Skip to main content

AnthropicLLM matchup

Claude Sonnet 5.5vs.Claude Fable 5

Is the higher price worth it?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 performs better than Claude Fable 5 and is cheaper: Claude Fable 5 costs 5 times as much.

Sonnet 5.5 ahead
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
121.9

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Rank 5

112.8

Claude Fable 5

Rank 12

Sonnet 5.5 faster
SpeedTokens per second
103

Claude Sonnet 5.5

50

Claude Fable 5

Sonnet 5.5 cheaper
Price$ per 1M tokens
$4

Claude Sonnet 5.5

$20

Claude Fable 5

Popularity0 to 100
79

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Rank 21 of 478

n/a

Claude Fable 5

Choose Claude Sonnet 5.5 for

GeneralMathematicsCodingAgentsKnowledgeFinanceReasoning (not certain)Health (not certain)

Choose Claude Fable 5 for

Multimodal

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

Sonnet 5.5Fable 5Median of all ranked models

11513595CodingSonnet 5.5ReasoningslightlySonnet 5.5MathematicsSonnet 5.5KnowledgeSonnet 5.5AgentsSonnet 5.5GeneralSonnet 5.5MultimodalFable 5FinanceSonnet 5.5LegallevelHealthslightlySonnet 5.5
CodingSonnet 5.5 ahead
Sonnet 5.5125.2Rank 3
Fable 5113.2Rank 14
Median of ranked models87.5

95 % range: Sonnet 5.5 119.5 to 130.9, Fable 5 109.6 to 116.9.

AreaSonnet 5.5Fable 5

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the close-up the net starts at 95 points, just below the weaker model's lowest value; the reference group average is 100.

Sonnet 5.5 is ahead in 6 of 10 areas, Fable 5 in 1.

Sonnet 5.5 ahead: 6Sonnet 5.5 slightly ahead: 2level: 1Fable 5 ahead: 1

Areas in the overall index
GeneralSonnet 5.5 +23125.0 to 101.9
MathematicsSonnet 5.5 +14131.9 to 117.4
CodingSonnet 5.5 +12125.2 to 113.2
AgentsSonnet 5.5 +9120.8 to 111.4
MultimodalFable 5 +9110.7 to 119.5
KnowledgeSonnet 5.5 +8122.8 to 115.2
Reasoningleaning Sonnet 5.5not certain · 2 and 4 tests
Specialist fields
FinanceSonnet 5.5 +7119.4 to 112.6
Healthleaning Sonnet 5.5not certain · 2 tests each
Legallevel114.5 to 111.8

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 4 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
Productivitytoo little data116.4 to 117.7
Cybersecurityonly Sonnet 5.5 has a score
Searchonly Fable 5 has a score
Educationonly Sonnet 5.5 has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeSonnet 5.5Coding 125.2 to 113.2
Maths and data analysisSonnet 5.5Mathematics 131.9 to 117.4, Reasoning 118.3 to 103.3
Facts and researchSonnet 5.5Knowledge 122.8 to 115.2, Search without a score for Sonnet 5.5
Agents and workflowsSonnet 5.5Agents 120.8 to 111.4
Fast chat repliesSonnet 5.5103 to 50 tokens per second
Security analysisopenCybersecurity without a score for Fable 5
Many requests on a small budgetSonnet 5.5$4 to $20 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsSonnet 5.5Finance 119.4 to 112.6, Legal 114.5 to 111.8, Health 121.9 to 117.7
Images, screenshots and PDFsFable 5Multimodal 110.7 to 119.5

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5 in our own test

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Claude Sonnet 5.5: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 28 s · $0.04

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
3,886 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0389
Response time
28.2 s
API model reported in response
anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5
Pinned endpoint
Anthropic | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5-20260928
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Claude Fable 5

Claude Fable 5: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Sep 7, 2026 · 53 s · $0.11

Test details
Run date
Sep 7, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
anthropic/claude-fable-5
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
2,287 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.1146
Response time
53.1 s
API model reported in response
anthropic/claude-fable-5
Pinned endpoint
Anthropic | anthropic/claude-5-fable-20260609
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Unavailable in this round

Claude Fable 5

Unavailable in this round

Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Claude Fable 5 in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v5)

20 of 95 models

Claude Fable 5.2max130.9
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh127.0
Claude Opus 5.5max125.7
Claude Fable 5.1max124.1
Claude Sonnet 5.5max121.9
Gemini 4 Argonhigh121.2
GPT-6 Astramax119.6
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.4
GPT-6.1 Solmax117.5
Claude Opus 5max117.3
Muse Wondermax113.7
Claude Fable 5max112.8
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.6
Muse Ember 1.0max110.5
GPT-5.6 Solmax109.3
GPT-6 Solmax108.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.7
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max107.1
GPT-6.1 Terramax106.5
Gemini 3.8 Flashhigh106.4

Popularity compared

How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.

Claude Fable 5 has no popularity score yet.

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 13, 2026

Claude Sonnet 5.5Claude Fable 5

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricClaude Sonnet 5.5Claude Fable 5
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better121.9112.8
RankRank 5 of 95Rank 12 of 95
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$2$10
Outputwhat the model writes$10$50
Cost per task (own tests)average of 3 original-protocol tasks both models passed (SVG short test not included)$0.038$0.13
Speed
Tokens per second10350
Popularity
Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 10079Rank 21 of 478n/a
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffJune 2026January 2026
ReleasedSep 28, 2026Jun 9, 2026
AvailabilityActiveActive
Open weightsnono

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

Successor of Fable 5Claude Fable 5.1

Overall index 124.1, rank 4$10 input and $50 output per 1M tokens

Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5.1
As cheap as Sonnet 5.5Gemini 4 Carbon

Overall index 127.0, rank 2$2 input and $10 output per 1M tokens

Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
Best model in the overall indexClaude Fable 5.2

Overall index 130.9, rank 1$8 input and $40 output per 1M tokens

Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5.2

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: Claude Sonnet 5.5B: Claude Fable 5

Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 69.8%Claude Fable 5: 55.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 75.7%Claude Fable 5: 73.7%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 58.1%Claude Fable 5: 56.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 48.1%Claude Fable 5: 49.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,772Claude Fable 5: 1,625LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,473Claude Fable 5: 1,504LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,263Claude Fable 5: 1,309LMArenaAs of 11/09/2026
MedCodeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 52.9%Claude Fable 5: 56.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 91.1%Claude Fable 5: 88.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 6.5%Claude Fable 5: 2.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
ProofBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 100%Claude Fable 5: 95%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Public Benefits Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 67.2%Claude Fable 5: 70.4%Vals AIAs of 10/12/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 42.0%Claude Fable 5: 38.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 64.1%Claude Fable 5: 41.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 61.8%Claude Fable 5: 44.6%Terminal-BenchAs of 10/06/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 47.1%Claude Fable 5: 15.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 92.4%Claude Fable 5: 90.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 69.8%Claude Fable 5: 60.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 80.0%Claude Fable 5: 70.8%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 52.7%Claude Fable 5: 51.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 69.7%Claude Fable 5: 57.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevHTML development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,753Claude Fable 5: 1,649LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,474Claude Fable 5: 1,501LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,372Claude Fable 5: 1,362LMArenaAs of 11/09/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 49.5%Claude Fable 5: 33.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 16.7%Claude Fable 5: 13.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Hardware · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 53.3%Claude Fable 5: 40.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEarth Sciences · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 12.5%Claude Fable 5: 25.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCOBOL · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 70%Claude Fable 5: 40%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBDataroom · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 86.3%Claude Fable 5: 85.4%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)All-Pass · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 47.6%Claude Fable 5: 45.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 91.3%Claude Fable 5: 90.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevImage to WebDev · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,744Claude Fable 5: 1,621LMArenaAs of 11/10/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,541Claude Fable 5: 1,555LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlCreative writing with images · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,243Claude Fable 5: 1,323LMArenaAs of 11/09/2026
ProgramBenchFully Resolved · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 6.5%Claude Fable 5: 2.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 65.2%Claude Fable 5: 68.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Media · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 75%Claude Fable 5: 50%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEngineering Sciences · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 44.4%Claude Fable 5: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCode Quality · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 4.601 / 5Claude Fable 5: 4.442 / 5Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBDCF · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 70.1%Claude Fable 5: 68.9%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Comparables · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 47.1%Claude Fable 5: 44.0%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · All-pass · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 39.5%Claude Fable 5: 51.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevReact development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,822Claude Fable 5: 1,632LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCoding · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,517Claude Fable 5: 1,552LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlDiagram understanding · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,308Claude Fable 5: 1,350LMArenaAs of 11/09/2026
ProgramBenchRaw Pass Rate · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 76.3%Claude Fable 5: 76.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 49.9%Claude Fable 5: 53.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0ML · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 81.8%Claude Fable 5: 42.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceLife Sciences · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 42.1%Claude Fable 5: 10.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBLBO · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 70.0%Claude Fable 5: 65.9%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Disclosure Analysis · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 71.4%Claude Fable 5: 68.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 77.8%Claude Fable 5: 91.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevWeb development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,772Claude Fable 5: 1,625LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCreative writing · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,464Claude Fable 5: 1,501LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlEnglish · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,259Claude Fable 5: 1,306LMArenaAs of 11/09/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 77.2%Claude Fable 5: 71.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Operations · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 51.9%Claude Fable 5: 25.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceMathematical Sciences · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 58.8%Claude Fable 5: 11.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBM&A · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 83.0%Claude Fable 5: 80.6%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Earnings Analysis · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 76.5%Claude Fable 5: 77.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchCivil Litigation · All-pass · higher is betterClaude Sonnet 5.5: 48.1%Claude Fable 5: 44.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlEnglish · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,484Claude Fable 5: 1,513LMArenaAs of 11/11/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlHomework · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Sonnet 5.5: 1,317Claude Fable 5: 1,353LMArenaAs of 11/09/2026

More comparisons

Compare Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Claude Fable 5 with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  2. 2Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  3. 3Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5.5
  4. 4Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3
  5. 5Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
  6. 6Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 5
  7. 7Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Grok 4.7
  8. 8Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  9. 9Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5.1
Show all 61 comparisons
  1. 10Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  2. 11Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  3. 12Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  4. 13Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Kimi K3
  5. 14Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  6. 15Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.6
  7. 16Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  8. 17Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  9. 18Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GLM-5.2
  10. 19Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  11. 20Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  12. 21Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
  13. 22Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  14. 23Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  15. 24Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.6
  16. 25Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  17. 26Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  18. 27Claude Fable 5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  19. 28Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Muse Spark 1.3
  20. 29Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.7
  21. 30Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  22. 31Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.8
  23. 32Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5
  24. 33Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Kimi K2.6
  25. 34Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Grok 4.6
  26. 35Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  27. 36Claude Fable 5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  28. 37Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.5
  29. 38Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
  30. 39Claude Fable 5 vs. Kimi K3
  31. 40Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  32. 41Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5
  33. 42Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 4.5
  34. 43Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 4
  35. 44Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Mistral Medium 3.5
  36. 45Claude Fable 5 vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  37. 46Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  38. 47Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-5.4
  39. 48Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  40. 49Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-5.5
  41. 50Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.5
  42. 51Claude Fable 5 vs. Mistral Large 4
  43. 52Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  44. 53Claude Fable 5 vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
  45. 54Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra
  46. 55Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Muse Wonder Full
  47. 56Claude Fable 5 vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  48. 57Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  49. 58Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
  50. 59Claude Fable 5 vs. Muse Wonder Full
  51. 60Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  52. 61Claude Fable 5 vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro