- Home
- LLM comparison
- Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Argon
AnthropicGoogle DeepMindLLM matchup
Claude Haiku 5.5vs.Gemini 4 Argon
Which one is better?
Gemini 4 Argon performs better than Claude Haiku 5.5, but costs 20 times as much.
Claude Haiku 5.5
Rank 20
Gemini 4 Argon
Rank 5
Claude Haiku 5.5
Gemini 4 Argon
Claude Haiku 5.5
Gemini 4 Argon
Claude Haiku 5.5
Rank 3 of 875
Gemini 4 Argon
Rank 1 of 875
Above 100,000 tokens of context, Claude Haiku 5.5 costs more: $0.50 input and $2.50 output per 1M tokens.
Choose Claude Haiku 5.5 for
No clear advantage
Choose Gemini 4 Argon for
On this page
Where is the difference?
Strengths at a glance
Haiku 5.5Gemini 4 Argon
The median of all ranked models is below 100 in every area, so it sits in the centre of the net.
95 % range: Haiku 5.5 102.5 to 109.9, Gemini 4 Argon 114.8 to 128.9.
The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the top field the net starts at 100 points, the reference group average; values below sit as a hollow point in the centre. Not in the net because a model has no own value there or the data are too thin: Multimodal.
Gemini 4 Argon is ahead in 9 of 9 areas, Haiku 5.5 in none.
Gemini 4 Argon ahead: 9
Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.
Show 3 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Argon at the same effort
Both models measured at the same reasoning efforts. This shows whether a lead comes from the model or only from more compute.
| Effort | Haiku 5.5 | Gemini 4 Argon | Gap | Verdict | Test series |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| high | 96.6 | 122.3 | 20.1 | Gemini 4 Argon ahead | 11 |
| Overall index (max vs. high) | 103.4 | 122.3 | 19.0 | Gemini 4 Argon ahead |
Gap and verdict compare only the Artificial Analysis test series in which both models are measured at that effort. Tied below 3 points, ahead only beyond two standard errors. The single values rest on all test series of each model, so their difference can deviate from the gap.
Which model for which task?
Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.
See for yourself: same task, one attempt
SVG short test
One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.
Prompt
Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.
Claude Haiku 5.5
Unavailable in this round
Gemini 4 Argon
Unavailable in this round
Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemini 4 Argon in the overall index
Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.
Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v4)
20 of 91 models
4 models in this view are measured at a lower reasoning effort than max in the overall index. Dashed column: lower reasoning effort than the top.
Popularity compared
How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.
Gemini 4 Argon is more popular than Claude Haiku 5.5: 92 to 77 out of 100.
Over time
Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 5, 2026
Claude Haiku 5.5Gemini 4 Argon
All data side by side
The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | ||
| Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better | 103.4 | 122.3 |
| Rank | Rank 20 of 91 | Rank 5 of 91 |
| Price per 1M tokens | ||
| Inputwhat you send | $0.10above 100,000 tokens: $0.50 | $2 |
| Outputwhat the model writes | $0.50above 100,000 tokens: $2.50 | $10 |
| Speed | ||
| Tokens per second | 236 | 74 |
| Popularity | ||
| Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 100 | 77Rank 3 of 875 | 92Rank 1 of 875 |
| Technical | ||
| Context windowhow much text the model reads at once | 1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages | 1.05 M tokens≈ 1,570 A4 pages |
| Knowledge cutoff | June 2026 | n/a |
| Released | Oct 7, 2026 | Oct 13, 2026 |
| Availability | Active | Active |
| Open weights | no | no |
- Gemini 4 Argon, Standard pricing through November 30, 2026: Per 1 million tokens: $2.00 input, $10.00 output including thinking, and $0.10 cached input. Source
- Gemini 4 Argon, Standard pricing from December 1, 2026: Per 1 million tokens: $4.00 input, $20.00 output including thinking, and $0.20 cached input. Source
- Gemini 4 Argon, Caching: Implicit caching only; explicit caching is not supported. Source
Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis
Is there a better choice?
Overall index 125.7, rank 2. No API price in our data yet.
Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 CarbonOverall index 126.1, rank 1. $4 input and $20 output per 1M tokens.
Gemini 4 Argon vs. Claude Opus 5.5Shared benchmarks
Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.
A: Claude Haiku 5.5B: Gemini 4 Argon
Show 54 more benchmarks
More comparisons
Compare Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemini 4 Argon with the models people compare them with most often.
Compare another matchup
Predecessor and successor
The most popular comparisons
- 1Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Argon
- 2Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
- 3Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
- 4Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
- 5Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 6GPT-6 Astra vs. Gemini 4 Argon
- 7Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 8Claude Fable 5.1 vs. Gemini 4 Argon
- 9Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
Show all 48 comparisons
- 10GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 4 Argon
- 11GPT-6.1 Terra vs. Gemini 4 Argon
- 12Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3
- 13Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
- 14Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
- 15Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.5
- 16GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 4 Argon
- 17Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5
- 18Gemini 4 Argon vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 19Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 5
- 20Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra
- 21Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
- 22Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.8
- 23Gemini 4 Argon vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
- 24Gemini 4 Argon vs. Grok 4.7
- 25Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Grok 4.7
- 26Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
- 27Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
- 28Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Argon
- 29Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Muse Spark 1.3
- 30Gemini 4 Argon vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
- 31Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.6
- 32Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
- 33Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 4
- 34GPT-5.6 Sol vs. Gemini 4 Argon
- 35Gemini 4 Argon vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
- 36Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
- 37Gemini 4 Argon vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
- 38Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
- 39Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
- 40Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
- 41Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
- 42Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
- 43Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.6
- 44Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Kimi K2.6
- 45Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.7
- 46Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 3
- 47Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-5.5
- 48Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra