- Home
- LLM comparison
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 3
AnthropicMistral AILLM matchup
Claude Opus 5.5vs.Mistral Large 3
Which one is better?
Claude Opus 5.5 performs better than Mistral Large 3, but costs 8 times (input) and 13.3 times (output) as much.
Claude Opus 5.5
Rank 1
Mistral Large 3
Rank 92
Claude Opus 5.5
Mistral Large 3
Claude Opus 5.5
Mistral Large 3
Claude Opus 5.5
Rank 8 of 785
Mistral Large 3
Rank 476 of 785
Choose Claude Opus 5.5 for
Choose Mistral Large 3 for
No clear advantage
On this page
Where is the difference?
Strengths at a glance
Opus 5.5Mistral Large 3Median of all ranked models
95 % range: Opus 5.5 121.2 to 138.7, Mistral Large 3 29.0 to 47.6.
The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the close-up the net starts at 25 points, just below the weaker model's lowest value; the reference group average is 100.
Opus 5.5 is ahead in 10 of 10 areas, Mistral Large 3 in none.
Opus 5.5 ahead: 10
Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.
Show 4 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.
Which model for which task?
Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.
See for yourself: same task, one attempt
The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.
Claude Opus 5.5

Oct 1, 2026 · 33 s · $0.07
Test details
- Run date
- Oct 1, 2026
- API provider
- openrouter
- Requested API model
- anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
- Reasoning setting
- high
- Token limit including reasoning
- 8,192 tokens
- Output tokens
- 3,536 tokens
- Cost of the attempt
- $0.0708
- Response time
- 33.2 s
- API model reported in response
- anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
- Pinned endpoint
- Anthropic | anthropic/claude-opus-5.5-20260921
- Temperature
- Provider default
- Test protocol
- community-visual-tests-v1
- Technical checks
- Passed, not a quality rating
Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.
Mistral Large 3

Oct 1, 2026 · 14 s · $0.0022
Test details
- Run date
- Oct 1, 2026
- API provider
- openrouter
- Requested API model
- mistralai/mistral-large-2512
- Reasoning setting
- not specified
- Token limit including reasoning
- 8,192 tokens
- Output tokens
- 1,451 tokens
- Cost of the attempt
- $0.0022
- Response time
- 14.2 s
- API model reported in response
- mistralai/mistral-large-2512
- Pinned endpoint
- Mistral | mistralai/mistral-large-2512
- Temperature
- Provider default
- Test protocol
- community-visual-tests-v1
- Technical checks
- Passed, not a quality rating
- Reasoning (model default)
- no reasoning mode Source
Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.
Earlier attempts (1)
- Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: not specified
SVG short test
SVG short test
One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.
Prompt
Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.
Claude Opus 5.5
Unavailable in this round
Mistral Large 3
API request failed. The model was not evaluated.
Claude Opus 5.5 and Mistral Large 3 in the overall index
Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.
Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v4)
20 of 92 models
5 models in this view are measured at a lower reasoning effort than max in the overall index. Dashed column: lower reasoning effort than the top.
Popularity compared
How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.
Claude Opus 5.5 is more popular than Mistral Large 3: 68 to 32 out of 100.
Over time
Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 7, 2026
Claude Opus 5.5Mistral Large 3
All data side by side
The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 | Mistral Large 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | ||
| Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better | 126.1 | 38.8 |
| Rank | Rank 1 of 92 | Rank 92 of 92 |
| Price per 1M tokens | ||
| Inputwhat you send | $4 | $0.50 |
| Outputwhat the model writes | $20 | $1.50 |
| Cost per task (own tests)average of 1 original-protocol task both models passed (SVG short test not included) | $0.071 | $0.002 |
| Speed | ||
| Tokens per second | 106 | 78 |
| Popularity | ||
| Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 100 | 68Rank 8 of 785 | 32Rank 476 of 785 |
| Technical | ||
| Context windowhow much text the model reads at once | 1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages | 262,144 tokens≈ 390 A4 pages |
| Knowledge cutoff | June 2026 | n/a |
| Released | Sep 22, 2026 | Dec 2, 2025 |
| Availability | Active | Active |
| Open weights | no | yes |
Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis
Is there a better choice?
Overall index 106.6, rank 17$0.15 input and $0.60 output per 1M tokens
Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Shared benchmarks
Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.
A: Claude Opus 5.5B: Mistral Large 3
Show 27 more benchmarks
More comparisons
Compare Claude Opus 5.5 and Mistral Large 3 with the models people compare them with most often.
Compare another matchup
Predecessor and successor
The most popular comparisons
- 1Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra
- 2Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5.5
- 3Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
- 4Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
- 5Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Argon
- 6Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
- 7Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5.1
- 8Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- 9Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
Show all 51 comparisons
- 10Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
- 11Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
- 12Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Kimi K3
- 13Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5
- 14Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
- 15Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3
- 16Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
- 17Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
- 18Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.6
- 19Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.6
- 20Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
- 21Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Grok 4.6
- 22Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.2
- 23Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
- 24Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
- 25Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.5
- 26Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Muse Spark 1.3
- 27Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.8
- 28Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
- 29Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 4
- 30Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
- 31Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.5
- 32Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 33Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Grok 4.7
- 34Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
- 35Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.5
- 36Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5
- 37Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
- 38GLM-5.3 vs. Mistral Large 3
- 39Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
- 40Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Mistral Medium 3.5
- 41Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Muse Wonder Full
- 42Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 4.5
- 43Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
- 44Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra
- 45Mistral Large 4 vs. Mistral Large 3
- 46Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.4
- 47Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.1
- 48Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 3
- 49DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. Mistral Large 3
- 50DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs. Mistral Large 3
- 51DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. Mistral Large 3