Skip to main content

OpenAIGoogleLLM matchup

GPT-6.1 Solvs.Gemini 3.7 Flash

Which one is better?

GPT-6.1 Sol performs better than Gemini 3.7 Flash.

GPT-6.1 Sol ahead
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
117.5

GPT-6.1 Sol

Rank 9

107.7

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Rank 17

Gemini 3.7 Flash faster
SpeedTokens per second
54

GPT-6.1 Sol

71

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Price$ per 1M tokens
$4

GPT-6.1 Sol

n/a

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Above 272,000 tokens of context, GPT-6.1 Sol costs more: $4 input and $15 output per 1M tokens.

Choose GPT-6.1 Sol for

MathematicsCodingKnowledgeMultimodalReasoningGeneral (not certain)Legal (not certain)Health (not certain)

No clear advantage for Gemini 3.7 Flash.

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

GPT-6.1 SolGemini 3.7 FlashMedian of all ranked models

10011012013090CodingGPT-6.1 SolReasoningGPT-6.1 SolMathematicsGPT-6.1 SolKnowledgeGPT-6.1 SolAgentslevelGeneralslightlyGPT-6.1 SolMultimodalGPT-6.1 SolFinancelevelLegalslightlyGPT-6.1 SolHealthslightlyGPT-6.1 Sol
CodingGPT-6.1 Sol ahead
GPT-6.1 Sol120.6Rank 8
Gemini 3.7 Flash97.7Rank 41
Median of ranked models87.5

95 % range: GPT-6.1 Sol 113.7 to 127.5, Gemini 3.7 Flash 93.0 to 102.3.

AreaGPT-6.1 SolGemini 3.7 Flash

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the close-up the net starts at 90 points, just below the weaker model's lowest value; the reference group average is 100.

GPT-6.1 Sol is ahead in 5 of 10 areas, Gemini 3.7 Flash in none.

GPT-6.1 Sol ahead: 5GPT-6.1 Sol slightly ahead: 3level: 2

Areas in the overall index
MathematicsGPT-6.1 Sol +24124.1 to 100.2
CodingGPT-6.1 Sol +23120.6 to 97.7
KnowledgeGPT-6.1 Sol +11123.7 to 112.7
MultimodalGPT-6.1 Sol +6118.0 to 112.2
ReasoningGPT-6.1 Sol +5122.7 to 117.9
Generalleaning GPT-6.1 Solnot certain · 7 and 2 tests
Agentslevel112.0 to 112.8
Specialist fields
Legalleaning GPT-6.1 Solnot certain · 3 and 2 tests
Healthleaning GPT-6.1 Solnot certain · 2 tests each
Financelevel105.8 to 104.8

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 4 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
Cybersecuritytoo little data93.0 to 86.1
Searchonly GPT-6.1 Sol has a score
Productivityonly GPT-6.1 Sol has a score
Educationonly GPT-6.1 Sol has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeGPT-6.1 SolCoding 120.6 to 97.7
Maths and data analysisGPT-6.1 SolMathematics 124.1 to 100.2, Reasoning 122.7 to 117.9
Facts and researchGPT-6.1 SolKnowledge 123.7 to 112.7, Search without a score for Gemini 3.7 Flash
Agents and workflowslevelAgents 112.0 to 112.8
Fast chat repliesGemini 3.7 Flash54 to 71 tokens per second
Security analysisopenCybersecurity 93.0 to 86.1 (too little data)
Finance, legal and medical textsleaning GPT-6.1 SolFinance 105.8 to 104.8, Legal 107.0 to 102.8, Health 110.2 to 106.6
Images, screenshots and PDFsGPT-6.1 SolMultimodal 118.0 to 112.2

GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash in our own test

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

GPT-6.1 Sol

GPT-6.1 Sol: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 84 s · $0.04

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
openai/gpt-6.1-sol
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
3,583 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0359
Response time
83.6 s
API model reported in response
openai/gpt-6.1-sol
Pinned endpoint
OpenAI | openai/gpt-6.1-sol-20260929
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

The response reached the token limit. No complete recording is available.

Oct 5, 2026 · 29 s · $0.03

Not yet visually reviewed. A successful recording does not confirm correct physics or full compliance with the prompt.

Test details
Run date
Oct 5, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
google/gemini-3.7-flash
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
8,188 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0307
Response time
28.8 s
API model reported in response
google/gemini-3.7-flash
Pinned endpoint
Google AI Studio | google/gemini-3.7-flash-20260813
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Failed

Earlier attempts (3)

  • Oct 2, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
  • Oct 1, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
  • Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

GPT-6.1 Sol

Unavailable in this round

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Unavailable in this round

GPT-6.1 Sol and Gemini 3.7 Flash in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v5)

20 of 95 models

Claude Fable 5.2max130.9
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh127.0
Claude Opus 5.5max125.7
Claude Fable 5.1max124.1
Claude Sonnet 5.5max121.9
Gemini 4 Argonhigh121.2
GPT-6 Astramax119.6
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.4
GPT-6.1 Solmax117.5
Claude Opus 5max117.3
Muse Wondermax113.7
Claude Fable 5max112.8
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.6
Muse Ember 1.0max110.5
GPT-5.6 Solmax109.3
GPT-6 Solmax108.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.7
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max107.1
GPT-6.1 Terramax106.5
Gemini 3.8 Flashhigh106.4

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricGPT-6.1 SolGemini 3.7 Flash
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better117.5107.7
RankRank 9 of 95Rank 17 of 95
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$2above 272,000 tokens: $4n/a
Outputwhat the model writes$10above 272,000 tokens: $15n/a
Cost per task (own tests)average of 2 original-protocol tasks both models passed (SVG short test not included)$0.047$0.042
Speed
Tokens per second5471
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1.05 M tokens≈ 1,580 A4 pages1.05 M tokens≈ 1,570 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffApr 30, 2026March 2026
ReleasedSep 29, 2026Aug 13, 2026
AvailabilityActiveDiscontinued
Open weightsnono

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

Successor of Gemini 3.7 FlashGemini 3.8 Flash

Overall index 106.4, rank 20$0.75 input and $3.75 output per 1M tokens

GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
Best model in the overall indexClaude Fable 5.2

Overall index 130.9, rank 1$8 input and $40 output per 1M tokens

GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Claude Fable 5.2

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: GPT-6.1 SolB: Gemini 3.7 Flash

Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 65.1%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 34.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 39.3%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 43.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 70.8%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.3%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 52%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 59%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
GDPval-AAOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,520.5 eloGemini 3.7 Flash: 1,403.7 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
IOIOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 96.9%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 67.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 38.5%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 34.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,743Gemini 3.7 Flash: 1,588LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,481Gemini 3.7 Flash: 1,489LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,293Gemini 3.7 Flash: 1,294LMArenaAs of 11/09/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
MedCodeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 48.8%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 53.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 86.5%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 83.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MMMU-ProOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 84.9%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 85.5%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 3%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ProofBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 99%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 58%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
SRE BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 50.8%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 4.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 21.8%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 22.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 55.1%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 12.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 52.9%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 7.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 88.9%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 63.5%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 23.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1Patch · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 78.6%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 87.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 61.8%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 74.6%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 44.7%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 54.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
IOIIOI 2024 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 100.0%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 72.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 53.0%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevHTML development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,794Gemini 3.7 Flash: 1,593LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,480Gemini 3.7 Flash: 1,486LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,348Gemini 3.7 Flash: 1,363LMArenaAs of 11/09/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 46.0%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 9.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchCapability Score · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 56.3%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 14.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 6.7%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 6.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Hardware · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 40.0%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 13.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEarth Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 62.5%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCOBOL · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 70.0%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 68.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1PoC · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 0%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBDataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 84.5%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 86.5%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)All-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 39.9%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 47.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
IOIIOI 2025 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 100.0%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 85.5%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 85.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevImage to WebDev · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,696Gemini 3.7 Flash: 1,600LMArenaAs of 11/10/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,531Gemini 3.7 Flash: 1,546LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlCreative writing with images · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,303Gemini 3.7 Flash: 1,300LMArenaAs of 11/09/2026
ProgramBenchFully Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 3%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchFully Solved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 50.8%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 4.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 64.8%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 46.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Media · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 50%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEngineering Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 33.3%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCode Quality · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 4.496 / 5Gemini 3.7 Flash: 3.664 / 5Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBDCF · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 65.3%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 66.1%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Comparables · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 42.6%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 50.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
IOIIOI 2026 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 90.7%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 60.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 39.5%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 37.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevReact development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,747Gemini 3.7 Flash: 1,583LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCoding · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,540Gemini 3.7 Flash: 1,520LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlDiagram understanding · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,327Gemini 3.7 Flash: 1,320LMArenaAs of 11/09/2026
ProgramBenchRaw Pass Rate · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 85.3%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 68.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 33.3%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 30.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0ML · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 54.5%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 12.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceLife Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 47.4%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 10.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBLBO · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 64.4%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 59.4%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Disclosure Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 58.4%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 67.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 84.2%Gemini 3.7 Flash: 89.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevWeb development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,743Gemini 3.7 Flash: 1,588LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026

More comparisons

Compare GPT-6.1 Sol and Gemini 3.7 Flash with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  2. 2GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-6.1 Terra
  3. 3GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-6 Astra
  4. 4GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  5. 5Gemini 3.7 Flash vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  6. 6GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
  7. 7GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  8. 8Gemini 3.7 Flash vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  9. 9GPT-5.6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
Show all 55 comparisons
  1. 10Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
  2. 11Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
  3. 12Gemini 3.7 Flash vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
  4. 13Gemini 3.7 Flash vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  5. 14Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  6. 15Gemini 3.7 Flash vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  7. 16Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  8. 17GPT-5.6 Terra vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
  9. 18Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
  10. 19GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  11. 20GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-6 Luna
  12. 21GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
  13. 22GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  14. 23Claude Opus 4.8 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  15. 24Claude Opus 4.6 vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
  16. 25GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  17. 26GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  18. 27GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  19. 28GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.4 mini
  20. 29GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.4
  21. 30GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  22. 31GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  23. 32Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  24. 33Claude Opus 4.6 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  25. 34GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  26. 35Claude Sonnet 5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  27. 36Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  28. 37GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.5
  29. 38Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  30. 39GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Grok 4.7
  31. 40Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  32. 41GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  33. 42Claude Opus 4.7 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  34. 43GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GLM-5.3
  35. 44Claude Fable 5.2 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  36. 45GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  37. 46Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  38. 47GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  39. 48GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  40. 49Gemini 4 Carbon vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
  41. 50GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Kimi K3
  42. 51Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  43. 52GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  44. 53GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Muse Wonder
  45. 54Claude Haiku 4.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  46. 55Claude Opus 4.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol