Skip to main content

AnthropicZ.aiLLM matchup

Claude Opus 5.5vs.GLM-5.3-Flash

Which one is better?

Claude Opus 5.5 performs better than GLM-5.3-Flash, but costs 26.7 times (input) and 40 times (output) as much.

Opus 5.5 ahead
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
126.1

Claude Opus 5.5

Rank 1

94.2

GLM-5.3-Flash

Rank 37

Opus 5.5 faster
SpeedTokens per second
106

Claude Opus 5.5

56

GLM-5.3-Flash

GLM-5.3-Flash cheaper
Price$ per 1M tokens
$8

Claude Opus 5.5

$0.24

GLM-5.3-Flash

Opus 5.5 more popular
Popularity0 to 100
68

Claude Opus 5.5

Rank 8 of 785

44

GLM-5.3-Flash

Rank 202 of 785

Choose Claude Opus 5.5 for

KnowledgeMathematicsReasoningGeneralCodingMultimodalEducationCybersecurityAgentsHealthLegalFinance

Choose GLM-5.3-Flash for

No clear advantage

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

Opus 5.5GLM-5.3-FlashMedian of all ranked models

10012014080CodingOpus 5.5ReasoningOpus 5.5MathematicsOpus 5.5KnowledgeOpus 5.5AgentsOpus 5.5GeneralOpus 5.5MultimodalOpus 5.5FinanceOpus 5.5LegalOpus 5.5HealthOpus 5.5
CodingOpus 5.5 ahead
Opus 5.5129.9Rank 1
GLM-5.3-Flash96.8Rank 38
Median of ranked models84.1

95 % range: Opus 5.5 121.2 to 138.7, GLM-5.3-Flash 91.3 to 102.2.

AreaOpus 5.5GLM-5.3-Flash

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the close-up the net starts at 80 points, just below the weaker model's lowest value; the reference group average is 100.

Opus 5.5 is ahead in 10 of 10 areas, GLM-5.3-Flash in none.

Opus 5.5 ahead: 10

Areas in the overall index
KnowledgeOpus 5.5 +43131.4 to 88.8
MathematicsOpus 5.5 +40131.8 to 91.3
ReasoningOpus 5.5 +35122.5 to 87.7
GeneralOpus 5.5 +34125.1 to 91.1
CodingOpus 5.5 +33129.9 to 96.8
MultimodalOpus 5.5 +27123.1 to 96.2
AgentsOpus 5.5 +23117.2 to 93.7
Specialist fields
HealthOpus 5.5 +23122.1 to 99.3
LegalOpus 5.5 +22121.5 to 99.4
FinanceOpus 5.5 +21121.4 to 100.1

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 4 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
EducationOpus 5.5 +25127.0 to 101.8
CybersecurityOpus 5.5 +25120.5 to 96.0
Searchonly Opus 5.5 has a score
Productivityonly Opus 5.5 has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash at the same effort

Both models measured at the same reasoning efforts. This shows whether a lead comes from the model or only from more compute.

maxOpus 5.5 ahead
Opus 5.5 126.1 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash 94.2 · Gap 26.9 · Test series 13
Overall index (max vs. max)Opus 5.5 ahead
Opus 5.5 126.1 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash 94.2

Gap and verdict compare only the Artificial Analysis test series in which both models are measured at that effort. Tied below 3 points, ahead only beyond two standard errors. The single values rest on all test series of each model, so their difference can deviate from the gap.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeOpus 5.5Coding 129.9 to 96.8
Maths and data analysisOpus 5.5Mathematics 131.8 to 91.3, Reasoning 122.5 to 87.7
Facts and researchOpus 5.5Knowledge 131.4 to 88.8, Search without a score for GLM-5.3-Flash
Agents and workflowsOpus 5.5Agents 117.2 to 93.7
Fast chat repliesOpus 5.5106 to 56 tokens per second
Security analysisOpus 5.5Cybersecurity 120.5 to 96.0
Many requests on a small budgetGLM-5.3-Flash$8 to $0.24 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsOpus 5.5Finance 121.4 to 100.1, Legal 121.5 to 99.4, Health 122.1 to 99.3
Images, screenshots and PDFsOpus 5.5Multimodal 123.1 to 96.2

See for yourself: same task, one attempt

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

Claude Opus 5.5

Claude Opus 5.5: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 33 s · $0.07

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
3,536 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0708
Response time
33.2 s
API model reported in response
anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Pinned endpoint
Anthropic | anthropic/claude-opus-5.5-20260921
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

GLM-5.3-Flash

GLM-5.3-Flash: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 50 s · $0.0013

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
z-ai/glm-5.3-flash
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
2,563 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0013
Response time
49.7 s
API model reported in response
z-ai/glm-5.3-flash
Pinned endpoint
Z.AI | z-ai/glm-5.3-flash-20260826
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Earlier attempts (1)

  • Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

Claude Opus 5.5

Unavailable in this round

GLM-5.3-Flash

Unavailable in this round

Claude Opus 5.5 and GLM-5.3-Flash in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v4)

20 of 92 models

4 models in this view are measured at a lower reasoning effort than max in the overall index. Dashed column: lower reasoning effort than the top.

Claude Opus 5.5max126.1
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh125.8
Claude Fable 5.1max123.8
Claude Sonnet 5.5max122.8
Gemini 4 Argonhigh122.3
GPT-6 Astramax121.3
GPT-6.1 Solmax119.2
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.3
Claude Opus 5max117.2
Muse Wondermax113.4
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.9
Claude Fable 5max112.5
GPT-6 Solmax110.5
GPT-5.6 Solmax108.7
Muse Spark 1.3max107.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max106.6
Gemini 3.8 Flashhigh106.5
GPT-6.1 Terramax105.3
GLM-5.3-Flashmax94.2

Popularity compared

How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.

Claude Opus 5.5 is more popular than GLM-5.3-Flash: 68 to 44 out of 100.

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 7, 2026

Claude Opus 5.5GLM-5.3-Flash

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricClaude Opus 5.5GLM-5.3-Flash
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better126.194.2
RankRank 1 of 92Rank 37 of 92
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$4$0.15
Outputwhat the model writes$20$0.50
Cost per task (own tests)average of 3 original-protocol tasks both models passed (SVG short test not included)$0.11$0.005
Speed
Tokens per second10656
Popularity
Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 10068Rank 8 of 78544Rank 202 of 785
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffJune 2026n/a
ReleasedSep 22, 2026Aug 26, 2026
AvailabilityActiveOpen Source
Open weightsnoyes

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

Cheaper than GLM-5.3-FlashClaude Haiku 5.5

Overall index 103.4, rank 20$0.10 input and $0.50 output per 1M tokens

Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: Claude Opus 5.5B: GLM-5.3-Flash

Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 66.6%GLM-5.3-Flash: 20.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Code Migration v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 81.0%GLM-5.3-Flash: 51.6%Vals AIAs of 10/30/2026
CyberBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 55.4%GLM-5.3-Flash: 67.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 75.9%GLM-5.3-Flash: 55.9%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMB v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 75.8%GLM-5.3-Flash: 66.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 58.6%GLM-5.3-Flash: 57.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Finance Agent v2.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 67.8%GLM-5.3-Flash: 60.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
HLAB-Vals-1.1Overall · Task fully resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 9.2%GLM-5.3-Flash: 10.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
IOIOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 95.1%GLM-5.3-Flash: 52.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 50.5%GLM-5.3-Flash: 45.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,810GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,607LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,509GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,477LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,293GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,271LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 91.4%GLM-5.3-Flash: 88.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 18.5%GLM-5.3-Flash: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ProofBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 100%GLM-5.3-Flash: 21%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
SAGEOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 91.3%GLM-5.3-Flash: 89.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 33.6%GLM-5.3-Flash: 0.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 45.6%GLM-5.3-Flash: 31.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65.2%GLM-5.3-Flash: 37.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 47.1%GLM-5.3-Flash: 2.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Finance IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65.6%GLM-5.3-Flash: 55.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 70.2%GLM-5.3-Flash: 50.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Legal IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 72.3%GLM-5.3-Flash: 71.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Router IndexFull Index · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 64.2%GLM-5.3-Flash: 50.9%Vals AIAs of 11/03/2026
Vibe Code Bench 1-100Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 30.4%GLM-5.3-Flash: 16.0%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 90.3%GLM-5.3-Flash: 30.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65.5%GLM-5.3-Flash: 7.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Code Migration v1.1CLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 78.4%GLM-5.3-Flash: 38.7%Vals AIAs of 10/30/2026
CyberBench v1.1Patch · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 85.7%GLM-5.3-Flash: 85.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 76.4%GLM-5.3-Flash: 44.6%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMB v1.1Comps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 75.7%GLM-5.3-Flash: 67.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 54.5%GLM-5.3-Flash: 53.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Finance Agent v2.1Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 67.1%GLM-5.3-Flash: 57.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
HLAB-Vals-1.1Antitrust Competition · Criteria passed · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 88.4%GLM-5.3-Flash: 92.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
IOIIOI 2024 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 100.0%GLM-5.3-Flash: 53.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65.2%GLM-5.3-Flash: 57.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevHTML development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,753GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,577LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,495GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,470LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlCreative writing with images · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,287GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,242LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65%GLM-5.3-Flash: 7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SAGEComputer Science · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 92.8%GLM-5.3-Flash: 91.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchCapability Score · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 53.6%GLM-5.3-Flash: 6.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 30%GLM-5.3-Flash: 10%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Hardware · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 60%GLM-5.3-Flash: 20%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEarth Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 37.5%GLM-5.3-Flash: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Finance IndexEMB v1.1 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 75.8%GLM-5.3-Flash: 66.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals IndexCode Migration v1.1 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 80.5%GLM-5.3-Flash: 50.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Legal IndexBusiness & Commercial · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 69.2%GLM-5.3-Flash: 67.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Router IndexCode Migration · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 47.5%GLM-5.3-Flash: 50.6%Vals AIAs of 11/03/2026
Code MigrationCOBOL · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 70%GLM-5.3-Flash: 60%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Code Migration v1.1COBOL · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 89.0%GLM-5.3-Flash: 90.5%Vals AIAs of 10/30/2026
CyberBench v1.1PoC · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 25%GLM-5.3-Flash: 50%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBDataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 84.9%GLM-5.3-Flash: 65.7%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMB v1.1Dataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 86.2%GLM-5.3-Flash: 80.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent (v2)All-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 48.1%GLM-5.3-Flash: 46.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Finance Agent v2.1All-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 56.3%GLM-5.3-Flash: 47.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
HLAB-Vals-1.1Antitrust Competition · Task fully resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 0%GLM-5.3-Flash: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
IOIIOI 2025 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 100.0%GLM-5.3-Flash: 56.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 85.4%GLM-5.3-Flash: 90.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevImage to WebDev · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,753GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,578LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,574GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,530LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlDiagram understanding · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,330GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,306LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchFully Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 18.5%GLM-5.3-Flash: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026

More comparisons

Compare Claude Opus 5.5 and GLM-5.3-Flash with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  2. 2Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5.5
  3. 3Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  4. 4Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  5. 5Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  6. 6Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  7. 7Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5.1
  8. 8Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  9. 9Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
Show all 78 comparisons
  1. 10Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  2. 11Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Kimi K3
  3. 12Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5
  4. 13Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
  5. 14Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3
  6. 15GPT-6 Luna vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  7. 16Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  8. 17Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  9. 18Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.6
  10. 19Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.6
  11. 20Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  12. 21DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  13. 22Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  14. 23Grok 4.7 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  15. 24Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Grok 4.6
  16. 25Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.2
  17. 26GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  18. 27Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
  19. 28Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  20. 29Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.5
  21. 30Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Muse Spark 1.3
  22. 31Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.8
  23. 32DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  24. 33Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  25. 34GPT-5.4 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  26. 35Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  27. 36Claude Opus 5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  28. 37GPT-6 Sol vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  29. 38DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  30. 39Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 4
  31. 40Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  32. 41GLM-5.3-Flash vs. Mistral Large 4
  33. 42GLM-5.3-Flash vs. GLM-5.3
  34. 43Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.5
  35. 44GPT-6 Astra vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  36. 45Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  37. 46GPT-5.6 Sol vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  38. 47Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  39. 48Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Grok 4.7
  40. 49Claude Opus 4.6 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  41. 50Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 3
  42. 51Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  43. 52Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.5
  44. 53Claude Opus 4.8 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  45. 54Kimi K3 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  46. 55Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5
  47. 56Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  48. 57Claude Haiku 4.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  49. 58Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  50. 59Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Mistral Medium 3.5
  51. 60Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Muse Wonder Full
  52. 61Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  53. 62Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 4.5
  54. 63GLM-5.3-Flash vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  55. 64Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  56. 65DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  57. 66Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  58. 67Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra
  59. 68Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.4
  60. 69Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.1
  61. 70GLM-5.3-Flash vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  62. 71GLM-5.3-Flash vs. MiMo-V2.5-Pro
  63. 72GLM-5.3-Flash vs. GLM-5.2
  64. 73GPT-5.6 Luna vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  65. 74GPT-5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  66. 75Grok 4.3 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  67. 76Kimi K3.1 Pro vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  68. 77GPT-6.1 Terra vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  69. 78Gemini 4 Argon vs. GLM-5.3-Flash