Skip to main content

OpenAIGoogleLLM matchup

GPT-6 Solvs.Gemini 3.5 Flash

Which one is better?

GPT-6 Sol performs better than Gemini 3.5 Flash.

GPT-6 Sol ahead
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
110.5

GPT-6 Sol

Rank 13

96.9

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Rank 33

Gemini 3.5 Flash faster
SpeedTokens per second
111

GPT-6 Sol

184

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Price$ per 1M tokens
$4

GPT-6 Sol

n/a

Gemini 3.5 Flash

GPT-6 Sol more popular
Popularity0 to 100
73

GPT-6 Sol

Rank 3 of 785

37

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Rank 372 of 785

Above 272,000 tokens of context, GPT-6 Sol costs more: $4 input and $15 output per 1M tokens.

Choose GPT-6 Sol for

CodingMathematicsReasoningGeneralLegalAgentsHealth (not certain)Multimodal (not certain)Knowledge (not certain)Finance (not certain)

Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash for

No clear advantage

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

GPT-6 SolGemini 3.5 FlashMedian of all ranked models

10012080CodingGPT-6 SolReasoningGPT-6 SolMathematicsGPT-6 SolKnowledgeslightlyGPT-6 SolAgentsGPT-6 SolGeneralGPT-6 SolMultimodalslightlyGPT-6 SolFinanceslightlyGPT-6 SolLegalGPT-6 SolHealthslightlyGPT-6 Sol
CodingGPT-6 Sol ahead
GPT-6 Sol114.9Rank 11
Gemini 3.5 Flash89.9Rank 50
Median of ranked models84.1

95 % range: GPT-6 Sol 112.2 to 117.6, Gemini 3.5 Flash 84.8 to 94.9.

AreaGPT-6 SolGemini 3.5 Flash

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the close-up the net starts at 80 points, just below the weaker model's lowest value; the reference group average is 100.

GPT-6 Sol is ahead in 6 of 10 areas, Gemini 3.5 Flash in none.

GPT-6 Sol ahead: 6GPT-6 Sol slightly ahead: 4

Areas in the overall index
CodingGPT-6 Sol +25114.9 to 89.9
MathematicsGPT-6 Sol +25117.5 to 92.7
ReasoningGPT-6 Sol +19114.1 to 95.0
GeneralGPT-6 Sol +17113.0 to 96.2
AgentsGPT-6 Sol +10107.2 to 97.2
Multimodalleaning GPT-6 Solnot certain · 2 and 3 tests
Knowledgeleaning GPT-6 Solnot certain · 2 tests each
Specialist fields
LegalGPT-6 Sol +11104.8 to 93.5
Healthleaning GPT-6 Solnot certain · 2 tests each
Financeleaning GPT-6 Solnot certain · 3 and 6 tests

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 3 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
Productivitytoo little data99.4 to 91.2
Cybersecurityonly GPT-6 Sol has a score
Searchonly GPT-6 Sol has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeGPT-6 SolCoding 114.9 to 89.9
Maths and data analysisGPT-6 SolMathematics 117.5 to 92.7, Reasoning 114.1 to 95.0
Facts and researchleaning GPT-6 SolKnowledge 109.8 to 105.1, Search without a score for Gemini 3.5 Flash
Agents and workflowsGPT-6 SolAgents 107.2 to 97.2
Fast chat repliesGemini 3.5 Flash111 to 184 tokens per second
Security analysisopenCybersecurity without a score for Gemini 3.5 Flash
Finance, legal and medical textsGPT-6 SolFinance 101.3 to 97.7, Legal 104.8 to 93.5, Health 104.8 to 98.1
Images, screenshots and PDFsleaning GPT-6 SolMultimodal 106.9 to 101.9

See for yourself: same task, one attempt

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

GPT-6 Sol

GPT-6 Sol: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 80 s · $0.04

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
openai/gpt-6-sol
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
4,389 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0439
Response time
80.5 s
API model reported in response
openai/gpt-6-sol
Pinned endpoint
OpenAI | openai/gpt-6-sol-20260922
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Gemini 3.5 Flash

The response reached the token limit. No complete recording is available.

Oct 6, 2026 · 32 s · $0.07

Not yet visually reviewed. A successful recording does not confirm correct physics or full compliance with the prompt.

Test details
Run date
Oct 6, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
google/gemini-3.5-flash
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
8,188 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0737
Response time
31.7 s
API model reported in response
google/gemini-3.5-flash
Pinned endpoint
Google AI Studio | google/gemini-3.5-flash-20260519
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Failed

Earlier attempts (3)

  • Oct 2, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
  • Oct 1, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
  • Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

GPT-6 Sol

Unavailable in this round

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Unavailable in this round

GPT-6 Sol and Gemini 3.5 Flash in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v4)

20 of 92 models

5 models in this view are measured at a lower reasoning effort than max in the overall index. Dashed column: lower reasoning effort than the top.

Claude Opus 5.5max126.1
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh125.8
Claude Fable 5.1max123.8
Claude Sonnet 5.5max122.8
Gemini 4 Argonhigh122.3
GPT-6 Astramax121.3
GPT-6.1 Solmax119.2
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.3
Claude Opus 5max117.2
Muse Wondermax113.4
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.9
Claude Fable 5max112.5
GPT-6 Solmax110.5
GPT-5.6 Solmax108.7
Muse Spark 1.3max107.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max106.6
Gemini 3.8 Flashhigh106.5
GPT-6.1 Terramax105.3
Gemini 3.5 Flashhigh96.9

Popularity compared

How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.

GPT-6 Sol is more popular than Gemini 3.5 Flash: 73 to 37 out of 100.

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 7, 2026

GPT-6 SolGemini 3.5 Flash

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricGPT-6 SolGemini 3.5 Flash
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better110.596.9
RankRank 13 of 92Rank 33 of 92
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$2above 272,000 tokens: $4n/a
Outputwhat the model writes$10above 272,000 tokens: $15n/a
Cost per task (own tests)average of 2 original-protocol tasks both models passed (SVG short test not included)$0.044$0.12
Speed
Tokens per second111184
Popularity
Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 10073Rank 3 of 78537Rank 372 of 785
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1.05 M tokens≈ 1,580 A4 pages1.05 M tokens≈ 1,570 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffApr 20, 2026n/a
ReleasedSep 22, 2026May 19, 2026
AvailabilityActiveDiscontinued
Open weightsnono

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

Successor of GPT-6 SolGPT-6.1 Sol

Overall index 119.2, rank 7$2 input and $10 output per 1M tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
Successor of Gemini 3.5 FlashGemini 3.6 Flash

Overall index 96.7, rank 34$0.75 input and $3.75 output per 1M tokens

GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
Best model in the overall indexClaude Opus 5.5

Overall index 126.1, rank 1$4 input and $20 output per 1M tokens

GPT-6 Sol vs. Claude Opus 5.5

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: GPT-6 SolB: Gemini 3.5 Flash

Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 57.2%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 26.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 71.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 63.5%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 49.1%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 57.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
GDPval-AAOverall · higher is betterGPT-6 Sol: 1,403.8 eloGemini 3.5 Flash: 1,211.6 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 28.8%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 30.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,678Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,499LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,458Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,478LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,266Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,282LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
MedCodeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 47.1%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 55.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 82.0%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 76.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
MMMU-ProOverall · higher is betterGPT-6 Sol: 82.0%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 84.3%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 2%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ProofBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 83%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 31%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Public Benefits Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 56.6%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 59.5%Vals AIAs of 10/12/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 15.0%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 21.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 44.4%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 6.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 30.0%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 5.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 87.8%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 48.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 52.9%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 17.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 73.3%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 69.8%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 43.2%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 54.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 39.4%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 43.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevHTML development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,680Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,512LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,448Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,468LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlCreative writing with images · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,252Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,275LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 32.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 6.7%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 3.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Hardware · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 6.7%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 6.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEarth Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 25%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 25%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCOBOL · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 70.0%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 55.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBDataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 83.9%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 80.9%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)All-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 36.0%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 80.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 87.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevImage to WebDev · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,660Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,501LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,485Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,513LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlDiagram understanding · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,303Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,305LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchFully Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 2%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 50.7%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 34.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Media · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 41.7%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEngineering Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 22.2%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCode Quality · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 4.375 / 5Gemini 3.5 Flash: 2.789 / 5Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBDCF · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 63.1%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 58.4%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Comparables · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 40.8%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 48.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 27.9%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 27.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevReact development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,680Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,495LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCoding · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,519Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,508LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlEnglish · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,255Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,278LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchRaw Pass Rate · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 81.9%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 56.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 23.2%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 26.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0ML · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 45.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 6.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceLife Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 42.1%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 5.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBLBO · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 59.4%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 46.5%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Disclosure Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 55.6%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 63.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 80.4%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 84.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevWeb development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,678Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,499LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCreative writing · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,435Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,465LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlHomework · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,306Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,306LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 56.1%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 61.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Operations · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 40.7%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 7.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceMathematical Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 29.4%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBM&A · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 83.0%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 68.4%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Earnings Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 72.4%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 79.0%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchCivil Litigation · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 18.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 22.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlEnglish · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Sol: 1,459Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,479LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026

More comparisons

Compare GPT-6 Sol and Gemini 3.5 Flash with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  2. 2GPT-6 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  3. 3GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  4. 4GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  5. 5GPT-6 Astra vs. GPT-6 Sol
  6. 6GPT-6 Sol vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  7. 7Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  8. 8GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  9. 9Claude Opus 4.8 vs. GPT-6 Sol
Show all 44 comparisons
  1. 10GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.4
  2. 11GPT-6 Sol vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  3. 12GPT-6 Sol vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  4. 13GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-6 Luna
  5. 14GPT-6 Sol vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  6. 15Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  7. 16GPT-6 Sol vs. Grok 4.7
  8. 17Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  9. 18Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  10. 19GPT-6 Sol vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  11. 20Claude Sonnet 5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  12. 21GPT-6 Sol vs. Kimi K3
  13. 22Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  14. 23Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  15. 24GPT-6 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  16. 25GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  17. 26Claude Opus 5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  18. 27Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  19. 28GPT-6 Sol vs. Mistral Large 4
  20. 29GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  21. 30GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  22. 31GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  23. 32Claude Opus 4.6 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  24. 33GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  25. 34Gemini 3.5 Flash vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  26. 35Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  27. 36GPT-6 Sol vs. Muse Wonder
  28. 37Gemini 3.5 Flash vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  29. 38Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  30. 39Claude Haiku 4.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  31. 40GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-5.5
  32. 41GPT-6.1 Terra vs. GPT-6 Sol
  33. 42Gemini 3.5 Flash vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  34. 43Gemini 4 Carbon vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  35. 44GPT-6 Sol vs. Gemini 4 Carbon