GPT-6.1 Terravs.DeepSeek-V4-Flash
Which one is better?
Only GPT-6.1 Terra has a place in the overall index so far; DeepSeek-V4-Flash does not have enough benchmark results yet. DeepSeek-V4-Flash is cheaper: GPT-6.1 Terra costs 6.7 times (input) and 16.7 times (output) as much per token.
GPT-6.1 Terra
Rank 12 to 27
DeepSeek-V4-Flash
not ranked yet
GPT-6.1 Terra
fairly slow
DeepSeek-V4-Flash
fairly fast
GPT-6.1 Terra
fairly expensive
DeepSeek-V4-Flash
cheap
GPT-6.1 Terra
- Subscription
Subscriptions in Germany: n/a
- Via API
$1 input, $5 output per 1M tokens.
DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- Subscription
No DeepSeek subscription includes this model. Through other providers from ≈ €1.06 a month (Command Code Go, with limited credits). 10 plans in Germany.
- Via API
$0.15 input, $0.30 output per 1M tokens according to the provider; the price index has listed it at $0.13 and $0.26 since Oct 26, 2026.
- Note
- There is a successor: DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash (rank 23 to 34, $0.15 input, $0.60 output).
Overall index with data through Oct 29, 2026 · Prices from Oct 29, 2026 · Speed: measured by Artificial Analysis · Subscriptions as of Oct 24, 2026 · Subscription prices incl. VAT
Where is the difference?
Values from 0 to 100 per task area. We only name a winner when the gap is large enough and there are enough tests.
GPT-6.1 Terra ahead: 2DeepSeek-V4-Flash ahead: 0level: 0too little data: 5of 7 areas
See for yourself: same task, one attempt
The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.
Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.
GPT-6.1 Terra
Not tested yet
DeepSeek-V4-Flash
The response reached the token limit. No complete recording is available.
Reasoning (requested): high
Current attempt
- Run date
- Oct 5, 2026
- API provider
- openrouter
- Requested API model
- deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731
- API model reported in response
- deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731
- Reasoning setting
- high
- Pinned endpoint
- StreamLake | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-20260731
- Temperature
- Provider default
- Token limit including reasoning
- 8,192 tokens
- Test protocol
- community-visual-tests-v1
- Technical checks
- Failed
- Response time
- 97.8 s
Not yet visually reviewed. A successful recording does not confirm correct physics or full compliance with the prompt.
Earlier attempts (3)
- Oct 2, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
- Oct 1, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
- Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
Prompt and test conditions
Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle
Token limit including reasoning: 8,192 tokens
Task origin (Simon Willison)SVG short test
There is no shared test round for this selection. Results from different rounds are not mixed.
All data side by side
The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra | DeepSeek-V4-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | ||
| Overall index0 to 100, higher is better | 67 | n/a |
| Rank | Rank 12 to 27 of 95 | not ranked yet |
| Price per 1M tokens | ||
| Inputwhat you send | $1above 272,000 tokens: $2 | $0.15 |
| Outputwhat the model writes | $5above 272,000 tokens: $7.50 | $0.30 |
| Speed | ||
| Tokens per second | 91 | 119 |
| Technical | ||
| Context windowhow much text the model reads at once | 1.05 M tokens≈ 1,580 A4 pages | 1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jun 1, 2026 | n/a |
| Released | Oct 26, 2026 | Apr 24, 2026 |
| Availability | Active | Limited access |
| Open weights | no | yes |
- GPT-6.1 Terra, 12-hour cache write: The table's cache-write rate covers 30-minute retention. With 12-hour retention it is $2.50 per 1M tokens through 272,000 input tokens, $5 above. Source
- GPT-6.1 Terra, Long-context billing: Above 272,000 input tokens, the higher rates apply to the entire request. Input and cache rates double, while output costs 1.5 times the standard rate. Source
- GPT-6.1 Terra, Batch and Flex pricing: 50% off standard pricing Source
- GPT-6.1 Terra, Fast pricing: Fast mode costs twice the standard price Source
- GPT-6.1 Terra, Regional processing: 10% surcharge over standard processing Source
Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis
Shared benchmarks
Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.
A: GPT-6.1 TerraB: DeepSeek-V4-Flash
Compare another matchup
More matchups
Related LLM comparisons
Compare GPT-6.1 Terra and DeepSeek-V4-Flash with other leading models.