Skip to main content

AnthropicOpenAILLM matchup

Claude Fable 5vs.GPT-6 Luna

Which one is better?

Claude Fable 5 performs better than GPT-6 Luna, but costs 100 times as much.

Fable 5 ahead
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
112.5

Claude Fable 5

Rank 12

96.3

GPT-6 Luna

Rank 35

about as fast
SpeedTokens per second
86

Claude Fable 5

101

GPT-6 Luna

GPT-6 Luna cheaper
Price$ per 1M tokens
$20

Claude Fable 5

$0.20

GPT-6 Luna

GPT-6 Luna more popular
Popularity0 to 100
44

Claude Fable 5

Rank 208 of 785

60

GPT-6 Luna

Rank 30 of 785

Above 272,000 tokens of context, GPT-6 Luna costs more: $0.20 input and $0.75 output per 1M tokens.

Choose Claude Fable 5 for

SearchProductivityMultimodalKnowledgeHealthLegalCodingFinanceMathematicsAgentsGeneral (not certain)Reasoning (not certain)

Choose GPT-6 Luna for

No clear advantage

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

Fable 5GPT-6 LunaMedian of all ranked models

10012080CodingFable 5ReasoningslightlyFable 5MathematicsFable 5KnowledgeFable 5AgentsFable 5GeneralslightlyFable 5MultimodalFable 5FinanceFable 5LegalFable 5HealthFable 5
CodingFable 5 ahead
Fable 5112.6Rank 14
GPT-6 Luna97.5Rank 35
Median of ranked models84.1

95 % range: Fable 5 109.4 to 115.8, GPT-6 Luna 94.5 to 100.5.

AreaFable 5GPT-6 Luna

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the close-up the net starts at 80 points, just below the weaker model's lowest value; the reference group average is 100.

Fable 5 is ahead in 8 of 10 areas, GPT-6 Luna in none.

Fable 5 ahead: 8Fable 5 slightly ahead: 2

Areas in the overall index
MultimodalFable 5 +24116.4 to 92.0
KnowledgeFable 5 +24113.5 to 89.2
CodingFable 5 +15112.6 to 97.5
MathematicsFable 5 +12117.5 to 105.5
AgentsFable 5 +12111.0 to 99.5
Generalleaning Fable 5not certain · 2 and 5 tests
Reasoningleaning Fable 5not certain · 4 tests each
Specialist fields
HealthFable 5 +21116.0 to 95.2
LegalFable 5 +20110.9 to 90.7
FinanceFable 5 +13111.8 to 98.3

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 4 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
SearchFable 5 +31114.5 to 83.3
ProductivityFable 5 +25115.9 to 90.5
Cybersecurityonly GPT-6 Luna has a score
Educationonly GPT-6 Luna has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeFable 5Coding 112.6 to 97.5
Maths and data analysisFable 5Mathematics 117.5 to 105.5, Reasoning 104.4 to 97.8
Facts and researchFable 5Knowledge 113.5 to 89.2, Search 114.5 to 83.3
Agents and workflowsFable 5Agents 111.0 to 99.5
Fast chat repliesabout the same86 to 101 tokens per second
Security analysisopenCybersecurity without a score for Fable 5
Many requests on a small budgetGPT-6 Luna$20 to $0.20 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsFable 5Finance 111.8 to 98.3, Legal 110.9 to 90.7, Health 116.0 to 95.2
Images, screenshots and PDFsFable 5Multimodal 116.4 to 92.0

See for yourself: same task, one attempt

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

Claude Fable 5

Claude Fable 5: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Sep 7, 2026 · 53 s · $0.11

Test details
Run date
Sep 7, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
anthropic/claude-fable-5
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
2,287 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.1146
Response time
53.1 s
API model reported in response
anthropic/claude-fable-5
Pinned endpoint
Anthropic | anthropic/claude-5-fable-20260609
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

GPT-6 Luna

GPT-6 Luna: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 47 s · $0.0022

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
openai/gpt-6-luna
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
4,493 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0022
Response time
46.7 s
API model reported in response
openai/gpt-6-luna
Pinned endpoint
OpenAI | openai/gpt-6-luna-20260922
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

Claude Fable 5

Unavailable in this round

GPT-6 Luna

Unavailable in this round

Claude Fable 5 and GPT-6 Luna in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v4)

20 of 92 models

4 models in this view are measured at a lower reasoning effort than max in the overall index. Dashed column: lower reasoning effort than the top.

Claude Opus 5.5max126.1
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh125.8
Claude Fable 5.1max123.8
Claude Sonnet 5.5max122.8
Gemini 4 Argonhigh122.3
GPT-6 Astramax121.3
GPT-6.1 Solmax119.2
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.3
Claude Opus 5max117.2
Muse Wondermax113.4
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.9
Claude Fable 5max112.5
GPT-6 Solmax110.5
GPT-5.6 Solmax108.7
Muse Spark 1.3max107.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max106.6
Gemini 3.8 Flashhigh106.5
GPT-6.1 Terramax105.3
GPT-6 Lunamax96.3

Popularity compared

How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.

GPT-6 Luna is more popular than Claude Fable 5: 60 to 44 out of 100.

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 7, 2026

Claude Fable 5GPT-6 Luna

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricClaude Fable 5GPT-6 Luna
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better112.596.3
RankRank 12 of 92Rank 35 of 92
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$10$0.10above 272,000 tokens: $0.20
Outputwhat the model writes$50$0.50above 272,000 tokens: $0.75
Cost per task (own tests)average of 3 original-protocol tasks both models passed (SVG short test not included)$0.13$0.003
Speed
Tokens per second86101
Popularity
Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 10044Rank 208 of 78560Rank 30 of 785
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages1.05 M tokens≈ 1,580 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffJanuary 2026May 18, 2026
ReleasedJun 9, 2026Sep 22, 2026
AvailabilityActiveActive
Open weightsnono

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

Successor of Fable 5Claude Fable 5.1

Overall index 123.8, rank 3$10 input and $50 output per 1M tokens

GPT-6 Luna vs. Claude Fable 5.1
As cheap as GPT-6 LunaClaude Haiku 5.5

Overall index 103.4, rank 20$0.10 input and $0.50 output per 1M tokens

Fable 5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
Best model in the overall indexClaude Opus 5.5

Overall index 126.1, rank 1$4 input and $20 output per 1M tokens

Fable 5 vs. Claude Opus 5.5

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: Claude Fable 5B: GPT-6 Luna

Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 55.1%GPT-6 Luna: 42.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 73.7%GPT-6 Luna: 68.5%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 56.3%GPT-6 Luna: 49.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 49.5%GPT-6 Luna: 30.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 1,624GPT-6 Luna: 1,579LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena SearchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 1,229GPT-6 Luna: 1,160LMArenaAs of 10/13/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 1,504GPT-6 Luna: 1,441LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 1,309GPT-6 Luna: 1,240LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
MedCodeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 56.1%GPT-6 Luna: 44.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 88.5%GPT-6 Luna: 83.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 2.0%GPT-6 Luna: 0.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ProofBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 95%GPT-6 Luna: 64%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Public Benefits Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 70.4%GPT-6 Luna: 57.6%Vals AIAs of 10/12/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 38.3%GPT-6 Luna: 19.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 41.4%GPT-6 Luna: 13.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 15.7%GPT-6 Luna: 4.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 90.4%GPT-6 Luna: 81.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 60.1%GPT-6 Luna: 37.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 70.8%GPT-6 Luna: 70.5%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 51.1%GPT-6 Luna: 49.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 57.6%GPT-6 Luna: 37.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevHTML development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 1,651GPT-6 Luna: 1,595LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 1,501GPT-6 Luna: 1,441LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 1,355GPT-6 Luna: 1,292LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 33%GPT-6 Luna: 8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 13.3%GPT-6 Luna: 6.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Hardware · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 40%GPT-6 Luna: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEarth Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 25%GPT-6 Luna: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCOBOL · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 40.0%GPT-6 Luna: 58.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBDataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 85.4%GPT-6 Luna: 75.5%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)All-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 45.7%GPT-6 Luna: 38.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 90.2%GPT-6 Luna: 83.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevImage to WebDev · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 1,623GPT-6 Luna: 1,571LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 1,555GPT-6 Luna: 1,483LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlCreative writing with images · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 1,319GPT-6 Luna: 1,232LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchFully Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 2.0%GPT-6 Luna: 0.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 68.4%GPT-6 Luna: 54.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Media · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 50.0%GPT-6 Luna: 16.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEngineering Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 0.0%GPT-6 Luna: 11.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCode Quality · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 4.442 / 5GPT-6 Luna: 3.752 / 5Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBDCF · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 68.9%GPT-6 Luna: 62.8%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Comparables · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 44.0%GPT-6 Luna: 39.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 51.2%GPT-6 Luna: 23.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevReact development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 1,630GPT-6 Luna: 1,575LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCoding · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 1,550GPT-6 Luna: 1,506LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlDiagram understanding · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 1,353GPT-6 Luna: 1,275LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchRaw Pass Rate · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 76.8%GPT-6 Luna: 66.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 53.2%GPT-6 Luna: 16.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0ML · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 42.4%GPT-6 Luna: 9.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceLife Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 10.5%GPT-6 Luna: 10.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBLBO · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 65.9%GPT-6 Luna: 59.1%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Disclosure Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 68.8%GPT-6 Luna: 57.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 91.4%GPT-6 Luna: 79.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevWeb development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 1,624GPT-6 Luna: 1,579LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCreative writing · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 1,501GPT-6 Luna: 1,410LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlEnglish · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 1,303GPT-6 Luna: 1,228LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 71.0%GPT-6 Luna: 55.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Operations · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 25.9%GPT-6 Luna: 3.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceMathematical Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 11.8%GPT-6 Luna: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBM&A · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 80.6%GPT-6 Luna: 72.1%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Earnings Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 77.3%GPT-6 Luna: 74.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchCivil Litigation · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 44.4%GPT-6 Luna: 25.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlEnglish · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 1,512GPT-6 Luna: 1,449LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlHomework · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Fable 5: 1,352GPT-6 Luna: 1,281LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026

More comparisons

Compare Claude Fable 5 and GPT-6 Luna with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1GPT-6 Luna vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  2. 2Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  3. 3GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  4. 4GPT-6 Luna vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  5. 5GPT-6 Luna vs. GPT-5.4 mini
  6. 6GPT-6 Astra vs. GPT-6 Luna
  7. 7GPT-6 Luna vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  8. 8GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-6 Luna
  9. 9GPT-6 Luna vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
Show all 57 comparisons
  1. 10Claude Sonnet 5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  2. 11GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
  3. 12Claude Haiku 4.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  4. 13Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  5. 14GPT-6 Luna vs. GPT-5.4
  6. 15GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  7. 16Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  8. 17GPT-6 Luna vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  9. 18Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5
  10. 19Claude Opus 4.8 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  11. 20GPT-6 Luna vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  12. 21GPT-6 Luna vs. Grok 4.7
  13. 22GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  14. 23GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-6 Luna
  15. 24Claude Opus 4.6 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  16. 25Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  17. 26GPT-6 Luna vs. Muse Spark 1.3
  18. 27GPT-6 Luna vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  19. 28Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  20. 29GPT-6 Luna vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  21. 30GPT-6 Luna vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  22. 31Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5
  23. 32GPT-6 Luna vs. GLM-5.2
  24. 33Claude Fable 5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  25. 34GPT-6 Luna vs. GPT-5.5
  26. 35GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
  27. 36Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  28. 37GPT-6 Luna vs. GLM-5.3
  29. 38GPT-6 Luna vs. Grok 4.6
  30. 39Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  31. 40Claude Opus 4.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  32. 41Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5
  33. 42Claude Fable 5 vs. Kimi K3
  34. 43Claude Fable 5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  35. 44Claude Fable 5 vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  36. 45GPT-6 Luna vs. MiMo-V2.5
  37. 46GPT-6 Luna vs. Mistral Large 4
  38. 47Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  39. 48GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  40. 49GPT-6.1 Terra vs. GPT-6 Luna
  41. 50GPT-6 Luna vs. Mistral Medium 3.5
  42. 51Claude Fable 5 vs. Mistral Large 4
  43. 52GPT-6 Luna vs. Grok 4.5
  44. 53Claude Opus 4.7 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  45. 54GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  46. 55Claude Fable 5 vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
  47. 56Claude Fable 5 vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  48. 57Claude Fable 5 vs. Muse Wonder Full