Skip to main content

AnthropicDeepSeekLLM matchup

Claude Opus 5.5vs.DeepSeek-V4-Pro

Which one is better?

Claude Opus 5.5 performs better than DeepSeek-V4-Pro, but costs 6.1 times (input) and 10.1 times (output) as much.

Opus 5.5 ahead
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
126.1

Claude Opus 5.5

Rank 1

86.8

DeepSeek-V4-Pro

Rank 43

Opus 5.5 faster
SpeedTokens per second
106

Claude Opus 5.5

70

DeepSeek-V4-Pro

DeepSeek-V4-Pro cheaper
Price$ per 1M tokens
$8

Claude Opus 5.5

$0.99

DeepSeek-V4-Pro

Opus 5.5 more popular
Popularity0 to 100
68

Claude Opus 5.5

Rank 8 of 785

56

DeepSeek-V4-Pro

Rank 49 of 785

Choose Claude Opus 5.5 for

MathematicsKnowledgeHealthCodingGeneralReasoningLegalProductivityFinanceAgents

Choose DeepSeek-V4-Pro for

No clear advantage

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

Opus 5.5DeepSeek-V4-ProMedian of all ranked models

9511513575CodingOpus 5.5ReasoningOpus 5.5MathematicsOpus 5.5KnowledgeOpus 5.5AgentsOpus 5.5GeneralOpus 5.5FinanceOpus 5.5LegalOpus 5.5HealthOpus 5.5
CodingOpus 5.5 ahead
Opus 5.5129.9Rank 1
DeepSeek-V4-Pro90.4Rank 49
Median of ranked models84.1

95 % range: Opus 5.5 121.2 to 138.7, DeepSeek-V4-Pro 85.8 to 95.0.

AreaOpus 5.5DeepSeek-V4-Pro

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the close-up the net starts at 75 points, just below the weaker model's lowest value; the reference group average is 100. Not in the net because a model has no own value there or the data are too thin: Multimodal.

Opus 5.5 is ahead in 9 of 10 areas, DeepSeek-V4-Pro in none.

Opus 5.5 ahead: 9too little data: 1

Areas in the overall index
MathematicsOpus 5.5 +46131.8 to 85.4
KnowledgeOpus 5.5 +43131.4 to 88.3
CodingOpus 5.5 +40129.9 to 90.4
GeneralOpus 5.5 +38125.1 to 87.1
ReasoningOpus 5.5 +38122.5 to 84.6
AgentsOpus 5.5 +24117.2 to 93.0
Multimodalonly Opus 5.5 has a score
Specialist fields
HealthOpus 5.5 +40122.1 to 81.8
LegalOpus 5.5 +38121.5 to 83.7
FinanceOpus 5.5 +34121.4 to 87.1

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 4 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
ProductivityOpus 5.5 +35125.0 to 89.5
Cybersecurityonly Opus 5.5 has a score
Searchonly Opus 5.5 has a score
Educationonly Opus 5.5 has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro at the same effort

Both models measured at the same reasoning efforts. This shows whether a lead comes from the model or only from more compute.

maxOpus 5.5 ahead
Opus 5.5 126.1 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro 86.8 · Gap 35.2 · Test series 11
Overall index (max vs. max)Opus 5.5 ahead
Opus 5.5 126.1 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro 86.8

Gap and verdict compare only the Artificial Analysis test series in which both models are measured at that effort. Tied below 3 points, ahead only beyond two standard errors. The single values rest on all test series of each model, so their difference can deviate from the gap.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeOpus 5.5Coding 129.9 to 90.4
Maths and data analysisOpus 5.5Mathematics 131.8 to 85.4, Reasoning 122.5 to 84.6
Facts and researchOpus 5.5Knowledge 131.4 to 88.3, Search without a score for DeepSeek-V4-Pro
Agents and workflowsOpus 5.5Agents 117.2 to 93.0
Fast chat repliesOpus 5.5106 to 70 tokens per second
Security analysisopenCybersecurity without a score for DeepSeek-V4-Pro
Many requests on a small budgetDeepSeek-V4-Pro$8 to $0.99 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsOpus 5.5Finance 121.4 to 87.1, Legal 121.5 to 83.7, Health 122.1 to 81.8
Images, screenshots and PDFsopenMultimodal without a score for DeepSeek-V4-Pro

See for yourself: same task, one attempt

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

Claude Opus 5.5

Claude Opus 5.5: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 33 s · $0.07

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
3,536 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0708
Response time
33.2 s
API model reported in response
anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Pinned endpoint
Anthropic | anthropic/claude-opus-5.5-20260921
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro

The response reached the token limit. No complete recording is available.

Oct 5, 2026 · 68 s · $0.02

Not yet visually reviewed. A successful recording does not confirm correct physics or full compliance with the prompt.

Test details
Run date
Oct 5, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0813
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
8,192 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0163
Response time
67.6 s
API model reported in response
deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0813
Pinned endpoint
DeepSeek | deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-20260813
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Failed

Earlier attempts (3)

  • Oct 2, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
  • Oct 1, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
  • Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

Claude Opus 5.5

Unavailable in this round

DeepSeek-V4-Pro

DeepSeek-V4-Pro: SVG short test

Oct 14, 2026 · $0.0020

Test details
Test run
Oct 14, 2026
Provider
streamlake
API model
deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0813
Output
963 tokens
Reasoning
API reports 0 reasoning tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0020
Test round
43b8c5c46830

Claude Opus 5.5 and DeepSeek-V4-Pro in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v4)

20 of 92 models

4 models in this view are measured at a lower reasoning effort than max in the overall index. Dashed column: lower reasoning effort than the top.

Claude Opus 5.5max126.1
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh125.8
Claude Fable 5.1max123.8
Claude Sonnet 5.5max122.8
Gemini 4 Argonhigh122.3
GPT-6 Astramax121.3
GPT-6.1 Solmax119.2
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.3
Claude Opus 5max117.2
Muse Wondermax113.4
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.9
Claude Fable 5max112.5
GPT-6 Solmax110.5
GPT-5.6 Solmax108.7
Muse Spark 1.3max107.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max106.6
Gemini 3.8 Flashhigh106.5
GPT-6.1 Terramax105.3
DeepSeek-V4-Promax86.8

Popularity compared

How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.

Claude Opus 5.5 is more popular than DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 68 to 56 out of 100.

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 7, 2026

Claude Opus 5.5DeepSeek-V4-Pro

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricClaude Opus 5.5DeepSeek-V4-Pro
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better126.186.8
RankRank 1 of 92Rank 43 of 92
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$4$0.66
Outputwhat the model writes$20$1.98
Cost per task (own tests)average of 1 original-protocol task both models passed (SVG short test not included)$0.11$0.021
Speed
Tokens per second10670
Popularity
Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 10068Rank 8 of 78556Rank 49 of 785
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffJune 2026n/a
ReleasedSep 22, 2026Apr 24, 2026
AvailabilityActiveActive
Open weightsnoyes
  • DeepSeek-V4-Pro: At peak times (Mon, Tue, Wed, Thu, Fri, 01:00-04:00 UTC; Mon, Tue, Wed, Thu, Fri, 06:00-10:00 UTC) the price is $1.32 input and $3.96 output per 1M tokens. The table shows the off-peak price.

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

Cheaper than DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Overall index 106.6, rank 17$0.15 input and $0.60 output per 1M tokens

Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: Claude Opus 5.5B: DeepSeek-V4-Pro

Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 66.6%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 26.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 75.9%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 51.6%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 58.6%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 44.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 50.5%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 23.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,810DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 1,464LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,509DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 1,455LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
MedCodeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 49.8%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 40.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 91.4%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 75.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 18.5%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
ProofBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 100%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 16%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
Public Benefits Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 70.6%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 62.9%Vals AIAs of 10/12/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 45.6%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 25.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65.2%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 11.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 90.3%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 49.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65.5%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 15.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 76.4%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 57.4%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 54.5%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 41.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65.2%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 28.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevHTML development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,753DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 1,471LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,495DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 1,448LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 65%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 30.0%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 12.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Hardware · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 60%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCOBOL · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 70.0%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 58.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBDataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 84.9%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 62.6%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)All-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 48.1%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 31.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 85.4%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 83.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevReact development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,860DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 1,454LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,574DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 1,500LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
ProgramBenchFully Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 18.5%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 66.9%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 54.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Media · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 75%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCode Quality · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 4.541 / 5DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 3.401 / 5Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBDCF · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 70.1%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 44.4%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Comparables · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 45.8%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 39.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 48.8%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 23.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevWeb development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 1,810DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 1,464LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCoding · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,551DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 1,488LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
ProgramBenchRaw Pass Rate · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 87.0%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 47.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 46.6%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 36.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0ML · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 81.8%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 3.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBLBO · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 69.0%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 43.9%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Disclosure Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 71.0%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 52.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 71.0%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 86.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCreative writing · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,520DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 1,440LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 73.3%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 65.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Operations · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 29.6%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 7.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBM&A · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 82.3%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 48.2%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Earnings Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 78.0%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 59.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchCivil Litigation · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 48.1%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 33.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlEnglish · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,516DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 1,467LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
Tax Agent BenchFact-Pattern Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 46.5%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 21.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Science · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 71.4%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 7.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBMisc · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 71.0%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 57.6%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Financial Modeling · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 26.9%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 10.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchCivil Litigation · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 74%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 86%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlEntertainment, sports and media · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,501DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 1,432LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
Tax Agent BenchFact-Pattern Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 72.9%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 55.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Security · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 100.0%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 26.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBOperating · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 77.9%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 47.2%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)General Qualitative Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 67.8%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 60.3%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchConstitutional / Civil Rights · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 42.1%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 13.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlExcluding ties · higher is betterClaude Opus 5.5: 1,530DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 1,457LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
Tax Agent BenchForms & Filings · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalClaude Opus 5.5: 30.0%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 13.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026

More comparisons

Compare Claude Opus 5.5 and DeepSeek-V4-Pro with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra
  2. 2Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5.5
  3. 3Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  4. 4Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Argon
  5. 5Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.8 Flash
  6. 6Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5.1
  7. 7Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  8. 8Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  9. 9Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
Show all 69 comparisons
  1. 10Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol
  2. 11Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Kimi K3
  3. 12Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 5
  4. 13Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 5.5
  5. 14Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.3
  6. 15Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Terra
  7. 16Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  8. 17Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.6
  9. 18Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.6
  10. 19Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  11. 20GPT-6 Luna vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  12. 21Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Grok 4.6
  13. 22Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.2
  14. 23Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 4 Carbon
  15. 24Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  16. 25Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Sonnet 4.5
  17. 26Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Muse Spark 1.3
  18. 27Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  19. 28Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.8
  20. 29Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Luna
  21. 30Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  22. 31Claude Opus 5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  23. 32Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 4
  24. 33Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
  25. 34DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  26. 35DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  27. 36Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.5
  28. 37Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  29. 38Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Grok 4.7
  30. 39Grok 4.7 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  31. 40Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Mistral Large 3
  32. 41Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Luna
  33. 42DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. Kimi K3
  34. 43DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  35. 44Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Opus 4.5
  36. 45GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  37. 46Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  38. 47GPT-5.6 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  39. 48DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. GLM-5.3
  40. 49Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Fable 5
  41. 50DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. Mistral Large 4
  42. 51Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Sol
  43. 52DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  44. 53Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.6 Flash
  45. 54GPT-6 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  46. 55Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Mistral Medium 3.5
  47. 56Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Muse Wonder Full
  48. 57Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Claude Haiku 4.5
  49. 58DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  50. 59Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Gemini 3.5 Flash
  51. 60Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Terra
  52. 61Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-5.4
  53. 62Claude Opus 5.5 vs. GLM-5.1
  54. 63Gemini 3.7 Flash vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  55. 64DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. MiMo-V2.5-Pro
  56. 65DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. MiMo-V2.5
  57. 66Claude Opus 4.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  58. 67Gemini 4 Argon vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  59. 68DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  60. 69Muse Wonder Full vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro