Skip to main content

AnthropicDeepSeekLLM matchup

Claude Fable 5.1vs.DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Which one is better?

Claude Fable 5.1 performs better than DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash, but costs 66.7 times (input) and 83.3 times (output) as much.

Fable 5.1 ahead
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
123.8

Claude Fable 5.1

Rank 3

99.7

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Rank 29

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash faster
SpeedTokens per second
88

Claude Fable 5.1

176

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash cheaper
Price$ per 1M tokens
$20

Claude Fable 5.1

$0.26

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Fable 5.1 more popular
Popularity0 to 100
56

Claude Fable 5.1

Rank 59 of 875

38

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Rank 298 of 875

Choose Claude Fable 5.1 for

MathematicsProductivityLegalHealthGeneralMultimodalCodingCybersecurityFinanceAgents (not certain)

Choose DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash for

No clear advantage

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

Fable 5.1DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

The median of all ranked models is below 100 in every area, so it sits in the centre of the net.

110120130140100CodingFable 5.1MathematicsFable 5.1Agentsslightly Fable 5.1GeneralFable 5.1MultimodalFable 5.1FinanceFable 5.1LegalFable 5.1HealthFable 5.1
CodingFable 5.1 ahead
Fable 5.1122.8Rank 5
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash98.8Rank 30
Median of ranked models83.7

95 % range: Fable 5.1 117.1 to 128.5, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash 91.4 to 106.3.

AreaFable 5.1DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the top field the net starts at 100 points, the reference group average; values below sit as a hollow point in the centre. Not in the net because a model has no own value there or the data are too thin: Reasoning, Knowledge.

Fable 5.1 is ahead in 7 of 10 areas, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash in none.

Fable 5.1 ahead: 7Fable 5.1 slightly ahead: 1too little data: 2

Areas in the overall index
MathematicsFable 5.1 +33130.2 to 97.3
GeneralFable 5.1 +25122.5 to 97.1
MultimodalFable 5.1 +24120.2 to 95.7
CodingFable 5.1 +24122.8 to 98.8
Agentsleaning Fable 5.1not certain · 6 and 4 tests
Reasoningonly Fable 5.1 has a score
Knowledgeonly Fable 5.1 has a score
Specialist fields
LegalFable 5.1 +29129.7 to 100.8
HealthFable 5.1 +27122.9 to 95.5
FinanceFable 5.1 +17121.0 to 103.7

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 3 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
ProductivityFable 5.1 +29128.7 to 99.7
CybersecurityFable 5.1 +20123.5 to 103.1
Educationonly DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash at the same effort

Both models measured at the same reasoning efforts. This shows whether a lead comes from the model or only from more compute.

maxFable 5.1 ahead
Fable 5.1 123.8 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash 99.7 · Gap 10.0 · Test series 4
Overall index (max vs. max)Fable 5.1 ahead
Fable 5.1 123.8 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash 99.7

Gap and verdict compare only the Artificial Analysis test series in which both models are measured at that effort. Tied below 3 points, ahead only beyond two standard errors. The single values rest on all test series of each model, so their difference can deviate from the gap.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeFable 5.1Coding 122.8 to 98.8
Maths and data analysisFable 5.1Mathematics 130.2 to 97.3, Reasoning without a score for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Facts and researchopenKnowledge without a score for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Agents and workflowsleaning Fable 5.1Agents 114.5 to 106.4
Fast chat repliesDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash88 to 176 tokens per second
Security analysisFable 5.1Cybersecurity 123.5 to 103.1
Many requests on a small budgetDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash$20 to $0.26 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsFable 5.1Finance 121.0 to 103.7, Legal 129.7 to 100.8, Health 122.9 to 95.5
Images, screenshots and PDFsFable 5.1Multimodal 120.2 to 95.7

See for yourself: same task, one attempt

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

Claude Fable 5.1

Claude Fable 5.1: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Sep 7, 2026 · 27 s · $0.11

Test details
Run date
Sep 7, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
anthropic/claude-fable-5.1
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
2,198 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.1102
Response time
27 s
API model reported in response
anthropic/claude-fable-5.1
Pinned endpoint
Anthropic | anthropic/claude-fable-5.1-20260831
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

The response reached the token limit. No complete recording is available.

Oct 5, 2026 · 26 s · $0.0049

Not yet visually reviewed. A successful recording does not confirm correct physics or full compliance with the prompt.

Test details
Run date
Oct 5, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
8,191 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0049
Response time
25.8 s
API model reported in response
deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash
Pinned endpoint
DeepSeek | deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash-20260910
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Failed

Earlier attempts (2)

  • Oct 2, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
  • Oct 1, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

Claude Fable 5.1

Unavailable in this round

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: SVG short test

Oct 14, 2026 · $0.0001

Test details
Test run
Oct 14, 2026
Provider
decart/fp4
API model
deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash
Output
590 tokens
Reasoning
API reports 0 reasoning tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0001
Test round
43b8c5c46830

Claude Fable 5.1 and DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v4)

20 of 91 models

4 models in this view are measured at a lower reasoning effort than max in the overall index. Dashed column: lower reasoning effort than the top.

Claude Opus 5.5max126.1
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh125.7
Claude Fable 5.1max123.8
Claude Sonnet 5.5max122.8
Gemini 4 Argonhigh122.3
GPT-6 Astramax121.3
GPT-6.1 Solmax119.2
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.3
Claude Opus 5max117.2
Muse Wondermax113.4
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.9
Claude Fable 5max112.5
GPT-6 Solmax110.6
GPT-5.6 Solmax108.7
Muse Spark 1.3max107.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max106.6
Gemini 3.8 Flashhigh106.5
GPT-6.1 Terramax105.2
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flashmax99.7

Popularity compared

How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.

Claude Fable 5.1 is more popular than DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 56 to 38 out of 100.

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 5, 2026

Claude Fable 5.1DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricClaude Fable 5.1DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better123.899.7
RankRank 3 of 91Rank 29 of 91
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$10$0.15
Outputwhat the model writes$50$0.60
Cost per task (own tests)average of 2 tests both passed$0.22$0.008
Speed
Tokens per second88176
Popularity
Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 10056Rank 59 of 87538Rank 298 of 875
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffJune 2026n/a
ReleasedSep 1, 2026Sep 10, 2026
AvailabilityActiveActive
Open weightsnoyes
  • DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: At peak times (Mon, Tue, Wed, Thu, Fri, 01:00-04:00 UTC; Mon, Tue, Wed, Thu, Fri, 06:00-10:00 UTC) the price is $0.30 input and $1.20 output per 1M tokens. The table shows the off-peak price.

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

Successor of DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Overall index 106.6, rank 17. $0.15 input and $0.60 output per 1M tokens.

Fable 5.1 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Cheaper than DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashClaude Haiku 5.5

Overall index 103.4, rank 20. $0.10 input and $0.50 output per 1M tokens.

Fable 5.1 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
Best model in the overall indexClaude Opus 5.5

Overall index 126.1, rank 1. $4 input and $20 output per 1M tokens.

Fable 5.1 vs. Claude Opus 5.5

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: Claude Fable 5.1B: DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 54.6%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 45.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 70.4%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 73.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 76.7%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 57.2%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMB v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 76.7%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 67.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 58.9%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 53.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ImmigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 75.4%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 65.6%Vals AIAs of 10/28/2026
IOIOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 90.8%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 40.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 55.3%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 41.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LegalBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 88.5%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 83.3%Vals AIAs of 10/13/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterClaude Fable 5.1: 1,746DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,619LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterClaude Fable 5.1: 1,504DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,476LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterClaude Fable 5.1: 1,288DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,261LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
MedCodeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 53.5%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 41.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 91.3%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 85.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MysteryMechanismOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 47.7%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 21.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 7%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 0.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ProofBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 100%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 54%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Public Benefits Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 74.9%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 64.3%Vals AIAs of 10/12/2026
SkillsBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 61.6%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 69.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
SRE BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 22.9%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 0.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SWE-bench MultimodalOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 61.3%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 46.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 49.2%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 26.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 58.1%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 19.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 40%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vibe Code Bench 1-100Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 28%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 16.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 90.3%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 84.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 52.8%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 37.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1Patch · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 87.5%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 85.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 82.2%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 43.9%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMB v1.1Comps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 82%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 68%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 54.4%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 49.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ImmigrationAll-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 26.3%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 19.5%Vals AIAs of 10/28/2026
IOIIOI 2024 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 100%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 42.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 68.2%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 53%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LegalBenchConclusion Tasks · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 92.5%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 89.1%Vals AIAs of 10/13/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevHTML development · higher is betterClaude Fable 5.1: 1,683DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,613LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterClaude Fable 5.1: 1,487DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,478LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterClaude Fable 5.1: 1,351DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,311LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 53.5%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 16.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SkillsBenchNo Skills · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 44.8%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 61.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
SRE BenchCapability Score · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 36.6%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 14.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SWE-bench Multimodalbpmn-js · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 79.2%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 60.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 26.7%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 3.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Hardware · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 60%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEarth Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 25%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCOBOL · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 60%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 70%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1PoC · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 53.3%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 61.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBDataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 86.7%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 73.9%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMB v1.1Dataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 88.5%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 79.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent (v2)All-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 47.8%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 41.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ImmigrationContent Checks · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 73.2%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 64.2%Vals AIAs of 10/28/2026
IOIIOI 2025 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 87.2%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 35.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 92.5%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 89.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LegalBenchInterpretation Tasks · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 86.9%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 80.4%Vals AIAs of 10/13/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevImage to WebDev · higher is betterClaude Fable 5.1: 1,722DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,606LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterClaude Fable 5.1: 1,565DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,523LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlCreative writing with images · higher is betterClaude Fable 5.1: 1,290DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 1,254LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchFully Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 7%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 0.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SkillsBenchWith Skills · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 61.6%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 69.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
SRE BenchFully Solved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 22.9%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 0.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SWE-bench MultimodalCarbon · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 44.4%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 29.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 70.6%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 52.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Media · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 66.7%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 8.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEngineering Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 44.4%DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026

More comparisons

Compare Claude Fable 5.1 and DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  2. 2Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  3. 3Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5.1
  4. 4GPT-6 Luna vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  5. 5Muse Spark 1.3 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  6. 6Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  7. 7Claude Fable 5.1 vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  8. 8Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  9. 9GPT-6 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Show all 56 comparisons
  1. 10GPT-6 Astra vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  2. 11Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  3. 12Claude Sonnet 5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  4. 13Grok 4.7 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  5. 14Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5.1
  6. 15Claude Opus 5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  7. 16GPT-5.6 Terra vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  8. 17DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  9. 18Claude Opus 4.6 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  10. 19Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  11. 20DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  12. 21GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  13. 22DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  14. 23DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. Mistral Large 4
  15. 24DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. MiMo-V2.5-Pro
  16. 25Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  17. 26Claude Haiku 4.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  18. 27Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  19. 28Claude Fable 5.1 vs. Grok 4.7
  20. 29Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  21. 30DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. GLM-5.2
  22. 31Gemini 3.6 Flash vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  23. 32DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. GLM-5.3
  24. 33Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  25. 34GPT-5.6 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  26. 35Claude Opus 4.8 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  27. 36DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. Kimi K3
  28. 37Claude Fable 5.1 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  29. 38Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  30. 39Grok 4.6 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  31. 40Claude Fable 5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  32. 41Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  33. 42GPT-5.6 Luna vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  34. 43Claude Fable 5.1 vs. Mistral Large 4
  35. 44Claude Opus 4.7 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  36. 45Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  37. 46Claude Opus 4.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  38. 47DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. Mistral Medium 3.5
  39. 48Claude Fable 5.1 vs. Claude Opus 4.8
  40. 49DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. MiMo-V2.5
  41. 50DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. GLM-5.1
  42. 51Claude Fable 5.1 vs. Claude Opus 4.6
  43. 52DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. Mistral Large 3
  44. 53GPT-5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  45. 54Muse Wonder Full vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  46. 55Claude Fable 5.1 vs. Muse Wonder
  47. 56Claude Fable 5.1 vs. Gemini 4 Carbon