Skip to main content

AnthropicOpenAILLM matchup

Claude Opus 5.5vs.GPT-6 Astra

Which one is better?

Claude Opus 5.5 performs better than GPT-6 Astra and is cheaper: GPT-6 Astra costs 2.5 times as much.

Opus 5.5 ahead
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
126.1

Claude Opus 5.5

Rank 1

121.3

GPT-6 Astra

Rank 6

Opus 5.5 faster
SpeedTokens per second
106

Claude Opus 5.5

43

GPT-6 Astra

Opus 5.5 cheaper
Price$ per 1M tokens
$8

Claude Opus 5.5

$20

GPT-6 Astra

GPT-6 Astra more popular
Popularity0 to 100
68

Claude Opus 5.5

Rank 8 of 785

83

GPT-6 Astra

Rank 1 of 785

Above 272,000 tokens of context, GPT-6 Astra costs more: $20 input and $75 output per 1M tokens.

Choose Claude Opus 5.5 for

FinanceLegalCybersecurityHealthMathematicsKnowledgeMultimodalCoding (not certain)Agents (not certain)

Choose GPT-6 Astra for

SearchReasoning (not certain)

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

Opus 5.5GPT-6 Astra

The median of all ranked models is below 100 in every area, so it sits in the centre of the net.

110120130140100Codingslightly Opus5.5ReasoningslightlyGPT-6 AstraMathematicsOpus 5.5KnowledgeOpus 5.5Agentsslightly Opus5.5GenerallevelMultimodalOpus 5.5FinanceOpus 5.5LegalOpus 5.5HealthOpus 5.5
CodingOpus 5.5 slightly ahead
Opus 5.5129.9Rank 1
GPT-6 Astra124.3Rank 3
Median of ranked models84.1

95 % range: Opus 5.5 121.2 to 138.7, GPT-6 Astra 116.1 to 132.6.

AreaOpus 5.5GPT-6 Astra

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the close-up the net starts at 100 points, just below the weaker model's lowest value; the reference group average is 100.

Opus 5.5 is ahead in 6 of 10 areas, GPT-6 Astra in none.

Opus 5.5 ahead: 6Opus 5.5 slightly ahead: 2level: 1GPT-6 Astra slightly ahead: 1

Areas in the overall index
MathematicsOpus 5.5 +6131.8 to 126.2
KnowledgeOpus 5.5 +5131.4 to 126.2
MultimodalOpus 5.5 +4123.1 to 119.0
Codingleaning Opus 5.5not certain · 14 tests each
Agentsleaning Opus 5.5not certain · 5 tests each
Reasoningleaning GPT-6 Astranot certain · 2 and 4 tests
Generallevel125.1 to 126.4
Specialist fields
FinanceOpus 5.5 +13121.4 to 108.1
LegalOpus 5.5 +11121.5 to 110.4
HealthOpus 5.5 +6122.1 to 115.9

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 4 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
CybersecurityOpus 5.5 +8120.5 to 112.4
SearchGPT-6 Astra +3119.5 to 122.7
Productivityonly Opus 5.5 has a score
Educationonly Opus 5.5 has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra at the same effort

Both models measured at the same reasoning efforts. This shows whether a lead comes from the model or only from more compute.

lowGPT-6 Astra ahead
Opus 5.5 106.6 vs. GPT-6 Astra 110.7 · Gap 6.4 · Test series 11
mediumtied
Opus 5.5 117.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra 116.6 · Gap 1.5 · Test series 11
hightied
Opus 5.5 120.4 vs. GPT-6 Astra 119.6 · Gap 1.1 · Test series 11
xhightied
Opus 5.5 124.2 vs. GPT-6 Astra 120.3 · Gap 2.4 · Test series 11
maxtied
Opus 5.5 126.1 vs. GPT-6 Astra 121.3 · Gap 2.7 · Test series 14
Overall index (max vs. max)Opus 5.5 ahead
Opus 5.5 126.1 vs. GPT-6 Astra 121.3

Gap and verdict compare only the Artificial Analysis test series in which both models are measured at that effort. Tied below 3 points, ahead only beyond two standard errors. The single values rest on all test series of each model, so their difference can deviate from the gap.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeleaning Opus 5.5Coding 129.9 to 124.3
Maths and data analysisdepends on the partMathematics 131.8 to 126.2, Reasoning 122.5 to 126.5
Facts and researchdepends on the partKnowledge 131.4 to 126.2, Search 119.5 to 122.7
Agents and workflowsleaning Opus 5.5Agents 117.2 to 113.1
Fast chat repliesOpus 5.5106 to 43 tokens per second
Security analysisOpus 5.5Cybersecurity 120.5 to 112.4
Many requests on a small budgetOpus 5.5$8 to $20 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsOpus 5.5Finance 121.4 to 108.1, Legal 121.5 to 110.4, Health 122.1 to 115.9
Images, screenshots and PDFsOpus 5.5Multimodal 123.1 to 119.0

See for yourself: same task, one attempt

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

Claude Opus 5.5

Claude Opus 5.5: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 33 s · $0.07

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
3,536 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0708
Response time
33.2 s
API model reported in response
anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Pinned endpoint
Anthropic | anthropic/claude-opus-5.5-20260921
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

GPT-6 Astra

GPT-6 Astra: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Sep 7, 2026 · 142 s · $0.20

Test details
Run date
Sep 7, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
openai/gpt-6-astra
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
3,966 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.1985
Response time
141.7 s
API model reported in response
openai/gpt-6-astra
Pinned endpoint
OpenAI | openai/gpt-6-astra-20260903
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

Claude Opus 5.5

Unavailable in this round

GPT-6 Astra

Unavailable in this round

Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v4)

20 of 92 models

4 models in this view are measured at a lower reasoning effort than max in the overall index. Dashed column: lower reasoning effort than the top.

Claude Opus 5.5max126.1
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh125.8
Claude Fable 5.1max123.8
Claude Sonnet 5.5max122.8
Gemini 4 Argonhigh122.3
GPT-6 Astramax121.3
GPT-6.1 Solmax119.2
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.3
Claude Opus 5max117.2
Muse Wondermax113.4
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.9
Claude Fable 5max112.5
GPT-6 Solmax110.5
GPT-5.6 Solmax108.7
Muse Spark 1.3max107.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max106.6
Gemini 3.8 Flashhigh106.5
GPT-6.1 Terramax105.3
Claude Haiku 5.5max103.4

Popularity compared

How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.

GPT-6 Astra is more popular than Claude Opus 5.5: 83 to 68 out of 100.

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 7, 2026

Claude Opus 5.5GPT-6 Astra

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricClaude Opus 5.5GPT-6 Astra
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better126.1121.3
RankRank 1 of 92Rank 6 of 92
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$4$10above 272,000 tokens: $20
Outputwhat the model writes$20$50above 272,000 tokens: $75
Cost per task (own tests)average of 3 original-protocol tasks both models passed (SVG short test not included)$0.11$0.26
Speed
Tokens per second10643
Popularity
Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 10068Rank 8 of 78583Rank 1 of 785
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages1.05 M tokens≈ 1,580 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffJune 2026Apr 30, 2026
ReleasedSep 22, 2026Sep 3, 2026
AvailabilityActiveLimited access
Open weightsnono

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

Cheaper than Opus 5.5Claude Sonnet 5.5

Overall index 122.8, rank 4$2 input and $10 output per 1M tokens

Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5.5

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: Claude Opus 5.5B: GPT-6 Astra

AutomationBench-AA (strict pass@1)Overall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 41.2%GPT-6 Astra: 41.6%MetaAs of 10/15/2026
BioMysteryBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 79.3%GPT-6 Astra: 79.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 66.6%GPT-6 Astra: 67.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Code Migration v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 81.0%GPT-6 Astra: 80.6%Vals AIAs of 10/30/2026
CyberBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 55.4%GPT-6 Astra: 41.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
DeepSWEOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 74.2%GPT-6 Astra: 74.1%MetaAs of 10/15/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 75.9%GPT-6 Astra: 71.7%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMB v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 75.8%GPT-6 Astra: 72.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 58.6%GPT-6 Astra: 53.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Finance Agent v2.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 67.8%GPT-6 Astra: 60.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
GDP.pdfOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 30.6 pointsGPT-6 Astra: 34.2 pointsMetaAs of 10/15/2026
Harvey LAB-AAOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 4.2%GPT-6 Astra: 8.6%MetaAs of 10/15/2026
HealthBench ProOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 65.6 pointsGPT-6 Astra: 65.3 pointsMetaAs of 10/15/2026
HLAB-Vals-1.1Overall · Task fully resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 9.2%GPT-6 Astra: 7.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ImmigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 72.1%GPT-6 Astra: 67.7%Vals AIAs of 10/28/2026
IOIOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 95.1%GPT-6 Astra: 100.0%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
JobBenchOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 75.4 pointsGPT-6 Astra: 66.1 pointsMetaAs of 10/15/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 50.5%GPT-6 Astra: 39.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,810GPT-6 Astra: 1,773LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena SearchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,213GPT-6 Astra: 1,234LMArenaAs of 10/13/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,509GPT-6 Astra: 1,476LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,293GPT-6 Astra: 1,285LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
MedCodeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 49.8%GPT-6 Astra: 48.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 91.4%GPT-6 Astra: 87.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MemoryBenchOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 81.5 pointsGPT-6 Astra: 81.4 pointsMetaAs of 10/15/2026
MysteryMechanismOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 49.6%GPT-6 Astra: 53.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
OSWorld V2.1 (partial reward)Overall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 81.8%GPT-6 Astra: 75.8%MetaAs of 10/15/2026
Personal Superintelligence IndexOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 55.2 pointsGPT-6 Astra: 54.5 pointsMetaAs of 10/15/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 18.5%GPT-6 Astra: 5.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 70.5%GPT-6 Astra: 52.5%MetaAs of 10/15/2026
ProofBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 100%GPT-6 Astra: 99%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
SRE BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 33.6%GPT-6 Astra: 56.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SWE-bench MultimodalOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 70.2%GPT-6 Astra: 43.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SWE-Marathon v1.1Overall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 46.3%GPT-6 Astra: 42.5%MetaAs of 10/15/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 45.6%GPT-6 Astra: 20.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65.2%GPT-6 Astra: 59.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0-AAOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 59.6%GPT-6 Astra: 59.1%MetaAs of 10/15/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 47.1%GPT-6 Astra: 62.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Time Horizon Index: KSPOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 91.3%GPT-6 Astra: 90.5%Vals AIAs of 10/07/2026
Vals Finance Agent V2Overall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 58.6%GPT-6 Astra: 53.5%MetaAs of 10/15/2026
Vals Finance IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65.6%GPT-6 Astra: 55.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 70.2%GPT-6 Astra: 65.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Legal IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 72.3%GPT-6 Astra: 68.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Router IndexFull Index · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 64.2%GPT-6 Astra: 65.0%Vals AIAs of 11/03/2026
Vals Science IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 58.7%GPT-6 Astra: 65.1%Vals AIAs of 10/25/2026
Vibe Code Bench 1-100Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 30.4%GPT-6 Astra: 27.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 90.3%GPT-6 Astra: 89.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
BioMysteryBenchHard · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 47.1%GPT-6 Astra: 37.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65.5%GPT-6 Astra: 67.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Code Migration v1.1CLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 78.4%GPT-6 Astra: 76.4%Vals AIAs of 10/30/2026
CyberBench v1.1Patch · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 85.7%GPT-6 Astra: 82.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 76.4%GPT-6 Astra: 78.0%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMB v1.1Comps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 75.7%GPT-6 Astra: 76.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 54.5%GPT-6 Astra: 48.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Finance Agent v2.1Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 67.1%GPT-6 Astra: 58.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
HLAB-Vals-1.1Antitrust Competition · Criteria passed · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 88.4%GPT-6 Astra: 91.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ImmigrationAll-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 24.4%GPT-6 Astra: 22.1%Vals AIAs of 10/28/2026
IOIIOI 2024 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 100%GPT-6 Astra: 100%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65.2%GPT-6 Astra: 53.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevHTML development · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,753GPT-6 Astra: 1,785LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,495GPT-6 Astra: 1,473LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlCreative writing with images · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,287GPT-6 Astra: 1,294LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65%GPT-6 Astra: 50%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchCapability Score · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 53.6%GPT-6 Astra: 63.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026

More comparisons

Compare Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-6 Astra
  2. 2Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5.5
  3. 3Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  4. 4Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  5. 5Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  6. 6Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  7. 7Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5.1
  8. 8Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  9. 9Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
Show all 77 comparisons
  1. 10Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  2. 11Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  3. 12Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Kimi K3
  4. 13Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5
  5. 14Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
  6. 15GPT-6 Astra vs. GPT-6 Luna
  7. 16Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3
  8. 17GPT-6 Astra vs. Kimi K3
  9. 18Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  10. 19Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  11. 20Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.6
  12. 21GPT-6 Astra vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  13. 22Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.6
  14. 23Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  15. 24GPT-6 Astra vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  16. 25GPT-6 Astra vs. GPT-6 Sol
  17. 26Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Grok 4.6
  18. 27Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.2
  19. 28Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
  20. 29GPT-6 Astra vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  21. 30Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  22. 31Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.5
  23. 32Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Muse Spark 1.3
  24. 33Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.8
  25. 34Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  26. 35Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  27. 36Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 4
  28. 37Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  29. 38Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  30. 39GPT-6 Astra vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  31. 40Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.5
  32. 41GPT-6 Astra vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  33. 42Claude Opus 4.8 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  34. 43Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  35. 44Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  36. 45Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Grok 4.7
  37. 46GPT-6 Astra vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  38. 47Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 3
  39. 48Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  40. 49GPT-6 Astra vs. GLM-5.3
  41. 50Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.5
  42. 51GPT-6 Astra vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  43. 52Claude Opus 4.6 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  44. 53GPT-6 Astra vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  45. 54GPT-6 Astra vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  46. 55Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5
  47. 56Claude Sonnet 5 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  48. 57Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  49. 58Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  50. 59Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  51. 60Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  52. 61GPT-6 Astra vs. GLM-5.2
  53. 62Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Mistral Medium 3.5
  54. 63Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Muse Wonder Full
  55. 64Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 4.5
  56. 65Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  57. 66Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  58. 67Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra
  59. 68GPT-6 Astra vs. GPT-5.4
  60. 69Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.4
  61. 70Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.1
  62. 71GPT-6.1 Terra vs. GPT-6 Astra
  63. 72Claude Opus 4.7 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  64. 73GPT-6 Astra vs. Muse Wonder
  65. 74Claude Opus 4.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  66. 75GPT-6 Astra vs. Muse Wonder Full
  67. 76GPT-6 Astra vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
  68. 77GPT-6 Astra vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro