Skip to main content

AnthropicOpenAILLM matchup

Claude Opus 5vs.GPT-6 Sol

Which one is better?

Claude Opus 5 performs better than GPT-6 Sol, but costs 2.5 times as much.

Opus 5 ahead
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
117.2

Claude Opus 5

Rank 9

110.5

GPT-6 Sol

Rank 13

GPT-6 Sol faster
SpeedTokens per second
66

Claude Opus 5

111

GPT-6 Sol

GPT-6 Sol cheaper
Price$ per 1M tokens
$10

Claude Opus 5

$4

GPT-6 Sol

GPT-6 Sol more popular
Popularity0 to 100
63

Claude Opus 5

Rank 23 of 785

73

GPT-6 Sol

Rank 3 of 785

Above 272,000 tokens of context, GPT-6 Sol costs more: $4 input and $15 output per 1M tokens.

Choose Claude Opus 5 for

ProductivitySearchHealthFinanceLegalKnowledgeMultimodalAgentsCodingGeneral (not certain)

Choose GPT-6 Sol for

Reasoning (not certain)Mathematics (not certain)

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

Opus 5GPT-6 SolMedian of all ranked models

10511512513595CodingOpus 5ReasoningslightlyGPT-6 SolMathematicsslightlyGPT-6 SolKnowledgeOpus 5AgentsOpus 5Generalslightly Opus5MultimodalOpus 5FinanceOpus 5LegalOpus 5HealthOpus 5
CodingOpus 5 ahead
Opus 5118.0Rank 8
GPT-6 Sol114.9Rank 11
Median of ranked models84.1

95 % range: Opus 5 114.4 to 121.6, GPT-6 Sol 112.2 to 117.6.

AreaOpus 5GPT-6 Sol

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the close-up the net starts at 95 points, just below the weaker model's lowest value; the reference group average is 100.

Opus 5 is ahead in 7 of 10 areas, GPT-6 Sol in none.

Opus 5 ahead: 7Opus 5 slightly ahead: 1GPT-6 Sol slightly ahead: 2

Areas in the overall index
KnowledgeOpus 5 +10119.8 to 109.8
MultimodalOpus 5 +8114.9 to 106.9
AgentsOpus 5 +5112.6 to 107.2
CodingOpus 5 +3118.0 to 114.9
Reasoningleaning GPT-6 Solnot certain · 5 and 4 tests
Generalleaning Opus 5not certain · 5 tests each
Mathematicsleaning GPT-6 Solnot certain · 4 tests each
Specialist fields
HealthOpus 5 +21126.1 to 104.8
FinanceOpus 5 +17118.0 to 101.3
LegalOpus 5 +11115.9 to 104.8

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 3 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
ProductivityOpus 5 +28127.5 to 99.4
SearchOpus 5 +22121.0 to 98.6
Cybersecuritytoo little data115.8 to 116.4

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-6 Sol at the same effort

Both models measured at the same reasoning efforts. This shows whether a lead comes from the model or only from more compute.

maxtied
Opus 5 117.2 vs. GPT-6 Sol 110.5 · Gap 2.8 · Test series 11
Overall index (max vs. max)Opus 5 ahead
Opus 5 117.2 vs. GPT-6 Sol 110.5

Gap and verdict compare only the Artificial Analysis test series in which both models are measured at that effort. Tied below 3 points, ahead only beyond two standard errors. The single values rest on all test series of each model, so their difference can deviate from the gap.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeOpus 5Coding 118.0 to 114.9
Maths and data analysisleaning GPT-6 SolMathematics 114.2 to 117.5, Reasoning 108.5 to 114.1
Facts and researchOpus 5Knowledge 119.8 to 109.8, Search 121.0 to 98.6
Agents and workflowsOpus 5Agents 112.6 to 107.2
Fast chat repliesGPT-6 Sol66 to 111 tokens per second
Security analysisopenCybersecurity 115.8 to 116.4 (too little data)
Many requests on a small budgetGPT-6 Sol$10 to $4 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsOpus 5Finance 118.0 to 101.3, Legal 115.9 to 104.8, Health 126.1 to 104.8
Images, screenshots and PDFsOpus 5Multimodal 114.9 to 106.9

See for yourself: same task, one attempt

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

Claude Opus 5

Claude Opus 5: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 63 s · $0.14

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
anthropic/claude-opus-5
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
5,423 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.1357
Response time
63 s
API model reported in response
anthropic/claude-opus-5
Pinned endpoint
Anthropic | anthropic/claude-opus-5-20260723
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Earlier attempts (1)

  • Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high

GPT-6 Sol

GPT-6 Sol: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 80 s · $0.04

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
openai/gpt-6-sol
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
4,389 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0439
Response time
80.5 s
API model reported in response
openai/gpt-6-sol
Pinned endpoint
OpenAI | openai/gpt-6-sol-20260922
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

Claude Opus 5

Unavailable in this round

GPT-6 Sol

Unavailable in this round

Claude Opus 5 and GPT-6 Sol in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v4)

20 of 92 models

4 models in this view are measured at a lower reasoning effort than max in the overall index. Dashed column: lower reasoning effort than the top.

Claude Opus 5.5max126.1
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh125.8
Claude Fable 5.1max123.8
Claude Sonnet 5.5max122.8
Gemini 4 Argonhigh122.3
GPT-6 Astramax121.3
GPT-6.1 Solmax119.2
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.3
Claude Opus 5max117.2
Muse Wondermax113.4
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.9
Claude Fable 5max112.5
GPT-6 Solmax110.5
GPT-5.6 Solmax108.7
Muse Spark 1.3max107.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max106.6
Gemini 3.8 Flashhigh106.5
GPT-6.1 Terramax105.3
Claude Haiku 5.5max103.4

Popularity compared

How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.

GPT-6 Sol is more popular than Claude Opus 5: 73 to 63 out of 100.

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 7, 2026

Claude Opus 5GPT-6 Sol

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricClaude Opus 5GPT-6 Sol
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better117.2110.5
RankRank 9 of 92Rank 13 of 92
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$5$2above 272,000 tokens: $4
Outputwhat the model writes$25$10above 272,000 tokens: $15
Cost per task (own tests)average of 3 original-protocol tasks both models passed (SVG short test not included)$0.14$0.044
Speed
Tokens per second66111
Popularity
Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 10063Rank 23 of 78573Rank 3 of 785
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages1.05 M tokens≈ 1,580 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffMay 2026Apr 20, 2026
ReleasedJul 24, 2026Sep 22, 2026
AvailabilityActiveActive
Open weightsnono

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

Successor of Opus 5Claude Opus 5.5

Overall index 126.1, rank 1$4 input and $20 output per 1M tokens

GPT-6 Sol vs. Claude Opus 5.5
Successor of GPT-6 SolGPT-6.1 Sol

Overall index 119.2, rank 7$2 input and $10 output per 1M tokens

Opus 5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
As cheap as GPT-6 SolClaude Sonnet 5.5

Overall index 122.8, rank 4$2 input and $10 output per 1M tokens

Opus 5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5.5

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: Claude Opus 5B: GPT-6 Sol

AA-BriefcaseOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5: 1,654.7 eloGPT-6 Sol: 1,476.5 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
AA-OmniscienceOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5: 37.6 pointsGPT-6 Sol: 21.4 pointsArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
AA-Omniscience AccuracyOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5: 60.9%GPT-6 Sol: 51.1%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateOverall · lower is betterClaude Opus 5: 59.4%GPT-6 Sol: 60.8%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
AutomationBench-AAOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5: 56.6%GPT-6 Sol: 61.6%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
BioMysteryBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 79.3%GPT-6 Sol: 74.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 57.5%GPT-6 Sol: 57.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CritPt v2 (Hard Subset)Overall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5: 50.0%GPT-6 Sol: 66.5%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
CyberBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 65.4%GPT-6 Sol: 78.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 73.6%GPT-6 Sol: 71.5%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 58.6%GPT-6 Sol: 49.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
FrontierCodeOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5: 31.2%GPT-6 Sol: 35.6%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
GDP.pdfOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5: 21.6%GPT-6 Sol: 25.2%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
GDPval-AAOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5: 1,729.9 eloGPT-6 Sol: 1,515.9 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
HLE-DiamondOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5: 44.8%GPT-6 Sol: 45.2%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
IOIOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 84.3%GPT-6 Sol: 82.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 55.3%GPT-6 Sol: 28.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5: 1,691GPT-6 Sol: 1,678LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena SearchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 1,242GPT-6 Sol: 1,175LMArenaAs of 10/13/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5: 1,491GPT-6 Sol: 1,458LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 1,288GPT-6 Sol: 1,266LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
MedCodeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 63.6%GPT-6 Sol: 47.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 91%GPT-6 Sol: 82%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MMMU-ProOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5: 84.7%GPT-6 Sol: 82.9%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
MysteryMechanismOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 37.4%GPT-6 Sol: 30.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 3%GPT-6 Sol: 2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ProofBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 99%GPT-6 Sol: 83%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Public Benefits Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 76.9%GPT-6 Sol: 56.6%Vals AIAs of 10/12/2026
SRE BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 12.2%GPT-6 Sol: 30.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 45.5%GPT-6 Sol: 15.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-BenchOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5: 49.0%GPT-6 Sol: 43.9%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 53.5%GPT-6 Sol: 44.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 27.1%GPT-6 Sol: 30.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5: 28.6%GPT-6 Sol: 30.0%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
Vals Science IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 47.9%GPT-6 Sol: 45.0%Vals AIAs of 10/25/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 88.4%GPT-6 Sol: 87.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
BioMysteryBenchHard · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 43.1%GPT-6 Sol: 35.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 53.3%GPT-6 Sol: 52.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1Patch · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 85.7%GPT-6 Sol: 89.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 75.2%GPT-6 Sol: 73.3%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 54.6%GPT-6 Sol: 43.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
IOIIOI 2024 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 100%GPT-6 Sol: 100%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 65.2%GPT-6 Sol: 39.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevHTML development · higher is betterClaude Opus 5: 1,677GPT-6 Sol: 1,680LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterClaude Opus 5: 1,484GPT-6 Sol: 1,448LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlCreative writing with images · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 1,275GPT-6 Sol: 1,252LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 41.5%GPT-6 Sol: 32.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchCapability Score · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 31.1%GPT-6 Sol: 57.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 23.3%GPT-6 Sol: 6.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Hardware · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 33.3%GPT-6 Sol: 6.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEarth Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 12.5%GPT-6 Sol: 25.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Science IndexBioMysteryBench · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 79.3%GPT-6 Sol: 74.8%Vals AIAs of 10/25/2026
BioMysteryBenchHuman-solvable · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 87.7%GPT-6 Sol: 84.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCOBOL · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 70%GPT-6 Sol: 70%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1PoC · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 45.0%GPT-6 Sol: 66.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBDataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 87.7%GPT-6 Sol: 83.9%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)All-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 47.7%GPT-6 Sol: 36.0%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
IOIIOI 2025 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 87.2%GPT-6 Sol: 79.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 92.7%GPT-6 Sol: 80.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevImage to WebDev · higher is betterClaude Opus 5: 1,662GPT-6 Sol: 1,660LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterClaude Opus 5: 1,547GPT-6 Sol: 1,485LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlDiagram understanding · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 1,329GPT-6 Sol: 1,303LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchFully Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 3%GPT-6 Sol: 2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchFully Solved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5: 12.2%GPT-6 Sol: 30.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026

More comparisons

Compare Claude Opus 5 and GPT-6 Sol with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  2. 2GPT-6 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  3. 3GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  4. 4Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 5
  5. 5GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  6. 6GPT-6 Astra vs. GPT-6 Sol
  7. 7Claude Opus 5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  8. 8Claude Opus 5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  9. 9Claude Opus 5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
Show all 58 comparisons
  1. 10GPT-6 Sol vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  2. 11Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  3. 12Claude Opus 5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  4. 13Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  5. 14GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  6. 15Claude Opus 4.8 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  7. 16Claude Opus 5 vs. Kimi K3
  8. 17GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.4
  9. 18GPT-6 Sol vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  10. 19GPT-6 Sol vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  11. 20Claude Opus 5 vs. Mistral Large 4
  12. 21GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-6 Luna
  13. 22Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  14. 23GPT-6 Sol vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  15. 24Claude Opus 5 vs. Muse Spark 1.3
  16. 25Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  17. 26Claude Opus 5 vs. Grok 4.6
  18. 27Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 5
  19. 28Claude Opus 5 vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  20. 29GPT-6 Sol vs. Grok 4.7
  21. 30Claude Opus 5 vs. GLM-5.3
  22. 31Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  23. 32Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  24. 33GPT-6 Sol vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  25. 34Claude Sonnet 5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  26. 35GPT-6 Sol vs. Kimi K3
  27. 36Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  28. 37Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  29. 38Claude Opus 5 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  30. 39GPT-6 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  31. 40GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  32. 41Claude Opus 5 vs. Grok 4.7
  33. 42Claude Opus 5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5
  34. 43Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  35. 44Claude Opus 5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.5
  36. 45GPT-6 Sol vs. Mistral Large 4
  37. 46GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  38. 47GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  39. 48Claude Opus 4.6 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  40. 49GPT-6 Sol vs. Muse Wonder
  41. 50Claude Haiku 4.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  42. 51GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.5
  43. 52GPT-6.1 Terra vs. GPT-6 Sol
  44. 53Claude Opus 5 vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
  45. 54Claude Opus 5 vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  46. 55Claude Opus 5 vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  47. 56GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
  48. 57Claude Opus 5 vs. Muse Wonder Full
  49. 58Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra