%GPT-6 Astra: 7.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
HLE-DiamondOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 23.7%GPT-6 Astra: 59.3%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
ImmigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 61.8%GPT-6 Astra: 67.7%Vals AIAs of 10/28/2026
IOIOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 47.3%GPT-6 Astra: 100%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 43.8%GPT-6 Astra: 39.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 1,589GPT-6 Astra: 1,773LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 1,425GPT-6 Astra: 1,476LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
MedCodeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 51.5%GPT-6 Astra: 48.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 89.5%GPT-6 Astra: 87.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MysteryMechanismOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 35.1%GPT-6 Astra: 53.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 2.5%GPT-6 Astra: 5.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ProofBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 89%GPT-6 Astra: 99%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
SRE BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 5.7%GPT-6 Astra: 56.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SWE-bench MultimodalOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 44%GPT-6 Astra: 43.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 31.9%GPT-6 Astra: 20.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-BenchOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 21.7%GPT-6 Astra: 54.0%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 36.4%GPT-6 Astra: 59.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 10%GPT-6 Astra: 62.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 10.0%GPT-6 Astra: 59.5%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
Vals Finance IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 57.4%GPT-6 Astra: 55.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 58.7%GPT-6 Astra: 65%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Legal IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 70.3%GPT-6 Astra: 68.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Router IndexFull Index · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 58.7%GPT-6 Astra: 65%Vals AIAs of 11/03/2026
Vals Science IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 38.5%GPT-6 Astra: 65.1%Vals AIAs of 10/25/2026
Vibe Code Bench 1-100Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 20.4%GPT-6 Astra: 27.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 90.4%GPT-6 Astra: 89.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
AA-BriefcaseOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 1,523.33 eloGPT-6 Astra: 1,543.53 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AA-OmniscienceOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 7.833 pointsGPT-6 Astra: 43.667 pointsArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AA-Omniscience AccuracyOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 33.8%GPT-6 Astra: 61.0%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateOverall · lower is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 39.2%GPT-6 Astra: 44.6%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AutomationBench-AAOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 36.0%GPT-6 Astra: 67.2%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
BioMysteryBenchHard · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 29.4%GPT-6 Astra: 37.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 36.1%GPT-6 Astra: 67.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Code Migration v1.1CLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 42.1%GPT-6 Astra: 76.4%Vals AIAs of 10/30/2026
CritPt v2 (Hard Subset)Overall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 47.5%GPT-6 Astra: 71.0%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
CyberBench v1.1Patch · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 89.3%GPT-6 Astra: 82.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 77.9%GPT-6 Astra: 78%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMB v1.1Comps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 77.7%GPT-6 Astra: 76.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 49.6%GPT-6 Astra: 48.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Finance Agent v2.1Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 67.7%GPT-6 Astra: 58.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
FrontierCodeOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 29.9%GPT-6 Astra: 41.4%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
GDP.pdfOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 18.2%GPT-6 Astra: 32.2%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
GDPval-AAOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 1,521.54 eloGPT-6 Astra: 1,569.36 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
HLAB-Vals-1.1Antitrust Competition · Criteria passed · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 86.2%GPT-6 Astra: 91.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
HLE-DiamondOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 28.8%GPT-6 Astra: 61.5%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026

More comparisons

Compare Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  2. 2Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  3. 3GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-6 Astra
  4. 4Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
  5. 5Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  6. 6Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  7. 7GPT-6 Astra vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  8. 8Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  9. 9GPT-6 Astra vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Show all 61 comparisons
  1. 10GPT-6 Astra vs. Kimi K3
  2. 11Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
  3. 12GPT-6 Astra vs. GPT-6 Sol
  4. 13Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  5. 14Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3
  6. 15GPT-6 Astra vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  7. 16GPT-6 Astra vs. GPT-6 Luna
  8. 17Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
  9. 18Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  10. 19GPT-6 Astra vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  11. 20Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.5
  12. 21Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5
  13. 22Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  14. 23GPT-6 Astra vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  15. 24GPT-6 Astra vs. Muse Wonder Full
  16. 25Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 5
  17. 26Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  18. 27Claude Opus 4.8 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  19. 28Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.8
  20. 29Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  21. 30GPT-6 Astra vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  22. 31Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Grok 4.7
  23. 32GPT-6 Astra vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  24. 33Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  25. 34Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  26. 35Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Muse Spark 1.3
  27. 36GPT-6 Astra vs. GLM-5.3
  28. 37Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.6
  29. 38Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
  30. 39Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 4
  31. 40Claude Opus 4.6 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  32. 41Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  33. 42Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  34. 43Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  35. 44Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  36. 45Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  37. 46Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  38. 47Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  39. 48GPT-6 Astra vs. Muse Wonder
  40. 49Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  41. 50GPT-6 Astra vs. GLM-5.2
  42. 51GPT-6 Astra vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  43. 52Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.6
  44. 53Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Kimi K2.6
  45. 54Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.7
  46. 55Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 3
  47. 56Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-5.5
  48. 57GPT-6.1 Terra vs. GPT-6 Astra
  49. 58Claude Opus 4.7 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  50. 59Claude Opus 4.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  51. 60Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra
  52. 61GPT-6 Astra vs. Gemini 4 Carbon