- Home
- LLM comparison
- Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra
Claude Haiku 5.5vs.GPT-6.1 Terra
Which one is better?
Level in the overall index: the gap is too small for a clear winner. Claude Haiku 5.5 is cheaper: GPT-6.1 Terra costs 10 times as much per token.
Claude Haiku 5.5
Rank 16 to 27
GPT-6.1 Terra
Rank 12 to 27
Claude Haiku 5.5
fast
GPT-6.1 Terra
fairly slow
Claude Haiku 5.5
cheap
GPT-6.1 Terra
fairly expensive
Claude Haiku 5.5
- Subscription
Free to use at Anthropic (Claude Free), more from €21.42 a month (Claude Pro). Through other providers from €6.83 a month (Poe Basic, with limited points). 29 plans in Germany.
- Via API
$0.10 input, $0.50 output per 1M tokens, unchanged since Oct 14, 2026.
GPT-6.1 Terra
- Subscription
Subscriptions in Germany: n/a
- Via API
$1 input, $5 output per 1M tokens.
Overall index with data through Oct 29, 2026 · Prices from Oct 29, 2026 · Speed: measured by Artificial Analysis · Subscriptions as of Oct 24, 2026 · Subscription prices incl. VAT
Where is the difference?
Values from 0 to 100 per task area. We only name a winner when the gap is large enough and there are enough tests.
Haiku 5.5 ahead: 0GPT-6.1 Terra ahead: 3level: 3too little data: 4of 10 areas
Show 3 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
See for yourself: same task, one attempt
There is no shared test round for this selection. Results from different rounds are not mixed.
All data side by side
The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 | GPT-6.1 Terra |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | ||
| Overall index0 to 100, higher is better | 57 | 67 |
| Rank | Rank 16 to 27 of 95 | Rank 12 to 27 of 95 |
| Price per 1M tokens | ||
| Inputwhat you send | $0.10above 100,000 tokens: $0.50 | $1above 272,000 tokens: $2 |
| Outputwhat the model writes | $0.50above 100,000 tokens: $2.50 | $5above 272,000 tokens: $7.50 |
| Speed | ||
| Tokens per second | 241 | 91 |
| Technical | ||
| Context windowhow much text the model reads at once | 1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages | 1.05 M tokens≈ 1,580 A4 pages |
| Knowledge cutoff | June 2026 | Jun 1, 2026 |
| Released | Oct 7, 2026 | Oct 26, 2026 |
| Availability | Active | Active |
| Open weights | no | no |
- GPT-6.1 Terra, 12-hour cache write: The table's cache-write rate covers 30-minute retention. With 12-hour retention it is $2.50 per 1M tokens through 272,000 input tokens, $5 above. Source
- GPT-6.1 Terra, Long-context billing: Above 272,000 input tokens, the higher rates apply to the entire request. Input and cache rates double, while output costs 1.5 times the standard rate. Source
- GPT-6.1 Terra, Batch and Flex pricing: 50% off standard pricing Source
- GPT-6.1 Terra, Fast pricing: Fast mode costs twice the standard price Source
- GPT-6.1 Terra, Regional processing: 10% surcharge over standard processing Source
Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis
Shared benchmarks
Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.
A: Claude Haiku 5.5B: GPT-6.1 Terra
Show 54 more benchmarks
Compare another matchup
More matchups
Related LLM comparisons
Compare Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT-6.1 Terra with other leading models.