Skip to main content

OpenAIZ.aiLLM matchup

GPT-6.1 Solvs.GLM-5.3-Flash

Which one is better?

GPT-6.1 Sol performs better than GLM-5.3-Flash, but costs 13.3 times (input) and 20 times (output) as much.

GPT-6.1 Sol ahead
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
117.5

GPT-6.1 Sol

Rank 9

94.3

GLM-5.3-Flash

Rank 43

GLM-5.3-Flash faster
SpeedTokens per second
54

GPT-6.1 Sol

94

GLM-5.3-Flash

GLM-5.3-Flash cheaper
Price$ per 1M tokens
$4

GPT-6.1 Sol

$0.24

GLM-5.3-Flash

Popularity0 to 100
n/a

GPT-6.1 Sol

85

GLM-5.3-Flash

Rank 7 of 485

Above 272,000 tokens of context, GPT-6.1 Sol costs more: $4 input and $15 output per 1M tokens.

Choose GPT-6.1 Sol for

KnowledgeReasoningMathematicsGeneralCodingMultimodalAgentsEducationLegal (not certain)Finance (not certain)

No clear advantage for GLM-5.3-Flash.

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

GPT-6.1 SolGLM-5.3-FlashMedian of all ranked models

10012014080CodingGPT-6.1 SolReasoningGPT-6.1 SolMathematicsGPT-6.1 SolKnowledgeGPT-6.1 SolAgentsGPT-6.1 SolGeneralGPT-6.1 SolMultimodalGPT-6.1 SolFinanceslightlyGPT-6.1 SolLegalslightlyGPT-6.1 Sol
CodingGPT-6.1 Sol ahead
GPT-6.1 Sol120.6Rank 8
GLM-5.3-Flash97.0Rank 44
Median of ranked models87.5

95 % range: GPT-6.1 Sol 113.7 to 127.5, GLM-5.3-Flash 91.3 to 102.6.

AreaGPT-6.1 SolGLM-5.3-Flash

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the close-up the net starts at 80 points, just below the weaker model's lowest value; the reference group average is 100. Not in the net because a model has no own value there or the data are too thin: Health.

GPT-6.1 Sol is ahead in 7 of 10 areas, GLM-5.3-Flash in none.

GPT-6.1 Sol ahead: 7GPT-6.1 Sol slightly ahead: 2too little data: 1

Areas in the overall index
KnowledgeGPT-6.1 Sol +37123.7 to 87.1
ReasoningGPT-6.1 Sol +36122.7 to 86.8
MathematicsGPT-6.1 Sol +33124.1 to 91.0
GeneralGPT-6.1 Sol +28119.0 to 91.4
CodingGPT-6.1 Sol +24120.6 to 97.0
MultimodalGPT-6.1 Sol +21118.0 to 97.1
AgentsGPT-6.1 Sol +19112.0 to 93.0
Specialist fields
Legalleaning GPT-6.1 Solnot certain · 3 tests each
Financeleaning GPT-6.1 Solnot certain · 5 and 6 tests
Healthtoo little data110.2 to 102.0

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 4 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
EducationGPT-6.1 Sol +15119.9 to 104.9
Cybersecuritytoo little data93.0 to 97.0
Searchonly GPT-6.1 Sol has a score
Productivityonly GPT-6.1 Sol has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GLM-5.3-Flash at the same effort

Both models measured at the same reasoning efforts. This shows whether a lead comes from the model or only from more compute.

maxGPT-6.1 Sol ahead
25.1 points gap across 12 shared test series
Overall index (max vs. max)GPT-6.1 Sol ahead
GPT-6.1 Sol 117.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash 94.3

The gap compares only the Artificial Analysis test series in which both models are measured at that effort. Tied below 3 points, ahead only beyond two standard errors.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeGPT-6.1 SolCoding 120.6 to 97.0
Maths and data analysisGPT-6.1 SolMathematics 124.1 to 91.0, Reasoning 122.7 to 86.8
Facts and researchGPT-6.1 SolKnowledge 123.7 to 87.1, Search without a score for GLM-5.3-Flash
Agents and workflowsGPT-6.1 SolAgents 112.0 to 93.0
Fast chat repliesGLM-5.3-Flash54 to 94 tokens per second
Security analysisopenCybersecurity 93.0 to 97.0 (too little data)
Many requests on a small budgetGLM-5.3-Flash$4 to $0.24 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsleaning GPT-6.1 SolFinance 105.8 to 100.4, Legal 107.0 to 101.0, Health 110.2 to 102.0 (too little data)
Images, screenshots and PDFsGPT-6.1 SolMultimodal 118.0 to 97.1

GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GLM-5.3-Flash in our own test

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

GPT-6.1 Sol

GPT-6.1 Sol: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 84 s · $0.04

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
openai/gpt-6.1-sol
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
3,583 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0359
Response time
83.6 s
API model reported in response
openai/gpt-6.1-sol
Pinned endpoint
OpenAI | openai/gpt-6.1-sol-20260929
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

GLM-5.3-Flash

GLM-5.3-Flash: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 50 s · $0.0013

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
z-ai/glm-5.3-flash
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
2,563 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0013
Response time
49.7 s
API model reported in response
z-ai/glm-5.3-flash
Pinned endpoint
Z.AI | z-ai/glm-5.3-flash-20260826
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Earlier attempts (1)

  • Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

GPT-6.1 Sol

Unavailable in this round

GLM-5.3-Flash

Unavailable in this round

GPT-6.1 Sol and GLM-5.3-Flash in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v5)

20 of 95 models

Claude Fable 5.2max130.9
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh127.0
Claude Opus 5.5max125.7
Claude Fable 5.1max124.1
Claude Sonnet 5.5max121.9
Gemini 4 Argonhigh121.2
GPT-6 Astramax119.6
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.4
GPT-6.1 Solmax117.5
Claude Opus 5max117.3
Muse Wondermax113.7
Claude Fable 5max112.8
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.6
Muse Ember 1.0max110.5
GPT-5.6 Solmax109.3
GPT-6 Solmax108.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.7
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max107.1
GPT-6.1 Terramax106.5
GLM-5.3-Flashmax94.3

Popularity compared

How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.

GPT-6.1 Sol has no popularity score yet.

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 14, 2026

GPT-6.1 SolGLM-5.3-Flash

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricGPT-6.1 SolGLM-5.3-Flash
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better117.594.3
RankRank 9 of 95Rank 43 of 95
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$2above 272,000 tokens: $4$0.15
Outputwhat the model writes$10above 272,000 tokens: $15$0.50
Cost per task (own tests)average of 3 original-protocol tasks both models passed (SVG short test not included)$0.044$0.005
Speed
Tokens per second5494
Popularity
Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 100n/a85Rank 7 of 485
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1.05 M tokens≈ 1,580 A4 pages1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffApr 30, 2026n/a
ReleasedSep 29, 2026Aug 26, 2026
AvailabilityActiveOpen Source
Open weightsnoyes

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

Cheaper than GLM-5.3-FlashMuse Ember 1.0

Overall index 110.5, rank 14$0.10 input and $0.50 output per 1M tokens

View profile
Best model in the overall indexClaude Fable 5.2

Overall index 130.9, rank 1$8 input and $40 output per 1M tokens

GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Claude Fable 5.2

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: GPT-6.1 SolB: GLM-5.3-Flash

Access to Justice BenchmarkOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 65.8%GLM-5.3-Flash: 71.1%Vals AIAs of 11/10/2026
Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 65.1%GLM-5.3-Flash: 20.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Code Migration v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 77.3%GLM-5.3-Flash: 51.6%Vals AIAs of 10/30/2026
CyberBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 39.3%GLM-5.3-Flash: 67.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 70.8%GLM-5.3-Flash: 55.9%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMB v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 71.1%GLM-5.3-Flash: 66.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 52.0%GLM-5.3-Flash: 57.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Finance Agent v2.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 61.8%GLM-5.3-Flash: 60.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
HLAB-Vals-1.1Overall · Task fully resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 6.3%GLM-5.3-Flash: 10.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
IOIOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 96.9%GLM-5.3-Flash: 52.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 38.5%GLM-5.3-Flash: 45.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,743GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,609LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,481GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,475LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,293GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,272LMArenaAs of 11/09/2026
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 86.5%GLM-5.3-Flash: 88.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 3%GLM-5.3-Flash: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ProofBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 99%GLM-5.3-Flash: 21%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
SAGEOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 90.5%GLM-5.3-Flash: 89.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 50.8%GLM-5.3-Flash: 0.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 21.8%GLM-5.3-Flash: 31.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 55.1%GLM-5.3-Flash: 37.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 52.9%GLM-5.3-Flash: 2.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Finance IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 55.8%GLM-5.3-Flash: 55.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 63.9%GLM-5.3-Flash: 50.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Legal IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 68.7%GLM-5.3-Flash: 71.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Router IndexFull Index · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 63.9%GLM-5.3-Flash: 50.9%Vals AIAs of 11/03/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 88.9%GLM-5.3-Flash: 30.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 63.5%GLM-5.3-Flash: 7.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Code Migration v1.1CLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 74.8%GLM-5.3-Flash: 38.7%Vals AIAs of 10/30/2026
CyberBench v1.1Patch · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 78.6%GLM-5.3-Flash: 85.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 61.8%GLM-5.3-Flash: 44.6%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMB v1.1Comps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 61.2%GLM-5.3-Flash: 67.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 44.7%GLM-5.3-Flash: 53.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Finance Agent v2.1Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 54.7%GLM-5.3-Flash: 57.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
HLAB-Vals-1.1Antitrust Competition · Criteria passed · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 90.8%GLM-5.3-Flash: 92.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
IOIIOI 2024 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 100.0%GLM-5.3-Flash: 53.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 53.0%GLM-5.3-Flash: 57.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevHTML development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,794GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,576LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,480GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,471LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,348GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,334LMArenaAs of 11/09/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 46%GLM-5.3-Flash: 7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SAGEComputer Science · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 92.4%GLM-5.3-Flash: 91.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchCapability Score · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 56.3%GLM-5.3-Flash: 6.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 6.7%GLM-5.3-Flash: 10.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Hardware · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 40%GLM-5.3-Flash: 20%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEarth Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 62.5%GLM-5.3-Flash: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Finance IndexEMB v1.1 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 71.1%GLM-5.3-Flash: 66.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals IndexCode Migration v1.1 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 75.1%GLM-5.3-Flash: 50.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Legal IndexBusiness & Commercial · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 65.6%GLM-5.3-Flash: 67.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Router IndexCode Migration · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 75.1%GLM-5.3-Flash: 50.6%Vals AIAs of 11/03/2026
Code MigrationCOBOL · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 70%GLM-5.3-Flash: 60%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Code Migration v1.1COBOL · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 85.0%GLM-5.3-Flash: 90.5%Vals AIAs of 10/30/2026
CyberBench v1.1PoC · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 0%GLM-5.3-Flash: 50%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBDataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 84.5%GLM-5.3-Flash: 65.7%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMB v1.1Dataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 86.5%GLM-5.3-Flash: 80.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent (v2)All-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 39.9%GLM-5.3-Flash: 46.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Finance Agent v2.1All-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 48.2%GLM-5.3-Flash: 47.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
HLAB-Vals-1.1Antitrust Competition · Task fully resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 10%GLM-5.3-Flash: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
IOIIOI 2025 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 100.0%GLM-5.3-Flash: 56.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 85.5%GLM-5.3-Flash: 90.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevImage to WebDev · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,696GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,582LMArenaAs of 11/10/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,531GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,529LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlCreative writing with images · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,303GLM-5.3-Flash: 1,246LMArenaAs of 11/09/2026
ProgramBenchFully Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 3%GLM-5.3-Flash: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026

More comparisons

Compare GPT-6.1 Sol and GLM-5.3-Flash with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  2. 2Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  3. 3GPT-6 Luna vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  4. 4Grok 4.7 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  5. 5Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  6. 6GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  7. 7DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  8. 8GLM-5.3-Flash vs. GLM-5.3
  9. 9Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
Show all 76 comparisons
  1. 10DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  2. 11GLM-5.3-Flash vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  3. 12Claude Opus 5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  4. 13GPT-6 Sol vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  5. 14GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-6.1 Terra
  6. 15GPT-6 Astra vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  7. 16GPT-5.6 Sol vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  8. 17Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  9. 18Claude Opus 4.6 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  10. 19GPT-5.4 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  11. 20Claude Opus 4.8 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  12. 21GLM-5.3-Flash vs. Mistral Large 4
  13. 22Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  14. 23Kimi K3 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  15. 24GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-6 Astra
  16. 25DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  17. 26GLM-5.3-Flash vs. GLM-5.2
  18. 27GPT-5.6 Luna vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  19. 28GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  20. 29Claude Haiku 4.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  21. 30GLM-5.3-Flash vs. MiMo-V2.5-Pro
  22. 31GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  23. 32Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  24. 33Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  25. 34Claude Fable 5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  26. 35Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  27. 36GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-6 Luna
  28. 37GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
  29. 38GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  30. 39Claude Opus 4.7 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  31. 40Claude Opus 4.8 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  32. 41Grok 4.3 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  33. 42GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  34. 43GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  35. 44GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  36. 45GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.4 mini
  37. 46Kimi K3.1 Pro vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  38. 47GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.4
  39. 48GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  40. 49GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  41. 50Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  42. 51Claude Opus 4.6 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  43. 52GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  44. 53GPT-6.1 Terra vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  45. 54Claude Sonnet 5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  46. 55Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  47. 56GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.5
  48. 57Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  49. 58GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Grok 4.7
  50. 59Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  51. 60GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  52. 61Claude Opus 4.7 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  53. 62GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GLM-5.3
  54. 63Gemini 4 Argon vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  55. 64Claude Fable 5.2 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  56. 65GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
  57. 66GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  58. 67Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  59. 68GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  60. 69GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  61. 70GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Kimi K3
  62. 71Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  63. 72GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  64. 73Muse Wonder Full vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  65. 74GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Muse Wonder
  66. 75Claude Haiku 4.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  67. 76Claude Opus 4.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol