AnthropicOpenAILLM matchup
Claude Haiku 5.5vs.GPT-6.1 Terra
Which one is better?
Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT-6.1 Terra perform about equally well, but GPT-6.1 Terra costs 10 times as much.
103.4
Claude Haiku 5.5
Rank 20
105.2
GPT-6.1 Terra
Rank 19
236
Claude Haiku 5.5
73
GPT-6.1 Terra
$0.20
Claude Haiku 5.5
$2
GPT-6.1 Terra
77
Claude Haiku 5.5
Rank 3 of 875
12
GPT-6.1 Terra
Rank 632 of 875
Above 100,000 tokens of context, Claude Haiku 5.5 costs more: $0.50 input and $2.50 output per 1M tokens. Above 272,000 tokens of context, GPT-6.1 Terra costs more: $2 input and $7.50 output per 1M tokens.
Choose Claude Haiku 5.5 for
Legal (not certain)Finance (not certain)Agents (not certain)
Choose GPT-6.1 Terra for
KnowledgeCoding (not certain)Reasoning (not certain)
Where is the difference?
Strengths at a glance
Haiku 5.5GPT-6.1 Terra
The median of all ranked models is below 100 in every area, so it sits in the centre of the net.
CodingGPT-6.1 Terra slightly ahead
Haiku 5.5106.2Rank 18
GPT-6.1 Terra113.0Rank 12
Median of ranked models83.7
95 % range: Haiku 5.5 102.5 to 109.9, GPT-6.1 Terra 104.3 to 121.7.
AreaHaiku 5.5GPT-6.1 Terra
The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the top field the net starts at 100 points, the reference group average; values below sit as a hollow point in the centre. Not in the net because a model has no own value there or the data are too thin: Mathematics, General, Multimodal, Health.
GPT-6.1 Terra is ahead in 1 of 10 areas, Haiku 5.5 in none.
Haiku 5.5 slightly ahead: 3too little data: 4GPT-6.1 Terra slightly ahead: 2GPT-6.1 Terra ahead: 1
Areas in the overall index
KnowledgeGPT-6.1 Terra +2385.5 to 108.1
Codingleaning GPT-6.1 Terranot certain · 14 and 6 tests
Reasoningleaning GPT-6.1 Terranot certain · 4 and 2 tests
Agentsleaning Haiku 5.5not certain · 4 and 3 tests
Generaltoo little data106.4 to 109.2
Mathematicsonly Haiku 5.5 has a score
Multimodalonly GPT-6.1 Terra has a score
Specialist fields
Legalleaning Haiku 5.5not certain · 3 and 2 tests
Financeleaning Haiku 5.5not certain · 5 and 3 tests
Healthonly Haiku 5.5 has a score
Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.
Show 3 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
Cybersecurityonly Haiku 5.5 has a score
Productivityonly Haiku 5.5 has a score
Educationonly Haiku 5.5 has a score
Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra at the same effort
Both models measured at the same reasoning efforts. This shows whether a lead comes from the model or only from more compute.
lowGPT-6.1 Terra ahead
Haiku 5.5 80.8 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra 89.4 · Gap 16.4 · Test series 11
mediumGPT-6.1 Terra ahead
Haiku 5.5 90.4 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra 97.1 · Gap 15.1 · Test series 11
highGPT-6.1 Terra ahead
Haiku 5.5 96.6 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra 99.5 · Gap 11.3 · Test series 11
xhighGPT-6.1 Terra ahead
Haiku 5.5 101.3 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra 101.9 · Gap 9.1 · Test series 11
maxGPT-6.1 Terra ahead
Haiku 5.5 103.4 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra 105.2 · Gap 10.4 · Test series 11
Overall index (max vs. max)level
Haiku 5.5 103.4 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra 105.2
| Effort | Haiku 5.5 | GPT-6.1 Terra | Gap | Verdict | Test series |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| low | 80.8 | 89.4 | 16.4 | GPT-6.1 Terra ahead | 11 |
| medium | 90.4 | 97.1 | 15.1 | GPT-6.1 Terra ahead | 11 |
| high | 96.6 | 99.5 | 11.3 | GPT-6.1 Terra ahead | 11 |
| xhigh | 101.3 | 101.9 | 9.1 | GPT-6.1 Terra ahead | 11 |
| max | 103.4 | 105.2 | 10.4 | GPT-6.1 Terra ahead | 11 |
| Overall index (max vs. max) | 103.4 | 105.2 | 1.9 | level |
Gap and verdict compare only the Artificial Analysis test series in which both models are measured at that effort. Tied below 3 points, ahead only beyond two standard errors. The single values rest on all test series of each model, so their difference can deviate from the gap.
Which model for which task?
Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.
TaskBetter choicebased on
Writing and debugging codeleaning GPT-6.1 TerraCoding 106.2 to 113.0
Maths and data analysisleaning GPT-6.1 TerraMathematics without a score for GPT-6.1 Terra, Reasoning 105.2 to 110.9
Facts and researchGPT-6.1 TerraKnowledge 85.5 to 108.1
Agents and workflowsleaning Haiku 5.5Agents 106.1 to 102.9
Fast chat repliesHaiku 5.5236 to 73 tokens per second
Security analysisopenCybersecurity without a score for GPT-6.1 Terra
Many requests on a small budgetHaiku 5.5$0.20 to $2 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsleaning Haiku 5.5Finance 104.7 to 99.6, Legal 94.4 to 84.4, Health without a score for GPT-6.1 Terra
Images, screenshots and PDFsopenMultimodal without a score for Haiku 5.5
See for yourself: same task, one attempt
There is no shared test round for this selection. Results from different rounds are not mixed.
Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT-6.1 Terra in the overall index
Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.
Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v4)
20 of 91 models
4 models in this view are measured at a lower reasoning effort than max in the overall index. Dashed column: lower reasoning effort than the top.
Claude Opus 5.5max126.1
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh125.7
Claude Fable 5.1max123.8
Claude Sonnet 5.5max122.8
Gemini 4 Argonhigh122.3
GPT-6 Astramax121.3
GPT-6.1 Solmax119.2
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.3
Claude Opus 5max117.2
Muse Wondermax113.4
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.9
Claude Fable 5max112.5
GPT-6 Solmax110.6
GPT-5.6 Solmax108.7
Muse Spark 1.3max107.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max106.6
Gemini 3.8 Flashhigh106.5
GPT-6.1 Terramax105.2
Claude Haiku 5.5max103.4
Claude Opus 5.5, Anthropic: 126.1 · Rank 1 · reasoning effort max
Gemini 4 Carbon, Google DeepMind: 125.7 · Rank 2 · reasoning effort high
Claude Fable 5.1, Anthropic: 123.8 · Rank 3 · reasoning effort max
Claude Sonnet 5.5, Anthropic: 122.8 · Rank 4 · reasoning effort max
Gemini 4 Argon, Google DeepMind: 122.3 · Rank 5 · reasoning effort high
GPT-6 Astra, OpenAI: 121.3 · Rank 6 · reasoning effort max
GPT-6.1 Sol, OpenAI: 119.2 · Rank 7 · reasoning effort max
Muse Wonder Full, Meta: 118.3 · Rank 8 · reasoning effort max
Claude Opus 5, Anthropic: 117.2 · Rank 9 · reasoning effort max
Muse Wonder, Meta: 113.4 · Rank 10 · reasoning effort max
Kimi K3.1 Pro, Moonshot AI: 112.9 · Rank 11 · reasoning effort max
Claude Fable 5, Anthropic: 112.5 · Rank 12 · reasoning effort max
GPT-6 Sol, OpenAI: 110.6 · Rank 13 · reasoning effort max
GPT-5.6 Sol, OpenAI: 108.7 · Rank 14 · reasoning effort max
Muse Spark 1.3, Meta: 107.4 · Rank 15 · reasoning effort max
Gemini 3.7 Flash, Google: 107.1 · Rank 16 · reasoning effort high
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, DeepSeek: 106.6 · Rank 17 · reasoning effort max
Gemini 3.8 Flash, Google: 106.5 · Rank 18 · reasoning effort high
GPT-6.1 Terra, OpenAI: 105.2 · Rank 19 · reasoning effort max
Claude Haiku 5.5, Anthropic: 103.4 · Rank 20 · reasoning effort max
Claude Opus 5.5
Gemini 4 Carbon
Claude Fable 5.1
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Gemini 4 Argon
GPT-6 Astra
GPT-6.1 Sol
Muse Wonder Full
Claude Opus 5
Muse Wonder
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Claude Fable 5
GPT-6 Sol
GPT-5.6 Sol
Muse Spark 1.3
Gemini 3.7 Flash
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Gemini 3.8 Flash
GPT-6.1 Terra
Claude Haiku 5.5
Popularity compared
How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.
Claude Haiku 5.5 is more popular than GPT-6.1 Terra: 77 to 12 out of 100.
Over time
Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 5, 2026
Claude Haiku 5.5GPT-6.1 Terra
All data side by side
The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 | GPT-6.1 Terra |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | ||
| Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better | 103.4 | 105.2 |
| Rank | Rank 20 of 91 | Rank 19 of 91 |
| Price per 1M tokens | ||
| Inputwhat you send | $0.10above 100,000 tokens: $0.50 | $1above 272,000 tokens: $2 |
| Outputwhat the model writes | $0.50above 100,000 tokens: $2.50 | $5above 272,000 tokens: $7.50 |
| Speed | ||
| Tokens per second | 236 | 73 |
| Popularity | ||
| Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 100 | 77Rank 3 of 875 | 12Rank 632 of 875 |
| Technical | ||
| Context windowhow much text the model reads at once | 1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages | 1.05 M tokens≈ 1,580 A4 pages |
| Knowledge cutoff | June 2026 | Jun 1, 2026 |
| Released | Oct 7, 2026 | Oct 26, 2026 |
| Availability | Active | Active |
| Open weights | no | no |
- GPT-6.1 Terra, 12-hour cache write: The table's cache-write rate covers 30-minute retention. With 12-hour retention it is $2.50 per 1M tokens through 272,000 input tokens, $5 above. Source
- GPT-6.1 Terra, Long-context billing: Above 272,000 input tokens, the higher rates apply to the entire request. Input and cache rates double, while output costs 1.5 times the standard rate. Source
- GPT-6.1 Terra, Batch and Flex pricing: 50% off standard pricing Source
- GPT-6.1 Terra, Fast pricing: Fast mode costs twice the standard price Source
- GPT-6.1 Terra, Regional processing: 10% surcharge over standard processing Source
Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis
Is there a better choice?
Best model in the overall indexClaude Opus 5.5
Overall index 126.1, rank 1. $4 input and $20 output per 1M tokens.
GPT-6.1 Terra vs. Claude Opus 5.5Shared benchmarks
Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.
A: Claude Haiku 5.5B: GPT-6.1 Terra
AA-BriefcaseOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 1,441.38 eloGPT-6.1 Terra: 1,263.74 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AA-OmniscienceOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 5.3 pointsGPT-6.1 Terra: 27.767 pointsArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AA-Omniscience AccuracyOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 31.8%GPT-6.1 Terra: 47.3%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateOverall · lower is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 38.9%GPT-6.1 Terra: 37.0%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AutomationBench-AAOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 33.7%GPT-6.1 Terra: 58.5%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
CritPt v2 (Hard Subset)Overall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 45.0%GPT-6.1 Terra: 61.5%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
EMB v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 65.5%GPT-6.1 Terra: 73.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent v2.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 65.4%GPT-6.1 Terra: 56%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
FrontierCodeOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 23.2%GPT-6.1 Terra: 37.5%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
FrontierCode 1.1 MainOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 43.6%GPT-6.1 Terra: 37.2%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
GDP.pdfOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 17.2%GPT-6.1 Terra: 28.0%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
GDPval-AAOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 1,424.29 eloGPT-6.1 Terra: 1,352.74 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
HLAB-Vals-1.1Overall · Task fully resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 4.2%GPT-6.1 Terra: 1.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
HLE-DiamondOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 23.7%GPT-6.1 Terra: 35.4%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 43.8%GPT-6.1 Terra: 26%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 31.9%GPT-6.1 Terra: 17.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-BenchOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 21.7%GPT-6.1 Terra: 41.9%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 36.4%GPT-6.1 Terra: 49.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 10.0%GPT-6.1 Terra: 33.3%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
Vals Finance IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 57.4%GPT-6.1 Terra: 53.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 58.7%GPT-6.1 Terra: 60.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Legal IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 70.3%GPT-6.1 Terra: 58.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 90.4%GPT-6.1 Terra: 84%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
AA-BriefcaseOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 1,523.33 eloGPT-6.1 Terra: 1,333.47 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AA-OmniscienceOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 7.833 pointsGPT-6.1 Terra: 28.933 pointsArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AA-Omniscience AccuracyOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 33.8%GPT-6.1 Terra: 48.0%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateOverall · lower is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 39.2%GPT-6.1 Terra: 36.8%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AutomationBench-AAOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 36.0%GPT-6.1 Terra: 59.9%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
CritPt v2 (Hard Subset)Overall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 47.5%GPT-6.1 Terra: 60.5%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
EMB v1.1Comps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 77.7%GPT-6.1 Terra: 75.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent v2.1Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 67.7%GPT-6.1 Terra: 50.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
FrontierCodeOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 29.9%GPT-6.1 Terra: 36.9%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
FrontierCode 1.1 MainOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 45.5%GPT-6.1 Terra: 41.4%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
GDP.pdfOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 18.2%GPT-6.1 Terra: 26.6%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
GDPval-AAOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 1,521.54 eloGPT-6.1 Terra: 1,414.87 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
HLAB-Vals-1.1Antitrust Competition · Criteria passed · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 86.2%GPT-6.1 Terra: 83%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
HLE-DiamondOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 28.8%GPT-6.1 Terra: 42.3%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 50%GPT-6.1 Terra: 45.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 6.7%GPT-6.1 Terra: 6.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-BenchOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 29.3%GPT-6.1 Terra: 46.5%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Hardware · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 20%GPT-6.1 Terra: 26.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 18.1%GPT-6.1 Terra: 41.9%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
Vals Finance IndexEMB v1.1 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 65.5%GPT-6.1 Terra: 73.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals IndexCode Migration v1.1 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 50.2%GPT-6.1 Terra: 72.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Legal IndexBusiness & Commercial · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 67.1%GPT-6.1 Terra: 51.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
AA-BriefcaseOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 1,114.41 eloGPT-6.1 Terra: 1,030.56 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AA-OmniscienceOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 2.167 pointsGPT-6.1 Terra: 22.933 pointsArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AA-Omniscience AccuracyOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 30.4%GPT-6.1 Terra: 45.6%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateOverall · lower is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 40.5%GPT-6.1 Terra: 41.6%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
AutomationBench-AAOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 22.9%GPT-6.1 Terra: 56.2%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
CritPt v2 (Hard Subset)Overall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 21.5%GPT-6.1 Terra: 50.5%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
EMB v1.1Dataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 85.8%GPT-6.1 Terra: 86.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent v2.1All-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 51.8%GPT-6.1 Terra: 42.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
FrontierCodeOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 8.0%GPT-6.1 Terra: 24.5%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
FrontierCode 1.1 MainOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 29.3%GPT-6.1 Terra: 36.3%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
GDP.pdfOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 11.2%GPT-6.1 Terra: 25.6%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
GDPval-AAOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 1,130.36 eloGPT-6.1 Terra: 1,203.75 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
HLAB-Vals-1.1Antitrust Competition · Task fully resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 0%GPT-6.1 Terra: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
HLE-DiamondOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 14.1%GPT-6.1 Terra: 24.9%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 88.7%GPT-6.1 Terra: 84.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 54.1%GPT-6.1 Terra: 45.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-BenchOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 12.6%GPT-6.1 Terra: 15.2%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Media · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Haiku 5.5: 25%GPT-6.1 Terra: 58.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterClaude Haiku 5.5: 1.9%GPT-6.1 Terra: 7.6%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/06/2026
More comparisons
Compare Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT-6.1 Terra with the models people compare them with most often.
Compare another matchup
Predecessor and successor
The most popular comparisons
- 1Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
- 2Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
- 3Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
- 4Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 5Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 6Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
- 7GPT-6.1 Terra vs. Gemini 4 Argon
- 8GPT-6.1 Terra vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
- 9Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3
Show all 46 comparisons
- 10Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
- 11Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
- 12Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.5
- 13Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5
- 14Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 5
- 15Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra
- 16Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
- 17Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.8
- 18Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Argon
- 19Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Grok 4.7
- 20GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-6.1 Terra
- 21Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
- 22Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
- 23Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Muse Spark 1.3
- 24Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.6
- 25Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
- 26Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 4
- 27Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
- 28Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
- 29Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
- 30Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
- 31Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
- 32Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
- 33Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.6
- 34Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Kimi K2.6
- 35GPT-6.1 Terra vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
- 36Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.7
- 37Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra
- 38Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 3
- 39Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-5.5
- 40GPT-6.1 Terra vs. GPT-6 Astra
- 41GPT-6.1 Terra vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
- 42GPT-6.1 Terra vs. GPT-6 Sol
- 43GPT-6.1 Terra vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
- 44GPT-6.1 Terra vs. GPT-6 Luna
- 45GPT-6.1 Terra vs. Mistral Large 4
- 46GPT-6.1 Terra vs. Gemini 4 Carbon