Skip to main content

AnthropicOpenAILLM matchup

Claude Opus 5.5vs.GPT-6 Luna

Which one is better?

Claude Opus 5.5 performs better than GPT-6 Luna, but costs 40 times as much.

Opus 5.5 ahead
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
126.1

Claude Opus 5.5

Rank 1

96.3

GPT-6 Luna

Rank 35

about as fast
SpeedTokens per second
106

Claude Opus 5.5

101

GPT-6 Luna

GPT-6 Luna cheaper
Price$ per 1M tokens
$8

Claude Opus 5.5

$0.20

GPT-6 Luna

Opus 5.5 more popular
Popularity0 to 100
68

Claude Opus 5.5

Rank 8 of 785

60

GPT-6 Luna

Rank 30 of 785

Above 272,000 tokens of context, GPT-6 Luna costs more: $0.20 input and $0.75 output per 1M tokens.

Choose Claude Opus 5.5 for

KnowledgeSearchProductivityEducationCodingMultimodalLegalGeneralHealthMathematicsReasoningFinanceAgents

Choose GPT-6 Luna for

No clear advantage

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

Opus 5.5GPT-6 LunaMedian of all ranked models

10012014080CodingOpus 5.5ReasoningOpus 5.5MathematicsOpus 5.5KnowledgeOpus 5.5AgentsOpus 5.5GeneralOpus 5.5MultimodalOpus 5.5FinanceOpus 5.5LegalOpus 5.5HealthOpus 5.5
CodingOpus 5.5 ahead
Opus 5.5129.9Rank 1
GPT-6 Luna97.5Rank 35
Median of ranked models84.1

95 % range: Opus 5.5 121.2 to 138.7, GPT-6 Luna 94.5 to 100.5.

AreaOpus 5.5GPT-6 Luna

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the close-up the net starts at 80 points, just below the weaker model's lowest value; the reference group average is 100.

Opus 5.5 is ahead in 10 of 10 areas, GPT-6 Luna in none.

Opus 5.5 ahead: 10

Areas in the overall index
KnowledgeOpus 5.5 +42131.4 to 89.2
CodingOpus 5.5 +32129.9 to 97.5
MultimodalOpus 5.5 +31123.1 to 92.0
GeneralOpus 5.5 +31125.1 to 94.4
MathematicsOpus 5.5 +26131.8 to 105.5
ReasoningOpus 5.5 +25122.5 to 97.8
AgentsOpus 5.5 +18117.2 to 99.5
Specialist fields
LegalOpus 5.5 +31121.5 to 90.7
HealthOpus 5.5 +27122.1 to 95.2
FinanceOpus 5.5 +23121.4 to 98.3

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 4 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
SearchOpus 5.5 +36119.5 to 83.3
ProductivityOpus 5.5 +34125.0 to 90.5
EducationOpus 5.5 +34127.0 to 93.0
Cybersecuritytoo little data120.5 to 101.8

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna at the same effort

Both models measured at the same reasoning efforts. This shows whether a lead comes from the model or only from more compute.

lowOpus 5.5 ahead
Opus 5.5 106.6 vs. GPT-6 Luna 65.2 · Gap 41.5 · Test series 12
mediumOpus 5.5 ahead
Opus 5.5 117.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna 82.4 · Gap 35.1 · Test series 12
highOpus 5.5 ahead
Opus 5.5 120.4 vs. GPT-6 Luna 87.1 · Gap 33.3 · Test series 12
xhighOpus 5.5 ahead
Opus 5.5 124.2 vs. GPT-6 Luna 90.6 · Gap 33.6 · Test series 12
maxOpus 5.5 ahead
Opus 5.5 126.1 vs. GPT-6 Luna 96.3 · Gap 28.7 · Test series 13
Overall index (max vs. max)Opus 5.5 ahead
Opus 5.5 126.1 vs. GPT-6 Luna 96.3

Gap and verdict compare only the Artificial Analysis test series in which both models are measured at that effort. Tied below 3 points, ahead only beyond two standard errors. The single values rest on all test series of each model, so their difference can deviate from the gap.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeOpus 5.5Coding 129.9 to 97.5
Maths and data analysisOpus 5.5Mathematics 131.8 to 105.5, Reasoning 122.5 to 97.8
Facts and researchOpus 5.5Knowledge 131.4 to 89.2, Search 119.5 to 83.3
Agents and workflowsOpus 5.5Agents 117.2 to 99.5
Fast chat repliesabout the same106 to 101 tokens per second
Security analysisopenCybersecurity 120.5 to 101.8 (too little data)
Many requests on a small budgetGPT-6 Luna$8 to $0.20 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsOpus 5.5Finance 121.4 to 98.3, Legal 121.5 to 90.7, Health 122.1 to 95.2
Images, screenshots and PDFsOpus 5.5Multimodal 123.1 to 92.0

See for yourself: same task, one attempt

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

Claude Opus 5.5

Claude Opus 5.5: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 33 s · $0.07

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
3,536 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0708
Response time
33.2 s
API model reported in response
anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Pinned endpoint
Anthropic | anthropic/claude-opus-5.5-20260921
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

GPT-6 Luna

GPT-6 Luna: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 47 s · $0.0022

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
openai/gpt-6-luna
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
4,493 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0022
Response time
46.7 s
API model reported in response
openai/gpt-6-luna
Pinned endpoint
OpenAI | openai/gpt-6-luna-20260922
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

Claude Opus 5.5

Unavailable in this round

GPT-6 Luna

Unavailable in this round

Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Luna in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v4)

20 of 92 models

4 models in this view are measured at a lower reasoning effort than max in the overall index. Dashed column: lower reasoning effort than the top.

Claude Opus 5.5max126.1
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh125.8
Claude Fable 5.1max123.8
Claude Sonnet 5.5max122.8
Gemini 4 Argonhigh122.3
GPT-6 Astramax121.3
GPT-6.1 Solmax119.2
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.3
Claude Opus 5max117.2
Muse Wondermax113.4
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.9
Claude Fable 5max112.5
GPT-6 Solmax110.5
GPT-5.6 Solmax108.7
Muse Spark 1.3max107.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max106.6
Gemini 3.8 Flashhigh106.5
GPT-6.1 Terramax105.3
GPT-6 Lunamax96.3

Popularity compared

How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.

Claude Opus 5.5 is more popular than GPT-6 Luna: 68 to 60 out of 100.

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 7, 2026

Claude Opus 5.5GPT-6 Luna

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricClaude Opus 5.5GPT-6 Luna
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better126.196.3
RankRank 1 of 92Rank 35 of 92
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$4$0.10above 272,000 tokens: $0.20
Outputwhat the model writes$20$0.50above 272,000 tokens: $0.75
Cost per task (own tests)average of 3 original-protocol tasks both models passed (SVG short test not included)$0.11$0.003
Speed
Tokens per second106101
Popularity
Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 10068Rank 8 of 78560Rank 30 of 785
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages1.05 M tokens≈ 1,580 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffJune 2026May 18, 2026
ReleasedSep 22, 2026Sep 22, 2026
AvailabilityActiveActive
Open weightsnono

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

As cheap as GPT-6 LunaClaude Haiku 5.5

Overall index 103.4, rank 20$0.10 input and $0.50 output per 1M tokens

Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: Claude Opus 5.5B: GPT-6 Luna

BioMysteryBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 79.3%GPT-6 Luna: 61.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ClaimBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 100.0%GPT-6 Luna: 99.2%Vals AIAs of 10/23/2026
Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 66.6%GPT-6 Luna: 42.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Code Migration v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 81.0%GPT-6 Luna: 46.7%Vals AIAs of 10/30/2026
CyberBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 55.4%GPT-6 Luna: 76.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 75.9%GPT-6 Luna: 68.5%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMB v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 75.8%GPT-6 Luna: 70.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 58.6%GPT-6 Luna: 49.9%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Finance Agent v2.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 67.8%GPT-6 Luna: 56.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
HLAB-Vals-1.1Overall · Task fully resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 9.2%GPT-6 Luna: 4.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
ImmigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 72.1%GPT-6 Luna: 62.5%Vals AIAs of 10/28/2026
IOIOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 95.1%GPT-6 Luna: 55.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 50.5%GPT-6 Luna: 30.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,810GPT-6 Luna: 1,579LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena SearchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,213GPT-6 Luna: 1,160LMArenaAs of 10/13/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,509GPT-6 Luna: 1,441LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,293GPT-6 Luna: 1,240LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
MedCodeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 49.8%GPT-6 Luna: 44.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 91.4%GPT-6 Luna: 83.7%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MysteryMechanismOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 49.6%GPT-6 Luna: 19.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 18.5%GPT-6 Luna: 0.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ProofBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 100%GPT-6 Luna: 64%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Public Benefits Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 70.6%GPT-6 Luna: 57.6%Vals AIAs of 10/12/2026
SAGEOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 91.3%GPT-6 Luna: 83.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 33.6%GPT-6 Luna: 2.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SWE-bench MultimodalOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 70.2%GPT-6 Luna: 37.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 45.6%GPT-6 Luna: 19.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65.2%GPT-6 Luna: 13.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 47.1%GPT-6 Luna: 4.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Finance IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65.6%GPT-6 Luna: 53.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 70.2%GPT-6 Luna: 52.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Legal IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 72.3%GPT-6 Luna: 62.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Router IndexFull Index · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 64.2%GPT-6 Luna: 52.3%Vals AIAs of 11/03/2026
Vals Science IndexOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 58.7%GPT-6 Luna: 28.4%Vals AIAs of 10/25/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 90.3%GPT-6 Luna: 81.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
BioMysteryBenchHard · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 47.1%GPT-6 Luna: 17.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ClaimBenchDirect support · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 100%GPT-6 Luna: 100%Vals AIAs of 10/23/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65.5%GPT-6 Luna: 37.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Code Migration v1.1CLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 78.4%GPT-6 Luna: 44.3%Vals AIAs of 10/30/2026
CyberBench v1.1Patch · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 85.7%GPT-6 Luna: 87.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 76.4%GPT-6 Luna: 70.5%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
EMB v1.1Comps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 75.7%GPT-6 Luna: 69.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 54.5%GPT-6 Luna: 49.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Finance Agent v2.1Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 67.1%GPT-6 Luna: 56.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
HLAB-Vals-1.1Antitrust Competition · Criteria passed · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 88.4%GPT-6 Luna: 84.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ImmigrationAll-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 24.4%GPT-6 Luna: 16.4%Vals AIAs of 10/28/2026
IOIIOI 2024 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 100.0%GPT-6 Luna: 69.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65.2%GPT-6 Luna: 37.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevHTML development · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,753GPT-6 Luna: 1,595LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,495GPT-6 Luna: 1,441LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Vision, Style ControlCreative writing with images · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,287GPT-6 Luna: 1,232LMArenaAs of 10/19/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65%GPT-6 Luna: 8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SAGEComputer Science · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 92.8%GPT-6 Luna: 86.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SRE BenchCapability Score · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 53.6%GPT-6 Luna: 11.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
SWE-bench Multimodalbpmn-js · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 83.0%GPT-6 Luna: 56.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 30.0%GPT-6 Luna: 6.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Hardware · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 60%GPT-6 Luna: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench-ScienceEarth Sciences · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 37.5%GPT-6 Luna: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Finance IndexEMB v1.1 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 75.8%GPT-6 Luna: 70.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals IndexCode Migration v1.1 · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 80.5%GPT-6 Luna: 45.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Legal IndexBusiness & Commercial · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 69.2%GPT-6 Luna: 55.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vals Router IndexCode Migration · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 47.5%GPT-6 Luna: 45.5%Vals AIAs of 11/03/2026
Vals Science IndexBioMysteryBench · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 79.3%GPT-6 Luna: 61.5%Vals AIAs of 10/25/2026
BioMysteryBenchHuman-solvable · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 86.8%GPT-6 Luna: 71.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026

More comparisons

Compare Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Luna with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  2. 2GPT-6 Luna vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  3. 3Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  4. 4Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5.5
  5. 5Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  6. 6Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  7. 7Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  8. 8GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  9. 9Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
Show all 89 comparisons
  1. 10Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5.1
  2. 11GPT-6 Luna vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  3. 12Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  4. 13GPT-6 Luna vs. GPT-5.4 mini
  5. 14Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  6. 15Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  7. 16Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  8. 17Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Kimi K3
  9. 18Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5
  10. 19Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
  11. 20GPT-6 Astra vs. GPT-6 Luna
  12. 21Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3
  13. 22GPT-6 Luna vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  14. 23Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  15. 24Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  16. 25Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.6
  17. 26Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.6
  18. 27Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  19. 28GPT-6.1 Sol vs. GPT-6 Luna
  20. 29GPT-6 Luna vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  21. 30Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Grok 4.6
  22. 31Claude Sonnet 5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  23. 32Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.2
  24. 33Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
  25. 34GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
  26. 35Claude Haiku 4.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  27. 36Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  28. 37Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.5
  29. 38Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  30. 39GPT-6 Luna vs. GPT-5.4
  31. 40Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Muse Spark 1.3
  32. 41GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  33. 42Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.8
  34. 43Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  35. 44Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  36. 45GPT-6 Luna vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  37. 46Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 4
  38. 47Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  39. 48Claude Opus 4.8 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  40. 49GPT-6 Luna vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  41. 50Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.5
  42. 51GPT-6 Luna vs. Grok 4.7
  43. 52GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  44. 53Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  45. 54Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Grok 4.7
  46. 55GPT-6 Sol vs. GPT-6 Luna
  47. 56Claude Opus 4.6 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  48. 57Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  49. 58GPT-6 Luna vs. Muse Spark 1.3
  50. 59GPT-6 Luna vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  51. 60Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 3
  52. 61Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.5
  53. 62GPT-6 Luna vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  54. 63GPT-6 Luna vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  55. 64Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5
  56. 65Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  57. 66GPT-6 Luna vs. GLM-5.2
  58. 67Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  59. 68GPT-6 Luna vs. GPT-5.5
  60. 69GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash
  61. 70Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Mistral Medium 3.5
  62. 71Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Muse Wonder Full
  63. 72Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 4.5
  64. 73Claude Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  65. 74GPT-6 Luna vs. GLM-5.3
  66. 75GPT-6 Luna vs. Grok 4.6
  67. 76Claude Opus 4.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  68. 77Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  69. 78Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra
  70. 79Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.4
  71. 80Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.1
  72. 81GPT-6 Luna vs. MiMo-V2.5
  73. 82Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  74. 83GPT-6 Luna vs. Mistral Large 4
  75. 84GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  76. 85GPT-6.1 Terra vs. GPT-6 Luna
  77. 86GPT-6 Luna vs. Mistral Medium 3.5
  78. 87GPT-6 Luna vs. Grok 4.5
  79. 88Claude Opus 4.7 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  80. 89GPT-6 Luna vs. Gemini 4 Argon