- Home
- LLM comparison
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
DeepSeekLLM matchup
DeepSeek-V4-Flashvs.DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
What has improved?
DeepSeek-V4-Flash does not have enough benchmark results yet. DeepSeek-V4-Flash is cheaper: DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash costs 1.1 times (input) and 2.1 times (output) as much.
DeepSeek-V4-Flash
not ranked yet
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Rank 29
DeepSeek-V4-Flash
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
DeepSeek-V4-Flash
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
DeepSeek-V4-Flash
Rank 23 of 876
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Rank 312 of 876
Choose DeepSeek-V4-Flash for
No clear advantage
Choose DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash for
On this page
Where is the difference?
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is ahead in 1 of 8 areas, DeepSeek-V4-Flash in none.
too little data: 7DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash ahead: 1
Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.
Show 3 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.
Which model for which task?
Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.
See for yourself: same task, one attempt
SVG short test
One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.
Prompt
Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.
DeepSeek-V4-Flash

Oct 14, 2026 · $0.0001
Test details
- Test run
- Oct 14, 2026
- Provider
- deepinfra/fp8
- API model
- deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731
- Output
- 798 tokens
- Reasoning
- API reports 0 reasoning tokens
- Cost of the attempt
- $0.0001
- Test round
- 43b8c5c46830
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Oct 14, 2026 · $0.0001
Test details
- Test run
- Oct 14, 2026
- Provider
- decart/fp4
- API model
- deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash
- Output
- 590 tokens
- Reasoning
- API reports 0 reasoning tokens
- Cost of the attempt
- $0.0001
- Test round
- 43b8c5c46830
Earlier tests
DeepSeek-V4-Flash
The response reached the token limit. No complete recording is available.
Oct 5, 2026 · 98 s · $0.0011
Not yet visually reviewed. A successful recording does not confirm correct physics or full compliance with the prompt.
Test details
- Run date
- Oct 5, 2026
- API provider
- openrouter
- Requested API model
- deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731
- Reasoning setting
- high
- Token limit including reasoning
- 8,192 tokens
- Output tokens
- 8,192 tokens
- Cost of the attempt
- $0.0011
- Response time
- 97.8 s
- API model reported in response
- deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731
- Pinned endpoint
- StreamLake | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-20260731
- Temperature
- Provider default
- Test protocol
- community-visual-tests-v1
- Technical checks
- Failed
Earlier attempts (3)
- Oct 2, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
- Oct 1, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
- Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
The response reached the token limit. No complete recording is available.
Oct 5, 2026 · 26 s · $0.0049
Not yet visually reviewed. A successful recording does not confirm correct physics or full compliance with the prompt.
Test details
- Run date
- Oct 5, 2026
- API provider
- openrouter
- Requested API model
- deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash
- Reasoning setting
- high
- Token limit including reasoning
- 8,192 tokens
- Output tokens
- 8,191 tokens
- Cost of the attempt
- $0.0049
- Response time
- 25.8 s
- API model reported in response
- deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash
- Pinned endpoint
- DeepSeek | deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash-20260910
- Temperature
- Provider default
- Test protocol
- community-visual-tests-v1
- Technical checks
- Failed
Earlier attempts (2)
- Oct 2, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
- Oct 1, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
Popularity compared
How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.
DeepSeek-V4-Flash is more popular than DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: 65 to 38 out of 100.
Over time
Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 6, 2026
DeepSeek-V4-FlashDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
All data side by side
The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.
| Metric | DeepSeek-V4-Flash | DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | ||
| Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better | n/a | 99.7 |
| Rank | not ranked yet | Rank 29 of 92 |
| Price per 1M tokens | ||
| Inputwhat you send | $0.14 | $0.15 |
| Outputwhat the model writes | $0.28 | $0.60 |
| Cost per task (own tests)average of 2 original-protocol tasks both models passed (SVG short test not included) | $0.002 | $0.008 |
| Speed | ||
| Tokens per second | 123 | 176 |
| Popularity | ||
| Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 100 | 65Rank 23 of 876 | 38Rank 312 of 876 |
| Technical | ||
| Context windowhow much text the model reads at once | 1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages | 1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages |
| Knowledge cutoff | n/a | n/a |
| Released | Apr 24, 2026 | Sep 10, 2026 |
| Availability | Limited access | Active |
| Open weights | yes | yes |
- DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: At peak times (Mon, Tue, Wed, Thu, Fri, 01:00-04:00 UTC; Mon, Tue, Wed, Thu, Fri, 06:00-10:00 UTC) the price is $0.30 input and $1.20 output per 1M tokens. The table shows the off-peak price.
Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis
Is there a better choice?
Overall index 106.6, rank 17$0.15 input and $0.60 output per 1M tokens
DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Overall index 126.1, rank 1$4 input and $20 output per 1M tokens
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. Claude Opus 5.5Shared benchmarks
Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.
A: DeepSeek-V4-FlashB: DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Show 24 more benchmarks
More comparisons
Compare DeepSeek-V4-Flash and DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash with the models people compare them with most often.
Compare another matchup
Predecessor and successor
The most popular comparisons
- 1Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 2Muse Spark 1.3 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 3Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 4Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 5Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 6GPT-6 Luna vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 7GPT-6 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 8Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 9GPT-6 Astra vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Show all 71 comparisons
- 10Grok 4.7 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 11Claude Sonnet 5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 12GPT-6 Astra vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 13Gemini 4 Argon vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 14GPT-5.6 Terra vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 15DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
- 16DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
- 17DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
- 18Claude Opus 5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 19Claude Opus 4.6 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 20DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
- 21GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 22DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
- 23Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 24Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 25Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 26DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. Mistral Large 4
- 27DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. Mistral Large 4
- 28DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 29DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. GLM-5.2
- 30Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 31GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 32GPT-6 Luna vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 33Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 34DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. MiMo-V2.5-Pro
- 35DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. GLM-5.3
- 36Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 37Gemini 3.6 Flash vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 38Claude Opus 4.8 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 39Claude Haiku 4.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 40DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. Kimi K3
- 41GPT-5.6 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 42Muse Spark 1.3 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 43DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 44Claude Fable 5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 45GPT-5.6 Luna vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 46DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. Kimi K3
- 47Grok 4.7 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 48GPT-5.6 Luna vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 49GPT-5.6 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 50Grok 4.6 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 51Gemini 4 Argon vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 52DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. GLM-5.2
- 53DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
- 54Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 55Grok 4.6 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 56DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. Mistral Medium 3.5
- 57DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. MiMo-V2.5
- 58Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 59Claude Opus 4.8 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 60DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. Mistral Large 3
- 61Claude Fable 5.1 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 62Claude Opus 4.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 63GPT-6.1 Terra vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 64Claude Opus 4.7 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 65DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. GLM-5.1
- 66DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. Mistral Large 3
- 67Gemini 3.5 Flash vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 68GPT-6.1 Terra vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 69Muse Wonder vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 70DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
- 71DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro