Skip to main content

AnthropicLLM matchup

Claude Opus 5.5vs.Claude Opus 5

What has improved?

Claude Opus 5.5 performs better than Claude Opus 5 and is cheaper: Claude Opus 5 costs 1.3 times as much.

Opus 5.5 ahead
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
126.1

Claude Opus 5.5

Rank 1

117.2

Claude Opus 5

Rank 9

Opus 5.5 faster
SpeedTokens per second
106

Claude Opus 5.5

66

Claude Opus 5

Opus 5.5 cheaper
Price$ per 1M tokens
$8

Claude Opus 5.5

$10

Claude Opus 5

Opus 5.5 more popular
Popularity0 to 100
68

Claude Opus 5.5

Rank 9 of 785

63

Claude Opus 5

Rank 23 of 785

Choose Claude Opus 5.5 for

MathematicsReasoningCodingKnowledgeMultimodalGeneralLegal (not certain)Agents (not certain)Finance (not certain)

Choose Claude Opus 5 for

ProductivityHealth (not certain)

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

Opus 5.5Opus 5

The median of all ranked models is below 100 in every area, so it sits in the centre of the net.

110120130140100CodingOpus 5.5ReasoningOpus 5.5MathematicsOpus 5.5KnowledgeOpus 5.5Agentsslightly Opus5.5GeneralOpus 5.5MultimodalOpus 5.5Financeslightly Opus5.5Legalslightly Opus5.5Healthslightly Opus5
CodingOpus 5.5 ahead
Opus 5.5129.9Rank 1
Opus 5118.0Rank 8
Median of ranked models84.1

95 % range: Opus 5.5 121.2 to 138.7, Opus 5 114.4 to 121.6.

AreaOpus 5.5Opus 5

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the close-up the net starts at 100 points, just below the weaker model's lowest value; the reference group average is 100.

Opus 5.5 is ahead in 6 of 10 areas, Opus 5 in none.

Opus 5.5 ahead: 6Opus 5.5 slightly ahead: 3Opus 5 slightly ahead: 1

Areas in the overall index
MathematicsOpus 5.5 +18131.8 to 114.2
ReasoningOpus 5.5 +14122.5 to 108.5
CodingOpus 5.5 +12129.9 to 118.0
KnowledgeOpus 5.5 +12131.4 to 119.8
MultimodalOpus 5.5 +8123.1 to 114.9
GeneralOpus 5.5 +8125.1 to 117.0
Agentsleaning Opus 5.5not certain · 5 tests each
Specialist fields
Legalleaning Opus 5.5not certain · 3 and 2 tests
Healthleaning Opus 5not certain · 2 tests each
Financeleaning Opus 5.5not certain · 5 and 6 tests

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 4 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
ProductivityOpus 5 +3125.0 to 127.5
Cybersecuritytoo little data120.5 to 115.8
Searchtoo little data119.5 to 121.0
Educationonly Opus 5.5 has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 5 at the same effort

Both models measured at the same reasoning efforts. This shows whether a lead comes from the model or only from more compute.

maxOpus 5.5 ahead
Opus 5.5 126.1 vs. Opus 5 117.2 · Gap 11.8 · Test series 12
Overall index (max vs. max)Opus 5.5 ahead
Opus 5.5 126.1 vs. Opus 5 117.2

Gap and verdict compare only the Artificial Analysis test series in which both models are measured at that effort. Tied below 3 points, ahead only beyond two standard errors. The single values rest on all test series of each model, so their difference can deviate from the gap.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeOpus 5.5Coding 129.9 to 118.0
Maths and data analysisOpus 5.5Mathematics 131.8 to 114.2, Reasoning 122.5 to 108.5
Facts and researchOpus 5.5Knowledge 131.4 to 119.8, Search 119.5 to 121.0 (too little data)
Agents and workflowsleaning Opus 5.5Agents 117.2 to 112.6
Fast chat repliesOpus 5.5106 to 66 tokens per second
Security analysisopenCybersecurity 120.5 to 115.8 (too little data)
Many requests on a small budgetOpus 5.5$8 to $10 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsdepends on the partFinance 121.4 to 118.0, Legal 121.5 to 115.9, Health 122.1 to 126.1
Images, screenshots and PDFsOpus 5.5Multimodal 123.1 to 114.9

See for yourself: same task, one attempt

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

Claude Opus 5.5

Claude Opus 5.5: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 33 s · $0.07

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
3,536 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0708
Response time
33.2 s
API model reported in response
anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Pinned endpoint
Anthropic | anthropic/claude-opus-5.5-20260921
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Claude Opus 5

Claude Opus 5: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 63 s · $0.14

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
anthropic/claude-opus-5
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
5,423 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.1357
Response time
63 s
API model reported in response
anthropic/claude-opus-5
Pinned endpoint
Anthropic | anthropic/claude-opus-5-20260723
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Earlier attempts (1)

  • Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

Claude Opus 5.5

Unavailable in this round

Claude Opus 5

Unavailable in this round

Claude Opus 5.5 and Claude Opus 5 in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v4)

20 of 92 models

4 models in this view are measured at a lower reasoning effort than max in the overall index. Dashed column: lower reasoning effort than the top.

Claude Opus 5.5max126.1
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh125.8
Claude Fable 5.1max123.8
Claude Sonnet 5.5max122.8
Gemini 4 Argonhigh122.3
GPT-6 Astramax121.3
GPT-6.1 Solmax119.2
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.3
Claude Opus 5max117.2
Muse Wondermax113.4
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.9
Claude Fable 5max112.5
GPT-6 Solmax110.5
GPT-5.6 Solmax108.7
Muse Spark 1.3max107.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max106.6
Gemini 3.8 Flashhigh106.5
GPT-6.1 Terramax105.3
Claude Haiku 5.5max103.4

Popularity compared

How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.

Claude Opus 5.5 is more popular than Claude Opus 5: 68 to 63 out of 100.

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 8, 2026

Claude Opus 5.5Claude Opus 5

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricClaude Opus 5.5Claude Opus 5
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better126.1117.2
RankRank 1 of 92Rank 9 of 92
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$4$5
Outputwhat the model writes$20$25
Cost per task (own tests)average of 3 original-protocol tasks both models passed (SVG short test not included)$0.11$0.14
Speed
Tokens per second10666
Popularity
Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 10068Rank 9 of 78563Rank 23 of 785
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffJune 2026May 2026
ReleasedSep 22, 2026Jul 24, 2026
AvailabilityActiveActive
Open weightsnono

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

Cheaper than Opus 5.5Claude Sonnet 5.5

Overall index 122.8, rank 4$2 input and $10 output per 1M tokens

Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5.5

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: Claude Opus 5.5B: Claude Opus 5

BioMysteryBenchOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 79.3%Claude Opus 5: 79.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 66.6%Claude Opus 5: 57.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CUA-benchOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 14%Claude Opus 5: 9%Vals AIAs of 10/13/2026
CyberBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 55.4%Claude Opus 5: 65.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 75.9%Claude Opus 5: 73.6%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 58.6%Claude Opus 5: 58.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
IOIOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 95.1%Claude Opus 5: 84.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 50.5%Claude Opus 5: 55.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,810Claude Opus 5: 1,691LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena SearchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,213Claude Opus 5: 1,242LMArenaAs of 10/13/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,509Claude Opus 5: 1,491LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,293Claude Opus 5: 1,288LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
MedCodeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 49.8%Claude Opus 5: 63.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 91.4%Claude Opus 5: 91.0%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MysteryMechanismOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 49.6%Claude Opus 5: 37.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 18.5%Claude Opus 5: 3.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ProofBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 100%Claude Opus 5: 99%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Public Benefits Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 70.6%Claude Opus 5: 76.9%Vals AIAs of 10/12/2026
SRE BenchOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 33.6%Claude Opus 5: 12.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 45.6%Claude Opus 5: 45.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 65.2%Claude Opus 5: 53.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 64.9%Claude Opus 5: 51.8%Terminal-BenchAs of 10/06/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 47.1%Claude Opus 5: 27.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Time Horizon Index: KSPOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 91.3%Claude Opus 5: 18.8%Vals AIAs of 10/07/2026
Vals Science IndexOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 58.7%Claude Opus 5: 47.9%Vals AIAs of 10/25/2026
Vibe Code Bench 1-100Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 30.4%Claude Opus 5: 28.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 90.3%Claude Opus 5: 88.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
BioMysteryBenchHard · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 47.1%Claude Opus 5: 43.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 65.5%Claude Opus 5: 53.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CUA-bencheFootball · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 0%Claude Opus 5: 0%Vals AIAs of 10/13/2026
CyberBench v1.1Patch · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 85.7%Claude Opus 5: 85.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 76.4%Claude Opus 5: 75.2%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 54.5%Claude Opus 5: 54.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
IOIIOI 2024 · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 100%Claude Opus 5: 100%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 65.2%Claude Opus 5: 65.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevHTML development · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,753Claude Opus 5: 1,677LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,495Claude Opus 5: 1,484LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlCreative writing with images · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,287Claude Opus 5: 1,275LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 65.0%Claude Opus 5: 41.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchCapability Score · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 53.6%Claude Opus 5: 31.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 30.0%Claude Opus 5: 23.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Hardware · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 60.0%Claude Opus 5: 33.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEarth Sciences · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 37.5%Claude Opus 5: 12.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Time Horizon Index: KSPProgress efficiency · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 69.8%Claude Opus 5: 17.5%Vals AIAs of 10/07/2026
Vals Science IndexBioMysteryBench · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 79.3%Claude Opus 5: 79.3%Vals AIAs of 10/25/2026
BioMysteryBenchHuman-solvable · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 86.8%Claude Opus 5: 87.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCOBOL · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 70%Claude Opus 5: 70%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CUA-benchHidden reflex · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 22%Claude Opus 5: 20%Vals AIAs of 10/13/2026
CyberBench v1.1PoC · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 25%Claude Opus 5: 45%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBDataroom · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 84.9%Claude Opus 5: 87.7%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)All-Pass · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 48.1%Claude Opus 5: 47.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
IOIIOI 2025 · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 100.0%Claude Opus 5: 87.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 85.4%Claude Opus 5: 92.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevImage to WebDev · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,753Claude Opus 5: 1,662LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,574Claude Opus 5: 1,547LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlDiagram understanding · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,330Claude Opus 5: 1,329LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchFully Resolved · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 18.5%Claude Opus 5: 3.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchFully Solved · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 33.6%Claude Opus 5: 12.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 66.9%Claude Opus 5: 70.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Media · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 75.0%Claude Opus 5: 58.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEngineering Sciences · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 22.2%Claude Opus 5: 11.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Science IndexMysteryMechanism · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 49.6%Claude Opus 5: 37.4%Vals AIAs of 10/25/2026
Code MigrationCode Quality · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 4.541 / 5Claude Opus 5: 4.75 / 5Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CUA-benchHidden sandbox · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 20%Claude Opus 5: 0%Vals AIAs of 10/13/2026

More comparisons

Compare Claude Opus 5.5 and Claude Opus 5 with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  2. 2Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5.5
  3. 3Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  4. 4Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  5. 5Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  6. 6Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  7. 7Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5.1
  8. 8Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  9. 9Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
Show all 72 comparisons
  1. 10Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  2. 11Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  3. 12Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Kimi K3
  4. 13Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5
  5. 14Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
  6. 15Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3
  7. 16Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 5
  8. 17Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  9. 18Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  10. 19Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.6
  11. 20Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.6
  12. 21Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  13. 22Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Grok 4.6
  14. 23Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.2
  15. 24Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
  16. 25Claude Opus 5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  17. 26Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  18. 27Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.5
  19. 28Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Muse Spark 1.3
  20. 29Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.8
  21. 30Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  22. 31Claude Opus 5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  23. 32Claude Opus 5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  24. 33Claude Opus 5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  25. 34Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  26. 35Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 4
  27. 36Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  28. 37Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.5
  29. 38Claude Opus 5 vs. Kimi K3
  30. 39Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  31. 40Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Grok 4.7
  32. 41Claude Opus 5 vs. Mistral Large 4
  33. 42Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  34. 43Claude Opus 5 vs. Muse Spark 1.3
  35. 44Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 3
  36. 45Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  37. 46Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.5
  38. 47Claude Opus 5 vs. Grok 4.6
  39. 48Claude Opus 5 vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  40. 49Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 5
  41. 50Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5
  42. 51Claude Opus 5 vs. GLM-5.3
  43. 52Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  44. 53Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  45. 54Claude Opus 5 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  46. 55Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  47. 56Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Mistral Medium 3.5
  48. 57Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Muse Wonder Full
  49. 58Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  50. 59Claude Opus 5 vs. Grok 4.7
  51. 60Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 4.5
  52. 61Claude Opus 5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5
  53. 62Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  54. 63Claude Opus 5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.5
  55. 64Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra
  56. 65Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  57. 66Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.4
  58. 67Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.1
  59. 68Claude Opus 5 vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
  60. 69Claude Opus 5 vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  61. 70Claude Opus 5 vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  62. 71Claude Opus 5 vs. Muse Wonder Full
  63. 72Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra