Skip to main content

OpenAIGoogleLLM matchup

GPT-6.1 Solvs.Gemini 3.5 Flash

Which one is better?

GPT-6.1 Sol performs better than Gemini 3.5 Flash.

GPT-6.1 Sol ahead
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
117.5

GPT-6.1 Sol

Rank 9

96.4

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Rank 39

Gemini 3.5 Flash faster
SpeedTokens per second
54

GPT-6.1 Sol

144

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Price$ per 1M tokens
$4

GPT-6.1 Sol

n/a

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Above 272,000 tokens of context, GPT-6.1 Sol costs more: $4 input and $15 output per 1M tokens.

Choose GPT-6.1 Sol for

GeneralMathematicsCodingReasoningKnowledgeMultimodalAgentsLegalProductivityFinanceHealth (not certain)

No clear advantage for Gemini 3.5 Flash.

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

GPT-6.1 SolGemini 3.5 FlashMedian of all ranked models

10012014080CodingGPT-6.1 SolReasoningGPT-6.1 SolMathematicsGPT-6.1 SolKnowledgeGPT-6.1 SolAgentsGPT-6.1 SolGeneralGPT-6.1 SolMultimodalGPT-6.1 SolFinanceGPT-6.1 SolLegalGPT-6.1 SolHealthslightlyGPT-6.1 Sol
CodingGPT-6.1 Sol ahead
GPT-6.1 Sol120.6Rank 8
Gemini 3.5 Flash89.7Rank 55
Median of ranked models87.5

95 % range: GPT-6.1 Sol 113.7 to 127.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash 84.0 to 95.4.

AreaGPT-6.1 SolGemini 3.5 Flash

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the close-up the net starts at 80 points, just below the weaker model's lowest value; the reference group average is 100.

GPT-6.1 Sol is ahead in 9 of 10 areas, Gemini 3.5 Flash in none.

GPT-6.1 Sol ahead: 9GPT-6.1 Sol slightly ahead: 1

Areas in the overall index
GeneralGPT-6.1 Sol +33119.0 to 85.7
MathematicsGPT-6.1 Sol +32124.1 to 92.4
CodingGPT-6.1 Sol +31120.6 to 89.7
ReasoningGPT-6.1 Sol +28122.7 to 95.2
KnowledgeGPT-6.1 Sol +16123.7 to 107.6
MultimodalGPT-6.1 Sol +14118.0 to 104.0
AgentsGPT-6.1 Sol +14112.0 to 98.0
Specialist fields
LegalGPT-6.1 Sol +14107.0 to 93.2
FinanceGPT-6.1 Sol +8105.8 to 98.2
Healthleaning GPT-6.1 Solnot certain · 2 tests each

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 4 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
ProductivityGPT-6.1 Sol +12100.7 to 89.1
Cybersecurityonly GPT-6.1 Sol has a score
Searchonly GPT-6.1 Sol has a score
Educationonly GPT-6.1 Sol has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeGPT-6.1 SolCoding 120.6 to 89.7
Maths and data analysisGPT-6.1 SolMathematics 124.1 to 92.4, Reasoning 122.7 to 95.2
Facts and researchGPT-6.1 SolKnowledge 123.7 to 107.6, Search without a score for Gemini 3.5 Flash
Agents and workflowsGPT-6.1 SolAgents 112.0 to 98.0
Fast chat repliesGemini 3.5 Flash54 to 144 tokens per second
Security analysisopenCybersecurity without a score for Gemini 3.5 Flash
Finance, legal and medical textsGPT-6.1 SolFinance 105.8 to 98.2, Legal 107.0 to 93.2, Health 110.2 to 99.0
Images, screenshots and PDFsGPT-6.1 SolMultimodal 118.0 to 104.0

GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash in our own test

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

GPT-6.1 Sol

GPT-6.1 Sol: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 84 s · $0.04

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
openai/gpt-6.1-sol
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
3,583 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0359
Response time
83.6 s
API model reported in response
openai/gpt-6.1-sol
Pinned endpoint
OpenAI | openai/gpt-6.1-sol-20260929
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Gemini 3.5 Flash

The response reached the token limit. No complete recording is available.

Oct 6, 2026 · 32 s · $0.07

Not yet visually reviewed. A successful recording does not confirm correct physics or full compliance with the prompt.

Test details
Run date
Oct 6, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
google/gemini-3.5-flash
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
8,188 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0737
Response time
31.7 s
API model reported in response
google/gemini-3.5-flash
Pinned endpoint
Google AI Studio | google/gemini-3.5-flash-20260519
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Failed

Earlier attempts (3)

  • Oct 2, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
  • Oct 1, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
  • Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

GPT-6.1 Sol

Unavailable in this round

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Unavailable in this round

GPT-6.1 Sol and Gemini 3.5 Flash in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v5)

20 of 95 models

Claude Fable 5.2max130.9
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh127.0
Claude Opus 5.5max125.7
Claude Fable 5.1max124.1
Claude Sonnet 5.5max121.9
Gemini 4 Argonhigh121.2
GPT-6 Astramax119.6
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.4
GPT-6.1 Solmax117.5
Claude Opus 5max117.3
Muse Wondermax113.7
Claude Fable 5max112.8
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.6
Muse Ember 1.0max110.5
GPT-5.6 Solmax109.3
GPT-6 Solmax108.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.7
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max107.1
GPT-6.1 Terramax106.5
Gemini 3.5 Flashhigh96.4

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricGPT-6.1 SolGemini 3.5 Flash
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better117.596.4
RankRank 9 of 95Rank 39 of 95
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$2above 272,000 tokens: $4n/a
Outputwhat the model writes$10above 272,000 tokens: $15n/a
Cost per task (own tests)average of 2 original-protocol tasks both models passed (SVG short test not included)$0.047$0.12
Speed
Tokens per second54144
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1.05 M tokens≈ 1,580 A4 pages1.05 M tokens≈ 1,570 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffApr 30, 2026n/a
ReleasedSep 29, 2026May 19, 2026
AvailabilityActiveDiscontinued
Open weightsnono

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

Successor of Gemini 3.5 FlashGemini 3.6 Flash

Overall index 97.2, rank 38$0.75 input and $3.75 output per 1M tokens

GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
Best model in the overall indexClaude Fable 5.2

Overall index 130.9, rank 1$8 input and $40 output per 1M tokens

GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Claude Fable 5.2

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: GPT-6.1 SolB: Gemini 3.5 Flash

Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 65.1%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 26.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 70.8%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 63.5%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 52.0%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 57.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Financial Coaching BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 68.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 63.0%Vals AIAs of 11/13/2026
GDPval-AAOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,520.5 eloGemini 3.5 Flash: 1,211.6 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 38.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 30.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,743Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,500LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,481Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,478LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,293Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,281LMArenaAs of 11/09/2026
MedCodeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 48.8%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 55.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 86.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 76.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MMMU-ProOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 84.9%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 84.3%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 3%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ProofBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 99%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 31%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Public Benefits Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 59.3%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 59.5%Vals AIAs of 10/12/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 21.8%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 21.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 55.1%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 6.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 52.9%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 5.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 88.9%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 48.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 63.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 17.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 61.8%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 69.8%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 44.7%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 54.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Financial Coaching BenchElicitation · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 59.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 49.7%Vals AIAs of 11/13/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 53.0%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 43.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevHTML development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,794Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,512LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,480Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,468LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,348Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,341LMArenaAs of 11/09/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 46.0%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 6.7%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 3.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Hardware · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 40.0%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 6.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEarth Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 62.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 25.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCOBOL · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 70.0%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 55.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBDataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 84.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 80.9%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)All-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 39.9%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Financial Coaching BenchLength-Controlled · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 69.9%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 62.3%Vals AIAs of 11/13/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 85.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 87.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevImage to WebDev · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,696Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,500LMArenaAs of 11/10/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,531Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,514LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlCreative writing with images · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,303Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,272LMArenaAs of 11/09/2026
ProgramBenchFully Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 3%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 64.8%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 34.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Media · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 50%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEngineering Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 33.3%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCode Quality · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 4.496 / 5Gemini 3.5 Flash: 2.789 / 5Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBDCF · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 65.3%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 58.4%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Comparables · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 42.6%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 48.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 39.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 27.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevReact development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,747Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,495LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCoding · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,540Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,508LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlDiagram understanding · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,327Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,307LMArenaAs of 11/09/2026
ProgramBenchRaw Pass Rate · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 85.3%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 56.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 33.3%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 26.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0ML · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 54.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 6.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceLife Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 47.4%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 5.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBLBO · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 64.4%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 46.5%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Disclosure Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 58.4%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 63.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 84.2%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 84.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevWeb development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,743Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,500LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCreative writing · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,449Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,465LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlEnglish · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,287Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,277LMArenaAs of 11/09/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 63.4%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 61.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Operations · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 40.7%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 7.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceMathematical Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 76.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBM&A · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 83.9%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 68.4%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026

More comparisons

Compare GPT-6.1 Sol and Gemini 3.5 Flash with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  2. 2GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-6.1 Terra
  3. 3GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-6 Astra
  4. 4GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  5. 5GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  6. 6GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  7. 7Gemini 3.5 Flash vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  8. 8Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  9. 9Gemini 3.5 Flash vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
Show all 53 comparisons
  1. 10Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  2. 11Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  3. 12Gemini 3.5 Flash vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  4. 13Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  5. 14GPT-5.6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  6. 15Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  7. 16GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  8. 17GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-6 Luna
  9. 18GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  10. 19GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
  11. 20GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  12. 21Claude Opus 4.8 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  13. 22Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  14. 23GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  15. 24GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  16. 25GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  17. 26GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.4 mini
  18. 27GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.4
  19. 28GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  20. 29GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  21. 30Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  22. 31Claude Opus 4.6 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  23. 32GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  24. 33Claude Sonnet 5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  25. 34Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  26. 35GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.5
  27. 36Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  28. 37GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Grok 4.7
  29. 38Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  30. 39Claude Opus 4.7 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  31. 40GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GLM-5.3
  32. 41Claude Fable 5.2 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  33. 42Gemini 4 Carbon vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  34. 43GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
  35. 44GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  36. 45Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  37. 46GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  38. 47GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  39. 48GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Kimi K3
  40. 49Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  41. 50GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  42. 51GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Muse Wonder
  43. 52Claude Haiku 4.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  44. 53Claude Opus 4.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol