Skip to main content

AnthropicOpenAILLM matchup

Claude Fable 5.1vs.GPT-6 Sol

Which one is better?

Claude Fable 5.1 performs better than GPT-6 Sol, but costs 5 times as much.

Fable 5.1 ahead
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
123.8

Claude Fable 5.1

Rank 3

110.5

GPT-6 Sol

Rank 13

GPT-6 Sol faster
SpeedTokens per second
88

Claude Fable 5.1

111

GPT-6 Sol

GPT-6 Sol cheaper
Price$ per 1M tokens
$20

Claude Fable 5.1

$4

GPT-6 Sol

GPT-6 Sol more popular
Popularity0 to 100
64

Claude Fable 5.1

Rank 18 of 785

73

GPT-6 Sol

Rank 3 of 785

Above 272,000 tokens of context, GPT-6 Sol costs more: $4 input and $15 output per 1M tokens.

Choose Claude Fable 5.1 for

ProductivityLegalFinanceHealthKnowledgeMultimodalMathematicsGeneralCodingAgents

Choose GPT-6 Sol for

No clear advantage

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

Fable 5.1GPT-6 SolMedian of all ranked models

10511512513595CodingFable 5.1ReasoninglevelMathematicsFable 5.1KnowledgeFable 5.1AgentsFable 5.1GeneralFable 5.1MultimodalFable 5.1FinanceFable 5.1LegalFable 5.1HealthFable 5.1
CodingFable 5.1 ahead
Fable 5.1122.8Rank 5
GPT-6 Sol114.9Rank 11
Median of ranked models84.1

95 % range: Fable 5.1 117.1 to 128.5, GPT-6 Sol 112.2 to 117.6.

AreaFable 5.1GPT-6 Sol

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the close-up the net starts at 95 points, just below the weaker model's lowest value; the reference group average is 100.

Fable 5.1 is ahead in 9 of 10 areas, GPT-6 Sol in none.

Fable 5.1 ahead: 9level: 1

Areas in the overall index
KnowledgeFable 5.1 +17127.2 to 109.8
MultimodalFable 5.1 +13120.2 to 106.9
MathematicsFable 5.1 +13130.2 to 117.5
GeneralFable 5.1 +9122.5 to 113.0
CodingFable 5.1 +8122.8 to 114.9
AgentsFable 5.1 +7114.5 to 107.2
Reasoninglevel116.3 to 114.1
Specialist fields
LegalFable 5.1 +25129.7 to 104.8
FinanceFable 5.1 +20121.1 to 101.3
HealthFable 5.1 +18122.9 to 104.8

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 3 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
ProductivityFable 5.1 +29128.8 to 99.4
Cybersecuritytoo little data123.5 to 116.4
Searchonly GPT-6 Sol has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-6 Sol at the same effort

Both models measured at the same reasoning efforts. This shows whether a lead comes from the model or only from more compute.

maxFable 5.1 slightly ahead
Fable 5.1 123.8 vs. GPT-6 Sol 110.5 · Gap 7.2 · Test series 11
Overall index (max vs. max)Fable 5.1 ahead
Fable 5.1 123.8 vs. GPT-6 Sol 110.5

Gap and verdict compare only the Artificial Analysis test series in which both models are measured at that effort. Tied below 3 points, ahead only beyond two standard errors. The single values rest on all test series of each model, so their difference can deviate from the gap.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeFable 5.1Coding 122.8 to 114.9
Maths and data analysisFable 5.1Mathematics 130.2 to 117.5, Reasoning 116.3 to 114.1
Facts and researchFable 5.1Knowledge 127.2 to 109.8, Search without a score for Fable 5.1
Agents and workflowsFable 5.1Agents 114.5 to 107.2
Fast chat repliesGPT-6 Sol88 to 111 tokens per second
Security analysisopenCybersecurity 123.5 to 116.4 (too little data)
Many requests on a small budgetGPT-6 Sol$20 to $4 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsFable 5.1Finance 121.1 to 101.3, Legal 129.7 to 104.8, Health 122.9 to 104.8
Images, screenshots and PDFsFable 5.1Multimodal 120.2 to 106.9

See for yourself: same task, one attempt

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

Claude Fable 5.1

Claude Fable 5.1: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Sep 7, 2026 · 27 s · $0.11

Test details
Run date
Sep 7, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
anthropic/claude-fable-5.1
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
2,198 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.1102
Response time
27 s
API model reported in response
anthropic/claude-fable-5.1
Pinned endpoint
Anthropic | anthropic/claude-fable-5.1-20260831
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

GPT-6 Sol

GPT-6 Sol: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 80 s · $0.04

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
openai/gpt-6-sol
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
4,389 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0439
Response time
80.5 s
API model reported in response
openai/gpt-6-sol
Pinned endpoint
OpenAI | openai/gpt-6-sol-20260922
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

Claude Fable 5.1

Unavailable in this round

GPT-6 Sol

Unavailable in this round

Claude Fable 5.1 and GPT-6 Sol in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v4)

20 of 92 models

4 models in this view are measured at a lower reasoning effort than max in the overall index. Dashed column: lower reasoning effort than the top.

Claude Opus 5.5max126.1
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh125.8
Claude Fable 5.1max123.8
Claude Sonnet 5.5max122.8
Gemini 4 Argonhigh122.3
GPT-6 Astramax121.3
GPT-6.1 Solmax119.2
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.3
Claude Opus 5max117.2
Muse Wondermax113.4
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.9
Claude Fable 5max112.5
GPT-6 Solmax110.5
GPT-5.6 Solmax108.7
Muse Spark 1.3max107.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max106.6
Gemini 3.8 Flashhigh106.5
GPT-6.1 Terramax105.3
Claude Haiku 5.5max103.4

Popularity compared

How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.

GPT-6 Sol is more popular than Claude Fable 5.1: 73 to 64 out of 100.

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 7, 2026

Claude Fable 5.1GPT-6 Sol

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricClaude Fable 5.1GPT-6 Sol
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better123.8110.5
RankRank 3 of 92Rank 13 of 92
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$10$2above 272,000 tokens: $4
Outputwhat the model writes$50$10above 272,000 tokens: $15
Cost per task (own tests)average of 3 original-protocol tasks both models passed (SVG short test not included)$0.19$0.044
Speed
Tokens per second88111
Popularity
Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 10064Rank 18 of 78573Rank 3 of 785
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages1.05 M tokens≈ 1,580 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffJune 2026Apr 20, 2026
ReleasedSep 1, 2026Sep 22, 2026
AvailabilityActiveActive
Open weightsnono

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

Successor of GPT-6 SolGPT-6.1 Sol

Overall index 119.2, rank 7$2 input and $10 output per 1M tokens

Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
As cheap as GPT-6 SolClaude Sonnet 5.5

Overall index 122.8, rank 4$2 input and $10 output per 1M tokens

Fable 5.1 vs. Claude Sonnet 5.5
Best model in the overall indexClaude Opus 5.5

Overall index 126.1, rank 1$4 input and $20 output per 1M tokens

Fable 5.1 vs. Claude Opus 5.5

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: Claude Fable 5.1B: GPT-6 Sol

Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 54.6%GPT-6 Sol: 57.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 70.4%GPT-6 Sol: 78.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 76.7%GPT-6 Sol: 71.5%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 58.9%GPT-6 Sol: 49.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
IOIOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 90.8%GPT-6 Sol: 82.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 55.3%GPT-6 Sol: 28.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterClaude Fable 5.1: 1,746GPT-6 Sol: 1,678LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterClaude Fable 5.1: 1,504GPT-6 Sol: 1,458LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterClaude Fable 5.1: 1,288GPT-6 Sol: 1,266LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
MedCodeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 53.5%GPT-6 Sol: 47.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 91.3%GPT-6 Sol: 82.0%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MysteryMechanismOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 47.7%GPT-6 Sol: 30.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 7%GPT-6 Sol: 2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ProofBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 100%GPT-6 Sol: 83%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Public Benefits Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 74.9%GPT-6 Sol: 56.6%Vals AIAs of 10/12/2026
SRE BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 22.9%GPT-6 Sol: 30.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 49.2%GPT-6 Sol: 15.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 58.1%GPT-6 Sol: 44.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 40%GPT-6 Sol: 30%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 90.3%GPT-6 Sol: 87.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 52.8%GPT-6 Sol: 52.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1Patch · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 87.5%GPT-6 Sol: 89.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 82.2%GPT-6 Sol: 73.3%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 54.4%GPT-6 Sol: 43.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
IOIIOI 2024 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 100%GPT-6 Sol: 100%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 68.2%GPT-6 Sol: 39.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevHTML development · higher is betterClaude Fable 5.1: 1,683GPT-6 Sol: 1,680LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterClaude Fable 5.1: 1,487GPT-6 Sol: 1,448LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlCreative writing with images · higher is betterClaude Fable 5.1: 1,290GPT-6 Sol: 1,252LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 53.5%GPT-6 Sol: 32.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchCapability Score · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 36.6%GPT-6 Sol: 57.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 26.7%GPT-6 Sol: 6.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Hardware · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 60.0%GPT-6 Sol: 6.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEarth Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 25%GPT-6 Sol: 25%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCOBOL · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 60%GPT-6 Sol: 70%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1PoC · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 53.3%GPT-6 Sol: 66.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBDataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 86.7%GPT-6 Sol: 83.9%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)All-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 47.8%GPT-6 Sol: 36.0%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
IOIIOI 2025 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 87.2%GPT-6 Sol: 79.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 92.5%GPT-6 Sol: 80.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevImage to WebDev · higher is betterClaude Fable 5.1: 1,722GPT-6 Sol: 1,660LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterClaude Fable 5.1: 1,565GPT-6 Sol: 1,485LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlDiagram understanding · higher is betterClaude Fable 5.1: 1,323GPT-6 Sol: 1,303LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchFully Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 7%GPT-6 Sol: 2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchFully Solved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 22.9%GPT-6 Sol: 30.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 70.6%GPT-6 Sol: 50.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Media · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 66.7%GPT-6 Sol: 41.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEngineering Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 44.4%GPT-6 Sol: 22.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCode Quality · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 4.513 / 5GPT-6 Sol: 4.375 / 5Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBDCF · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 69.9%GPT-6 Sol: 63.1%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Comparables · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 46.0%GPT-6 Sol: 40.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
IOIIOI 2026 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 85.2%GPT-6 Sol: 68.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 62.8%GPT-6 Sol: 27.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevReact development · higher is betterClaude Fable 5.1: 1,792GPT-6 Sol: 1,680LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCoding · higher is betterClaude Fable 5.1: 1,537GPT-6 Sol: 1,519LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlEnglish · higher is betterClaude Fable 5.1: 1,279GPT-6 Sol: 1,255LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchRaw Pass Rate · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 82.7%GPT-6 Sol: 81.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 59.8%GPT-6 Sol: 23.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0ML · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 60.6%GPT-6 Sol: 45.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceLife Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 26.3%GPT-6 Sol: 42.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBLBO · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 69.6%GPT-6 Sol: 59.4%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Disclosure Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 70.3%GPT-6 Sol: 55.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5.1: 94.6%GPT-6 Sol: 80.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevWeb development · higher is betterClaude Fable 5.1: 1,746GPT-6 Sol: 1,678LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026

More comparisons

Compare Claude Fable 5.1 and GPT-6 Sol with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5.1
  2. 2GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  3. 3GPT-6 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  4. 4GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  5. 5Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5.1
  6. 6GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  7. 7GPT-6 Astra vs. GPT-6 Sol
  8. 8GPT-6 Sol vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  9. 9Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
Show all 50 comparisons
  1. 10GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  2. 11Claude Opus 4.8 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  3. 12Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  4. 13GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.4
  5. 14GPT-6 Sol vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  6. 15GPT-6 Sol vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  7. 16Claude Fable 5.1 vs. Grok 4.7
  8. 17GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-6 Luna
  9. 18GPT-6 Sol vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  10. 19Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  11. 20Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  12. 21GPT-6 Sol vs. Grok 4.7
  13. 22Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  14. 23Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  15. 24GPT-6 Sol vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  16. 25Claude Sonnet 5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  17. 26GPT-6 Sol vs. Kimi K3
  18. 27GPT-6 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  19. 28GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  20. 29Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  21. 30Claude Fable 5.1 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  22. 31Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  23. 32Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  24. 33Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  25. 34Claude Fable 5.1 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  26. 35GPT-6 Sol vs. Mistral Large 4
  27. 36GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  28. 37Claude Fable 5.1 vs. Mistral Large 4
  29. 38GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  30. 39Claude Opus 4.6 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  31. 40Claude Fable 5.1 vs. Claude Opus 4.8
  32. 41GPT-6 Sol vs. Muse Wonder
  33. 42Claude Fable 5.1 vs. Claude Opus 4.6
  34. 43Claude Haiku 4.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  35. 44GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.5
  36. 45GPT-6.1 Terra vs. GPT-6 Sol
  37. 46Claude Fable 5.1 vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  38. 47Claude Fable 5.1 vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
  39. 48GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
  40. 49Claude Fable 5.1 vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  41. 50Claude Fable 5.1 vs. Muse Wonder