Skip to main content

AnthropicOpenAILLM matchup

Claude Opus 5.5vs.GPT-6 Sol

Which one is better?

Claude Opus 5.5 performs better than GPT-6 Sol, but costs twice as much.

Opus 5.5 ahead
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
126.1

Claude Opus 5.5

Rank 1

110.5

GPT-6 Sol

Rank 13

about as fast
SpeedTokens per second
106

Claude Opus 5.5

111

GPT-6 Sol

GPT-6 Sol cheaper
Price$ per 1M tokens
$8

Claude Opus 5.5

$4

GPT-6 Sol

GPT-6 Sol more popular
Popularity0 to 100
68

Claude Opus 5.5

Rank 8 of 785

73

GPT-6 Sol

Rank 3 of 785

Above 272,000 tokens of context, GPT-6 Sol costs more: $4 input and $15 output per 1M tokens.

Choose Claude Opus 5.5 for

ProductivityKnowledgeSearchFinanceHealthLegalMultimodalCodingMathematicsGeneralAgentsReasoning

Choose GPT-6 Sol for

No clear advantage

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

Opus 5.5GPT-6 SolMedian of all ranked models

11513595CodingOpus 5.5ReasoningOpus 5.5MathematicsOpus 5.5KnowledgeOpus 5.5AgentsOpus 5.5GeneralOpus 5.5MultimodalOpus 5.5FinanceOpus 5.5LegalOpus 5.5HealthOpus 5.5
CodingOpus 5.5 ahead
Opus 5.5129.9Rank 1
GPT-6 Sol114.9Rank 11
Median of ranked models84.1

95 % range: Opus 5.5 121.2 to 138.7, GPT-6 Sol 112.2 to 117.6.

AreaOpus 5.5GPT-6 Sol

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the close-up the net starts at 95 points, just below the weaker model's lowest value; the reference group average is 100.

Opus 5.5 is ahead in 10 of 10 areas, GPT-6 Sol in none.

Opus 5.5 ahead: 10

Areas in the overall index
KnowledgeOpus 5.5 +22131.4 to 109.8
MultimodalOpus 5.5 +16123.1 to 106.9
CodingOpus 5.5 +15129.9 to 114.9
MathematicsOpus 5.5 +14131.8 to 117.5
GeneralOpus 5.5 +12125.1 to 113.0
AgentsOpus 5.5 +10117.2 to 107.2
ReasoningOpus 5.5 +8122.5 to 114.1
Specialist fields
FinanceOpus 5.5 +20121.4 to 101.3
HealthOpus 5.5 +17122.1 to 104.8
LegalOpus 5.5 +17121.5 to 104.8

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 4 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
ProductivityOpus 5.5 +26125.0 to 99.4
SearchOpus 5.5 +21119.5 to 98.6
Cybersecuritytoo little data120.5 to 116.4
Educationonly Opus 5.5 has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol at the same effort

Both models measured at the same reasoning efforts. This shows whether a lead comes from the model or only from more compute.

maxOpus 5.5 ahead
Opus 5.5 126.1 vs. GPT-6 Sol 110.5 · Gap 13.1 · Test series 12
Overall index (max vs. max)Opus 5.5 ahead
Opus 5.5 126.1 vs. GPT-6 Sol 110.5

Gap and verdict compare only the Artificial Analysis test series in which both models are measured at that effort. Tied below 3 points, ahead only beyond two standard errors. The single values rest on all test series of each model, so their difference can deviate from the gap.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeOpus 5.5Coding 129.9 to 114.9
Maths and data analysisOpus 5.5Mathematics 131.8 to 117.5, Reasoning 122.5 to 114.1
Facts and researchOpus 5.5Knowledge 131.4 to 109.8, Search 119.5 to 98.6
Agents and workflowsOpus 5.5Agents 117.2 to 107.2
Fast chat repliesabout the same106 to 111 tokens per second
Security analysisopenCybersecurity 120.5 to 116.4 (too little data)
Many requests on a small budgetGPT-6 Sol$8 to $4 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsOpus 5.5Finance 121.4 to 101.3, Legal 121.5 to 104.8, Health 122.1 to 104.8
Images, screenshots and PDFsOpus 5.5Multimodal 123.1 to 106.9

See for yourself: same task, one attempt

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

Claude Opus 5.5

Claude Opus 5.5: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 33 s · $0.07

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
3,536 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0708
Response time
33.2 s
API model reported in response
anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Pinned endpoint
Anthropic | anthropic/claude-opus-5.5-20260921
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

GPT-6 Sol

GPT-6 Sol: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 80 s · $0.04

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
openai/gpt-6-sol
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
4,389 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0439
Response time
80.5 s
API model reported in response
openai/gpt-6-sol
Pinned endpoint
OpenAI | openai/gpt-6-sol-20260922
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

Claude Opus 5.5

Unavailable in this round

GPT-6 Sol

Unavailable in this round

Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Sol in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v4)

20 of 92 models

4 models in this view are measured at a lower reasoning effort than max in the overall index. Dashed column: lower reasoning effort than the top.

Claude Opus 5.5max126.1
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh125.8
Claude Fable 5.1max123.8
Claude Sonnet 5.5max122.8
Gemini 4 Argonhigh122.3
GPT-6 Astramax121.3
GPT-6.1 Solmax119.2
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.3
Claude Opus 5max117.2
Muse Wondermax113.4
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.9
Claude Fable 5max112.5
GPT-6 Solmax110.5
GPT-5.6 Solmax108.7
Muse Spark 1.3max107.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max106.6
Gemini 3.8 Flashhigh106.5
GPT-6.1 Terramax105.3
Claude Haiku 5.5max103.4

Popularity compared

How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.

GPT-6 Sol is more popular than Claude Opus 5.5: 73 to 68 out of 100.

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 7, 2026

Claude Opus 5.5GPT-6 Sol

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricClaude Opus 5.5GPT-6 Sol
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better126.1110.5
RankRank 1 of 92Rank 13 of 92
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$4$2above 272,000 tokens: $4
Outputwhat the model writes$20$10above 272,000 tokens: $15
Cost per task (own tests)average of 3 original-protocol tasks both models passed (SVG short test not included)$0.11$0.044
Speed
Tokens per second106111
Popularity
Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 10068Rank 8 of 78573Rank 3 of 785
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages1.05 M tokens≈ 1,580 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffJune 2026Apr 20, 2026
ReleasedSep 22, 2026Sep 22, 2026
AvailabilityActiveActive
Open weightsnono

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

Successor of GPT-6 SolGPT-6.1 Sol

Overall index 119.2, rank 7$2 input and $10 output per 1M tokens

Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
As cheap as GPT-6 SolClaude Sonnet 5.5

Overall index 122.8, rank 4$2 input and $10 output per 1M tokens

Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5.5

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: Claude Opus 5.5B: GPT-6 Sol

BioMysteryBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 79.3%GPT-6 Sol: 74.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 66.6%GPT-6 Sol: 57.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 55.4%GPT-6 Sol: 78.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 75.9%GPT-6 Sol: 71.5%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 58.6%GPT-6 Sol: 49.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
IOIOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 95.1%GPT-6 Sol: 82.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 50.5%GPT-6 Sol: 28.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,810GPT-6 Sol: 1,678LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena SearchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,213GPT-6 Sol: 1,175LMArenaAs of 10/13/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,509GPT-6 Sol: 1,458LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,293GPT-6 Sol: 1,266LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
MedCodeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 49.8%GPT-6 Sol: 47.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 91.4%GPT-6 Sol: 82.0%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MysteryMechanismOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 49.6%GPT-6 Sol: 30.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 18.5%GPT-6 Sol: 2.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ProofBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 100%GPT-6 Sol: 83%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Public Benefits Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 70.6%GPT-6 Sol: 56.6%Vals AIAs of 10/12/2026
SRE BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 33.6%GPT-6 Sol: 30.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 45.6%GPT-6 Sol: 15.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65.2%GPT-6 Sol: 44.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 47.1%GPT-6 Sol: 30.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Science IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 58.7%GPT-6 Sol: 45.0%Vals AIAs of 10/25/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 90.3%GPT-6 Sol: 87.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
BioMysteryBenchHard · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 47.1%GPT-6 Sol: 35.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65.5%GPT-6 Sol: 52.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1Patch · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 85.7%GPT-6 Sol: 89.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 76.4%GPT-6 Sol: 73.3%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 54.5%GPT-6 Sol: 43.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
IOIIOI 2024 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 100%GPT-6 Sol: 100%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65.2%GPT-6 Sol: 39.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevHTML development · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,753GPT-6 Sol: 1,680LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,495GPT-6 Sol: 1,448LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlCreative writing with images · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,287GPT-6 Sol: 1,252LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65.0%GPT-6 Sol: 32.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchCapability Score · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 53.6%GPT-6 Sol: 57.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 30.0%GPT-6 Sol: 6.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Hardware · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 60.0%GPT-6 Sol: 6.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEarth Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 37.5%GPT-6 Sol: 25.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Science IndexBioMysteryBench · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 79.3%GPT-6 Sol: 74.8%Vals AIAs of 10/25/2026
BioMysteryBenchHuman-solvable · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 86.8%GPT-6 Sol: 84.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCOBOL · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 70%GPT-6 Sol: 70%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1PoC · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 25.0%GPT-6 Sol: 66.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBDataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 84.9%GPT-6 Sol: 83.9%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)All-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 48.1%GPT-6 Sol: 36.0%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
IOIIOI 2025 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 100.0%GPT-6 Sol: 79.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 85.4%GPT-6 Sol: 80.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevImage to WebDev · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,753GPT-6 Sol: 1,660LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,574GPT-6 Sol: 1,485LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlDiagram understanding · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,330GPT-6 Sol: 1,303LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchFully Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 18.5%GPT-6 Sol: 2.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchFully Solved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 33.6%GPT-6 Sol: 30.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 66.9%GPT-6 Sol: 50.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Media · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 75.0%GPT-6 Sol: 41.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEngineering Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 22.2%GPT-6 Sol: 22.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Science IndexMysteryMechanism · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 49.6%GPT-6 Sol: 30.2%Vals AIAs of 10/25/2026
Code MigrationCode Quality · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 4.541 / 5GPT-6 Sol: 4.375 / 5Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBDCF · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 70.1%GPT-6 Sol: 63.1%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Comparables · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 45.8%GPT-6 Sol: 40.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
IOIIOI 2026 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 85.2%GPT-6 Sol: 68.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 48.8%GPT-6 Sol: 27.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevReact development · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,860GPT-6 Sol: 1,680LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCoding · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,551GPT-6 Sol: 1,519LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlEnglish · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,284GPT-6 Sol: 1,255LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchRaw Pass Rate · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 87.0%GPT-6 Sol: 81.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026

More comparisons

Compare Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Sol with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  2. 2Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5.5
  3. 3Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  4. 4Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  5. 5Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  6. 6Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  7. 7Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5.1
  8. 8Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  9. 9GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
Show all 78 comparisons
  1. 10GPT-6 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  2. 11Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  3. 12Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  4. 13Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  5. 14Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Kimi K3
  6. 15Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5
  7. 16Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
  8. 17Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3
  9. 18GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  10. 19Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  11. 20Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  12. 21Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.6
  13. 22GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  14. 23Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.6
  15. 24Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  16. 25GPT-6 Astra vs. GPT-6 Sol
  17. 26Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Grok 4.6
  18. 27Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.2
  19. 28Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
  20. 29Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  21. 30Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.5
  22. 31Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Muse Spark 1.3
  23. 32Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.8
  24. 33Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  25. 34GPT-6 Sol vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  26. 35Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  27. 36Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 4
  28. 37Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  29. 38GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  30. 39Claude Opus 4.8 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  31. 40Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.5
  32. 41GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.4
  33. 42GPT-6 Sol vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  34. 43Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  35. 44GPT-6 Sol vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  36. 45Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Grok 4.7
  37. 46GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-6 Luna
  38. 47GPT-6 Sol vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  39. 48Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 3
  40. 49Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  41. 50Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.5
  42. 51Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  43. 52Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5
  44. 53GPT-6 Sol vs. Grok 4.7
  45. 54Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  46. 55GPT-6 Sol vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  47. 56Claude Sonnet 5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  48. 57GPT-6 Sol vs. Kimi K3
  49. 58Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  50. 59Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  51. 60GPT-6 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  52. 61Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Mistral Medium 3.5
  53. 62GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  54. 63Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Muse Wonder Full
  55. 64Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  56. 65Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 4.5
  57. 66Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  58. 67Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra
  59. 68GPT-6 Sol vs. Mistral Large 4
  60. 69GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  61. 70Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.4
  62. 71Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.1
  63. 72GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  64. 73Claude Opus 4.6 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  65. 74GPT-6 Sol vs. Muse Wonder
  66. 75Claude Haiku 4.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  67. 76GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.5
  68. 77GPT-6.1 Terra vs. GPT-6 Sol
  69. 78GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 4 Carbon