- Home
- LLM comparison
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
AnthropicDeepSeekLLM matchup
Claude Opus 5.5vs.DeepSeek-V4-Flash
Which one is better?
DeepSeek-V4-Flash does not have enough benchmark results yet. DeepSeek-V4-Flash is cheaper: Claude Opus 5.5 costs 28.6 times (input) and 71.4 times (output) as much.
Claude Opus 5.5
Rank 1
DeepSeek-V4-Flash
not ranked yet
Claude Opus 5.5
DeepSeek-V4-Flash
Claude Opus 5.5
DeepSeek-V4-Flash
Claude Opus 5.5
Rank 8 of 785
DeepSeek-V4-Flash
Rank 17 of 785
Choose Claude Opus 5.5 for
Choose DeepSeek-V4-Flash for
No clear advantage
On this page
Where is the difference?
Opus 5.5 is ahead in 1 of 10 areas, DeepSeek-V4-Flash in none.
Opus 5.5 ahead: 1too little data: 9
Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.
Show 4 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.
Which model for which task?
Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.
See for yourself: same task, one attempt
The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.
Claude Opus 5.5

Oct 1, 2026 · 33 s · $0.07
Test details
- Run date
- Oct 1, 2026
- API provider
- openrouter
- Requested API model
- anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
- Reasoning setting
- high
- Token limit including reasoning
- 8,192 tokens
- Output tokens
- 3,536 tokens
- Cost of the attempt
- $0.0708
- Response time
- 33.2 s
- API model reported in response
- anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
- Pinned endpoint
- Anthropic | anthropic/claude-opus-5.5-20260921
- Temperature
- Provider default
- Test protocol
- community-visual-tests-v1
- Technical checks
- Passed, not a quality rating
Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.
DeepSeek-V4-Flash
The response reached the token limit. No complete recording is available.
Oct 5, 2026 · 98 s · $0.0011
Not yet visually reviewed. A successful recording does not confirm correct physics or full compliance with the prompt.
Test details
- Run date
- Oct 5, 2026
- API provider
- openrouter
- Requested API model
- deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731
- Reasoning setting
- high
- Token limit including reasoning
- 8,192 tokens
- Output tokens
- 8,192 tokens
- Cost of the attempt
- $0.0011
- Response time
- 97.8 s
- API model reported in response
- deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731
- Pinned endpoint
- StreamLake | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-20260731
- Temperature
- Provider default
- Test protocol
- community-visual-tests-v1
- Technical checks
- Failed
Earlier attempts (3)
- Oct 2, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
- Oct 1, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
- Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
SVG short test
SVG short test
One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.
Prompt
Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.
Claude Opus 5.5
Unavailable in this round
DeepSeek-V4-Flash

Oct 14, 2026 · $0.0001
Test details
- Test run
- Oct 14, 2026
- Provider
- deepinfra/fp8
- API model
- deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731
- Output
- 798 tokens
- Reasoning
- API reports 0 reasoning tokens
- Cost of the attempt
- $0.0001
- Test round
- 43b8c5c46830
Popularity compared
How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.
Both are about as popular: Claude Opus 5.5 68, DeepSeek-V4-Flash 64 out of 100.
Over time
Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 7, 2026
Claude Opus 5.5DeepSeek-V4-Flash
All data side by side
The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 | DeepSeek-V4-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | ||
| Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better | 126.1 | n/a |
| Rank | Rank 1 of 92 | not ranked yet |
| Price per 1M tokens | ||
| Inputwhat you send | $4 | $0.14 |
| Outputwhat the model writes | $20 | $0.28 |
| Cost per task (own tests)average of 2 original-protocol tasks both models passed (SVG short test not included) | $0.12 | $0.002 |
| Speed | ||
| Tokens per second | 106 | 123 |
| Popularity | ||
| Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 100 | 68Rank 8 of 785 | 64Rank 17 of 785 |
| Technical | ||
| Context windowhow much text the model reads at once | 1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages | 1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages |
| Knowledge cutoff | June 2026 | n/a |
| Released | Sep 22, 2026 | Apr 24, 2026 |
| Availability | Active | Limited access |
| Open weights | no | yes |
Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis
Is there a better choice?
Overall index 99.7, rank 29$0.15 input and $0.60 output per 1M tokens
Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashShared benchmarks
Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.
A: Claude Opus 5.5B: DeepSeek-V4-Flash
Show 21 more benchmarks
More comparisons
Compare Claude Opus 5.5 and DeepSeek-V4-Flash with the models people compare them with most often.
Compare another matchup
Predecessor and successor
The most popular comparisons
- 1Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra
- 2Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5.5
- 3Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
- 4Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
- 5Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Argon
- 6Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
- 7Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5.1
- 8Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 9Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
Show all 70 comparisons
- 10Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
- 11Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
- 12Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
- 13Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Kimi K3
- 14Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5
- 15Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
- 16Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3
- 17Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
- 18Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
- 19Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.6
- 20Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.6
- 21Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
- 22Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Grok 4.6
- 23GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 24Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.2
- 25Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
- 26DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
- 27GPT-6 Astra vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 28Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
- 29Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.5
- 30DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
- 31Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Muse Spark 1.3
- 32Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.8
- 33Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
- 34DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
- 35Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 4
- 36Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
- 37Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 38Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.5
- 39Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 40DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. Mistral Large 4
- 41Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Grok 4.7
- 42GPT-6 Luna vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 43Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 3
- 44Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
- 45Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.5
- 46Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5
- 47Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
- 48Muse Spark 1.3 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 49Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
- 50Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Mistral Medium 3.5
- 51Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Muse Wonder Full
- 52Grok 4.7 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 53DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. Kimi K3
- 54Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 4.5
- 55GPT-5.6 Luna vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 56GPT-5.6 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 57Grok 4.6 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 58DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. GLM-5.2
- 59Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
- 60Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra
- 61Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.4
- 62Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 63Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.1
- 64DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. GLM-5.1
- 65Gemini 3.5 Flash vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 66DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. MiMo-V2.5-Pro
- 67DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. Mistral Large 3
- 68Gemini 4 Argon vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 69GPT-6.1 Terra vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 70DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro