Skip to main content

AnthropicGoogleLLM matchup

Claude Opus 5.5vs.Gemini 3.8 Flash

Which one is better?

Claude Opus 5.5 performs better than Gemini 3.8 Flash, but costs 5.3 times as much.

Opus 5.5 ahead
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
126.1

Claude Opus 5.5

Rank 1

106.5

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Rank 18

about as fast
SpeedTokens per second
106

Claude Opus 5.5

115

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Gemini 3.8 Flash cheaper
Price$ per 1M tokens
$8

Claude Opus 5.5

$1.50

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Opus 5.5 more popular
Popularity0 to 100
68

Claude Opus 5.5

Rank 8 of 785

61

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Rank 25 of 785

Choose Claude Opus 5.5 for

MathematicsCodingCybersecurityProductivityEducationKnowledgeLegalGeneralHealthAgentsMultimodalFinanceReasoning

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash for

No clear advantage

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

Opus 5.5Gemini 3.8 FlashMedian of all ranked models

11013015090CodingOpus 5.5ReasoningOpus 5.5MathematicsOpus 5.5KnowledgeOpus 5.5AgentsOpus 5.5GeneralOpus 5.5MultimodalOpus 5.5FinanceOpus 5.5LegalOpus 5.5HealthOpus 5.5
CodingOpus 5.5 ahead
Opus 5.5129.9Rank 1
Gemini 3.8 Flash99.9Rank 27
Median of ranked models84.1

95 % range: Opus 5.5 121.2 to 138.7, Gemini 3.8 Flash 97.4 to 102.3.

AreaOpus 5.5Gemini 3.8 Flash

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the close-up the net starts at 90 points, just below the weaker model's lowest value; the reference group average is 100.

Opus 5.5 is ahead in 10 of 10 areas, Gemini 3.8 Flash in none.

Opus 5.5 ahead: 10

Areas in the overall index
MathematicsOpus 5.5 +31131.8 to 100.4
CodingOpus 5.5 +30129.9 to 99.9
KnowledgeOpus 5.5 +20131.4 to 111.6
GeneralOpus 5.5 +19125.1 to 105.8
AgentsOpus 5.5 +14117.2 to 103.2
MultimodalOpus 5.5 +14123.1 to 109.4
ReasoningOpus 5.5 +10122.5 to 113.0
Specialist fields
LegalOpus 5.5 +19121.5 to 102.1
HealthOpus 5.5 +19122.1 to 102.8
FinanceOpus 5.5 +10121.4 to 111.3

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 4 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
CybersecurityOpus 5.5 +23120.5 to 97.1
ProductivityOpus 5.5 +21125.0 to 104.3
EducationOpus 5.5 +21127.0 to 106.4
Searchonly Opus 5.5 has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash at the same effort

Both models measured at the same reasoning efforts. This shows whether a lead comes from the model or only from more compute.

lowOpus 5.5 slightly ahead
Opus 5.5 106.6 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash 99.7 · Gap 3.8 · Test series 3
mediumOpus 5.5 ahead
Opus 5.5 117.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash 105.6 · Gap 15.7 · Test series 12
highOpus 5.5 ahead
Opus 5.5 120.4 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash 106.5 · Gap 17.7 · Test series 12
Overall index (max vs. high)Opus 5.5 ahead
Opus 5.5 126.1 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash 106.5

Gap and verdict compare only the Artificial Analysis test series in which both models are measured at that effort. Tied below 3 points, ahead only beyond two standard errors. The single values rest on all test series of each model, so their difference can deviate from the gap.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeOpus 5.5Coding 129.9 to 99.9
Maths and data analysisOpus 5.5Mathematics 131.8 to 100.4, Reasoning 122.5 to 113.0
Facts and researchOpus 5.5Knowledge 131.4 to 111.6, Search without a score for Gemini 3.8 Flash
Agents and workflowsOpus 5.5Agents 117.2 to 103.2
Fast chat repliesabout the same106 to 115 tokens per second
Security analysisOpus 5.5Cybersecurity 120.5 to 97.1
Many requests on a small budgetGemini 3.8 Flash$8 to $1.50 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsOpus 5.5Finance 121.4 to 111.3, Legal 121.5 to 102.1, Health 122.1 to 102.8
Images, screenshots and PDFsOpus 5.5Multimodal 123.1 to 109.4

See for yourself: same task, one attempt

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

Claude Opus 5.5

Claude Opus 5.5: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 33 s · $0.07

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
3,536 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0708
Response time
33.2 s
API model reported in response
anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Pinned endpoint
Anthropic | anthropic/claude-opus-5.5-20260921
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Gemini 3.8 Flash

The response reached the token limit. No complete recording is available.

Oct 5, 2026 · 40 s · $0.03

Not yet visually reviewed. A successful recording does not confirm correct physics or full compliance with the prompt.

Test details
Run date
Oct 5, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
google/gemini-3.8-flash
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
8,188 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0307
Response time
40.2 s
API model reported in response
google/gemini-3.8-flash
Pinned endpoint
Google AI Studio | google/gemini-3.8-flash-20260902
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Failed

Earlier attempts (3)

  • Oct 2, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
  • Oct 1, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
  • Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

Claude Opus 5.5

Unavailable in this round

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Unavailable in this round

Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemini 3.8 Flash in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v4)

20 of 92 models

4 models in this view are measured at a lower reasoning effort than max in the overall index. Dashed column: lower reasoning effort than the top.

Claude Opus 5.5max126.1
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh125.8
Claude Fable 5.1max123.8
Claude Sonnet 5.5max122.8
Gemini 4 Argonhigh122.3
GPT-6 Astramax121.3
GPT-6.1 Solmax119.2
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.3
Claude Opus 5max117.2
Muse Wondermax113.4
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.9
Claude Fable 5max112.5
GPT-6 Solmax110.5
GPT-5.6 Solmax108.7
Muse Spark 1.3max107.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max106.6
Gemini 3.8 Flashhigh106.5
GPT-6.1 Terramax105.3
Claude Haiku 5.5max103.4

Popularity compared

How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.

Claude Opus 5.5 is more popular than Gemini 3.8 Flash: 68 to 61 out of 100.

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 7, 2026

Claude Opus 5.5Gemini 3.8 Flash

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricClaude Opus 5.5Gemini 3.8 Flash
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better126.1106.5
RankRank 1 of 92Rank 18 of 92
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$4$0.75
Outputwhat the model writes$20$3.75
Cost per task (own tests)average of 2 original-protocol tasks both models passed (SVG short test not included)$0.12$0.044
Speed
Tokens per second106115
Popularity
Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 10068Rank 8 of 78561Rank 25 of 785
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages1.05 M tokens≈ 1,570 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffJune 2026March 2026
ReleasedSep 22, 2026Sep 2, 2026
AvailabilityActiveActive
Open weightsnono

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

Cheaper than Gemini 3.8 FlashDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Overall index 106.6, rank 17$0.15 input and $0.60 output per 1M tokens

Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: Claude Opus 5.5B: Gemini 3.8 Flash

BioMysteryBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 79.3%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 62.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 66.6%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 36.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Code Migration v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 81.0%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 38.6%Vals AIAs of 10/30/2026
CyberBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 55.4%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 43.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 75.9%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 72.2%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMB v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 75.8%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 72.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 58.6%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 61.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Finance Agent v2.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 67.8%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 65.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
HLAB-Vals-1.1Overall · Task fully resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 9.2%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 12.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ImmigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 72.1%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 63.4%Vals AIAs of 10/28/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
IOIOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 95.1%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 56.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 50.5%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 38.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,810Gemini 3.8 Flash: 1,583LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,509Gemini 3.8 Flash: 1,496LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,293Gemini 3.8 Flash: 1,291LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
MedCodeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 49.8%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 48.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 91.4%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 84.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MysteryMechanismOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 49.6%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 36.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 18.5%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 1.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ProofBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 100%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 48%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Public Benefits Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 70.6%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 65.3%Vals AIAs of 10/12/2026
SAGEOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 91.3%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 88.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 33.6%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 11.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SWE-bench MultimodalOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 70.2%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 40.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 45.6%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 32.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65.2%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 19.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 47.1%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 8.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Time Horizon Index: KSPOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 91.3%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 18.8%Vals AIAs of 10/07/2026
Vals Finance IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65.6%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 60.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 70.2%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 56.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Legal IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 72.3%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 69.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Router IndexFull Index · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 64.2%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 56.0%Vals AIAs of 11/03/2026
Vals Science IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 58.7%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 35.8%Vals AIAs of 10/25/2026
Vibe Code Bench 1-100Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 30.4%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 18.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 90.3%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 78.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
BioMysteryBenchHard · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 47.1%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 21.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65.5%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 25.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Code Migration v1.1CLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 78.4%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 27.6%Vals AIAs of 10/30/2026
CyberBench v1.1Patch · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 85.7%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 87.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 76.4%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 76.4%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMB v1.1Comps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 75.7%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 76.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 54.5%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 54.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Finance Agent v2.1Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 67.1%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 61.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
HLAB-Vals-1.1Antitrust Competition · Criteria passed · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 88.4%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 92.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ImmigrationAll-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 24.4%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 16.4%Vals AIAs of 10/28/2026
IOIIOI 2024 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 100.0%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 55.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65.2%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 47.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevHTML development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,753Gemini 3.8 Flash: 1,612LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,495Gemini 3.8 Flash: 1,482LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlCreative writing with images · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,287Gemini 3.8 Flash: 1,276LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 14%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SAGEComputer Science · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 92.8%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 89.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchCapability Score · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 53.6%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 19.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SWE-bench Multimodalbpmn-js · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 83.0%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 64.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 30.0%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 6.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Hardware · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 60.0%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 26.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEarth Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 37.5%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Time Horizon Index: KSPProgress efficiency · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 69.8%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 14.5%Vals AIAs of 10/07/2026
Vals Finance IndexEMB v1.1 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 75.8%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 72.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals IndexCode Migration v1.1 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 80.5%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 38.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Legal IndexBusiness & Commercial · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 69.2%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 67.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Router IndexCode Migration · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 47.5%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 38.2%Vals AIAs of 11/03/2026
Vals Science IndexBioMysteryBench · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 79.3%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 62.2%Vals AIAs of 10/25/2026
BioMysteryBenchHuman-solvable · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 86.8%Gemini 3.8 Flash: 71.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026

More comparisons

Compare Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemini 3.8 Flash with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  2. 2Claude Opus 4.6 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  3. 3Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5.5
  4. 4Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  5. 5Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  6. 6Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  7. 7Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  8. 8GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  9. 9Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Show all 80 comparisons
  1. 10Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5.1
  2. 11Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  3. 12Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  4. 13Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  5. 14Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  6. 15Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Kimi K3
  7. 16Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5
  8. 17Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
  9. 18Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  10. 19Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  11. 20Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3
  12. 21Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
  13. 22GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  14. 23Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  15. 24Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  16. 25Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.6
  17. 26GPT-5.6 Sol vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  18. 27Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. Grok 4.7
  19. 28Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  20. 29Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.6
  21. 30Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  22. 31Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  23. 32GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  24. 33Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Grok 4.6
  25. 34Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.2
  26. 35Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
  27. 36Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  28. 37Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.5
  29. 38Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Muse Spark 1.3
  30. 39Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  31. 40Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.8
  32. 41Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  33. 42Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  34. 43Claude Opus 5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  35. 44GPT-5.6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  36. 45Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 4
  37. 46Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  38. 47Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  39. 48Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  40. 49Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.5
  41. 50Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  42. 51Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  43. 52Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Grok 4.7
  44. 53Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 3
  45. 54Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  46. 55Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. Muse Spark 1.3
  47. 56Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.5
  48. 57GPT-6 Astra vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  49. 58Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  50. 59Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. Grok 4.6
  51. 60GPT-5.4 mini vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  52. 61Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5
  53. 62Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. GLM-5.3
  54. 63Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  55. 64Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  56. 65Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Mistral Medium 3.5
  57. 66Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Muse Wonder Full
  58. 67Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 4.5
  59. 68Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. GLM-5.2
  60. 69Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. Mistral Large 4
  61. 70Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  62. 71Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra
  63. 72Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.4
  64. 73Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.1
  65. 74Claude Fable 5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  66. 75GPT-6.1 Terra vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  67. 76Claude Haiku 4.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  68. 77GPT-5.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  69. 78Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  70. 79Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. MiMo-V2.5-Pro
  71. 80Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro