Skip to main content

AnthropicOpenAILLM matchup

Claude Opus 4.7vs.GPT-6 Luna

Which one is better?

Claude Opus 4.7 and GPT-6 Luna perform about equally well, but Claude Opus 4.7 costs 50 times as much.

level
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
93.5

Claude Opus 4.7

Rank 39

96.3

GPT-6 Luna

Rank 35

GPT-6 Luna faster
SpeedTokens per second
80

Claude Opus 4.7

101

GPT-6 Luna

GPT-6 Luna cheaper
Price$ per 1M tokens
$10

Claude Opus 4.7

$0.20

GPT-6 Luna

GPT-6 Luna more popular
Popularity0 to 100
27

Claude Opus 4.7

Rank 597 of 785

60

GPT-6 Luna

Rank 30 of 785

Above 272,000 tokens of context, GPT-6 Luna costs more: $0.20 input and $0.75 output per 1M tokens.

Choose Claude Opus 4.7 for

SearchKnowledgeLegalHealth (not certain)

Choose GPT-6 Luna for

ReasoningGeneralCoding (not certain)

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

Opus 4.7GPT-6 LunaMedian of all ranked models

859510575CodingslightlyGPT-6 LunaReasoningGPT-6 LunaKnowledgeOpus 4.7AgentslevelGeneralGPT-6 LunaMultimodallevelFinancelevelLegalOpus 4.7Healthslightly Opus4.7
CodingGPT-6 Luna slightly ahead
Opus 4.792.7Rank 45
GPT-6 Luna97.5Rank 35
Median of ranked models84.1

95 % range: Opus 4.7 84.8 to 100.6, GPT-6 Luna 94.5 to 100.5.

AreaOpus 4.7GPT-6 Luna

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the close-up the net starts at 75 points, just below the weaker model's lowest value; the reference group average is 100. Not in the net because a model has no own value there or the data are too thin: Mathematics.

Opus 4.7 is ahead in 2 of 10 areas, GPT-6 Luna in 2.

Opus 4.7 ahead: 2Opus 4.7 slightly ahead: 1level: 3too little data: 1GPT-6 Luna slightly ahead: 1GPT-6 Luna ahead: 2

Areas in the overall index
ReasoningGPT-6 Luna +1187.1 to 97.8
GeneralGPT-6 Luna +1084.8 to 94.4
KnowledgeOpus 4.7 +795.9 to 89.2
Codingleaning GPT-6 Lunanot certain · 5 and 13 tests
Agentslevel97.6 to 99.5
Multimodallevel92.5 to 92.0
Mathematicsonly GPT-6 Luna has a score
Specialist fields
LegalOpus 4.7 +696.3 to 90.7
Healthleaning Opus 4.7not certain · 2 tests each
Financelevel97.4 to 98.3

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 4 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
SearchOpus 4.7 +17100.4 to 83.3
Cybersecurityonly GPT-6 Luna has a score
Productivityonly GPT-6 Luna has a score
Educationonly GPT-6 Luna has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Claude Opus 4.7 vs. GPT-6 Luna at the same effort

Both models measured at the same reasoning efforts. This shows whether a lead comes from the model or only from more compute.

maxtied
Opus 4.7 93.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna 96.3 · Gap 2.3 · Test series 3
Overall index (max vs. max)level
Opus 4.7 93.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna 96.3

Gap and verdict compare only the Artificial Analysis test series in which both models are measured at that effort. Tied below 3 points, ahead only beyond two standard errors. The single values rest on all test series of each model, so their difference can deviate from the gap.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeleaning GPT-6 LunaCoding 92.7 to 97.5
Maths and data analysisGPT-6 LunaMathematics without a score for Opus 4.7, Reasoning 87.1 to 97.8
Facts and researchOpus 4.7Knowledge 95.9 to 89.2, Search 100.4 to 83.3
Agents and workflowslevelAgents 97.6 to 99.5
Fast chat repliesGPT-6 Luna80 to 101 tokens per second
Security analysisopenCybersecurity without a score for Opus 4.7
Many requests on a small budgetGPT-6 Luna$10 to $0.20 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsOpus 4.7Finance 97.4 to 98.3, Legal 96.3 to 90.7, Health 99.6 to 95.2
Images, screenshots and PDFslevelMultimodal 92.5 to 92.0

See for yourself: same task, one attempt

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

Claude Opus 4.7

Claude Opus 4.7: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 20 s · $0.05

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
anthropic/claude-opus-4.7
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
1,966 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0493
Response time
19.9 s
API model reported in response
anthropic/claude-opus-4.7
Pinned endpoint
Anthropic | anthropic/claude-4.7-opus-20260416
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

GPT-6 Luna

GPT-6 Luna: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 47 s · $0.0022

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
openai/gpt-6-luna
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
4,493 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0022
Response time
46.7 s
API model reported in response
openai/gpt-6-luna
Pinned endpoint
OpenAI | openai/gpt-6-luna-20260922
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

Claude Opus 4.7

Unavailable in this round

GPT-6 Luna

Unavailable in this round

Claude Opus 4.7 and GPT-6 Luna in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v4)

20 of 92 models

4 models in this view are measured at a lower reasoning effort than max in the overall index. Dashed column: lower reasoning effort than the top.

Claude Opus 5.5max126.1
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh125.8
Claude Fable 5.1max123.8
Claude Sonnet 5.5max122.8
Gemini 4 Argonhigh122.3
GPT-6 Astramax121.3
GPT-6.1 Solmax119.2
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.3
Claude Opus 5max117.2
Muse Wondermax113.4
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.9
Claude Fable 5max112.5
GPT-6 Solmax110.5
GPT-5.6 Solmax108.7
Muse Spark 1.3max107.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max106.6
Gemini 3.8 Flashhigh106.5
GPT-6 Lunamax96.3
Claude Opus 4.7max93.5

Popularity compared

How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.

GPT-6 Luna is more popular than Claude Opus 4.7: 60 to 27 out of 100.

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 7, 2026

Claude Opus 4.7GPT-6 Luna

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricClaude Opus 4.7GPT-6 Luna
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better93.596.3
RankRank 39 of 92Rank 35 of 92
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$5$0.10above 272,000 tokens: $0.20
Outputwhat the model writes$25$0.50above 272,000 tokens: $0.75
Cost per task (own tests)average of 3 original-protocol tasks both models passed (SVG short test not included)$0.049$0.003
Speed
Tokens per second80101
Popularity
Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 10027Rank 597 of 78560Rank 30 of 785
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages1.05 M tokens≈ 1,580 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffJanuary 2026May 18, 2026
ReleasedApril 2026Sep 22, 2026
AvailabilityActiveActive
Open weightsnono

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

Successor of Opus 4.7Claude Opus 4.8

Overall index 99.0, rank 30$5 input and $25 output per 1M tokens

GPT-6 Luna vs. Claude Opus 4.8
As cheap as GPT-6 LunaClaude Haiku 5.5

Overall index 103.4, rank 20$0.10 input and $0.50 output per 1M tokens

GPT-6 Luna vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
Best model in the overall indexClaude Opus 5.5

Overall index 126.1, rank 1$4 input and $20 output per 1M tokens

GPT-6 Luna vs. Claude Opus 5.5

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: Claude Opus 4.7B: GPT-6 Luna

AA-AnalystAgentOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 4.7: 43.8%GPT-6 Luna: 43.8%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 43.9%GPT-6 Luna: 42.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 63.7%GPT-6 Luna: 68.5%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 51.5%GPT-6 Luna: 49.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
GDPval-AAOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 4.7: 1,361.7 eloGPT-6 Luna: 1,444.5 eloArtificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 38.5%GPT-6 Luna: 30.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,558GPT-6 Luna: 1,579LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena SearchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,230GPT-6 Luna: 1,160LMArenaAs of 10/13/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,501GPT-6 Luna: 1,441LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,298GPT-6 Luna: 1,240LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
MedCodeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 54.9%GPT-6 Luna: 44.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 83.0%GPT-6 Luna: 83.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MMMU-ProOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 4.7: 78.8%GPT-6 Luna: 79.7%Artificial AnalysisAs of 11/07/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 0.0%GPT-6 Luna: 0.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 23.7%GPT-6 Luna: 19.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 71.0%GPT-6 Luna: 81.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 35.2%GPT-6 Luna: 37.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 64.5%GPT-6 Luna: 70.5%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 45.4%GPT-6 Luna: 49.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 45.5%GPT-6 Luna: 37.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevHTML development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,546GPT-6 Luna: 1,595LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,508GPT-6 Luna: 1,441LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,336GPT-6 Luna: 1,292LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 9.5%GPT-6 Luna: 8.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 3.3%GPT-6 Luna: 6.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCOBOL · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 70.0%GPT-6 Luna: 58.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBDataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 80.9%GPT-6 Luna: 75.5%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)All-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 38.6%GPT-6 Luna: 38.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 87.0%GPT-6 Luna: 83.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevImage to WebDev · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,577GPT-6 Luna: 1,571LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,537GPT-6 Luna: 1,483LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlCreative writing with images · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,302GPT-6 Luna: 1,232LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchFully Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 0.0%GPT-6 Luna: 0.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 57.6%GPT-6 Luna: 54.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCode Quality · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 4.588 / 5GPT-6 Luna: 3.752 / 5Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBDCF · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 57.1%GPT-6 Luna: 62.8%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Comparables · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 45.6%GPT-6 Luna: 39.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 32.6%GPT-6 Luna: 23.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevReact development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,560GPT-6 Luna: 1,575LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCoding · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,551GPT-6 Luna: 1,506LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlDiagram understanding · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,333GPT-6 Luna: 1,275LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchRaw Pass Rate · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 64.2%GPT-6 Luna: 66.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 36.4%GPT-6 Luna: 16.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBLBO · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 56.4%GPT-6 Luna: 59.1%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Disclosure Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 61.3%GPT-6 Luna: 57.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 88.3%GPT-6 Luna: 79.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevWeb development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,558GPT-6 Luna: 1,579LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCreative writing · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,489GPT-6 Luna: 1,410LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlEnglish · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,302GPT-6 Luna: 1,228LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 66.5%GPT-6 Luna: 55.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBM&A · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 71.7%GPT-6 Luna: 72.1%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Earnings Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 71.6%GPT-6 Luna: 74.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchCivil Litigation · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 37.0%GPT-6 Luna: 25.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlEnglish · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,510GPT-6 Luna: 1,449LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlHomework · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,331GPT-6 Luna: 1,281LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
Tax Agent BenchFact-Pattern Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 20.9%GPT-6 Luna: 29.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBMisc · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 54.3%GPT-6 Luna: 68.6%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Financial Modeling · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 20.1%GPT-6 Luna: 22.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchCivil Litigation · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 88.2%GPT-6 Luna: 78.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlEntertainment, sports and media · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,480GPT-6 Luna: 1,413LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOptical character recognition · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 1,311GPT-6 Luna: 1,251LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
Tax Agent BenchFact-Pattern Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 61.6%GPT-6 Luna: 60.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBOperating · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 61.2%GPT-6 Luna: 71.1%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)General Qualitative Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 4.7: 65.4%GPT-6 Luna: 54.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026

More comparisons

Compare Claude Opus 4.7 and GPT-6 Luna with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1GPT-6 Luna vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  2. 2Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  3. 3GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  4. 4GPT-6 Luna vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  5. 5GPT-6 Luna vs. GPT-5.4 mini
  6. 6GPT-6 Astra vs. GPT-6 Luna
  7. 7GPT-6 Luna vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  8. 8GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-6 Luna
  9. 9GPT-6 Luna vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
Show all 54 comparisons
  1. 10Claude Sonnet 5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  2. 11GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
  3. 12Claude Haiku 4.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  4. 13Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  5. 14GPT-6 Luna vs. GPT-5.4
  6. 15GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  7. 16Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  8. 17GPT-6 Luna vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  9. 18Claude Opus 4.8 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  10. 19GPT-6 Luna vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  11. 20GPT-6 Luna vs. Grok 4.7
  12. 21GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  13. 22GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-6 Luna
  14. 23Claude Opus 4.6 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  15. 24Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  16. 25GPT-6 Luna vs. Muse Spark 1.3
  17. 26GPT-6 Luna vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  18. 27Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  19. 28Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.7
  20. 29GPT-6 Luna vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  21. 30GPT-6 Luna vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  22. 31GPT-6 Luna vs. GLM-5.2
  23. 32GPT-6 Luna vs. GPT-5.5
  24. 33GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
  25. 34Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  26. 35GPT-6 Luna vs. GLM-5.3
  27. 36GPT-6 Luna vs. Grok 4.6
  28. 37Claude Opus 4.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  29. 38Claude Opus 4.7 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  30. 39GPT-6 Luna vs. MiMo-V2.5
  31. 40Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  32. 41GPT-6 Luna vs. Mistral Large 4
  33. 42GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  34. 43GPT-6.1 Terra vs. GPT-6 Luna
  35. 44Claude Opus 4.7 vs. Grok 4.7
  36. 45Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.7
  37. 46Claude Opus 4.7 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  38. 47GPT-6 Luna vs. Mistral Medium 3.5
  39. 48Claude Opus 4.7 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  40. 49Claude Opus 4.7 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  41. 50GPT-6 Luna vs. Grok 4.5
  42. 51Claude Opus 4.7 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.6
  43. 52Claude Opus 4.7 vs. GLM-5.3
  44. 53GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  45. 54Claude Opus 4.7 vs. Muse Wonder Full