Skip to main content

OpenAIGoogleLLM matchup

GPT-6.1 Solvs.Gemini 3.6 Flash

Which one is better?

GPT-6.1 Sol performs better than Gemini 3.6 Flash, but costs 2.7 times as much.

GPT-6.1 Sol ahead
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
117.5

GPT-6.1 Sol

Rank 9

97.2

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Rank 38

Gemini 3.6 Flash faster
SpeedTokens per second
54

GPT-6.1 Sol

100

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Gemini 3.6 Flash cheaper
Price$ per 1M tokens
$4

GPT-6.1 Sol

$1.50

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Above 272,000 tokens of context, GPT-6.1 Sol costs more: $4 input and $15 output per 1M tokens.

Choose GPT-6.1 Sol for

MathematicsCodingGeneralReasoningAgentsKnowledgeProductivityMultimodalFinanceLegal (not certain)Health (not certain)

No clear advantage for Gemini 3.6 Flash.

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

GPT-6.1 SolGemini 3.6 FlashMedian of all ranked models

10512514585CodingGPT-6.1 SolReasoningGPT-6.1 SolMathematicsGPT-6.1 SolKnowledgeGPT-6.1 SolAgentsGPT-6.1 SolGeneralGPT-6.1 SolMultimodalGPT-6.1 SolFinanceGPT-6.1 SolLegalslightlyGPT-6.1 SolHealthslightlyGPT-6.1 Sol
CodingGPT-6.1 Sol ahead
GPT-6.1 Sol120.6Rank 8
Gemini 3.6 Flash91.3Rank 52
Median of ranked models87.5

95 % range: GPT-6.1 Sol 113.7 to 127.5, Gemini 3.6 Flash 86.8 to 95.7.

AreaGPT-6.1 SolGemini 3.6 Flash

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the close-up the net starts at 85 points, just below the weaker model's lowest value; the reference group average is 100.

GPT-6.1 Sol is ahead in 8 of 10 areas, Gemini 3.6 Flash in none.

GPT-6.1 Sol ahead: 8GPT-6.1 Sol slightly ahead: 2

Areas in the overall index
MathematicsGPT-6.1 Sol +31124.1 to 93.5
CodingGPT-6.1 Sol +29120.6 to 91.3
GeneralGPT-6.1 Sol +29119.0 to 90.1
ReasoningGPT-6.1 Sol +20122.7 to 103.2
AgentsGPT-6.1 Sol +19112.0 to 93.0
KnowledgeGPT-6.1 Sol +16123.7 to 107.4
MultimodalGPT-6.1 Sol +15118.0 to 103.2
Specialist fields
FinanceGPT-6.1 Sol +10105.8 to 96.0
Legalleaning GPT-6.1 Solnot certain · 3 and 2 tests
Healthleaning GPT-6.1 Solnot certain · 2 tests each

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 4 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
ProductivityGPT-6.1 Sol +16100.7 to 84.6
Cybersecuritytoo little data93.0 to 79.5
Searchonly GPT-6.1 Sol has a score
Educationonly GPT-6.1 Sol has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeGPT-6.1 SolCoding 120.6 to 91.3
Maths and data analysisGPT-6.1 SolMathematics 124.1 to 93.5, Reasoning 122.7 to 103.2
Facts and researchGPT-6.1 SolKnowledge 123.7 to 107.4, Search without a score for Gemini 3.6 Flash
Agents and workflowsGPT-6.1 SolAgents 112.0 to 93.0
Fast chat repliesGemini 3.6 Flash54 to 100 tokens per second
Security analysisopenCybersecurity 93.0 to 79.5 (too little data)
Many requests on a small budgetGemini 3.6 Flash$4 to $1.50 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsGPT-6.1 SolFinance 105.8 to 96.0, Legal 107.0 to 93.3, Health 110.2 to 98.6
Images, screenshots and PDFsGPT-6.1 SolMultimodal 118.0 to 103.2

GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash in our own test

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

GPT-6.1 Sol

GPT-6.1 Sol: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 84 s · $0.04

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
openai/gpt-6.1-sol
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
3,583 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0359
Response time
83.6 s
API model reported in response
openai/gpt-6.1-sol
Pinned endpoint
OpenAI | openai/gpt-6.1-sol-20260929
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Gemini 3.6 Flash

The response reached the token limit. No complete recording is available.

Oct 5, 2026 · 40 s · $0.03

Not yet visually reviewed. A successful recording does not confirm correct physics or full compliance with the prompt.

Test details
Run date
Oct 5, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
google/gemini-3.6-flash
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
8,188 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0307
Response time
39.6 s
API model reported in response
google/gemini-3.6-flash
Pinned endpoint
Google AI Studio | google/gemini-3.6-flash-20260721
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Failed

Earlier attempts (3)

  • Oct 2, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
  • Oct 1, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
  • Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

GPT-6.1 Sol

Unavailable in this round

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Unavailable in this round

GPT-6.1 Sol and Gemini 3.6 Flash in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v5)

20 of 95 models

Claude Fable 5.2max130.9
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh127.0
Claude Opus 5.5max125.7
Claude Fable 5.1max124.1
Claude Sonnet 5.5max121.9
Gemini 4 Argonhigh121.2
GPT-6 Astramax119.6
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.4
GPT-6.1 Solmax117.5
Claude Opus 5max117.3
Muse Wondermax113.7
Claude Fable 5max112.8
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.6
Muse Ember 1.0max110.5
GPT-5.6 Solmax109.3
GPT-6 Solmax108.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.7
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max107.1
GPT-6.1 Terramax106.5
Gemini 3.6 Flashhigh97.2

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricGPT-6.1 SolGemini 3.6 Flash
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better117.597.2
RankRank 9 of 95Rank 38 of 95
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$2above 272,000 tokens: $4$0.75
Outputwhat the model writes$10above 272,000 tokens: $15$3.75
Cost per task (own tests)average of 2 original-protocol tasks both models passed (SVG short test not included)$0.047$0.051
Speed
Tokens per second54100
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1.05 M tokens≈ 1,580 A4 pages1.05 M tokens≈ 1,570 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffApr 30, 2026March 2026
ReleasedSep 29, 2026Jul 21, 2026
AvailabilityActiveActive
Open weightsnono

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

Successor of Gemini 3.6 FlashGemini 3.7 Flash

Overall index 107.7, rank 17No API price in our data yet

GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
Cheaper than Gemini 3.6 FlashMuse Ember 1.0

Overall index 110.5, rank 14$0.10 input and $0.50 output per 1M tokens

View profile
Best model in the overall indexClaude Fable 5.2

Overall index 130.9, rank 1$8 input and $40 output per 1M tokens

GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Claude Fable 5.2

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: GPT-6.1 SolB: Gemini 3.6 Flash

BioMysteryBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 79.6%Gemini 3.6 Flash: 58.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 65.1%Gemini 3.6 Flash: 30.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 39.3%Gemini 3.6 Flash: 45.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 70.8%Gemini 3.6 Flash: 65.4%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 52.0%Gemini 3.6 Flash: 56.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Financial Coaching BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 68.5%Gemini 3.6 Flash: 65.8%Vals AIAs of 11/13/2026
GDPval-AAOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,520.5 eloGemini 3.6 Flash: 1,294.6 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
IOIOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 96.9%Gemini 3.6 Flash: 35.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 38.5%Gemini 3.6 Flash: 25.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,743Gemini 3.6 Flash: 1,538LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,481Gemini 3.6 Flash: 1,483LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,293Gemini 3.6 Flash: 1,280LMArenaAs of 11/09/2026
MedCodeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 48.8%Gemini 3.6 Flash: 53.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 86.5%Gemini 3.6 Flash: 79.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MMMU-ProOverall · higher is betterGPT-6.1 Sol: 84.9%Gemini 3.6 Flash: 83.2%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 3%Gemini 3.6 Flash: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Public Benefits Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 59.3%Gemini 3.6 Flash: 56.6%Vals AIAs of 10/12/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 21.8%Gemini 3.6 Flash: 18.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 52.9%Gemini 3.6 Flash: 4.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 88.9%Gemini 3.6 Flash: 64.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
BioMysteryBenchHard · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 39.2%Gemini 3.6 Flash: 21.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 63.5%Gemini 3.6 Flash: 19.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1Patch · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 78.6%Gemini 3.6 Flash: 85.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 61.8%Gemini 3.6 Flash: 70.0%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 44.7%Gemini 3.6 Flash: 53.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Financial Coaching BenchElicitation · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 59.5%Gemini 3.6 Flash: 48.7%Vals AIAs of 11/13/2026
IOIIOI 2024 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 100.0%Gemini 3.6 Flash: 40.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 53.0%Gemini 3.6 Flash: 31.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevHTML development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,794Gemini 3.6 Flash: 1,548LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,480Gemini 3.6 Flash: 1,474LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,348Gemini 3.6 Flash: 1,330LMArenaAs of 11/09/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 46.0%Gemini 3.6 Flash: 2.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 6.7%Gemini 3.6 Flash: 3.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEarth Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 62.5%Gemini 3.6 Flash: 12.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
BioMysteryBenchHuman-solvable · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 89.0%Gemini 3.6 Flash: 67.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCOBOL · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 70.0%Gemini 3.6 Flash: 65.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
CyberBench v1.1PoC · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 0%Gemini 3.6 Flash: 5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBDataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 84.5%Gemini 3.6 Flash: 73.0%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)All-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 39.9%Gemini 3.6 Flash: 44.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Financial Coaching BenchLength-Controlled · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 69.9%Gemini 3.6 Flash: 65.8%Vals AIAs of 11/13/2026
IOIIOI 2025 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 100.0%Gemini 3.6 Flash: 40.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 85.5%Gemini 3.6 Flash: 83.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevImage to WebDev · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,696Gemini 3.6 Flash: 1,545LMArenaAs of 11/10/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,531Gemini 3.6 Flash: 1,532LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlCreative writing with images · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,303Gemini 3.6 Flash: 1,253LMArenaAs of 11/09/2026
ProgramBenchFully Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 3%Gemini 3.6 Flash: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 64.8%Gemini 3.6 Flash: 37.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEngineering Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 33.3%Gemini 3.6 Flash: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCode Quality · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 4.496 / 5Gemini 3.6 Flash: 3.299 / 5Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBDCF · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 65.3%Gemini 3.6 Flash: 59.4%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Comparables · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 42.6%Gemini 3.6 Flash: 47.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
IOIIOI 2026 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 90.7%Gemini 3.6 Flash: 23.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 39.5%Gemini 3.6 Flash: 23.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevReact development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,747Gemini 3.6 Flash: 1,526LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCoding · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,540Gemini 3.6 Flash: 1,518LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlDiagram understanding · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,327Gemini 3.6 Flash: 1,312LMArenaAs of 11/09/2026
ProgramBenchRaw Pass Rate · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 85.3%Gemini 3.6 Flash: 59.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 33.3%Gemini 3.6 Flash: 19.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceLife Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 47.4%Gemini 3.6 Flash: 10.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBLBO · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 64.4%Gemini 3.6 Flash: 52.5%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Disclosure Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 58.4%Gemini 3.6 Flash: 62.0%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 84.2%Gemini 3.6 Flash: 84.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevWeb development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,743Gemini 3.6 Flash: 1,538LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCreative writing · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6.1 Sol: 1,449Gemini 3.6 Flash: 1,471LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026

More comparisons

Compare GPT-6.1 Sol and Gemini 3.6 Flash with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  2. 2GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-6.1 Terra
  3. 3Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  4. 4Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  5. 5Gemini 3.6 Flash vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  6. 6GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  7. 7GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-6 Astra
  8. 8Gemini 3.6 Flash vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  9. 9GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
Show all 56 comparisons
  1. 10Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  2. 11Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  3. 12GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  4. 13Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  5. 14Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  6. 15Gemini 3.6 Flash vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  7. 16Gemini 3.6 Flash vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  8. 17GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  9. 18GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  10. 19GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-6 Luna
  11. 20GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
  12. 21GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  13. 22Claude Opus 4.8 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  14. 23Claude Opus 4.6 vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  15. 24GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  16. 25GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  17. 26GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  18. 27GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.4 mini
  19. 28GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.4
  20. 29GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  21. 30GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  22. 31Gemini 4 Argon vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  23. 32Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  24. 33Claude Opus 4.6 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  25. 34GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  26. 35Claude Sonnet 5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  27. 36Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  28. 37GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-5.5
  29. 38Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  30. 39GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Grok 4.7
  31. 40Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  32. 41GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  33. 42Claude Opus 4.7 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  34. 43GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GLM-5.3
  35. 44Claude Fable 5.2 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  36. 45Gemini 4 Carbon vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  37. 46GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
  38. 47GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  39. 48Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  40. 49GPT-6.1 Terra vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  41. 50GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  42. 51GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Kimi K3
  43. 52Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  44. 53GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  45. 54GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Muse Wonder
  46. 55Claude Haiku 4.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  47. 56Claude Opus 4.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol