Skip to main content

AnthropicDeepSeekLLM matchup

Claude Opus 5.5vs.DeepSeek-V4-Flash

Which one is better?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash does not have enough benchmark results yet. DeepSeek-V4-Flash is cheaper: Claude Opus 5.5 costs 28.6 times (input) and 71.4 times (output) as much.

IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
126.1

Claude Opus 5.5

Rank 1

n/a

DeepSeek-V4-Flash

not ranked yet

about as fast
SpeedTokens per second
106

Claude Opus 5.5

123

DeepSeek-V4-Flash

DeepSeek-V4-Flash cheaper
Price$ per 1M tokens
$8

Claude Opus 5.5

$0.18

DeepSeek-V4-Flash

about as popular
Popularity0 to 100
68

Claude Opus 5.5

Rank 8 of 785

64

DeepSeek-V4-Flash

Rank 17 of 785

Choose Claude Opus 5.5 for

Agents

Choose DeepSeek-V4-Flash for

No clear advantage

Where is the difference?

Opus 5.5 is ahead in 1 of 10 areas, DeepSeek-V4-Flash in none.

Opus 5.5 ahead: 1too little data: 9

Areas in the overall index
AgentsOpus 5.5 +34117.2 to 83.2
Codingonly Opus 5.5 has a score
Reasoningonly Opus 5.5 has a score
Mathematicsonly Opus 5.5 has a score
Knowledgeonly Opus 5.5 has a score
Generalonly Opus 5.5 has a score
Multimodalonly Opus 5.5 has a score
Specialist fields
Financeonly Opus 5.5 has a score
Legalonly Opus 5.5 has a score
Healthonly Opus 5.5 has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 4 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
Cybersecurityonly Opus 5.5 has a score
Searchonly Opus 5.5 has a score
Productivityonly Opus 5.5 has a score
Educationonly Opus 5.5 has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeopenCoding without a score for DeepSeek-V4-Flash
Maths and data analysisopenMathematics without a score for DeepSeek-V4-Flash, Reasoning without a score for DeepSeek-V4-Flash
Facts and researchopenKnowledge without a score for DeepSeek-V4-Flash, Search without a score for DeepSeek-V4-Flash
Agents and workflowsOpus 5.5Agents 117.2 to 83.2
Fast chat repliesabout the same106 to 123 tokens per second
Security analysisopenCybersecurity without a score for DeepSeek-V4-Flash
Many requests on a small budgetDeepSeek-V4-Flash$8 to $0.18 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsopenFinance without a score for DeepSeek-V4-Flash, Legal without a score for DeepSeek-V4-Flash, Health without a score for DeepSeek-V4-Flash
Images, screenshots and PDFsopenMultimodal without a score for DeepSeek-V4-Flash

See for yourself: same task, one attempt

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

Claude Opus 5.5

Claude Opus 5.5: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 33 s · $0.07

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
3,536 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0708
Response time
33.2 s
API model reported in response
anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Pinned endpoint
Anthropic | anthropic/claude-opus-5.5-20260921
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash

The response reached the token limit. No complete recording is available.

Oct 5, 2026 · 98 s · $0.0011

Not yet visually reviewed. A successful recording does not confirm correct physics or full compliance with the prompt.

Test details
Run date
Oct 5, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
8,192 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0011
Response time
97.8 s
API model reported in response
deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731
Pinned endpoint
StreamLake | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-20260731
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Failed

Earlier attempts (3)

  • Oct 2, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
  • Oct 1, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
  • Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

Claude Opus 5.5

Unavailable in this round

DeepSeek-V4-Flash

DeepSeek-V4-Flash: SVG short test

Oct 14, 2026 · $0.0001

Test details
Test run
Oct 14, 2026
Provider
deepinfra/fp8
API model
deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731
Output
798 tokens
Reasoning
API reports 0 reasoning tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0001
Test round
43b8c5c46830

Popularity compared

How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.

Both are about as popular: Claude Opus 5.5 68, DeepSeek-V4-Flash 64 out of 100.

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 7, 2026

Claude Opus 5.5DeepSeek-V4-Flash

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricClaude Opus 5.5DeepSeek-V4-Flash
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better126.1n/a
RankRank 1 of 92not ranked yet
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$4$0.14
Outputwhat the model writes$20$0.28
Cost per task (own tests)average of 2 original-protocol tasks both models passed (SVG short test not included)$0.12$0.002
Speed
Tokens per second106123
Popularity
Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 10068Rank 8 of 78564Rank 17 of 785
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffJune 2026n/a
ReleasedSep 22, 2026Apr 24, 2026
AvailabilityActiveLimited access
Open weightsnoyes

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

Successor of DeepSeek-V4-FlashDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Overall index 99.7, rank 29$0.15 input and $0.60 output per 1M tokens

Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: Claude Opus 5.5B: DeepSeek-V4-Flash

LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,810DeepSeek-V4-Flash: 1,582LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,509DeepSeek-V4-Flash: 1,439LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevHTML development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,753DeepSeek-V4-Flash: 1,558LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,495DeepSeek-V4-Flash: 1,435LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevReact development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,860DeepSeek-V4-Flash: 1,585LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,574DeepSeek-V4-Flash: 1,480LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevWeb development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,810DeepSeek-V4-Flash: 1,582LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCoding · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,551DeepSeek-V4-Flash: 1,480LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCreative writing · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,520DeepSeek-V4-Flash: 1,410LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlEnglish · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,516DeepSeek-V4-Flash: 1,450LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
Show 21 more benchmarks
LMArena Text, Style ControlEntertainment, sports and media · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,501DeepSeek-V4-Flash: 1,407LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlExcluding ties · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,530DeepSeek-V4-Flash: 1,436LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlExpert prompts · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,538DeepSeek-V4-Flash: 1,467LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlFrench prompts · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,495DeepSeek-V4-Flash: 1,458LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlGerman prompts · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,492DeepSeek-V4-Flash: 1,434LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlHard prompts · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,535DeepSeek-V4-Flash: 1,458LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlHard prompts, English · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,538DeepSeek-V4-Flash: 1,465LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlInstruction following · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,522DeepSeek-V4-Flash: 1,434LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlJapanese prompts · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,535DeepSeek-V4-Flash: 1,425LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlLegal and government · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,500DeepSeek-V4-Flash: 1,458LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlLife, physical and social science · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,515DeepSeek-V4-Flash: 1,459LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlLonger queries · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,525DeepSeek-V4-Flash: 1,448LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlMath · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,512DeepSeek-V4-Flash: 1,442LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlMathematical professions · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,519DeepSeek-V4-Flash: 1,445LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlMedicine and healthcare · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,512DeepSeek-V4-Flash: 1,460LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlMulti-turn · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,499DeepSeek-V4-Flash: 1,447LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlNon-English · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,497DeepSeek-V4-Flash: 1,423LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlRussian prompts · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,511DeepSeek-V4-Flash: 1,436LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlSoftware and IT services · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,538DeepSeek-V4-Flash: 1,473LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlSpanish prompts · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,488DeepSeek-V4-Flash: 1,430LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlWriting, literature and language · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,519DeepSeek-V4-Flash: 1,422LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026

More comparisons

Compare Claude Opus 5.5 and DeepSeek-V4-Flash with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  2. 2Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5.5
  3. 3Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  4. 4Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  5. 5Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  6. 6Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  7. 7Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5.1
  8. 8Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  9. 9Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
Show all 70 comparisons
  1. 10Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  2. 11Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  3. 12Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  4. 13Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Kimi K3
  5. 14Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5
  6. 15Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
  7. 16Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3
  8. 17Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  9. 18Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  10. 19Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.6
  11. 20Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.6
  12. 21Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  13. 22Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Grok 4.6
  14. 23GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  15. 24Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.2
  16. 25Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
  17. 26DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  18. 27GPT-6 Astra vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  19. 28Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  20. 29Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.5
  21. 30DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  22. 31Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Muse Spark 1.3
  23. 32Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.8
  24. 33Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  25. 34DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  26. 35Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 4
  27. 36Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  28. 37Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  29. 38Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.5
  30. 39Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  31. 40DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. Mistral Large 4
  32. 41Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Grok 4.7
  33. 42GPT-6 Luna vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  34. 43Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 3
  35. 44Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  36. 45Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.5
  37. 46Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5
  38. 47Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  39. 48Muse Spark 1.3 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  40. 49Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  41. 50Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Mistral Medium 3.5
  42. 51Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Muse Wonder Full
  43. 52Grok 4.7 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  44. 53DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. Kimi K3
  45. 54Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 4.5
  46. 55GPT-5.6 Luna vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  47. 56GPT-5.6 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  48. 57Grok 4.6 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  49. 58DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. GLM-5.2
  50. 59Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  51. 60Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra
  52. 61Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.4
  53. 62Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  54. 63Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.1
  55. 64DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. GLM-5.1
  56. 65Gemini 3.5 Flash vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  57. 66DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. MiMo-V2.5-Pro
  58. 67DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. Mistral Large 3
  59. 68Gemini 4 Argon vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  60. 69GPT-6.1 Terra vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  61. 70DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro