Skip to main content

xAIDeepSeekLLM matchup

Grok 4.7vs.DeepSeek-V4-Pro

Which one is better?

Grok 4.7 performs better than DeepSeek-V4-Pro, but costs 3 times as much.

Grok 4.7 ahead
IntelligenceOverall index, 100 points = average
103.4

Grok 4.7

Rank 21

86.8

DeepSeek-V4-Pro

Rank 43

about as fast
SpeedTokens per second
71

Grok 4.7

70

DeepSeek-V4-Pro

DeepSeek-V4-Pro cheaper
Price$ per 1M tokens
$3

Grok 4.7

$0.99

DeepSeek-V4-Pro

about as popular
Popularity0 to 100
61

Grok 4.7

Rank 37 of 876

58

DeepSeek-V4-Pro

Rank 49 of 876

Above 200,000 tokens of context, Grok 4.7 costs more: $4 input and $12 output per 1M tokens.

Choose Grok 4.7 for

LegalHealthFinanceReasoningKnowledgeGeneralAgentsProductivityCodingMathematics

Choose DeepSeek-V4-Pro for

No clear advantage

Where is the difference?

Strengths at a glance

Grok 4.7DeepSeek-V4-ProMedian of all ranked models

859510511575CodingGrok 4.7ReasoningGrok 4.7MathematicsGrok 4.7KnowledgeGrok 4.7AgentsGrok 4.7GeneralGrok 4.7FinanceGrok 4.7LegalGrok 4.7HealthGrok 4.7
CodingGrok 4.7 ahead
Grok 4.7103.2Rank 22
DeepSeek-V4-Pro90.4Rank 49
Median of ranked models84.1

95 % range: Grok 4.7 100.2 to 106.1, DeepSeek-V4-Pro 85.8 to 95.0.

AreaGrok 4.7DeepSeek-V4-Pro

The same values and verdicts as the bars below. In the close-up the net starts at 75 points, just below the weaker model's lowest value; the reference group average is 100. Not in the net because a model has no own value there or the data are too thin: Multimodal.

Grok 4.7 is ahead in 9 of 10 areas, DeepSeek-V4-Pro in none.

Grok 4.7 ahead: 9too little data: 1

Areas in the overall index
ReasoningGrok 4.7 +18102.2 to 84.6
KnowledgeGrok 4.7 +17105.5 to 88.3
GeneralGrok 4.7 +15101.6 to 87.1
AgentsGrok 4.7 +14107.4 to 93.0
CodingGrok 4.7 +13103.2 to 90.4
MathematicsGrok 4.7 +994.8 to 85.4
Multimodalonly Grok 4.7 has a score
Specialist fields
LegalGrok 4.7 +26109.9 to 83.7
HealthGrok 4.7 +24106.2 to 81.8
FinanceGrok 4.7 +18105.3 to 87.1

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Show 3 more areas that do not count toward the overall index
ProductivityGrok 4.7 +14103.3 to 89.5
Cybersecurityonly Grok 4.7 has a score
Educationonly Grok 4.7 has a score

Bar length shows the gap in index points (full width 15 points, one standard deviation of the reference group). Solid means clearly ahead, hatched not certain yet, a thin grey bar level.

Which model for which task?

Everyday tasks, translated from the area values above. Each row names the values it rests on.

Writing and debugging codeGrok 4.7Coding 103.2 to 90.4
Maths and data analysisGrok 4.7Mathematics 94.8 to 85.4, Reasoning 102.2 to 84.6
Facts and researchGrok 4.7Knowledge 105.5 to 88.3
Agents and workflowsGrok 4.7Agents 107.4 to 93.0
Fast chat repliesabout the same71 to 70 tokens per second
Security analysisopenCybersecurity without a score for DeepSeek-V4-Pro
Many requests on a small budgetDeepSeek-V4-Pro$3 to $0.99 per 1M tokens
Finance, legal and medical textsGrok 4.7Finance 105.3 to 87.1, Legal 109.9 to 83.7, Health 106.2 to 81.8
Images, screenshots and PDFsopenMultimodal without a score for DeepSeek-V4-Pro

See for yourself: same task, one attempt

The same prompt for both models. We show the latest attempt without fixes; it does not count toward the overall index.

Pelican on a bicycle

Prompt

Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle

Task origin: Simon Willison

Grok 4.7

Grok 4.7: Pelican on a bicycle
A community classic for free-form SVG drawing.

Oct 1, 2026 · 13 s · $0.0072

Test details
Run date
Oct 1, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
x-ai/grok-4.7
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
1,069 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0072
Response time
13.4 s
API model reported in response
x-ai/grok-4.7
Pinned endpoint
xAI | x-ai/grok-4.7-20260916
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Passed, not a quality rating

Visually reviewed. This individual test does not establish overall model quality.

Earlier attempts (1)

  • Oct 1, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high

DeepSeek-V4-Pro

The response reached the token limit. No complete recording is available.

Oct 5, 2026 · 68 s · $0.02

Not yet visually reviewed. A successful recording does not confirm correct physics or full compliance with the prompt.

Test details
Run date
Oct 5, 2026
API provider
openrouter
Requested API model
deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0813
Reasoning setting
high
Token limit including reasoning
8,192 tokens
Output tokens
8,192 tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0163
Response time
67.6 s
API model reported in response
deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0813
Pinned endpoint
DeepSeek | deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-20260813
Temperature
Provider default
Test protocol
community-visual-tests-v1
Technical checks
Failed

Earlier attempts (3)

  • Oct 2, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
  • Oct 1, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
  • Sep 7, 2026API request failedReasoning setting: high
SVG short test

SVG short test

One SVG task with the same fixed settings for every model, without hidden thinking.

Prompt

Return only one standalone SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle. Use viewBox="0 0 800 600", simple shapes, two clearly visible wheels and a recognizable pelican with a long beak. At most 30 SVG elements and 1800 characters. No Markdown, explanations, comments, scripts, animation, CSS or external resources.

Grok 4.7

Unavailable in this round

DeepSeek-V4-Pro

DeepSeek-V4-Pro: SVG short test

Oct 14, 2026 · $0.0020

Test details
Test run
Oct 14, 2026
Provider
streamlake
API model
deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0813
Output
963 tokens
Reasoning
API reports 0 reasoning tokens
Cost of the attempt
$0.0020
Test round
43b8c5c46830

Grok 4.7 and DeepSeek-V4-Pro in the overall index

Every model with a place in the overall index, both models of this matchup highlighted. You can add or hide other models.

Overall index (Gradually Meta-Score v4)

20 of 92 models

5 models in this view are measured at a lower reasoning effort than max in the overall index. Dashed column: lower reasoning effort than the top.

Claude Opus 5.5max126.1
Gemini 4 Carbonhigh125.8
Claude Fable 5.1max123.8
Claude Sonnet 5.5max122.8
Gemini 4 Argonhigh122.3
GPT-6 Astramax121.3
GPT-6.1 Solmax119.2
Muse Wonder Fullmax118.3
Claude Opus 5max117.2
Muse Wondermax113.4
Kimi K3.1 Promax112.9
Claude Fable 5max112.5
GPT-6 Solmax110.5
GPT-5.6 Solmax108.7
Muse Spark 1.3max107.4
Gemini 3.7 Flashhigh107.1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017max106.6
Gemini 3.8 Flashhigh106.5
Grok 4.7xhigh103.4
DeepSeek-V4-Promax86.8

Popularity compared

How often the models are searched for, used and mentioned, on a scale from 0 to 100.

Both are about as popular: Grok 4.7 61, DeepSeek-V4-Pro 58 out of 100.

Over time

Weekly values from October 18, 2026 to November 6, 2026

Grok 4.7DeepSeek-V4-Pro

All data side by side

The better value is bold. For the overall index only when the gap is clear.

MetricGrok 4.7DeepSeek-V4-Pro
Intelligence
Overall indexpoints, 100 = reference group average, higher is better103.486.8
RankRank 21 of 92Rank 43 of 92
Price per 1M tokens
Inputwhat you send$2above 200,000 tokens: $4$0.66
Outputwhat the model writes$6above 200,000 tokens: $12$1.98
Speed
Tokens per second7170
Popularity
Popularitysearch, usage and mentions, 0 to 10061Rank 37 of 87658Rank 49 of 876
Technical
Context windowhow much text the model reads at once500,000 tokens≈ 750 A4 pages1 M tokens≈ 1,500 A4 pages
Knowledge cutoffMay 2026n/a
ReleasedSep 21, 2026Apr 24, 2026
AvailabilityActiveActive
Open weightsnoyes
  • DeepSeek-V4-Pro: At peak times (Mon, Tue, Wed, Thu, Fri, 01:00-04:00 UTC; Mon, Tue, Wed, Thu, Fri, 06:00-10:00 UTC) the price is $1.32 input and $3.96 output per 1M tokens. The table shows the off-peak price.

Prices without caching or batch discounts · Page count as a rule of thumb from Artificial Analysis

Is there a better choice?

Cheaper than DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Overall index 106.6, rank 17$0.15 input and $0.60 output per 1M tokens

Grok 4.7 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Best model in the overall indexClaude Opus 5.5

Overall index 126.1, rank 1$4 input and $20 output per 1M tokens

Grok 4.7 vs. Claude Opus 5.5

Shared benchmarks

Single results from the same benchmark version, task and metric. A value is bold only with the same test setup and a clear gap.

A: Grok 4.7B: DeepSeek-V4-Pro

Code MigrationOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 44.8%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 26.2%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 67.0%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 51.6%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 52.3%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 44.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchOverall · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 47.1%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 23.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LegalBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 84.4%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 80.3%Vals AIAs of 10/13/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 1,637DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 1,464LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 1,441DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 1,455LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
MedCodeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 49.6%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 40.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
MedScribeOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 89.4%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 75.1%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
ProgramBenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 0.5%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Show 54 more benchmarks
ProofBench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 26%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 16%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Public Benefits Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 65.6%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 62.9%Vals AIAs of 10/12/2026
Tax Agent BenchOverall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 34.2%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 25.2%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 28.8%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 11.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Vibe Code Bench v1.1Overall · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 86.2%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 49.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCLI · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 36.4%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 15.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBComps · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 65.0%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 57.4%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Adjustments · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 46.3%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 41.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 54.5%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 28.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LegalBenchConclusion Tasks · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 88.6%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 89.1%Vals AIAs of 10/13/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevHTML development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 1,629DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 1,471LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlBusiness, management and finance · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 1,437DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 1,448LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
ProgramBenchAlmost Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 21.5%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 13.3%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 12.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Hardware · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 26.7%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCOBOL · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 70.0%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 58.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBDataroom · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 83.6%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 62.6%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)All-Pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 42.1%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 31.4%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchAdministrative / Regulatory · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 87.2%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 83.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LegalBenchInterpretation Tasks · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 81.3%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 75.2%Vals AIAs of 10/13/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevReact development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 1,663DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 1,454LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlChinese · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 1,495DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 1,500LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
ProgramBenchFully Resolved · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 0.5%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 0.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchControversy & Precedence Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 62.7%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 54.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Media · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 0%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Code MigrationCode Quality · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 4.105 / 5DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 3.401 / 5Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
EMBDCF · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 58.2%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 44.4%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Comparables · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 42.2%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 39.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 44.2%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 23.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LegalBenchIssue Tasks · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 89.5%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 84.6%Vals AIAs of 10/13/2026
LMArena Code Arena WebDevWeb development · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 1,637DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 1,464LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCoding · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 1,494DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 1,488LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
ProgramBenchRaw Pass Rate · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 75.7%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 47.8%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 46.7%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 36.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0ML · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 36.4%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 3.0%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBLBO · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 56.9%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 43.9%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Disclosure Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 64.5%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 52.6%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchBusiness & Commercial · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 87.4%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 86.5%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LegalBenchRhetoric Tasks · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 81.5%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 75.3%Vals AIAs of 10/13/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlCreative writing · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 1,418DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 1,440LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
Tax Agent BenchCurrent & Temporal Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 74.5%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 65.7%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Operations · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 22.2%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 7.4%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBM&A · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 76.3%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 48.2%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Earnings Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 74.6%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 59.8%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchCivil Litigation · All-pass · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 44.4%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 33.3%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LegalBenchRule Tasks · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 81.0%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 77.4%Vals AIAs of 10/13/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlEnglish · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 1,454DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 1,467LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
Tax Agent BenchFact-Pattern Analysis · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 34.9%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 21.9%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
Terminal-Bench 4.0Science · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 26.2%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 7.1%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
EMBMisc · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 65.0%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 57.6%Vals AIAs of 10/20/2026
Finance Agent (v2)Financial Modeling · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 17.7%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 10.5%Vals AIAs of 10/29/2026
Legal Research BenchCivil Litigation · Weighted partial credit (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 90%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 86%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026
LMArena Text, Style ControlEntertainment, sports and media · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 1,416DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 1,432LMArenaAs of 10/28/2026
Tax Agent BenchFact-Pattern Analysis (weighted pass) · higher is betterTest setup not documented as identicalGrok 4.7: 64.3%DeepSeek-V4-Pro: 55.6%Vals AIAs of 11/05/2026

More comparisons

Compare Grok 4.7 and DeepSeek-V4-Pro with the models people compare them with most often.

Compare another matchup

The most popular comparisons

  1. 1Claude Opus 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  2. 2Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. Grok 4.7
  3. 3Grok 4.7 vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  4. 4Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Grok 4.7
  5. 5GPT-6 Luna vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  6. 6Grok 4.7 vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  7. 7Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. Grok 4.7
  8. 8Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  9. 9Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
Show all 57 comparisons
  1. 10Claude Opus 5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  2. 11Grok 4.7 vs. Kimi K3
  3. 12DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  4. 13Gemini 4 Argon vs. Grok 4.7
  5. 14Gemini 4 Argon vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  6. 15Grok 4.7 vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
  7. 16DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  8. 17GPT-6 Luna vs. Grok 4.7
  9. 18Claude Opus 4.8 vs. Grok 4.7
  10. 19Claude Opus 5.5 vs. Grok 4.7
  11. 20DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  12. 21DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. Kimi K3
  13. 22Claude Fable 5.1 vs. Grok 4.7
  14. 23Grok 4.7 vs. Grok 4.5
  15. 24DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. GLM-5.3
  16. 25Claude Haiku 5.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  17. 26GPT-5.6 Terra vs. Grok 4.7
  18. 27GPT-5.6 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  19. 28DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. Mistral Large 4
  20. 29DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. Qwen 3.8 27B
  21. 30GPT-6 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  22. 31GPT-6 Sol vs. Grok 4.7
  23. 32Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs. Grok 4.7
  24. 33DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  25. 34Grok 4.7 vs. GLM-5.3
  26. 35GPT-5.6 Luna vs. Grok 4.7
  27. 36GPT-6.1 Sol vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  28. 37Grok 4.7 vs. Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
  29. 38Grok 4.7 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Flash
  30. 39Claude Opus 5 vs. Grok 4.7
  31. 40DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. GLM-5.3-Flash
  32. 41GPT-5.6 Sol vs. Grok 4.7
  33. 42Grok 4.7 vs. GLM-5.2
  34. 43Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs. Grok 4.7
  35. 44Gemini 3.7 Flash vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  36. 45Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs. Grok 4.7
  37. 46DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. MiMo-V2.5-Pro
  38. 47DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. MiMo-V2.5
  39. 48Claude Opus 4.7 vs. Grok 4.7
  40. 49GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Grok 4.7
  41. 50Muse Wonder Full vs. Grok 4.7
  42. 51Claude Haiku 4.5 vs. Grok 4.7
  43. 52Claude Opus 4.5 vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  44. 53GPT-6.1 Terra vs. Grok 4.7
  45. 54Muse Wonder Full vs. DeepSeek-V4-Pro
  46. 55Grok 4.7 vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  47. 56DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs. Kimi K3.1 Pro
  48. 57Gemini 4 Carbon vs. Grok 4.7