Skip to main content

AnthropicDeepSeekLLM matchup

Claude Opus 5.5vs.DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Which one is better?

Claude Opus 5.5 performs better than DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash, but costs 26.7 times (input) and 33.3 times (output) as much.

Opus 5.5 ahead
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
126.1

Claude Opus 5.5

Rank 1

99.7

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Rank 29

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash faster
SpeedTokens per second
106

Claude Opus 5.5

176

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash cheaper
Price$ per 1M tokens
$8

Claude Opus 5.5

$0.26

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Opus 5.5 more popular
Popularity0 to 100
68

Claude Opus 5.5

Rank 8 of 785

55

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Rank 62 of 785

Choose Claude Opus 5.5 for

MathematicsCodingEducationGeneralMultimodalHealthProductivityLegalFinanceAgents

Choose DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash for

No clear advantage

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

Opus 5.5DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashMedian of all ranked models

11013015090CodingOpus 5.5MathematicsOpus 5.5AgentsOpus 5.5GeneralOpus 5.5MultimodalOpus 5.5FinanceOpus 5.5LegalOpus 5.5HealthOpus 5.5
CodingOpus 5.5 ahead
Opus 5.5129.9Rank 1
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash98.8Rank 30
Median of ranked models84.1

95 % range: Opus 5.5 121.2 to 138.7, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash 91.4 to 106.3.

AreaOpus 5.5DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the close-up the net starts at 90 points, just below the weaker model's lowest value; the reference group average is 100. Not in the net because a model has no own value there or the data are too thin: Reasoning, Knowledge.

Opus 5.5 is ahead in 8 of 10 areas, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash in none.

Opus 5.5 ahead: 8too little data: 2

Areas in the overall index
MathematicsOpus 5.5 +35131.8 to 97.3
CodingOpus 5.5 +31129.9 to 98.8
GeneralOpus 5.5 +28125.1 to 97.1
MultimodalOpus 5.5 +27123.1 to 95.7
AgentsOpus 5.5 +11117.2 to 106.4
Reasoningonly Opus 5.5 has a score
Knowledgeonly Opus 5.5 has a score
Specialist fields
HealthOpus 5.5 +27122.1 to 95.5
LegalOpus 5.5 +21121.5 to 100.8
FinanceOpus 5.5 +18121.4 to 103.7

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 4 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
EducationOpus 5.5 +29127.0 to 97.9
ProductivityOpus 5.5 +25125.0 to 99.7
Cybersecuritytoo little data120.5 to 103.2
Searchonly Opus 5.5 has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash at the same effort

Both models measured at the same reasoning efforts. This shows whether a lead comes from the model or only from more compute.

maxOpus 5.5 slightly ahead
Opus 5.5 126.1 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash 99.7 · Gap 14.7 · Test series 5
Overall index (max vs. max)Opus 5.5 ahead
Opus 5.5 126.1 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash 99.7

Gap and verdict compare only the Artificial Analysis test series in which both models are measured at that effort. Tied below 3 points, ahead only beyond two standard errors. The single values rest on all test series of each model, so their difference can deviate from the gap.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeOpus 5.5Coding 129.9 to 98.8
Maths and data analysisOpus 5.5Mathematics 131.8 to 97.3, Reasoning without a score for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Facts and researchopenKnowledge without a score for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash, Search without a score for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Agents and workflowsOpus 5.5Agents 117.2 to 106.4
Fast chat repliesDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash106 to 176 tokens per second
Security analysisopenCybersecurity 120.5 to 103.2 (too little data)
Many requests on a small budgetDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash$8 to $0.26 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsOpus 5.5Finance 121.4 to 103.7, Legal 121.5 to 100.8, Health 122.1 to 95.5
Images, screenshots and PDFsOpus 5.5Multimodal 123.1 to 95.7

See for yourself: same task, one attempt

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

Claude Opus 5.5

Claude Opus 5.5: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 33 s · $0.07

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
3,536 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0708
Response time
33.2 s
API model reported in response
anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Pinned endpoint
Anthropic | anthropic/claude-opus-5.5-20260921
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

The response reached the token limit. No complete recording is available.

Oct 5, 2026 · 26 s · $0.0049

Not yet visually reviewed. A successful recording does not confirm correct physics or full compliance with the prompt.

Test details
Run date
Oct 5, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
8,191 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0049
Response time
25.8 s
API model reported in response
deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash
Pinned endpoint
DeepSeek | deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash-20260910
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Failed

Earlier attempts (2)

  • Oct 2, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
  • Oct 1, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

Claude Opus 5.5

Unavailable in this round

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: SVG short test

Oct 14, 2026 · $0.0001

Test details
Test run
Oct 14, 2026
Provider
decart/fp4
API model
deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash
Output
590 tokens
Reasoning
API reports 0 reasoning tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0001
Test round
43b8c5c46830

Claude Opus 5.5 and DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v4)

20 of 92 models

4 models in this view are measured at a lower reasoning effort than max in the overall index. Dashed column: lower reasoning effort than the top.

Claude Opus 5.5max126.1
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh125.8
Claude Fable 5.1max123.8
Claude Sonnet 5.5max122.8
Gemini 4 Argonhigh122.3
GPT-6 Astramax121.3
GPT-6.1 Solmax119.2
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.3
Claude Opus 5max117.2
Muse Wondermax113.4
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.9
Claude Fable 5max112.5
GPT-6 Solmax110.5
GPT-5.6 Solmax108.7
Muse Spark 1.3max107.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max106.6
Gemini 3.8 Flashhigh106.5
GPT-6.1 Terramax105.3
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flashmax99.7

Popularity compared

How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.

Claude Opus 5.5 is more popular than DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 68 to 55 out of 100.

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 7, 2026

Claude Opus 5.5DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricClaude Opus 5.5DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better126.199.7
RankRank 1 of 92Rank 29 of 92
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$4$0.15
Outputwhat the model writes$20$0.60
Cost per task (own tests)average of 2 original-protocol tasks both models passed (SVG short test not included)$0.12$0.008
Speed
Tokens per second106176
Popularity
Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 10068Rank 8 of 78555Rank 62 of 785
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffJune 2026n/a
ReleasedSep 22, 2026Sep 10, 2026
AvailabilityActiveActive
Open weightsnoyes
  • DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: At peak times (Mon, Tue, Wed, Thu, Fri, 01:00-04:00 UTC; Mon, Tue, Wed, Thu, Fri, 06:00-10:00 UTC) the price is $0.30 input and $1.20 output per 1M tokens. The table shows the off-peak price.

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

Successor of DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Overall index 106.6, rank 17$0.15 input and $0.60 output per 1M tokens

Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Cheaper than DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashClaude Haiku 5.5

Overall index 103.4, rank 20$0.10 input and $0.50 output per 1M tokens

Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: Claude Opus 5.5B: DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

BioMysteryBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 79.3%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 67.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 66.6%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 45.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Code Migration v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 81.0%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 58.9%Vals AIAs of 10/30/2026
CyberBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 55.4%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 73.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 75.9%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 57.2%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMB v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 75.8%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 67.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 58.6%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 53.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Finance Agent v2.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 67.8%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 65.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ImmigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 72.1%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 65.6%Vals AIAs of 10/28/2026
IOIOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 95.1%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 40.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 50.5%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 41.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,810DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,619LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,509DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,476LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,293DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,261LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
MedCodeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 49.8%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 41.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 91.4%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 85.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MysteryMechanismOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 49.6%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 21.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 18.5%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 0.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ProofBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 100%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 54%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Public Benefits Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 70.6%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 64.3%Vals AIAs of 10/12/2026
SAGEOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 91.3%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 85.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 33.6%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 0.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SWE-bench MultimodalOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 70.2%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 46.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 45.6%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 26.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65.2%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 19.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 47.1%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Finance IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65.6%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 57.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Science IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 58.7%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 29.7%Vals AIAs of 10/25/2026
Vibe Code Bench 1-100Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 30.4%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 16.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 90.3%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 84.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
BioMysteryBenchHard · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 47.1%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 21.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65.5%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 37.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Code Migration v1.1CLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 78.4%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 47.7%Vals AIAs of 10/30/2026
CyberBench v1.1Patch · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 85.7%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 85.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 76.4%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 43.9%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMB v1.1Comps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 75.7%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 68.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 54.5%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 49.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Finance Agent v2.1Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 67.1%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 66.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ImmigrationAll-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 24.4%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 19.5%Vals AIAs of 10/28/2026
IOIIOI 2024 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 100.0%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 42.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65.2%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 53.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevHTML development · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,753DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,613LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,495DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,478LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlCreative writing with images · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,287DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,254LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65.0%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 16.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SAGEComputer Science · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 92.8%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 91.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchCapability Score · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 53.6%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 14.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SWE-bench Multimodalbpmn-js · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 83.0%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 60.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 30.0%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 3.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Hardware · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 60%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEarth Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 37.5%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Finance IndexEMB v1.1 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 75.8%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 67.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Science IndexBioMysteryBench · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 79.3%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 67.8%Vals AIAs of 10/25/2026
BioMysteryBenchHuman-solvable · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 86.8%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 78.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCOBOL · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 70%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 70%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Code Migration v1.1COBOL · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 89.0%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 92.5%Vals AIAs of 10/30/2026
CyberBench v1.1PoC · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 25.0%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 61.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBDataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 84.9%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 73.9%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMB v1.1Dataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 86.2%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 79.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent (v2)All-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 48.1%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 41.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Finance Agent v2.1All-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 56.3%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 51.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ImmigrationContent Checks · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 70.2%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 64.2%Vals AIAs of 10/28/2026
IOIIOI 2025 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 100.0%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 35.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 85.4%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 89.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026

More comparisons

Compare Claude Opus 5.5 and DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  2. 2Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5.5
  3. 3Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  4. 4Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  5. 5Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  6. 6Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  7. 7Muse Spark 1.3 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  8. 8Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  9. 9Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
Show all 90 comparisons
  1. 10Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5.1
  2. 11GPT-6 Luna vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  3. 12GPT-6 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  4. 13Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  5. 14Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  6. 15Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  7. 16Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Kimi K3
  8. 17Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  9. 18Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5
  10. 19Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
  11. 20Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3
  12. 21Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  13. 22Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  14. 23Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.6
  15. 24GPT-6 Astra vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  16. 25Grok 4.7 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  17. 26Claude Sonnet 5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  18. 27Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.6
  19. 28Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  20. 29DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  21. 30Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Grok 4.6
  22. 31GPT-5.6 Terra vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  23. 32Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.2
  24. 33Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
  25. 34Claude Opus 5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  26. 35Claude Opus 4.6 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  27. 36Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  28. 37GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  29. 38Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.5
  30. 39Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Muse Spark 1.3
  31. 40Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.8
  32. 41DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  33. 42Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  34. 43Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  35. 44Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 4
  36. 45Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  37. 46DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. GLM-5.2
  38. 47DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. Mistral Large 4
  39. 48DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  40. 49Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.5
  41. 50Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  42. 51Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  43. 52DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. MiMo-V2.5-Pro
  44. 53Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Grok 4.7
  45. 54DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. GLM-5.3
  46. 55Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 3
  47. 56Claude Opus 4.8 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  48. 57Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  49. 58Gemini 3.6 Flash vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  50. 59Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.5
  51. 60Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  52. 61Claude Haiku 4.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  53. 62DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. Kimi K3
  54. 63GPT-5.6 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  55. 64Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5
  56. 65Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  57. 66Claude Fable 5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  58. 67GPT-5.6 Luna vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  59. 68Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  60. 69DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  61. 70Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Mistral Medium 3.5
  62. 71Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Muse Wonder Full
  63. 72Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 4.5
  64. 73DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. MiMo-V2.5
  65. 74Grok 4.6 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  66. 75Claude Fable 5.1 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  67. 76Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  68. 77Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  69. 78Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra
  70. 79DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. Mistral Medium 3.5
  71. 80Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.4
  72. 81Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.1
  73. 82Claude Opus 4.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  74. 83DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. GLM-5.1
  75. 84Claude Opus 4.7 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  76. 85DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. Mistral Large 3
  77. 86Gemini 3.5 Flash vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  78. 87DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  79. 88GPT-6.1 Terra vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  80. 89Gemini 4 Argon vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  81. 90Muse Wonder vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash