Skip to main content

OpenAIGoogleLLM matchup

GPT-6 Lunavs.Gemini 3.5 Flash

Which one is better?

GPT-6 Luna and Gemini 3.5 Flash perform about equally well.

level
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
96.3

GPT-6 Luna

Rank 35

96.9

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Rank 33

Gemini 3.5 Flash faster
SpeedTokens per second
101

GPT-6 Luna

184

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Price$ per 1M tokens
$0.20

GPT-6 Luna

n/a

Gemini 3.5 Flash

GPT-6 Luna more popular
Popularity0 to 100
60

GPT-6 Luna

Rank 30 of 785

37

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Rank 372 of 785

Above 272,000 tokens of context, GPT-6 Luna costs more: $0.20 input and $0.75 output per 1M tokens.

Choose GPT-6 Luna for

MathematicsCoding

Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash for

KnowledgeMultimodal

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

GPT-6 LunaGemini 3.5 FlashMedian of all ranked models

9010011080CodingGPT-6 LunaReasoninglevelMathematicsGPT-6 LunaKnowledgeGemini 3.5FlashAgentslevelGenerallevelMultimodalGemini 3.5FlashFinancelevelLegallevelHealthlevel
CodingGPT-6 Luna ahead
GPT-6 Luna97.5Rank 35
Gemini 3.5 Flash89.9Rank 50
Median of ranked models84.1

95 % range: GPT-6 Luna 94.5 to 100.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash 84.8 to 94.9.

AreaGPT-6 LunaGemini 3.5 Flash

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the close-up the net starts at 80 points, just below the weaker model's lowest value; the reference group average is 100.

GPT-6 Luna is ahead in 2 of 10 areas, Gemini 3.5 Flash in 2.

GPT-6 Luna ahead: 2level: 6Gemini 3.5 Flash ahead: 2

Areas in the overall index
KnowledgeGemini 3.5 Flash +1689.2 to 105.1
MathematicsGPT-6 Luna +13105.5 to 92.7
MultimodalGemini 3.5 Flash +1092.0 to 101.9
CodingGPT-6 Luna +897.5 to 89.9
Reasoninglevel97.8 to 95.0
Agentslevel99.5 to 97.2
Generallevel94.4 to 96.2
Specialist fields
Healthlevel95.2 to 98.1
Legallevel90.7 to 93.5
Financelevel98.3 to 97.7

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 4 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
Productivitytoo little data90.5 to 91.2
Cybersecurityonly GPT-6 Luna has a score
Searchonly GPT-6 Luna has a score
Educationonly GPT-6 Luna has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeGPT-6 LunaCoding 97.5 to 89.9
Maths and data analysisGPT-6 LunaMathematics 105.5 to 92.7, Reasoning 97.8 to 95.0
Facts and researchGemini 3.5 FlashKnowledge 89.2 to 105.1, Search without a score for Gemini 3.5 Flash
Agents and workflowslevelAgents 99.5 to 97.2
Fast chat repliesGemini 3.5 Flash101 to 184 tokens per second
Security analysisopenCybersecurity without a score for Gemini 3.5 Flash
Finance, legal and medical textslevelFinance 98.3 to 97.7, Legal 90.7 to 93.5, Health 95.2 to 98.1
Images, screenshots and PDFsGemini 3.5 FlashMultimodal 92.0 to 101.9

See for yourself: same task, one attempt

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

GPT-6 Luna

GPT-6 Luna: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 47 s · $0.0022

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
openai/gpt-6-luna
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
4,493 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0022
Response time
46.7 s
API model reported in response
openai/gpt-6-luna
Pinned endpoint
OpenAI | openai/gpt-6-luna-20260922
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Gemini 3.5 Flash

The response reached the token limit. No complete recording is available.

Oct 6, 2026 · 32 s · $0.07

Not yet visually reviewed. A successful recording does not confirm correct physics or full compliance with the prompt.

Test details
Run date
Oct 6, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
google/gemini-3.5-flash
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
8,188 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0737
Response time
31.7 s
API model reported in response
google/gemini-3.5-flash
Pinned endpoint
Google AI Studio | google/gemini-3.5-flash-20260519
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Failed

Earlier attempts (3)

  • Oct 2, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
  • Oct 1, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
  • Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

GPT-6 Luna

Unavailable in this round

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Unavailable in this round

GPT-6 Luna and Gemini 3.5 Flash in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v4)

20 of 92 models

5 models in this view are measured at a lower reasoning effort than max in the overall index. Dashed column: lower reasoning effort than the top.

Claude Opus 5.5max126.1
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh125.8
Claude Fable 5.1max123.8
Claude Sonnet 5.5max122.8
Gemini 4 Argonhigh122.3
GPT-6 Astramax121.3
GPT-6.1 Solmax119.2
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.3
Claude Opus 5max117.2
Muse Wondermax113.4
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.9
Claude Fable 5max112.5
GPT-6 Solmax110.5
GPT-5.6 Solmax108.7
Muse Spark 1.3max107.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max106.6
Gemini 3.8 Flashhigh106.5
Gemini 3.5 Flashhigh96.9
GPT-6 Lunamax96.3

Popularity compared

How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.

GPT-6 Luna is more popular than Gemini 3.5 Flash: 60 to 37 out of 100.

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 7, 2026

GPT-6 LunaGemini 3.5 Flash

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricGPT-6 LunaGemini 3.5 Flash
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better96.396.9
RankRank 35 of 92Rank 33 of 92
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$0.10above 272,000 tokens: $0.20n/a
Outputwhat the model writes$0.50above 272,000 tokens: $0.75n/a
Cost per task (own tests)average of 2 original-protocol tasks both models passed (SVG short test not included)$0.004$0.12
Speed
Tokens per second101184
Popularity
Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 10060Rank 30 of 78537Rank 372 of 785
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1.05 M tokens≈ 1,580 A4 pages1.05 M tokens≈ 1,570 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffMay 18, 2026n/a
ReleasedSep 22, 2026May 19, 2026
AvailabilityActiveDiscontinued
Open weightsnono

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

Successor of Gemini 3.5 FlashGemini 3.6 Flash

Overall index 96.7, rank 34$0.75 input and $3.75 output per 1M tokens

GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
Best model in the overall indexClaude Opus 5.5

Overall index 126.1, rank 1$4 input and $20 output per 1M tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs. Claude Opus 5.5

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: GPT-6 LunaB: Gemini 3.5 Flash

Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 42.6%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 26.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 68.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 63.5%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 49.9%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 57.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
GDPval-AAOverall · higher is betterGPT-6 Luna: 1,352.1 eloGemini 3.5 Flash: 1,211.6 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 30.3%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 30.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 1,579Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,499LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 1,441Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,478LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 1,240Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,282LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
MedCodeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 44.7%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 55.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 83.7%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 76.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
MMMU-ProOverall · higher is betterGPT-6 Luna: 77.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 84.3%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 0.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ProofBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 64%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 31%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Public Benefits Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 57.6%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 59.5%Vals AIAs of 10/12/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 19.9%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 21.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 13.6%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 6.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 4.3%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 5.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 81.6%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 48.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 37.2%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 17.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 70.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 69.8%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 49.8%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 54.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 37.9%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 43.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevHTML development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 1,595Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,512LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 1,441Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,468LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 1,292Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,346LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 8.0%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 6.7%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 3.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Hardware · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 0.0%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 6.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEarth Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 0%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 25%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCOBOL · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 58.6%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 55.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBDataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 75.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 80.9%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)All-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 38.4%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 83.2%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 87.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevImage to WebDev · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 1,571Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,501LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 1,483Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,513LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlCreative writing with images · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 1,232Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,275LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchFully Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 0.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 54.4%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 34.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Media · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 16.7%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEngineering Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 11.1%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCode Quality · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 3.752 / 5Gemini 3.5 Flash: 2.789 / 5Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBDCF · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 62.8%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 58.4%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Comparables · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 39.8%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 48.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 23.3%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 27.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevReact development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 1,575Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,495LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCoding · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 1,506Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,508LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlDiagram understanding · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 1,275Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,305LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchRaw Pass Rate · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 66.2%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 56.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 16.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 26.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0ML · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 9.1%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 6.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceLife Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 10.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 5.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBLBO · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 59.1%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 46.5%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Disclosure Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 57.6%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 63.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 79.1%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 84.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevWeb development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 1,579Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,499LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCreative writing · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 1,410Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,465LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlEnglish · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 1,228Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,278LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 55.3%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 61.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Operations · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 3.7%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 7.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceMathematical Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 0%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBM&A · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 72.1%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 68.4%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Earnings Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 74.2%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 79.0%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchCivil Litigation · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 25.9%Gemini 3.5 Flash: 22.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlEnglish · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGPT-6 Luna: 1,449Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,479LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026

More comparisons

Compare GPT-6 Luna and Gemini 3.5 Flash with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1GPT-6 Luna vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  2. 2Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  3. 3GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  4. 4GPT-6 Luna vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  5. 5GPT-6 Luna vs. GPT-5.4 mini
  6. 6GPT-6 Astra vs. GPT-6 Luna
  7. 7GPT-6 Luna vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  8. 8GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-6 Luna
  9. 9GPT-6 Luna vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
Show all 53 comparisons
  1. 10Claude Sonnet 5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  2. 11GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
  3. 12Claude Haiku 4.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  4. 13Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  5. 14GPT-6 Luna vs. GPT-5.4
  6. 15GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  7. 16Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  8. 17GPT-6 Luna vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  9. 18Claude Opus 4.8 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  10. 19GPT-6 Luna vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  11. 20GPT-6 Luna vs. Grok 4.7
  12. 21GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  13. 22GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-6 Luna
  14. 23Claude Opus 4.6 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  15. 24Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  16. 25GPT-6 Luna vs. Muse Spark 1.3
  17. 26GPT-6 Luna vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  18. 27Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  19. 28GPT-6 Luna vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  20. 29GPT-6 Luna vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  21. 30GPT-6 Luna vs. GLM-5.2
  22. 31Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  23. 32GPT-6 Luna vs. GPT-5.5
  24. 33GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
  25. 34Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  26. 35GPT-6 Luna vs. GLM-5.3
  27. 36GPT-6 Luna vs. Grok 4.6
  28. 37Claude Opus 4.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  29. 38Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  30. 39GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  31. 40GPT-6 Luna vs. MiMo-V2.5
  32. 41Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  33. 42GPT-6 Luna vs. Mistral Large 4
  34. 43Gemini 3.5 Flash vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  35. 44GPT-6.1 Terra vs. GPT-6 Luna
  36. 45Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  37. 46Gemini 3.5 Flash vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  38. 47Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  39. 48GPT-6 Luna vs. Mistral Medium 3.5
  40. 49Gemini 3.5 Flash vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  41. 50GPT-6 Luna vs. Grok 4.5
  42. 51Claude Opus 4.7 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  43. 52GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  44. 53Gemini 4 Carbon vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash