Skip to main content

AnthropicOpenAILLM matchup

Claude Sonnet 4.6vs.GPT-6 Sol

Which one is better?

GPT-6 Sol performs better than Claude Sonnet 4.6 and is cheaper: Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs 1.5 times as much.

GPT-6 Sol ahead
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
86.4

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Rank 44

110.5

GPT-6 Sol

Rank 13

GPT-6 Sol faster
SpeedTokens per second
60

Claude Sonnet 4.6

111

GPT-6 Sol

GPT-6 Sol cheaper
Price$ per 1M tokens
$6

Claude Sonnet 4.6

$4

GPT-6 Sol

GPT-6 Sol more popular
Popularity0 to 100
54

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Rank 67 of 785

73

GPT-6 Sol

Rank 3 of 785

Above 272,000 tokens of context, GPT-6 Sol costs more: $4 input and $15 output per 1M tokens.

Choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 for

No clear advantage

Choose GPT-6 Sol for

GeneralReasoningCodingHealthKnowledgeAgentsMultimodalFinance (not certain)

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

Sonnet 4.6GPT-6 SolMedian of all ranked models

9011013070CodingGPT-6 SolReasoningGPT-6 SolKnowledgeGPT-6 SolAgentsGPT-6 SolGeneralGPT-6 SolMultimodalGPT-6 SolFinanceslightlyGPT-6 SolHealthGPT-6 Sol
CodingGPT-6 Sol ahead
Sonnet 4.686.9Rank 53
GPT-6 Sol114.9Rank 11
Median of ranked models84.1

95 % range: Sonnet 4.6 80.1 to 93.7, GPT-6 Sol 112.2 to 117.6.

AreaSonnet 4.6GPT-6 Sol

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the close-up the net starts at 70 points, just below the weaker model's lowest value; the reference group average is 100. Not in the net because a model has no own value there or the data are too thin: Mathematics, Legal.

GPT-6 Sol is ahead in 7 of 10 areas, Sonnet 4.6 in none.

too little data: 2GPT-6 Sol slightly ahead: 1GPT-6 Sol ahead: 7

Areas in the overall index
GeneralGPT-6 Sol +3083.1 to 113.0
ReasoningGPT-6 Sol +3084.4 to 114.1
CodingGPT-6 Sol +2886.9 to 114.9
KnowledgeGPT-6 Sol +2387.2 to 109.8
AgentsGPT-6 Sol +2086.7 to 107.2
MultimodalGPT-6 Sol +1988.2 to 106.9
Mathematicsonly GPT-6 Sol has a score
Specialist fields
HealthGPT-6 Sol +2678.4 to 104.8
Financeleaning GPT-6 Solnot certain · 6 and 3 tests
Legaltoo little data90.3 to 104.8

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 3 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
Productivitytoo little data89.1 to 99.4
Cybersecurityonly GPT-6 Sol has a score
Searchonly GPT-6 Sol has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. GPT-6 Sol at the same effort

Both models measured at the same reasoning efforts. This shows whether a lead comes from the model or only from more compute.

maxGPT-6 Sol ahead
Sonnet 4.6 86.4 vs. GPT-6 Sol 110.5 · Gap 18.1 · Test series 3
Overall index (max vs. max)GPT-6 Sol ahead
Sonnet 4.6 86.4 vs. GPT-6 Sol 110.5

Gap and verdict compare only the Artificial Analysis test series in which both models are measured at that effort. Tied below 3 points, ahead only beyond two standard errors. The single values rest on all test series of each model, so their difference can deviate from the gap.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeGPT-6 SolCoding 86.9 to 114.9
Maths and data analysisGPT-6 SolMathematics without a score for Sonnet 4.6, Reasoning 84.4 to 114.1
Facts and researchGPT-6 SolKnowledge 87.2 to 109.8, Search without a score for Sonnet 4.6
Agents and workflowsGPT-6 SolAgents 86.7 to 107.2
Fast chat repliesGPT-6 Sol60 to 111 tokens per second
Security analysisopenCybersecurity without a score for Sonnet 4.6
Many requests on a small budgetGPT-6 Sol$6 to $4 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsGPT-6 SolFinance 94.5 to 101.3, Legal 90.3 to 104.8 (too little data), Health 78.4 to 104.8
Images, screenshots and PDFsGPT-6 SolMultimodal 88.2 to 106.9

See for yourself: same task, one attempt

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

Claude Sonnet 4.6

The response reached the token limit. No complete recording is available.

Oct 6, 2026 · 106 s · $0.12

Not yet visually reviewed. A successful recording does not confirm correct physics or full compliance with the prompt.

Test details
Run date
Oct 6, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
8,192 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.1229
Response time
106 s
API model reported in response
anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6
Pinned endpoint
Anthropic | anthropic/claude-4.6-sonnet-20260217
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Failed

Earlier attempts (2)

  • Oct 2, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
  • Oct 1, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high

GPT-6 Sol

GPT-6 Sol: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 80 s · $0.04

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
openai/gpt-6-sol
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
4,389 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0439
Response time
80.5 s
API model reported in response
openai/gpt-6-sol
Pinned endpoint
OpenAI | openai/gpt-6-sol-20260922
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Claude Sonnet 4.6: SVG short test

Oct 14, 2026 · $0.0113

Test details
Test run
Oct 14, 2026
Provider
anthropic
API model
anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6
Output
738 tokens
Reasoning
API reports 0 reasoning tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0113
Test round
43b8c5c46830

GPT-6 Sol

Unavailable in this round

Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GPT-6 Sol in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v4)

20 of 92 models

4 models in this view are measured at a lower reasoning effort than max in the overall index. Dashed column: lower reasoning effort than the top.

Claude Opus 5.5max126.1
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh125.8
Claude Fable 5.1max123.8
Claude Sonnet 5.5max122.8
Gemini 4 Argonhigh122.3
GPT-6 Astramax121.3
GPT-6.1 Solmax119.2
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.3
Claude Opus 5max117.2
Muse Wondermax113.4
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.9
Claude Fable 5max112.5
GPT-6 Solmax110.5
GPT-5.6 Solmax108.7
Muse Spark 1.3max107.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max106.6
Gemini 3.8 Flashhigh106.5
GPT-6.1 Terramax105.3
Claude Sonnet 4.6max86.4

Popularity compared

How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.

GPT-6 Sol is more popular than Claude Sonnet 4.6: 73 to 54 out of 100.

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 7, 2026

Claude Sonnet 4.6GPT-6 Sol

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricClaude Sonnet 4.6GPT-6 Sol
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better86.4110.5
RankRank 44 of 92Rank 13 of 92
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$3$2above 272,000 tokens: $4
Outputwhat the model writes$15$10above 272,000 tokens: $15
Speed
Tokens per second60111
Popularity
Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 10054Rank 67 of 78573Rank 3 of 785
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages1.05 M tokens≈ 1,580 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffAugust 2025Apr 20, 2026
ReleasedFebruary 2026Sep 22, 2026
AvailabilityActiveActive
Open weightsnono

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

Successor of Sonnet 4.6Claude Sonnet 5

Overall index 92.1, rank 40$2 input and $10 output per 1M tokens

GPT-6 Sol vs. Claude Sonnet 5
Successor of GPT-6 SolGPT-6.1 Sol

Overall index 119.2, rank 7$2 input and $10 output per 1M tokens

Sonnet 4.6 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
As cheap as GPT-6 SolClaude Sonnet 5.5

Overall index 122.8, rank 4$2 input and $10 output per 1M tokens

GPT-6 Sol vs. Claude Sonnet 5.5

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: Claude Sonnet 4.6B: GPT-6 Sol

Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 39.9%GPT-6 Sol: 57.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 60.2%GPT-6 Sol: 71.5%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 51%GPT-6 Sol: 49%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
GDPval-AAOverall · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 4.6: 1,240.5 eloGPT-6 Sol: 1,515.9 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
ITBench-AA (SRE)Overall · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 4.6: 39.8%GPT-6 Sol: 49.4%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 38.5%GPT-6 Sol: 28.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 1,523GPT-6 Sol: 1,678LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 1,472GPT-6 Sol: 1,458LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 1,275GPT-6 Sol: 1,266LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
MMMU-ProOverall · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 4.6: 73.3%GPT-6 Sol: 82.9%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 0.5%GPT-6 Sol: 2.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Public Benefits Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 62.4%GPT-6 Sol: 56.6%Vals AIAs of 10/12/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 25.8%GPT-6 Sol: 15.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 51.5%GPT-6 Sol: 87.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 30.3%GPT-6 Sol: 52.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 61.5%GPT-6 Sol: 73.3%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 48.9%GPT-6 Sol: 43.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 43.9%GPT-6 Sol: 39.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevHTML development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 1,526GPT-6 Sol: 1,680LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 1,482GPT-6 Sol: 1,448LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlCreative writing with images · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 1,266GPT-6 Sol: 1,252LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 2.0%GPT-6 Sol: 32.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 10.0%GPT-6 Sol: 6.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCOBOL · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 68.6%GPT-6 Sol: 70.0%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBDataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 78.5%GPT-6 Sol: 83.9%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)All-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 38.8%GPT-6 Sol: 36.0%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 86.8%GPT-6 Sol: 80.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevImage to WebDev · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 1,529GPT-6 Sol: 1,660LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 1,510GPT-6 Sol: 1,485LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlDiagram understanding · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 1,306GPT-6 Sol: 1,303LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchFully Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 0.5%GPT-6 Sol: 2.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 57.9%GPT-6 Sol: 50.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCode Quality · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 3.997 / 5GPT-6 Sol: 4.375 / 5Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBDCF · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 38.3%GPT-6 Sol: 63.1%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Comparables · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 41.0%GPT-6 Sol: 40.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 34.9%GPT-6 Sol: 27.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevReact development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 1,512GPT-6 Sol: 1,680LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCoding · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 1,528GPT-6 Sol: 1,519LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlEnglish · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 1,283GPT-6 Sol: 1,255LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchRaw Pass Rate · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 59.1%GPT-6 Sol: 81.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 33.2%GPT-6 Sol: 23.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBLBO · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 52.5%GPT-6 Sol: 59.4%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Disclosure Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 65.8%GPT-6 Sol: 55.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 88.0%GPT-6 Sol: 80.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevWeb development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 1,523GPT-6 Sol: 1,678LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCreative writing · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 1,449GPT-6 Sol: 1,435LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlHomework · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 1,302GPT-6 Sol: 1,306LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 66.1%GPT-6 Sol: 56.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBM&A · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 70.5%GPT-6 Sol: 83.0%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Earnings Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 65.1%GPT-6 Sol: 72.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchCivil Litigation · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 29.6%GPT-6 Sol: 18.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlEnglish · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 1,482GPT-6 Sol: 1,459LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOptical character recognition · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 1,291GPT-6 Sol: 1,285LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
Tax Agent BenchFact-Pattern Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 23.3%GPT-6 Sol: 16.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBMisc · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 61.7%GPT-6 Sol: 65.0%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Financial Modeling · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 17.6%GPT-6 Sol: 19.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchCivil Litigation · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 87.4%GPT-6 Sol: 78.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlEntertainment, sports and media · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 1,445GPT-6 Sol: 1,430LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
Tax Agent BenchFact-Pattern Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 56.7%GPT-6 Sol: 49.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBOperating · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 58.1%GPT-6 Sol: 72.9%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)General Qualitative Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 71.6%GPT-6 Sol: 53.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchConstitutional / Civil Rights · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 34.2%GPT-6 Sol: 18.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlExcluding ties · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 1,482GPT-6 Sol: 1,463LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
Tax Agent BenchForms & Filings · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 4.6: 6.4%GPT-6 Sol: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026

More comparisons

Compare Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GPT-6 Sol with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  2. 2GPT-6 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  3. 3Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  4. 4GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  5. 5GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  6. 6Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.6
  7. 7GPT-6 Astra vs. GPT-6 Sol
  8. 8Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  9. 9Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Show all 54 comparisons
  1. 10Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  2. 11GPT-6 Sol vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  3. 12Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  4. 13GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  5. 14Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.6
  6. 15Claude Opus 4.8 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  7. 16GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.4
  8. 17GPT-6 Sol vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  9. 18GPT-6 Sol vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  10. 19GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-6 Luna
  11. 20GPT-6 Sol vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  12. 21Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  13. 22Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  14. 23Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.6
  15. 24GPT-6 Sol vs. Grok 4.7
  16. 25Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  17. 26Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  18. 27GPT-6 Sol vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  19. 28Claude Sonnet 5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  20. 29GPT-6 Sol vs. Kimi K3
  21. 30Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  22. 31Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. Grok 4.7
  23. 32Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  24. 33GPT-6 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  25. 34GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  26. 35Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  27. 36Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  28. 37Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. GLM-5.3
  29. 38Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  30. 39GPT-6 Sol vs. Mistral Large 4
  31. 40GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  32. 41GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  33. 42Claude Opus 4.6 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  34. 43Claude Opus 4.6 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.6
  35. 44GPT-6 Sol vs. Muse Wonder
  36. 45Claude Haiku 4.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  37. 46GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.5
  38. 47GPT-6.1 Terra vs. GPT-6 Sol
  39. 48Claude Opus 4.7 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.6
  40. 49Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. Claude Haiku 4.5
  41. 50Claude Opus 4.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.6
  42. 51Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  43. 52GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
  44. 53Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
  45. 54Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra